Oakland Golden Grizzlies vs Michigan Wolverines basketball final score

Mon, Nov 2 · 6:00 PM ET · Crisler Center, Ann Arbor, MI

Non-conferenceBTNCrisler Center, Ann Arbor, MI
Oakland
2025-26: 16-16 · 12-9 conf
Efficiency #172
@
16Michigan
2025-26: 37-3 · 21-2 conf
Efficiency #1
Final
6884
Final score
Projected 63.9 – 95.6
OAK win 0%MICH win 100%
MarketClose
Spread
MICH −26.5
open MICH −26.5
Total
157.5
open 159.5
Our line
MICH −31.6
as of Mon, Nov 2 · 5:51 PM ET

Our play

How our line is built

each step, from an even game to our line
Spread
Even game
0.0
Michiganrated 27.5 above average
+27.5
Oaklandrated 0.6 below average
+0.6
Home court
+3.5
Our line
MICH −31.6
◂ Oakland sideMichigan side ▸

The spread is seen from the home side: a plus moves it toward Michigan. Our total joins once both teams have played 3 games.

Pace & total

possessions per 40 minutes
Tempo, possessions per 40 minutes

Projected possessions: 72.4, from each team's opponent-adjusted tempo. On raw 2025-26 season pace, Michigan is the faster team (71.4, #34 of 365) and Oakland the slower (71.1, #46). When tempos clash, the slower team usually pulls the pace harder (weights 0.80 vs 0.66).

Projected possessions
72.4
per team, 40 min
Market total
157.5
Market close · open 159.5
Adjusted tempo, vs an average opponent
70.0#45
Oakland
70.7#22
Michigan

How this game plays

points this game from the four factors, vs an average D-I matchup
Our line
MICH −31.6
Four factors 10.2Not in these stats 21.4
From the four factors
Michigan has the ball+9.2
Oakland has the ball−0.9
Michigan has the ball
✓Shoots it welleFG% 58.3% #8 · OAK allows 54.7% #322+6.1
✓Wins second chancesOR% 34.7% #55 · OAK allows 34.4% #324+2.2
✓Takes care of the ballTO% 16.3% #159 · OAK forces 15.1% #284 · ~11 turnovers+1.3
✗Few trips to the lineFTR 38.0% #102 · OAK allows 24.6% #4 · FT 74.8% #91−0.3
Oakland has the ball
✗Tough shooting lookeFG% 52.7% #114 · MICH allows 44.6% #1−2.6
✓Takes care of the ballTO% 14.7% #49 · MICH forces 15.1% #272 · ~11 turnovers+2.0
✗Few second chancesOR% 31.3% #152 · MICH allows 28.2% #70−0.2
✗Few trips to the lineFTR 38.1% #100 · MICH allows 26.0% #14 · FT 75.1% #79−0.2

Shot diet

Where each offense shoots from and where each defense lets teams shoot · 2025-26 numbers
Oaklandoffense vs#16Michigandefense
Share of shots by zone
Oakland shoots
Michigan allows
D-I average
FG% by zone
ZoneD-I avg
Rim58.1%#19254.5%#4858.5%
Short 2 (≤9 ft)45.6%#5640.9%#20639.4%
Mid 2 (10 ft+)39.4%#13531.4%#1238.1%
Three34.7%#13130.4%#1833.7%
#16Michiganoffense vsOaklanddefense
Share of shots by zone
Michigan shoots
Oakland allows
D-I average
FG% by zone
ZoneD-I avg
Rim67.4%#761.3%#27758.5%
Short 2 (≤9 ft)40.3%#16945.0%#29939.4%
Mid 2 (10 ft+)40.8%#8248.9%#36538.1%
Three36.8%#3334.3%#20633.7%
RimShort 2 (≤9 ft)Mid 2 (10 ft+)Three

Zones from play-by-play shot descriptions; garbage time removed. Bars show the share of field-goal attempts in each zone; where a slice is too thin for its number, the shares are listed under the bar. FG% ranks: #1 = best for that side (most accurate shooting, stingiest defense).

