CBB Matchups

Every D1 game with tempo-free ratings, four factors and market lines, one place.

College basketball is being built for the 2026-27 season (tip-off Nov 3). What's here fills in as games are played.
Non-conferenceCase Gym, Boston, MA
Northeastern
Efficiency #274
2025-26: 7-24 · 3-17 conf
@
Boston U
Efficiency #237
2025-26: 17-17 · 12-9 conf
Mon, Nov 2 · TBD
74.3
win 31%
Projected
79.9
win 69%
No line posted yet.
Model: BU −5.6 · total 154.2 · ratings as of Sat, Oct 3
Preseason ratings start from 2025-26's final adjusted ratings, regressed toward the D1 average. The stats below are 2025-26's too; both update once 2026-27 games are played.

How the projection is built

each step, from an average D-I game to this one
Projected total
Average D-I game
148.2
PaceAdjusted tempo: Boston U 65.5, Northeastern 69.8 → 67.0 possessions
−2.8
Boston U offense vs Northeastern defense
+5.3
Northeastern offense vs Boston U defense
+3.5
Projected total
154.2
Axis starts at 140 pointsPoints added or removed at each step
Projected margin
Even game
0.0
Boston U offense vs Northeastern defense
+5.3
Northeastern offense vs Boston U defense
−3.5
Home court+2.9 points per 100 possessions to the home offense, −2.9 to the visitors
+3.9
Boston U by 5.6
5.6
Northeastern side ◂▸ Boston U side

Steps are rounded to one decimal, so they can differ from the total by 0.1: the margin steps add to +5.7 against +5.6. The margin is the same build seen from the home side; positive numbers help Boston U.

Pace & total

possessions per 40 minutes
Tempo, possessions per 40 minutes

Projected possessions: 67.0, from each team's opponent-adjusted tempo. On raw 2025-26 season pace, Northeastern is the faster team (69.6, #108 of 365) and Boston U the slower (63.5, #361). When tempos clash, the slower team usually pulls the pace harder (study weights 0.80 vs 0.66).

Projected possessions
67.0
per team, 40 min
Projected total
154.2
model
Projected team totals
74.3 / 79.9
Northeastern / Boston U
Adjusted tempo, vs an average opponent
69.8#63
Northeastern
65.5#357
Boston U

How this game plays

what the study found each side's numbers actually do when these two teams meet
AdvantageBoston U
Where Boston U scores: shooting
Boston U shoots an effective 57.5% (#11); Northeastern allows 56.4% (#351). Expect about 57.5%, 6.2 points above an average D1 matchup — worth roughly +8.8 points per 100 possessions.
AdvantageNortheastern
Where Northeastern scores: ball control
Northeastern turns it over on 16.4% of possessions (#162); Boston U forces turnovers on 13.0% of opponent possessions (#353). Expect about 14.2%, 2.6 points below an average D1 matchup — worth roughly +3.2 points per 100 possessions.
Pace
Tempo tug-of-war
Boston U averages 63.5 possessions per 40, Northeastern 69.6. Slower teams pull the pace toward themselves more than fast teams push it (0.80 vs 0.66 in five seasons of games), so expect about 65 — more possessions mean more points in the total and more chances for the better team to separate.
GlassNortheastern
Northeastern gets out-rebounded
Projected offensive rebound rate of 27.0% is worth roughly -2.1 points per 100 possessions against Northeastern's offense.
Watch for noise
3-point caution
A notable season 3-point number here (Boston U, Boston U's defense) is close to a coin flip going forward — the study's model of next-game 3P% barely beats guessing the D1 average. Shot volume is what actually carries: expect Northeastern at about 38.8% of its shots from three, Boston U about 40.2%.
ClashBoston U
Style clash: 3-point volume
Boston U takes 43.8% of its shots from three; Northeastern runs teams off the line (35.2% of shots allowed from three) (D1 average 39.5%). Expect about 40.2% — the offense's habit usually carries a bit more weight (0.80 vs 0.64).
Northeastern has the ball
OffenseBoston U allowsvs D1 avg
52.4% #130
53.6% #288
+2.7 pt/100
16.4% #162
13.0% #353
+3.2 pt/100
27.3% #286
28.0% #65
-2.1 pt/100
29.4% #324
30.5% #73
-0.7 pt/100
69.0% #299
—
-0.3 pt/100
Northeastern net across the four factors + FT%, vs. a D1-average matchup: +2.9 pts/100
Boston U has the ball
OffenseNortheastern allowsvs D1 avg
57.5% #11
56.4% #351
+8.8 pt/100
17.8% #255
16.8% #170
-0.7 pt/100
28.0% #269
30.2% #169
-1.1 pt/100
31.4% #270
41.9% #320
+0.3 pt/100
73.4% #157
—
+0.1 pt/100
Boston U net across the four factors + FT%, vs. a D1-average matchup: +7.4 pts/100

