CBB Matchups
Every D1 game with tempo-free ratings, four factors and market lines, one place.
College basketball is being built for the 2026-27 season (tip-off Nov 3). What's here fills in as games are played.
Non-conferenceNewman Arena, Ithaca, NY
Pepperdine
Efficiency #307
2025-26: 9-23 · 4-15 conf
@
Cornell
Efficiency #135
2025-26: 15-13 · 8-7 conf
Mon, Nov 2 · 6:00 PM ET
76.5
win 17%
Projected
87.6
win 83%
No line posted yet.
Model: COR −11.2 · total 164.1 · ratings as of Sat, Oct 3
Preseason ratings start from 2025-26's final adjusted ratings, regressed toward the D1 average. The stats below are 2025-26's too; both update once 2026-27 games are played.
How the projection is built
each step, from an average D-I game to this oneProjected total
Average D-I game
148.2
PaceAdjusted tempo: Cornell 70.9, Pepperdine 69.0 → 71.6 possessions
+7.1
Cornell offense vs Pepperdine defense
+7.9
Pepperdine offense vs Cornell defense
+0.9
Projected total
164.1
Axis starts at 140 pointsPoints added or removed at each step
Projected margin
Even game
0.0
Cornell offense vs Pepperdine defense
+7.9
Pepperdine offense vs Cornell defense
−0.9
Home court+2.9 points per 100 possessions to the home offense, −2.9 to the visitors
+4.1
Cornell by 11.2
11.2
Pepperdine side ◂▸ Cornell side
Steps are rounded to one decimal, so they can differ from the total by 0.1: the margin steps add to +11.1 against +11.2. The margin is the same build seen from the home side; positive numbers help Cornell.
Pace & total
possessions per 40 minutesTempo, possessions per 40 minutes
Projected possessions: 71.6, from each team's opponent-adjusted tempo. On raw 2025-26 season pace, Cornell is the faster team (71.3, #40 of 365) and Pepperdine the slower (69.5, #116). When tempos clash, the slower team usually pulls the pace harder (study weights 0.80 vs 0.66).
Projected possessions
71.6
per team, 40 min
Projected total
164.1
model
Projected team totals
76.5 / 87.6
Pepperdine / Cornell
Adjusted tempo, vs an average opponent
69.0#124
Pepperdine
70.9#19
Cornell
How this game plays
what the study found each side's numbers actually do when these two teams meetAdvantageCornell
Where Cornell scores: shooting
Cornell shoots an effective 58.5% (#7); Pepperdine allows 54.2% (#306). Expect about 57.0%, 5.7 points above an average D1 matchup — worth roughly +8.1 points per 100 possessions.
Pace
Track meet
Cornell averages 71.3 possessions per 40, Pepperdine 69.5. Slower teams pull the pace toward themselves more than fast teams push it (0.80 vs 0.66 in five seasons of games), so expect about 71 — more possessions mean more points in the total and more chances for the better team to separate.
Watch for noise
3-point caution
A notable season 3-point number here (Cornell, Cornell's defense) is close to a coin flip going forward — the study's model of next-game 3P% barely beats guessing the D1 average. Shot volume is what actually carries: expect Pepperdine at about 38.5% of its shots from three, Cornell about 49.8%.