Shot volume

Extra scoring chances from rebounds, turnovers and the foul line · 2025-26 numbers
Oakland
+2.9extra scoring chances per game vs a D-I average team#57 of 365
Off reb %
31.3%
#152
Def reb %
65.6%
#324
Turnover %
14.7%
#49
Forced TO %
15.1%
#284
FT rate
38.1%
#100
FT allowed
24.6%
#4
Where the chances come from (per game)
Offensive rebounding+0.3
Defensive rebounding−1.2
Ball security+1.4
Forcing turnovers−1.1
Foul shots drawn+0.8
Foul shots allowed+2.7
#16Michigan
+4.5extra scoring chances per game vs a D-I average team#29 of 365
Off reb %
34.7%
#55
Def reb %
71.8%
#70
Turnover %
16.3%
#159
Forced TO %
15.1%
#272
FT rate
38.0%
#102
FT allowed
26.0%
#14
Where the chances come from (per game)
Offensive rebounding+1.4
Defensive rebounding+0.8
Ball security+0.3
Forcing turnovers−1.1
Foul shots drawn+0.8
Foul shots allowed+2.4

Michigan has more extra scoring chances per game: +4.5 (#29 of 365) to Oakland’s +2.9 (#57).

Grade = extra shots and foul-line trips per game compared with a D-I average team, built from six season rates. Cell shading is the national rank for each rate (greener = better for that team).

Rotation

Oakland2025-26 numbers
#PlayerPosClHtGP-GSMPGPPGRPGAPGTOVeFG%3P%3PA/gFT%Usage
2FSr6'8"4-433.317.310.01.52.849.0%100.0%0.371.4%32.2%
0GJr6'6"4-432.015.53.51.53.344.1%29.0%7.894.4%32.7%
3GSo6'3"4-021.57.03.01.01.854.3%27.3%2.850.0%22.0%
13GJr6'6"4-421.53.82.31.01.325.0%0.0%1.883.3%18.6%
10GSr6'0"4-220.33.51.51.01.558.3%44.4%2.3—12.9%
24FSr6'8"4-417.85.02.80.81.031.6%0.0%0.361.5%23.6%
4GSr6'10"4-213.54.32.80.31.534.4%20.0%1.354.5%29.1%
1GSo6'4"4-012.82.01.50.00.544.4%25.0%2.0—12.5%
6FSo6'7"4-010.53.82.00.80.042.9%—0.081.8%16.8%
5GSo6'8"4-06.03.00.30.30.066.7%50.0%1.0—22.3%
22FJr6'8"4-04.00.50.50.00.014.3%0.0%1.0—25.8%
11GFr6'6"4-03.50.00.00.00.30.0%0.0%0.3—8.4%
21FFr6'8"4-03.31.00.30.30.0100.0%—0.00.0%15.5%
7GFr6'6"1-01.00.01.00.00.00.0%0.0%1.0—56.1%

Team comparison

national rank toned left for away, right for home
Oakland#16Michigan
Efficiency
112.3
120.9
112.0
95.4
70.0
70.7
Shooting
52.7%
58.3%
53.0%
60.6%
34.7%
36.8%
75.1%
74.8%
38.1%
38.0%
Ball control & glass
14.7%
16.3%
15.1%
15.1%
31.3%
34.7%
34.4%
28.2%
7.6%
8.9%
11.7%
8.5%
Style
34.0%
41.4%
49.0%
44.6%
18.8%
13.9%
54.9%
61.0%
23.7%
37.4%
Roster
3.35
3.50
6'7.1"
6'5.7"
9.9%
36.0%