Shot diet

Where each offense shoots from and where each defense lets teams shoot · 2025-26 numbers
Northeasternoffense vsBoston Udefense
Share of shots by zone
Northeastern shoots
Boston U allows
D-I average
FG% by zone
ZoneD-I avg
Rim60.6%#10354.3%#4458.6%
Short 2 (≤9 ft)36.7%#24953.8%#36439.5%
Mid 2 (10 ft+)38.7%#15745.4%#35238.0%
Three33.7%#18736.6%#33033.7%
Boston Uoffense vsNortheasterndefense
Share of shots by zone
Boston U shoots
Northeastern allows
D-I average
FG% by zone
ZoneD-I avg
Rim62.0%#7363.5%#33558.6%
Short 2 (≤9 ft)54.8%#145.5%#31439.5%
Mid 2 (10 ft+)44.4%#2047.9%#36438.0%
Three38.8%#535.8%#29733.7%
RimShort 2 (≤9 ft)Mid 2 (10 ft+)Three

Zones from play-by-play shot descriptions; garbage time removed. Bars show the share of field-goal attempts in each zone; where a slice is too thin for its number, the shares are listed under the bar. FG% ranks: #1 = best for that side (most accurate shooting, stingiest defense).

Shot volume

Extra scoring chances from rebounds, turnovers and the foul line · 2025-26 numbers
Northeastern
−3.7extra scoring chances per game vs a D-I average team#321 of 365
Off reb %
27.3%
#286
Def reb %
69.8%
#169
Turnover %
16.4%
#162
Forced TO %
16.8%
#170
FT rate
29.4%
#324
FT allowed
41.9%
#320
Where the chances come from (per game)
Offensive rebounding−1.0
Defensive rebounding+0.1
Ball security+0.3
Forcing turnovers+0.1
Foul shots drawn−1.4
Foul shots allowed−1.7
Boston U
−2.8extra scoring chances per game vs a D-I average team#298 of 365
Off reb %
28.0%
#269
Def reb %
72.0%
#65
Turnover %
17.8%
#255
Forced TO %
13.0%
#353
FT rate
31.4%
#270
FT allowed
30.5%
#73
Where the chances come from (per game)
Offensive rebounding−0.8
Defensive rebounding+0.9
Ball security−0.7
Forcing turnovers−2.5
Foul shots drawn−0.9
Foul shots allowed+1.2

Boston U has more extra scoring chances per game: −2.8 (#298 of 365) to Northeastern’s −3.7 (#321).

Grade = extra shots and foul-line trips per game compared with a D-I average team, built from six season rates. Cell shading is the national rank for each rate (greener = better for that team).

