Central Connecticut Blue Devils vs Temple Owls basketball final score

Mon, Nov 2 · 6:30 PM ET · Liacouras Center, Philadelphia, PA

Non-conferenceESPN+Liacouras Center, Philadelphia, PA
C Connecticut
2025-26: 18-12 · 12-7 conf
Efficiency #277
@
Temple
2025-26: 16-16 · 8-11 conf
Efficiency #168
Final
5668
Final score
Projected 65.0 – 78.0
CCSU win 13%TEM win 87%
MarketClose
Spread
TEM −14.5
open TEM −15.5
Total
145.5
open 143.0
Our line
TEM −13.0
as of Mon, Nov 2 · 6:21 PM ET

Our play

How our line is built

each step, from an even game to our line
Spread
Even game
0.0
Templerated 1.4 above average
+1.4
C Connecticutrated 8.1 below average
+8.1
Home court
+3.5
Our line
TEM −13.0
◂ C Connecticut sideTemple side ▸

The spread is seen from the home side: a plus moves it toward Temple. Our total joins once both teams have played 3 games.

Pace & total

possessions per 40 minutes
Tempo, possessions per 40 minutes

Projected possessions: 65.0, from each team's opponent-adjusted tempo. On raw 2025-26 season pace, Temple is the faster team (65.4, #320 of 365) and C Connecticut the slower (65.2, #325). When tempos clash, the slower team usually pulls the pace harder (weights 0.80 vs 0.66).

Projected possessions
65.0
per team, 40 min
Market total
145.5
Market close · open 143.0
Adjusted tempo, vs an average opponent
66.7#308
C Connecticut
66.7#310
Temple

How this game plays

points this game from the four factors, vs an average D-I matchup
Our line
TEM −13.0
Four factors 1.5Not in these stats 11.5
From the four factors
Temple has the ball+1.6
C Connecticut has the ball+0.2
Temple has the ball
✓Takes care of the ballTO% 13.7% #18 · CCSU forces 14.0% #336 · ~9 turnovers+2.9
✗Tough shooting lookeFG% 50.2% #229 · CCSU allows 50.2% #113−1.0
✗Few second chancesOR% 29.8% #209 · CCSU allows 30.4% #179−0.2
✗Few trips to the lineFTR 40.6% #52 · CCSU allows 26.9% #22 · FT 74.7% #960.0
C Connecticut has the ball
✓Takes care of the ballTO% 16.2% #153 · TEM forces 15.5% #247 · ~10 turnovers+0.9
✗Few second chancesOR% 27.5% #281 · TEM allows 30.3% #177−0.8
✓Gets to the lineFTR 31.2% #276 · TEM allows 35.5% #197 · FT 76.7% #38+0.1
✗Tough shooting lookeFG% 51.6% #165 · TEM allows 50.7% #1370.0

Shot diet

Where each offense shoots from and where each defense lets teams shoot · 2025-26 numbers
C Connecticutoffense vsTempledefense
Share of shots by zone
C Connecticut shoots
Temple allows
D-I average
FG% by zone
ZoneD-I avg
Rim59.0%#16358.5%#16758.5%
Short 2 (≤9 ft)54.1%#239.2%#16039.4%
Mid 2 (10 ft+)36.8%#23139.1%#20538.1%
Three35.8%#6932.8%#10733.7%
Templeoffense vsC Connecticutdefense
Share of shots by zone
Temple shoots
C Connecticut allows
D-I average
FG% by zone
ZoneD-I avg
Rim56.8%#24754.5%#5058.5%
Short 2 (≤9 ft)36.7%#25047.7%#33839.4%
Mid 2 (10 ft+)37.5%#20042.0%#30238.1%
Three33.6%#19433.4%#14633.7%
RimShort 2 (≤9 ft)Mid 2 (10 ft+)Three

Zones from play-by-play shot descriptions; garbage time removed. Bars show the share of field-goal attempts in each zone; where a slice is too thin for its number, the shares are listed under the bar. FG% ranks: #1 = best for that side (most accurate shooting, stingiest defense).