Pepperdine has the ball
OffenseCornell allowsvs D1 avg
47.6% #323
55.9% #343
+0.3 pt/100
18.3% #289
15.1% #279
+0.2 pt/100
29.1% #234
30.6% #187
-0.5 pt/100
33.8% #216
37.2% #244
+0.1 pt/100
75.8% #58
—
+0.3 pt/100
Pepperdine net across the four factors + FT%, vs. a D1-average matchup: +0.5 pts/100
Cornell has the ball
OffensePepperdine allowsvs D1 avg
58.5% #7
54.2% #306
+8.1 pt/100
16.0% #139
16.5% #182
+0.8 pt/100
30.2% #193
34.0% #318
+1.0 pt/100
30.2% #304
28.5% #35
-0.8 pt/100
74.1% #124
—
+0.2 pt/100
Cornell net across the four factors + FT%, vs. a D1-average matchup: +9.2 pts/100
Shot diet
Where each offense shoots from and where each defense lets teams shoot · 2025-26 numbersPepperdineoffense vsCornelldefense
Share of shots by zone
Pepperdine shoots
35.6
6.6
18.0
39.7
Cornell allows
43.4
4.0
14.5
38.1
D-I average
38.5
6.4
15.8
39.3
FG% by zone
| Zone | D-I avg | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Rim | 55.0%#298 | 60.7%#256 | 58.6% |
| Short 2 (≤9 ft) | 40.2%#170 | 44.6%#285 | 39.5% |
| Mid 2 (10 ft+) | 36.5%#252 | 41.7%#293 | 38.0% |
| Three | 31.4%#310 | 37.5%#349 | 33.7% |
Cornelloffense vsPepperdinedefense
Share of shots by zone
Cornell shoots
38.5
2.3
8.1
51.1
Pepperdine allows
41.8
6.8
11.5
39.9
D-I average
38.5
6.4
15.8
39.3
FG% by zone
| Zone | D-I avg | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Rim | 61.8%#77 | 60.5%#252 | 58.6% |
| Short 2 (≤9 ft) | 51.5%#7 | 49.1%#349 | 39.5% |
| Mid 2 (10 ft+) | 43.5%#31 | 39.6%#224 | 38.0% |
| Three | 38.3%#14 | 35.5%#276 | 33.7% |
RimShort 2 (≤9 ft)Mid 2 (10 ft+)Three
Zones from play-by-play shot descriptions; garbage time removed. Bars show the share of field-goal attempts in each zone; where a slice is too thin for its number, the shares are listed under the bar. FG% ranks: #1 = best for that side (most accurate shooting, stingiest defense).
Shot volume
Extra scoring chances from rebounds, turnovers and the foul line · 2025-26 numbersPepperdine
−1.3extra scoring chances per game vs a D-I average team#245 of 365
Off reb %
29.1%
#234
Def reb %
66.0%
#318
Turnover %
18.3%
#289
Forced TO %
16.5%
#182
FT rate
33.8%
#216
FT allowed
28.5%
#35
Where the chances come from (per game)
Offensive rebounding−0.4
Defensive rebounding−1.1
Ball security−1.1
Forcing turnovers−0.1
Foul shots drawn−0.3
Foul shots allowed+1.7
Cornell
−2.4extra scoring chances per game vs a D-I average team#281 of 365
Off reb %
30.2%
#193
Def reb %
69.4%
#187
Turnover %
16.0%
#139
Forced TO %
15.1%
#279
FT rate
30.2%
#304
FT allowed
37.2%
#244
Where the chances come from (per game)
Offensive rebounding−0.1
Defensive rebounding0.0
Ball security+0.5
Forcing turnovers−1.1
Foul shots drawn−1.2
Foul shots allowed−0.5
Pepperdine has more extra scoring chances per game: −1.3 (#245 of 365) to Cornell’s −2.4 (#281).
Grade = extra shots and foul-line trips per game compared with a D-I average team, built from six season rates. Cell shading is the national rank for each rate (greener = better for that team).
Rotation
Pepperdine2025-26 numbers
ESPN hasn't posted Pepperdine's 2026-27 roster yet — these are last season's players.
