Charlotte 49ers vs Indiana State Sycamores basketball final score

Mon, Nov 2 · 7:00 PM ET · Hulman Center, Terre Haute, IN

Non-conferenceESPN+Hulman Center, Terre Haute, IN
Charlotte
2025-26: 17-17 · 11-10 conf
Efficiency #193
@
Indiana St
2025-26: 11-21 · 4-17 conf
Efficiency #213
Final
7870
Final score
Projected 75.6 – 76.9
CLT win 46%INST win 54%
MarketClose
Spread
CLT −5.5
open CLT −3.0
Total
152.5
open 152.5
Our line
INST −1.3
as of Mon, Nov 2 · 6:51 PM ET

Our play

How our line is built

each step, from an even game to our line
Spread
Even game
0.0
Indiana Strated 3.3 below average
−3.3
Charlotterated 1.1 below average
+1.1
Home court
+3.5
Our line
INST −1.3
◂ Charlotte sideIndiana St side ▸

The spread is seen from the home side: a plus moves it toward Indiana St. Our total joins once both teams have played 3 games.

Pace & total

possessions per 40 minutes
Tempo, possessions per 40 minutes

Projected possessions: 66.2, from each team's opponent-adjusted tempo. On raw 2025-26 season pace, Indiana St is the faster team (68.3, #183 of 365) and Charlotte the slower (64.3, #349). When tempos clash, the slower team usually pulls the pace harder (weights 0.80 vs 0.66).

Projected possessions
66.2
per team, 40 min
Market total
152.5
Market close · open 152.5
Adjusted tempo, vs an average opponent
65.7#350
Charlotte
68.8#133
Indiana St

How this game plays

points this game from the four factors, vs an average D-I matchup
Our line
INST −1.3
Four factors −2.2 · not in these stats +3.5
From the four factors
Indiana St has the ball−0.1
Charlotte has the ball+2.1
Indiana St has the ball
✗Few second chancesOR% 26.2% #317 · CLT allows 32.5% #283−0.8
✓Shoots it welleFG% 52.8% #110 · CLT allows 50.9% #152+0.7
✗Few trips to the lineFTR 27.4% #349 · CLT allows 36.2% #213 · FT 67.8% #329−0.5
✓Takes care of the ballTO% 19.5% #338 · CLT forces 13.6% #345 · ~11 turnovers+0.4
Charlotte has the ball
✓Wins second chancesOR% 33.9% #71 · INST allows 31.8% #245+1.2
✓Shoots it welleFG% 53.4% #86 · INST allows 50.2% #110+0.7
✓Takes care of the ballTO% 18.1% #275 · INST forces 14.9% #301 · ~11 turnovers+0.4
✗Few trips to the lineFTR 36.4% #140 · INST allows 28.7% #39 · FT 71.6% #219−0.3

Shot diet

Where each offense shoots from and where each defense lets teams shoot · 2025-26 numbers
Charlotteoffense vsIndiana Stdefense
Share of shots by zone
Charlotte shoots
Indiana St allows
D-I average
FG% by zone
ZoneD-I avg
Rim60.0%#11856.4%#9458.5%
Short 2 (≤9 ft)40.6%#16044.2%#27239.4%
Mid 2 (10 ft+)39.6%#13147.3%#36338.1%
Three35.2%#10131.2%#3733.7%
Indiana Stoffense vsCharlottedefense
Share of shots by zone
Indiana St shoots
Charlotte allows
D-I average
FG% by zone
ZoneD-I avg
Rim62.9%#5459.9%#22358.5%
Short 2 (≤9 ft)30.0%#34926.3%#339.4%
Mid 2 (10 ft+)42.9%#3936.1%#11438.1%
Three31.5%#30533.5%#15333.7%
RimShort 2 (≤9 ft)Mid 2 (10 ft+)Three

Zones from play-by-play shot descriptions; garbage time removed. Bars show the share of field-goal attempts in each zone; where a slice is too thin for its number, the shares are listed under the bar. FG% ranks: #1 = best for that side (most accurate shooting, stingiest defense).