Shot volume

Extra scoring chances from rebounds, turnovers and the foul line · 2025-26 numbers
C Connecticut
−1.2extra scoring chances per game vs a D-I average team#243 of 365
Off reb %
27.5%
#281
Def reb %
69.6%
#179
Turnover %
16.2%
#153
Forced TO %
14.0%
#336
FT rate
31.2%
#276
FT allowed
26.9%
#22
Where the chances come from (per game)
Offensive rebounding−0.9
Defensive rebounding+0.1
Ball security+0.4
Forcing turnovers−1.9
Foul shots drawn−1.0
Foul shots allowed+2.1
Temple
+2.6extra scoring chances per game vs a D-I average team#76 of 365
Off reb %
29.8%
#209
Def reb %
69.7%
#177
Turnover %
13.7%
#18
Forced TO %
15.5%
#247
FT rate
40.6%
#52
FT allowed
35.5%
#197
Where the chances come from (per game)
Offensive rebounding−0.2
Defensive rebounding+0.1
Ball security+2.1
Forcing turnovers−0.8
Foul shots drawn+1.4
Foul shots allowed−0.1

Temple has more extra scoring chances per game: +2.6 (#76 of 365) to C Connecticut’s −1.2 (#243).

Grade = extra shots and foul-line trips per game compared with a D-I average team, built from six season rates. Cell shading is the national rank for each rate (greener = better for that team).

Rotation

C Connecticut2025-26 numbers
#PlayerPosClHtGP-GSMPGPPGRPGAPGTOVeFG%3P%3PA/gFT%Usage
24GJr6'6"3-334.36.77.71.31.340.5%25.0%1.375.0%16.0%
2GJr6'2"3-231.37.32.73.32.337.0%33.3%4.050.0%23.4%
1GJr6'3"3-329.713.34.70.72.341.9%30.0%3.375.0%34.3%
13GSo6'4"3-128.313.34.31.01.358.6%30.8%4.366.7%26.8%
11FJr6'9"3-326.36.73.31.00.740.5%20.0%1.775.0%19.4%
0GSo6'3"3-015.72.03.02.00.750.0%0.0%0.350.0%10.2%
7FJr6'8"3-014.33.70.71.01.035.7%0.0%1.033.3%26.1%
15GJr6'4"2-015.011.51.00.51.095.8%70.0%5.0—30.4%
6GSo6'2"3-16.30.00.00.01.30.0%0.0%0.3—22.0%
23FSo6'9"3-25.70.30.30.30.00.0%0.0%0.750.0%13.7%
3GJr6'1"2-05.00.00.00.00.0——0.0—0.0%
14FJr6'11"1-06.00.01.00.00.0——0.0—0.0%

Team comparison

national rank toned left for away, right for home
C ConnecticutTemple
Efficiency
106.3
110.0
112.3
109.6
66.7
66.7
Shooting
51.6%
50.2%
50.5%
50.0%
35.8%
33.6%
76.7%
74.7%
31.2%
40.6%
Ball control & glass
16.2%
13.7%
14.0%
15.5%
27.5%
29.8%
30.4%
30.3%
9.6%
8.1%
6.5%
11.4%
Style
34.9%
35.7%
42.0%
43.0%
9.6%
11.8%
50.9%
48.2%
29.0%
26.1%
Roster
2.90
3.83
6'4.8"
6'5.2"
35.3%
34.5%

Offseason

roster movement into this season — descriptive, not a model input
C Connecticut
Returning minutes: 35.3%Returning production: 24.6%
Lost
  • Darin Smith Jr. 32.7 mpg, 20.7 ppg · transferred to Rutgers
  • Jay Rodgers 29.2 mpg, 11.0 ppg · transferred to Penn State
  • Max Frazier 28.2 mpg, 12.0 ppg · transferred to Hampton
  • Melo Sanchez 23.9 mpg, 9.2 ppg · transferred to South Dakota
  • Nico Ashley 5.9 mpg, 2.0 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
  • Gabe Spinelli 5.4 mpg, 1.7 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
Added
  • Raphel Laurent new to D1 · 36.0 mpg, 19.0 ppg last season
  • Victor Payne Jr. new to D1 · 23.9 mpg, 6.8 ppg last season
  • Colin Langdon no D1 minutes last season
  • David Smith no D1 minutes last season
  • Rashawn Tibby no D1 minutes last season
  • Jhace Johnson no D1 minutes last season

No incoming D1 transfers are listed on ESPN's roster yet — until they are, returning shares read high.