| # | Player | Pos | Cl | Ht | GP-GS | MPG | PPG | RPG | APG | TOV | eFG% | 3P% | 3PA/g | FT% | Usage | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | Styles Phipps | G | So | 6'2" | 32-32 | 34.0 | 13.4 | 5.9 | 5.2 | 2.8 | 45.1% | 27.0% | 2.3 | 78.5% | 26.7% | |
| 3 | Aaron Clark | G | So | 6'4" | 32-26 | 32.3 | 15.3 | 3.4 | 2.7 | 2.8 | 50.0% | 36.1% | 5.2 | 76.9% | 29.9% | |
| 23 | Javon Cooley | G | Sr | 6'5" | 32-27 | 30.1 | 11.4 | 4.7 | 1.1 | 1.4 | 48.0% | 29.5% | 4.3 | 83.2% | 23.3% | |
| 35 | Danilo Dozic | C | So | 6'10" | 27-26 | 31.3 | 11.3 | 2.7 | 1.5 | 1.3 | 52.2% | 36.3% | 4.6 | 77.0% | 21.3% | |
| 18 | Yonatan Levy | F | So | 6'10" | 32-28 | 20.5 | 5.2 | 4.2 | 1.7 | 1.4 | 51.1% | 31.9% | 1.5 | 76.2% | 17.3% | |
| 4 | Pavle Stosic | F | So | 6'9" | 31-12 | 16.2 | 3.6 | 3.8 | 0.7 | 0.6 | 48.9% | 20.0% | 0.8 | 54.3% | 15.2% | |
| 14 | Stefan Cicic | C | Fr | 7'0" | 31-5 | 12.8 | 4.6 | 2.7 | 0.4 | 0.9 | 54.6% | 23.1% | 0.4 | 55.8% | 22.4% | |
| 77 | Luka Vudragovic | G | Fr | 6'6" | 31-4 | 12.0 | 3.7 | 1.2 | 0.3 | 0.5 | 45.3% | 24.6% | 2.2 | 84.6% | 21.3% | |
| 1 | David Mager | G | Jr | 6'4" | 31-0 | 10.6 | 4.4 | 0.9 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 49.2% | 39.2% | 1.6 | 70.8% | 24.1% | |
| 33 | Nikola Radovanovic | F | Fr | 6'9" | 17-0 | 5.0 | 1.4 | 1.1 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 53.6% | 25.0% | 0.2 | 66.7% | 16.0% | |
| 7 | Vladimir Sudar | F | Fr | 6'5" | 17-0 | 4.4 | 1.0 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 28.1% | 16.7% | 0.4 | 66.7% | 20.2% | |
| 9 | Pasha Shemirani | F | Fr | 6'5" | 17-0 | 4.1 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 34.6% | 33.3% | 0.5 | — | 11.6% | |
| 24 | Preston Phillips | F | Sr | 6'8" | 3-0 | 11.7 | 0.7 | 2.7 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 50.0% | 0.0% | 0.3 | — | 6.7% | |
| 25 | Anto Balian | G | Fr | 6'1" | 0-0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | — | 0.0 | — | — | |
| 11 | Ty Virgil | G | Fr | 6'5" | 0-0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | — | 0.0 | — | — | |
| 2 | Yassine Gharram | G | Sr | 6'3" | 0-0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | — | 0.0 | — | — |
Rosters come from ESPN and are still filling in; incoming transfers and freshmen may be missing.
Cornell2025-26 numbers
ESPN hasn't posted Cornell's 2026-27 roster yet — these are last season's players.
| # | Player | Pos | Cl | Ht | GP-GS | MPG | PPG | RPG | APG | TOV | eFG% | 3P% | 3PA/g | FT% | Usage | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 31 | Cooper Noard | G | Sr | 6'2" | 28-28 | 27.5 | 18.2 | 3.3 | 2.0 | 1.6 | 61.6% | 37.6% | 7.6 | 90.3% | 31.6% | |
| 8 | Adam Hinton | G | Sr | 6'4" | 28-28 | 24.6 | 12.5 | 3.1 | 1.9 | 1.3 | 59.1% | 41.5% | 4.8 | 77.6% | 26.1% | |
| 5 | Jacob Beccles | G | Jr | 6'3" | 28-27 | 23.4 | 7.7 | 2.5 | 3.1 | 1.3 | 52.9% | 32.8% | 2.2 | 67.3% | 19.8% | |
| 22 | Jake Fiegen | G | Sr | 6'4" | 24-17 | 26.1 | 17.1 | 5.1 | 2.1 | 1.2 | 64.9% | 41.4% | 5.5 | 77.2% | 30.4% | |