Shot volume

Extra scoring chances from rebounds, turnovers and the foul line · 2025-26 numbers
Charlotte
−2.4extra scoring chances per game vs a D-I average team#282 of 365
Off reb %
33.9%
#71
Def reb %
67.5%
#283
Turnover %
18.1%
#275
Forced TO %
13.6%
#345
FT rate
36.4%
#140
FT allowed
36.2%
#213
Where the chances come from (per game)
Offensive rebounding+1.1
Defensive rebounding−0.6
Ball security−0.9
Forcing turnovers−2.1
Foul shots drawn+0.4
Foul shots allowed−0.2
Indiana St
−5.1extra scoring chances per game vs a D-I average team#346 of 365
Off reb %
26.2%
#317
Def reb %
68.2%
#245
Turnover %
19.5%
#338
Forced TO %
14.9%
#301
FT rate
27.4%
#349
FT allowed
28.7%
#39
Where the chances come from (per game)
Offensive rebounding−1.3
Defensive rebounding−0.4
Ball security−1.9
Forcing turnovers−1.3
Foul shots drawn−1.9
Foul shots allowed+1.7

Charlotte has more extra scoring chances per game: −2.4 (#282 of 365) to Indiana St’s −5.1 (#346).

Grade = extra shots and foul-line trips per game compared with a D-I average team, built from six season rates. Cell shading is the national rank for each rate (greener = better for that team).

Rotation

Charlotte2025-26 numbers
#PlayerPosClHtGP-GSMPGPPGRPGAPGTOVeFG%3P%3PA/gFT%Usage
11GSo6'1"3-333.324.33.03.33.763.0%50.0%6.783.3%39.5%
1GSr6'5"3-328.78.35.04.02.047.1%40.0%1.775.0%20.1%
3CSr6'11"3-319.06.34.00.71.073.1%60.0%1.7—16.9%
8GFr6'8"3-018.78.02.30.70.059.4%41.7%4.0100.0%19.8%
21FFr6'9"3-017.05.73.31.00.770.0%0.0%0.3100.0%15.8%
7GSo6'6"3-316.02.72.70.30.340.0%22.2%3.00.0%15.0%
9FJr6'8"3-315.74.03.70.71.055.0%50.0%0.725.0%19.1%
24FSo6'9"3-015.03.72.70.30.366.7%—0.033.3%15.1%
2GSr6'5"3-012.73.02.00.71.725.0%0.0%1.050.0%31.5%
12FJr6'8"3-09.74.00.00.00.385.7%57.1%2.3—16.6%
0FSo6'9"3-09.71.73.70.70.740.0%—0.050.0%16.6%
6CJr7'0"2-05.01.01.00.01.550.0%—0.0—30.4%
10GFr6'4"1-03.00.00.00.00.00.0%—0.0—19.9%

Team comparison

national rank toned left for away, right for home
CharlotteIndiana St
Efficiency
110.5
106.0
111.5
107.8
65.7
68.8
Shooting
53.4%
52.8%
53.8%
57.4%
35.2%
31.5%
71.6%
67.8%
36.4%
27.4%
Ball control & glass
18.1%
19.5%
13.6%
14.9%
33.9%
26.2%
32.5%
31.8%
9.9%
11.4%
9.5%
13.4%
Style
45.4%
45.2%
39.1%
48.3%
11.9%
12.2%
51.8%
64.9%
41.9%
33.9%
Roster
2.93
3.21
6'6.9"
6'2.6"
9.0%
0.0%

