Montana State Bobcats vs Colorado State Rams basketball final score

Mon, Nov 2 · 10:00 PM ET · Moby Arena, Fort Collins, CO

Non-conferenceMoby Arena, Fort Collins, CO
Montana St
2025-26: 18-14 · 12-7 conf
Efficiency #129
@
Colorado St
2025-26: 21-13 · 12-10 conf
Efficiency #89
Final
7484
Final score
Projected 67.3 – 78.2
MTST win 17%CSU win 83%
MarketClose
Spread
CSU −11.5
open CSU −11.0
Total
148.0
open 145.5
Our line
CSU −10.9
as of Mon, Nov 2 · 9:51 PM ET

Our play

How our line is built

each step, from an even game to our line
Spread
Even game
0.0
Colorado Strated 6.7 above average
+6.7
Montana Strated 0.7 below average
+0.7
Home court
+3.5
Our line
CSU −10.9
◂ Montana St sideColorado St side ▸

The spread is seen from the home side: a plus moves it toward Colorado St. Our total joins once both teams have played 3 games.

Pace & total

possessions per 40 minutes
Tempo, possessions per 40 minutes

Projected possessions: 64.5, from each team's opponent-adjusted tempo. On raw 2025-26 season pace, Montana St is the faster team (67.4, #229 of 365) and Colorado St the slower (64.4, #345). When tempos clash, the slower team usually pulls the pace harder (weights 0.80 vs 0.66).

Projected possessions
64.5
per team, 40 min
Market total
148.0
Market close · open 145.5
Adjusted tempo, vs an average opponent
67.4#265
Montana St
65.5#358
Colorado St

How this game plays

points this game from the four factors, vs an average D-I matchup
Our line
CSU −10.9
Four factors 0.6Not in these stats 10.3
From the four factors
Colorado St has the ball+3.0
Montana St has the ball+2.4
Colorado St has the ball
✓Shoots it welleFG% 57.5% #12 · MTST allows 51.7% #193+3.5
✗Few second chancesOR% 30.0% #198 · MTST allows 28.2% #75−0.5
✓Gets to the lineFTR 39.4% #69 · MTST allows 29.6% #52 · FT 77.0% #33+0.2
✗Coughs it upTO% 18.5% #296 · MTST forces 15.7% #238 · ~11 turnovers−0.2
Montana St has the ball
✓Shoots it welleFG% 53.6% #80 · CSU allows 52.9% #263+2.1
✓Takes care of the ballTO% 14.7% #53 · CSU forces 15.5% #253 · ~10 turnovers+1.6
✗Few second chancesOR% 27.0% #292 · CSU allows 29.3% #123−1.2
✗Few trips to the lineFTR 30.2% #303 · CSU allows 34.2% #155 · FT 74.0% #132−0.1

Shot diet

Where each offense shoots from and where each defense lets teams shoot · 2025-26 numbers
Montana Stoffense vsColorado Stdefense
Share of shots by zone
Montana St shoots
Colorado St allows
D-I average
FG% by zone
ZoneD-I avg
Rim59.7%#13459.3%#20358.5%
Short 2 (≤9 ft)41.4%#13748.7%#34739.4%
Mid 2 (10 ft+)45.3%#1240.6%#26338.1%
Three36.1%#5234.2%#19633.7%
Colorado Stoffense vsMontana Stdefense
Share of shots by zone
Colorado St shoots
Montana St allows
D-I average
FG% by zone
ZoneD-I avg
Rim66.1%#1554.6%#5458.5%
Short 2 (≤9 ft)32.0%#33149.4%#35239.4%
Mid 2 (10 ft+)42.5%#4541.2%#27938.1%
Three38.6%#934.3%#19833.7%
RimShort 2 (≤9 ft)Mid 2 (10 ft+)Three

Zones from play-by-play shot descriptions; garbage time removed. Bars show the share of field-goal attempts in each zone; where a slice is too thin for its number, the shares are listed under the bar. FG% ranks: #1 = best for that side (most accurate shooting, stingiest defense).

Shot volume

Extra scoring chances from rebounds, turnovers and the foul line · 2025-26 numbers
Montana St
+0.6extra scoring chances per game vs a D-I average team#154 of 365
Off reb %
27.0%
#292
Def reb %
71.8%
#75
Turnover %
14.7%
#53
Forced TO %
15.7%
#238
FT rate
30.2%
#303
FT allowed
29.6%
#52
Where the chances come from (per game)
Offensive rebounding−1.1
Defensive rebounding+0.8
Ball security+1.4
Forcing turnovers−0.7
Foul shots drawn−1.2
Foul shots allowed+1.4
Colorado St
−0.3extra scoring chances per game vs a D-I average team#190 of 365
Off reb %
30.0%
#198
Def reb %
70.7%
#123
Turnover %
18.5%
#296
Forced TO %
15.5%
#253
FT rate
39.4%
#69
FT allowed
34.2%
#155
Where the chances come from (per game)
Offensive rebounding−0.1
Defensive rebounding+0.4
Ball security−1.2
Forcing turnovers−0.8
Foul shots drawn+1.1
Foul shots allowed+0.3

Montana St has more extra scoring chances per game: +0.6 (#154 of 365) to Colorado St’s −0.3 (#190).

Grade = extra shots and foul-line trips per game compared with a D-I average team, built from six season rates. Cell shading is the national rank for each rate (greener = better for that team).