Returns 35% of last season's minutes; lost 4 of its top 5 (4 transferred). Teams returning under 40% of last season's minutes have historically fallen about 0.8 points of AdjEM (n=716 team-seasons, 2022-2026).

Temple
Returning minutes: 34.5%Returning production: 35.9%
Lost
  • Aiden Tobiason 35.4 mpg, 15.3 ppg · transferred to Syracuse
  • Jordan Mason 33.7 mpg, 11.8 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
  • Babatunde Durodola 19.2 mpg, 4.8 ppg · transferred to Ball State
  • Masiah Gilyard 17.4 mpg, 5.6 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
  • Jamai Felt 12.9 mpg, 3.7 ppg · transferred to Little Rock
  • Ayuba Bryant Jr. 6.8 mpg, 1.5 ppg · transferred to North Florida
Added
  • Dez White from Oregon St · 26.9 mpg, 8.8 ppg last season
  • Baboucarr Njie from UTSA · 24.7 mpg, 9.1 ppg last season
  • Edwin Suarez Jr. from Weber St · 20.9 mpg, 8.9 ppg last season
  • Jordan Marsh from USC · 16.0 mpg, 6.3 ppg last season
  • Christian Beam from Georgia St · 12.7 mpg, 2.6 ppg last season
  • Sir Issac Herron from Louisiana Tech · 10.4 mpg, 3.6 ppg last season

Returns 34% of last season's minutes; lost 3 of its top 5 (2 transferred). Teams returning under 40% of last season's minutes have historically fallen about 0.8 points of AdjEM (n=716 team-seasons, 2022-2026).

Line history

Market line, home spread or game total

Lines by book

BookSpread (home) open → nowTotal open → nowML homeML away
DraftKings-15.5→-14.5-112143.5→144.5o-110 u-110-1350+800
FanDuel-15.5→-14.5-110143.5→144.5o-115 u-105-1600+860
BetMGM-15.5→-14.5-110143.5→144.5o-115 u-105-1400+800
BetRivers-15.5→-14.5-108144.5o-115 u-108-1430+750
Caesars-15→-14.5-110144→144.5o-110 u-110-1400+800
Fanatics-15.5→-14.5-110143→145o-110 u-110-1500+900
BetOnline-15.5→-14.5-110142.5→145.5o-110 u-110——
Bovada-15.5→-14.5-115142.5→145o-110 u-110-1600+800
theScore Bet-15.5→-14.5-110142.5→144.5o-110 u-110-1800+900
Hard Rock-15.5→-14.5-105144.5o-115 u-105-1400+750
Kalshi-15.5+113144.5o-108 u+104-1150+1011
Polymarket——-1329+900
Novig-15.5→-14.5-108143.5→145.5o+104 u-111-1150+1011
open = first-sighted line for this event · now = latest capture

Head-to-head

this season and last
No meetings the last two seasons.

More games on Mon, Nov 2

← Sun, Nov 1 · Tue, Nov 3 → · Full season schedule

The CBB Matchups tab lays out the day's Division I slate: matchup, tip time, records and rank, and — once posted — the market spread and total (the median across books when no market line is up). Three views switch the table between projected scores, pace and totals, and each team's offensive and defensive tendencies. Each game opens into opponent-adjusted possessions, efficiency and four-factor tendencies for both teams, plus recent form, rotation and head-to-head history. Every game also carries our projected score, spread and total, from our line: the same view our bets are made from.

What these numbers mean: line shopping.