Offseason

roster movement into this season — descriptive, not a model input
Charlotte
Returning minutes: 9.0%Returning production: 7.2%
Lost
  • Ben Bradford 28.2 mpg, 13.5 ppg · transferred to Charleston
  • Dezayne Mingo 26.9 mpg, 12.2 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
  • Anton Bonke 25.6 mpg, 10.6 ppg · transferred to Michigan St
  • Damoni Harrison 18.3 mpg, 8.6 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
  • Spencer Elliott 17.2 mpg, 4.1 ppg · transferred to UNC Wilmington
  • Major Freeman 14.1 mpg, 5.1 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
Added
  • Dorian Finister from Louisiana · 30.5 mpg, 14.0 ppg last season
  • Dylan Grant from Rutgers · 24.1 mpg, 9.5 ppg last season
  • Jayden Fort from Georgetown · 13.6 mpg, 3.3 ppg last season
  • Keyshuan Tillery from Cincinnati · 11.6 mpg, 3.5 ppg last season
  • Tyler McKinley from Cincinnati · 9.2 mpg, 1.3 ppg last season
  • Peyton Marshall from Georgia Tech · 6.2 mpg, 1.9 ppg last season

Returns 9% of last season's minutes; lost 4 of its top 5 (2 transferred). Teams returning under 40% of last season's minutes have historically fallen about 0.8 points of AdjEM (n=716 team-seasons, 2022-2026).

Indiana St
Returning minutes: 0.0%Returning production: 0.0%
Lost
  • Ian Scott 30.0 mpg, 13.5 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
  • Camp Wagner 28.8 mpg, 11.9 ppg · transferred to UC San Diego
  • Xavier Hall 27.7 mpg, 7.6 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
  • Sterling Young 21.9 mpg, 9.4 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
  • Bruno Alocen 21.3 mpg, 6.3 ppg · transferred to Valparaiso
  • Enel St. Bernard 17.6 mpg, 5.8 ppg · transferred to Sam Houston
Added
  • Meechie White from E Illinois · 30.4 mpg, 10.5 ppg last season
  • Karmani Gregory from SC Upstate · 29.6 mpg, 15.2 ppg last season
  • Maguire Mitchell from IU Indy · 26.3 mpg, 11.8 ppg last season
  • Duce Paschal from Weber St · 12.3 mpg, 3.6 ppg last season
  • Chance Puryear from SMU · 1.0 mpg, 0.1 ppg last season
  • Aleksa Vlajic from Buffalo · 0.2 mpg, 0.1 ppg last season

Returns 0% of last season's minutes; lost 5 of its top 5 (2 transferred). Teams returning under 40% of last season's minutes have historically fallen about 0.8 points of AdjEM (n=716 team-seasons, 2022-2026).

Line history

Market line, home spread or game total

Lines by book

BookSpread (home) open → nowTotal open → nowML homeML away
DraftKings+3.5→+5.5-112152.5→—+185-225
FanDuel+3.5→+5.5-110152.5→—+188-230
BetMGM+3.5→+5.5-110152.5→—+190-235
BetRivers+2.5→+5.5-117152.5o-110 u-113+188-240
Caesars+5→+5.5-110152.5→—+185-225
Fanatics+3→+5.5-110152.5→—+190-235
BetOnline+2.5→+5.5-105152.5→—+194-233
Bovada+4→+5.5-115152.5o-110 u-110+185-225
theScore Bet+3.5→+5.5-105152.5→—+195-230
Hard Rock+2.5→+5.5-115152.5o-110 u-110+190-240
Kalshi+4.5+108152.5o-104 u-104+186-194
Polymarket——+194-213
Novig+3.5→—152.5→—+194-203
open = first-sighted line for this event · now = latest capture

Head-to-head

this season and last
DateSeasonResult
Mon, Nov 32025-26Indiana St 76 – 92 Charlotte

More games on Mon, Nov 2

← Sun, Nov 1 · Tue, Nov 3 → · Full season schedule

The CBB Matchups tab lays out the day's Division I slate: matchup, tip time, records and rank, and — once posted — the market spread and total (the median across books when no market line is up). Three views switch the table between projected scores, pace and totals, and each team's offensive and defensive tendencies. Each game opens into opponent-adjusted possessions, efficiency and four-factor tendencies for both teams, plus recent form, rotation and head-to-head history. Every game also carries our projected score, spread and total, from our line: the same view our bets are made from.

What these numbers mean: line shopping.