Rotation

Montana St2025-26 numbers
#PlayerPosClHtGP-GSMPGPPGRPGAPGTOVeFG%3P%3PA/gFT%Usage
31FSr6'8"2-228.012.55.01.52.052.4%30.8%6.575.0%27.7%
2GSo6'7"2-028.010.55.01.52.071.4%60.0%5.050.0%19.5%
5GSr6'4"2-227.517.07.51.51.076.5%50.0%4.072.7%25.2%
44FJr6'8"2-225.07.56.01.02.526.7%0.0%3.070.0%28.6%
4GSr6'2"2-223.08.01.02.50.057.1%28.6%3.5—17.2%
0GJr6'3"2-115.58.01.00.51.042.9%28.6%3.580.0%33.6%
24GSr6'2"1-131.014.01.01.01.070.0%50.0%8.0—21.5%
12GSr6'3"2-014.51.01.50.00.025.0%0.0%0.5—7.9%
1GSr6'1"2-013.03.51.01.01.587.5%100.0%0.5—15.1%
21FSo7'0"1-013.07.04.01.01.050.0%0.0%1.050.0%37.0%
7FFr6'5"1-07.00.02.01.01.00.0%—0.0—15.6%

Team comparison

national rank toned left for away, right for home
Montana StColorado St
Efficiency
109.4
113.9
107.2
109.3
67.4
65.5
Shooting
53.6%
57.5%
53.1%
57.1%
36.1%
38.6%
74.0%
77.0%
30.2%
39.4%
Ball control & glass
14.7%
18.5%
15.7%
15.5%
27.0%
30.0%
28.2%
29.3%
7.9%
10.5%
7.5%
9.0%
Style
44.7%
49.1%
37.6%
35.6%
12.1%
11.1%
39.9%
62.9%
29.5%
30.9%
Roster
3.69
3.31
6'4.9"
6'5.6"
66.9%
57.9%

Offseason

roster movement into this season — descriptive, not a model input
Montana St
Returning minutes: 66.9%Returning production: 67.7%
Lost
  • Patrick McMahon 26.5 mpg, 12.4 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
  • Chris Hodges 23.3 mpg, 5.5 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
  • Davian Brown 16.4 mpg, 8.3 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
  • Grayson Gaddis 0.5 mpg, 0.3 ppg · transferred to Utah
Added
  • Darnez Slater from Colorado St · 4.6 mpg, 1.0 ppg last season
  • London Praytor from Toledo · 2.1 mpg, 1.1 ppg last season
  • James Steward no D1 minutes last season
  • Hale Hansen no D1 minutes last season
  • Isaiah Crane no D1 minutes last season
  • CJ Purdie no D1 minutes last season

Returns 67% of last season's minutes; lost 2 of its top 5. Teams returning at least 65% of last season's minutes have historically gained about 2.2 points of AdjEM (n=156 team-seasons, 2022-2026).

Colorado St
Returning minutes: 57.9%Returning production: 59.7%
Lost
  • Jevin Muniz 30.5 mpg, 9.4 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
  • Brandon Rechsteiner 27.7 mpg, 12.0 ppg · transferred to Kansas St
  • Augustinas Kiudulas 14.6 mpg, 5.9 ppg · transferred to W Michigan
  • Nikola Djapa 5.2 mpg, 1.3 ppg · transferred to Wright St
  • Darnez Slater 4.6 mpg, 1.0 ppg · transferred to Montana St
  • Jon Mekonnen 1.6 mpg, 0.7 ppg · transferred to S Dakota St
Added
  • Justin Menard from Marist · 29.3 mpg, 12.9 ppg last season
  • Docker Tedeschi no D1 minutes last season
  • Eric Fiedler no D1 minutes last season
  • River Sawyer no D1 minutes last season
  • Amondo Miller Jr. no D1 minutes last season
  • Jaxon Clark no D1 minutes last season

Returns 58% of last season's minutes; lost 2 of its top 5 (1 transferred).

Line history

Market line, home spread or game total

Lines by book

BookSpread (home) open → nowTotal open → nowML homeML away
DraftKings-10.5-118145.5→146.5o-115 u-105-675+490
FanDuel-10.5-110147.5o-110 u-110-610+440
BetMGM-11.5→-10.5-115145.5→147.5o-110 u-110-650+475
BetRivers-11.5→-10.5-120145.5→147.5o-108 u-115-670+450
Caesars-10→-10.5-110146.5→147.5o-110 u-110-650+460
Fanatics-11.5→-11-110145.5→147.5o-110 u-110-650+460
BetOnline-12→-11-110147.5o-105 u-115-625+461
Bovada-12.5→-11-115144.5→148o-110 u-110-700+475
theScore Bet-11.5+100145.5→147.5o-110 u-110-800+500
Hard Rock-11.5→-10.5-120145.5→147.5o-105 u-115-650+450
Kalshi-10.5-104147.5o-104 u-104-567+525
Polymarket——-567+525
Novig-10.5→—145.5→—-545+525
open = first-sighted line for this event · now = latest capture

Head-to-head

this season and last
No meetings the last two seasons.

More games on Mon, Nov 2

← Sun, Nov 1 · Tue, Nov 3 → · Full season schedule

The CBB Matchups tab lays out the day's Division I slate: matchup, tip time, records and rank, and — once posted — the market spread and total (the median across books when no market line is up). Three views switch the table between projected scores, pace and totals, and each team's offensive and defensive tendencies. Each game opens into opponent-adjusted possessions, efficiency and four-factor tendencies for both teams, plus recent form, rotation and head-to-head history. Every game also carries our projected score, spread and total, from our line: the same view our bets are made from.

What these numbers mean: line shopping.