Rotation

Northeastern2025-26 numbers
#PlayerPosClHtGP-GSMPGPPGRPGAPGTOVeFG%3P%3PA/gFT%UsageStatus
4Mike LoughnaneGJr6'4"31-2330.910.22.93.81.652.7%35.1%3.678.8%20.0%
8William KermouryGJr6'5"27-2426.913.13.22.31.457.9%40.2%6.871.7%26.7%
7Youri FritzFSr6'9"25-2325.99.85.41.51.659.8%33.3%0.152.1%22.1%
1Xavier AbreuGFr6'3"29-921.012.62.71.01.150.3%28.3%3.275.6%34.8%
13Luca Soroa SchallerGSo6'7"29-1220.75.63.42.21.940.0%22.6%1.873.7%22.0%
2Ryan WilliamsGSo6'4"28-1014.77.41.11.60.662.3%42.5%2.690.9%24.2%
21Petar PinterCFr6'11"26-1414.33.32.10.40.755.1%—0.055.0%14.7%
9Ty FrancisFFr6'7"24-515.04.52.60.40.652.9%21.1%0.857.6%18.5%
0Xander AlarieFFr6'8"11-1127.710.37.41.52.245.3%26.3%1.785.7%24.1%
12Liam KoelschCFr6'9"26-18.61.82.30.20.165.7%—0.08.7%12.4%
10Miles NewtonGFr6'3"9-716.85.42.00.90.858.3%35.3%1.970.0%18.0%
22Haris ElezovicFSr6'8"17-08.12.21.50.50.445.7%25.0%0.585.7%18.0%
3LA PrattGSr6'5"3-333.017.01.73.32.051.2%27.3%3.790.9%31.1%
Rosters come from ESPN and are still filling in; incoming transfers and freshmen may be missing.

Tale of the tape

national rank toned left for away, right for home
NortheasternBoston U
Efficiency
107.7
111.2
113.7
114.5
69.8
65.5
—
—
Shooting
52.4%
57.5%
53.6%
56.9%
33.7%
38.8%
69.0%
73.4%
29.4%
31.4%
Ball control & glass
16.4%
17.8%
16.8%
13.0%
27.3%
28.0%
30.2%
28.0%
9.3%
10.8%
9.5%
8.9%
Style
37.8%
43.8%
47.0%
40.7%
15.3%
7.0%
55.7%
53.6%
33.4%
23.5%
Roster
2.26
2.04
6'6.1"
6'5.6"
90.0%
—

Offseason

roster movement into this season — descriptive, not a model input
Northeastern
Returning minutes: 90.0%Returning production: 93.2%
Lost
  • JB Frankel 20.0 mpg, 5.7 ppg · transferred to Boston College
Added
Nobody of note.

No incoming D1 transfers are listed on ESPN's roster yet — until they are, returning shares read high.

Returns 90% of last season's minutes; lost 1 of its top 5 (1 transferred). Teams returning at least 65% of last season's minutes have historically gained about 2.2 points of AdjEM (n=156 team-seasons, 2022-2026).

Boston U
Returning minutes: 100.0%Returning production: 100.0%
ESPN hasn't posted Boston U's roster for this season yet — no movement to show.

Returns 100% of last season's minutes. Teams returning at least 65% of last season's minutes have historically gained about 2.2 points of AdjEM (n=156 team-seasons, 2022-2026). (ESPN hasn't posted this season's roster yet -- this may still be last season's list.)

Head-to-head

this season and last
DateSeasonResult
Mon, Nov 32025-26Boston U 76 – 75 Northeastern

The CBB Matchups tab lays out the day's Division I slate: matchup, tip time, records and rank, and — once posted — Pinnacle's spread and total (the median across books when Pinnacle has no line). Three views switch the table between projected scores, pace and totals, and each team's offensive and defensive tendencies. Each game opens into opponent-adjusted possessions, efficiency and four-factor tendencies for both teams, plus recent form, rotation and head-to-head history. Every game also carries our projected score, spread and total, built bottom-up from those same numbers: expected possessions times each side's opponent-adjusted points per possession, plus home court.

What these numbers mean: line shopping.