| 21 | Kaspar Sepp | F | Jr | 6'7" | 28-15 | 18.8 | 4.8 | 5.5 | 2.6 | 1.3 | 50.5% | 23.8% | 0.8 | 66.0% | 17.2% | |
| 24 | Josh Baldwin | G | Sr | 6'5" | 26-13 | 19.0 | 7.4 | 4.1 | 3.2 | 1.7 | 52.2% | 33.9% | 2.3 | 70.0% | 24.9% | |
| 7 | Anthony Nimani | G | So | 6'4" | 22-0 | 17.3 | 5.4 | 1.6 | 1.9 | 1.0 | 65.5% | 52.0% | 1.1 | 84.6% | 16.4% | |
| 23 | DJ Nix | F | Sr | 6'6" | 27-11 | 12.3 | 3.5 | 1.7 | 1.1 | 0.7 | 53.8% | 37.3% | 1.9 | 56.3% | 17.4% | |
| 4 | Gioacchino Panzini | F | So | 6'5" | 26-0 | 10.8 | 3.9 | 2.0 | 0.6 | 0.5 | 77.6% | 50.0% | 0.9 | 57.1% | 15.9% | |
| 14 | Corbin Zentner | G | Sr | 5'9" | 24-1 | 11.6 | 3.3 | 0.9 | 0.8 | 0.3 | 57.8% | 38.6% | 2.4 | 66.7% | 14.6% | |
| 0 | DaMaryon Fishburn | G | Jr | 6'5" | 21-0 | 8.6 | 2.5 | 2.0 | 1.5 | 0.7 | 83.3% | 58.3% | 0.6 | 57.1% | 14.2% | |
| 10 | Mateen Rafiq | G | So | 6'0" | 18-0 | 9.3 | 4.3 | 1.3 | 1.5 | 0.3 | 66.4% | 46.3% | 2.3 | 71.4% | 20.2% | |
| 2 | Ian Imegwu | F | Jr | 6'9" | 15-0 | 5.7 | 4.9 | 1.3 | 0.9 | 0.2 | 69.2% | 48.9% | 3.0 | 50.0% | 34.4% | |
| 3 | Jax Abalos | F | Fr | 6'8" | 12-0 | 6.4 | 2.8 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 53.6% | 27.3% | 1.8 | 80.0% | 21.7% | |
| 55 | AJ LaBeau | F | Jr | 6'10" | 10-0 | 4.1 | 0.7 | 1.2 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 33.3% | 0.0% | 0.1 | 33.3% | 19.3% | |
| 12 | Ryan Burbach | G | Fr | 6'3" | 5-0 | 8.2 | 2.6 | 1.6 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 31.6% | 15.4% | 2.6 | 100.0% | 27.3% | |
| 11 | Ty Iwanonkiw | F | So | 6'9" | 3-0 | 7.7 | 4.0 | 1.0 | 0.7 | 0.0 | 66.7% | 44.4% | 3.0 | — | 19.2% | |
| 13 | AJ Rodriguez | G | So | 6'6" | 0-0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | — | 0.0 | — | — | |
| 15 | Blake Lecklitner | F | Fr | 6'9" | 0-0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | — | 0.0 | — | — | |
| 1 | Elijah Griffin | G | Fr | 6'2" | 0-0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | — | 0.0 | — | — |
Rosters come from ESPN and are still filling in; incoming transfers and freshmen may be missing.
Pepperdine2025-26 numbers
ESPN hasn't posted Pepperdine's 2026-27 roster yet — these are last season's players.
| # | Player | Pos | Cl | Ht | GP-GS | MPG | PPG | RPG | APG | TOV | eFG% | 3P% | 3PA/g | FT% | Usage | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | Styles Phipps | G | So | 6'2" | 32-32 | 34.0 | 13.4 | 5.9 | 5.2 | 2.8 | 45.1% | 27.0% | 2.3 | 78.5% | 26.7% | |
| 3 | Aaron Clark | G | So | 6'4" | 32-26 | 32.3 | 15.3 | 3.4 | 2.7 | 2.8 | 50.0% | 36.1% | 5.2 | 76.9% | 29.9% | |
| 23 | Javon Cooley | G | Sr | 6'5" | 32-27 | 30.1 | 11.4 | 4.7 | 1.1 | 1.4 | 48.0% | 29.5% | 4.3 | 83.2% | 23.3% | |
| 35 | Danilo Dozic | C | So | 6'10" | 27-26 | 31.3 | 11.3 | 2.7 | 1.5 | 1.3 | 52.2% | 36.3% | 4.6 | 77.0% | 21.3% | |
| 18 | Yonatan Levy | F | So | 6'10" | 32-28 | 20.5 | 5.2 | 4.2 | 1.7 | 1.4 | 51.1% | 31.9% | 1.5 | 76.2% | 17.3% | |
| 4 | Pavle Stosic | F | So | 6'9" | 31-12 | 16.2 | 3.6 | 3.8 | 0.7 | 0.6 | 48.9% | 20.0% | 0.8 | 54.3% | 15.2% | |
| 14 | Stefan Cicic | C | Fr | 7'0" | 31-5 | 12.8 | 4.6 | 2.7 | 0.4 | 0.9 | 54.6% | 23.1% | 0.4 | 55.8% | 22.4% | |