Offseason

roster movement into this season — descriptive, not a model input
Oakland
Returning minutes: 9.9%Returning production: 7.7%
Lost
  • Brody Robinson 35.8 mpg, 17.6 ppg · transferred to Creighton
  • Tuburu Naivalurua 31.9 mpg, 14.3 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
  • Ziare Wells 26.8 mpg, 9.9 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
  • Isaac Garrett 25.3 mpg, 12.0 ppg · transferred to High Point
  • Brett White II 24.0 mpg, 9.1 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
  • Michael Houge 22.5 mpg, 10.6 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
Added
  • Belal El Shakery from New Hampshire · 25.7 mpg, 11.0 ppg last season
  • Brady Swartz from W Michigan · 16.6 mpg, 6.2 ppg last season
  • Chris Fields Jr. from Campbell · 14.8 mpg, 7.7 ppg last season
  • Josh Hill from Robert Morris · 11.3 mpg, 5.0 ppg last season
  • RJ Taylor from Northern Iowa · 9.1 mpg, 2.2 ppg last season
  • Nate Ahner no D1 minutes last season

Returns 10% of last season's minutes; lost 5 of its top 5 (2 transferred). Teams returning under 40% of last season's minutes have historically fallen about 0.8 points of AdjEM (n=716 team-seasons, 2022-2026).

#16Michigan
Returning minutes: 36.0%Returning production: 28.6%
Lost
  • Yaxel Lendeborg 30.3 mpg, 15.1 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
  • Morez Johnson Jr. 25.1 mpg, 13.1 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
  • Aday Mara 23.4 mpg, 12.1 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
  • Nimari Burnett 19.8 mpg, 8.2 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
  • Will Tschetter 13.7 mpg, 3.5 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
  • L.J. Cason 13.1 mpg, 5.8 ppg · transferred to Miami
Added
  • Kenny Noland from Columbia · 33.1 mpg, 17.1 ppg last season
  • Moustapha Thiam from Cincinnati · 25.5 mpg, 12.0 ppg last season
  • J.P. Estrella from Tennessee · 16.4 mpg, 8.9 ppg last season
  • Jalen Reed from LSU · 3.3 mpg, 1.8 ppg last season
  • Lincoln Cosby no D1 minutes last season
  • Harrison Hochberg no D1 minutes last season

Returns 36% of last season's minutes; lost 3 of its top 5. Teams returning under 40% of last season's minutes have historically fallen about 0.8 points of AdjEM (n=716 team-seasons, 2022-2026).

Line history

Market line, home spread or game total

Lines by book

BookSpread (home) open → nowTotal open → nowML homeML away
DraftKings-28.5→-26.5-115156.5→157.5o-112 u-108—+3500
FanDuel-26.5→-27.5-105156.5→157.5o-114 u-106——
BetMGM-26.5→-27.5-105156.5→157.5o-110 u-110—+3000
BetRivers-27.5-115157.5→158.5o-108 u-115——
Caesars-29→-27-110156.5→158o-110 u-110——
Fanatics-27.5→-27-110159.5→158o-110 u-110—+3000
BetOnline-27-107160→158o-110 u-110——
Bovada-26.5-120157→157.5o-120 u+100—+2500
theScore Bet-26.5-110156.5→158.5o-110 u-110—+3500
Hard Rock-27.5-115157.5o-115 u-105——
Kalshi—158.5o-104 u-108——
Polymarket————
Novig-28.5→-26.5-113156.5→158.5o-117 u-111——
open = first-sighted line for this event · now = latest capture

Head-to-head

this season and last
DateSeasonResult
Mon, Nov 32025-26Oakland 78 – 121 Michigan

More games on Mon, Nov 2

← Sun, Nov 1 · Tue, Nov 3 → · Full season schedule

The CBB Matchups tab lays out the day's Division I slate: matchup, tip time, records and rank, and — once posted — the market spread and total (the median across books when no market line is up). Three views switch the table between projected scores, pace and totals, and each team's offensive and defensive tendencies. Each game opens into opponent-adjusted possessions, efficiency and four-factor tendencies for both teams, plus recent form, rotation and head-to-head history. Every game also carries our projected score, spread and total, from our line: the same view our bets are made from.

What these numbers mean: line shopping.