| 77 | Luka Vudragovic | G | Fr | 6'6" | 31-4 | 12.0 | 3.7 | 1.2 | 0.3 | 0.5 | 45.3% | 24.6% | 2.2 | 84.6% | 21.3% | |
| 1 | David Mager | G | Jr | 6'4" | 31-0 | 10.6 | 4.4 | 0.9 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 49.2% | 39.2% | 1.6 | 70.8% | 24.1% | |
| 33 | Nikola Radovanovic | F | Fr | 6'9" | 17-0 | 5.0 | 1.4 | 1.1 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 53.6% | 25.0% | 0.2 | 66.7% | 16.0% | |
| 7 | Vladimir Sudar | F | Fr | 6'5" | 17-0 | 4.4 | 1.0 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 28.1% | 16.7% | 0.4 | 66.7% | 20.2% | |
| 9 | Pasha Shemirani | F | Fr | 6'5" | 17-0 | 4.1 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 34.6% | 33.3% | 0.5 | — | 11.6% | |
| 24 | Preston Phillips | F | Sr | 6'8" | 3-0 | 11.7 | 0.7 | 2.7 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 50.0% | 0.0% | 0.3 | — | 6.7% | |
| 25 | Anto Balian | G | Fr | 6'1" | 0-0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | — | 0.0 | — | — | |
| 11 | Ty Virgil | G | Fr | 6'5" | 0-0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | — | 0.0 | — | — | |
| 2 | Yassine Gharram | G | Sr | 6'3" | 0-0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | — | 0.0 | — | — |
Rosters come from ESPN and are still filling in; incoming transfers and freshmen may be missing.
Trends
Last 10 games of 2025-26Pepperdine
Against the spread
Season
14-16
Home
6-9
Road
8-5
Last 10
5-5
avg cover +1.4
Missed the spread in the last gameCovered 5 of 10 as an underdog
Over / under
Season
16-13-1
Home
9-5-1
Road
7-6
Last 10
9-1
avg vs total +15.7
Under in the last gameOver in 9 of 10 as an underdog
Last 10 games, newest first
| Date | Opponent | Site | Result | Total | PPP for | PPP vs | Pace | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 5 | Portland | N | L 68–77 | +3.5 | L−5.5 | 154.0 | U145 | 98.2 | 111.2 | 69.3 |
| Feb 28 | Washington St | H | W 88–79 | +8.0 | W+17.0 | 158.0 | O167 | 116.6 | 104.6 | 75.5 |
| Feb 25 | Seattle U | H | L 80–87 | +7.5 | W+0.5 | 145.5 | O167 | 114.1 | 124.1 | 70.1 |
| Feb 21 | Oregon St | A | L 73–83 | +9.0 | L−1.0 | 148.5 | O156 | 101.4 | 115.3 | 72.0 |
| Feb 18 | Portland | A | W 95–87 | +7.0 | W+15.0 | 151.0 | O182 | 136.2 | 124.8 | 69.7 |
| Feb 14 | LMU | H | W 90–89 | +6.0 | W+7.0 | 148.5 | O179 | 126.4 | 125.0 | 71.2 |
| Feb 11 | Saint Mary's | A | L 60–88 | +24.5 | L−3.5 | 144.0 | O148 | 83.8 | 122.9 | 71.6 |
| Feb 7 | Pacific | H | L 59–92 | +7.5 | L−25.5 | 142.5 | O151 | 81.3 | 126.8 | 72.5 |
| Feb 4 | Seattle U | A | L 81–83 | +13.0 | W+11.0 | 139.5 | O164 | 105.8 | 108.4 | 76.5 |
| Jan 28 | San Diego | H | L 88–92 OT | +2.5 | L−1.5 | 150.5 | O180 | 109.6 | 114.5 | 80.3 |
Cornell
Against the spread
Season
11-15
Home
2-7
Road
9-7
Last 10
5-5
avg cover +1.8
Missed the spread in the last gameCovered 4 of 8 as a favorite
Over / under
Season
14-12
Home
4-5
Road
9-7
Last 10
3-7
avg vs total −4.6
Over 3 straightOver in 2 of 8 as a favorite
Last 10 games, newest first
| Date | Opponent | Site | Result | Total | PPP for | PPP vs | Pace | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 14 | Yale | N | L 76–88 | +3.5 | L−8.5 | 163.5 | O164 | 125.2 | 144.9 | 60.7 |
| Mar 7 | Dartmouth | A | W 111–90 | −4.5 | W+16.5 | 166.0 | O201 | 142.5 | 115.5 | 77.9 |
| Feb 28 | Brown | H | W 86–80 | −9.5 | L−3.5 | 157.5 | O166 | 119.1 | 110.7 | 72.2 |
| Feb 27 | Yale | H | W 72–69 | +4.0 | W+7.0 | 164.0 | U141 | 112.1 | 107.4 | 64.3 |
| Feb 21 | Harvard | H | L 54–73 | −5.5 | L−24.5 | 155.0 | U127 | 89.9 | 121.5 | 60.1 |
| Feb 14 | Penn | A | L 76–82 | −3.0 | L−9.0 | 170.0 | U158 | 99.7 | 107.6 | 76.2 |
| Feb 13 | Princeton | A | W 89–65 | −3.5 | W+20.5 | 154.5 | U154 | 140.6 | 102.7 | 63.3 |
| Feb 7 | Columbia | A | W 88–67 | −1.0 | W+20.0 | 170.5 | U155 | 133.9 | 101.9 | 65.7 |
| Jan 31 | Penn | H | L 81–91 | −7.0 | L−17.0 | 174.5 | U172 | 112.3 | 126.1 | 72.1 |
| Jan 30 | Princeton | H | W 87–64 | −7.0 | W+16.0 | 159.5 | U151 | 141.5 | 104.1 | 61.5 |
Records vs the closing line describe the past; ten games is a small sample.
Tale of the tape
national rank toned left for away, right for homePepperdineCornell
Efficiency
103.9
116.2
111.8
114.3
69.0
70.9
—
—
Shooting
47.6%
58.5%
48.0%
59.7%
31.4%
38.3%
75.8%
74.1%
33.8%
30.2%
Ball control & glass
18.3%
16.0%
16.5%
15.1%
29.1%
30.2%
34.0%
30.6%
10.9%
9.1%
10.7%
9.6%
Style
39.2%
51.6%
40.5%
38.9%
9.4%
14.4%
56.2%
66.7%
27.8%
41.9%
Roster
2.21
3.37
6'6.3"
6'3.9"
—
—
Offseason
roster movement into this season — descriptive, not a model inputPepperdine
Returning minutes: 100.0%Returning production: 100.0%
ESPN hasn't posted Pepperdine's roster for this season yet — no movement to show.
Returns 100% of last season's minutes. Teams returning at least 65% of last season's minutes have historically gained about 2.2 points of AdjEM (n=156 team-seasons, 2022-2026). (ESPN hasn't posted this season's roster yet -- this may still be last season's list.)
Cornell
Returning minutes: 100.0%Returning production: 100.0%
ESPN hasn't posted Cornell's roster for this season yet — no movement to show.
Returns 100% of last season's minutes. Teams returning at least 65% of last season's minutes have historically gained about 2.2 points of AdjEM (n=156 team-seasons, 2022-2026). (ESPN hasn't posted this season's roster yet -- this may still be last season's list.)
Head-to-head
this season and lastNo meetings the last two seasons.
The CBB Matchups tab lays out the day's Division I slate: matchup, tip time, records and rank, and — once posted — Pinnacle's spread and total (the median across books when Pinnacle has no line). Three views switch the table between projected scores, pace and totals, and each team's offensive and defensive tendencies. Each game opens into opponent-adjusted possessions, efficiency and four-factor tendencies for both teams, plus recent form, rotation and head-to-head history. Every game also carries our projected score, spread and total, built bottom-up from those same numbers: expected possessions times each side's opponent-adjusted points per possession, plus home court.
What these numbers mean: line shopping.