CBB Matchups

Every D1 game with tempo-free ratings, four factors and market lines, one place.

College basketball is being built for the 2026-27 season (tip-off Nov 3). What's here fills in as games are played.
Non-conferenceNeutral siteDelta Center, Salt Lake City, UTBad Boy Mowers Series
Ohio State
Efficiency #31
2025-26: 21-13 · 13-9 conf
vs
BYU
Efficiency #26
2025-26: 23-12 · 11-10 conf
Mon, Nov 2 · TBD
78.3
win 47%
Projected
79.1
win 53%
No line posted yet.
Model: BYU −0.8 · total 157.4 · ratings as of Sat, Oct 3
Preseason ratings start from 2025-26's final adjusted ratings, regressed toward the D1 average. The stats below are 2025-26's too; both update once 2026-27 games are played.

How the projection is built

each step, from an average D-I game to this one
Projected total
Average D-I game
148.2
PaceAdjusted tempo: BYU 69.9, Ohio State 67.5 → 69.0 possessions
+1.5
BYU offense vs Ohio State defense
+4.2
Ohio State offense vs BYU defense
+3.4
Projected total
157.4
Axis starts at 140 pointsPoints added or removed at each step
Projected margin
Even game
0.0
BYU offense vs Ohio State defense
+4.2
Ohio State offense vs BYU defense
−3.4
BYU by 0.8
0.8
Ohio State side ◂▸ BYU side

Steps are rounded to one decimal, so they can differ from the total by 0.1: the total steps add to 157.3 against a projected 157.4. The margin is the same build seen from the home side; positive numbers help BYU.

Pace & total

possessions per 40 minutes
Tempo, possessions per 40 minutes

Projected possessions: 69.0, from each team's opponent-adjusted tempo. On raw 2025-26 season pace, BYU is the faster team (70.4, #80 of 365) and Ohio State the slower (66.4, #278). When tempos clash, the slower team usually pulls the pace harder (study weights 0.80 vs 0.66).

Projected possessions
69.0
per team, 40 min
Projected total
157.4
model
Projected team totals
78.3 / 79.1
Ohio State / BYU
Adjusted tempo, vs an average opponent
67.5#253
Ohio State
69.9#57
BYU

How this game plays

what the study found each side's numbers actually do when these two teams meet
AdvantageOhio State
Where Ohio State scores: shooting
Ohio State shoots an effective 56.2% (#19); BYU allows 51.2% (#174). Expect about 54.1%, 2.9 points above an average D1 matchup — worth roughly +4.1 points per 100 possessions.
AdvantageBYU
Where BYU scores: ball control
BYU turns it over on 15.2% of possessions (#80); Ohio State forces turnovers on 15.6% of opponent possessions (#242). Expect about 15.2%, 1.6 points below an average D1 matchup — worth roughly +2.0 points per 100 possessions.
GlassBYU
BYU owns the glass
Projected offensive rebound rate of 33.0% is worth roughly +1.6 points per 100 possessions for BYU's offense.
Ohio State has the ball
OffenseBYU allowsvs D1 avg
56.2% #19
51.2% #174
+4.1 pt/100
15.3% #91
16.4% #196
+1.3 pt/100
30.4% #185
29.6% #145
-0.2 pt/100
37.2% #122
28.9% #42
-0.3 pt/100
77.7% #21
—
+0.5 pt/100
Ohio State net across the four factors + FT%, vs. a D1-average matchup: +5.3 pts/100
BYU has the ball
OffenseOhio State allowsvs D1 avg
54.4% #54
50.2% #114
+1.8 pt/100
15.2% #80
15.6% #242
+2.0 pt/100
34.3% #61
30.0% #160
+1.6 pt/100
34.4% #198
34.7% #170
-0.1 pt/100
74.7% #94
—
+0.2 pt/100
BYU net across the four factors + FT%, vs. a D1-average matchup: +5.5 pts/100

Shot diet

Where each offense shoots from and where each defense lets teams shoot · 2025-26 numbers
Ohio Stateoffense vsBYUdefense
Share of shots by zone
Ohio State shoots
BYU allows
D-I average
FG% by zone
ZoneD-I avg
Rim66.1%#1461.2%#27458.6%
Short 2 (≤9 ft)50.3%#1235.4%#7039.5%
Mid 2 (10 ft+)47.6%#441.0%#27638.0%
Three35.7%#7235.3%#26933.7%
BYUoffense vsOhio Statedefense
Share of shots by zone
BYU shoots
Ohio State allows
D-I average
FG% by zone
ZoneD-I avg
Rim65.4%#1759.8%#22058.6%
Short 2 (≤9 ft)40.5%#16438.4%#14339.5%
Mid 2 (10 ft+)44.0%#2642.7%#32838.0%
Three34.5%#14531.9%#5733.7%
RimShort 2 (≤9 ft)Mid 2 (10 ft+)Three

Zones from play-by-play shot descriptions; garbage time removed. Bars show the share of field-goal attempts in each zone; where a slice is too thin for its number, the shares are listed under the bar. FG% ranks: #1 = best for that side (most accurate shooting, stingiest defense).

Shot volume

Extra scoring chances from rebounds, turnovers and the foul line · 2025-26 numbers
Ohio State
+1.2extra scoring chances per game vs a D-I average team#132 of 365
Off reb %
30.4%
#185
Def reb %
70.0%
#160
Turnover %
15.3%
#91
Forced TO %
15.6%
#242
FT rate
37.2%
#122
FT allowed
34.7%
#170
Where the chances come from (per game)
Offensive rebounding0.0
Defensive rebounding+0.2
Ball security+1.0
Forcing turnovers−0.7
Foul shots drawn+0.6
Foul shots allowed+0.1
BYU
+3.9extra scoring chances per game vs a D-I average team#38 of 365
Off reb %
34.3%
#61
Def reb %
70.4%
#145
Turnover %
15.2%
#80
Forced TO %
16.4%
#196
FT rate
34.4%
#198
FT allowed
28.9%
#42
Where the chances come from (per game)
Offensive rebounding+1.3
Defensive rebounding+0.3
Ball security+1.1
Forcing turnovers−0.2
Foul shots drawn−0.2
Foul shots allowed+1.6

BYU has more extra scoring chances per game: +3.9 (#38 of 365) to Ohio State’s +1.2 (#132).

Grade = extra shots and foul-line trips per game compared with a D-I average team, built from six season rates. Cell shading is the national rank for each rate (greener = better for that team).

Rotation

Ohio State2025-26 numbers
#PlayerPosClHtGP-GSMPGPPGRPGAPGTOVeFG%3P%3PA/gFT%UsageStatus
21Devin RoyalFJr6'6"32-3232.513.75.71.61.752.5%31.6%3.180.2%25.1%
0John Mobley Jr.GSo6'1"31-3131.615.72.42.81.856.7%41.1%7.686.8%28.2%
1Amare BynumFFr6'8"34-2428.59.74.91.11.156.1%30.8%2.772.6%20.2%
4Gabe CuppsGSo6'2"33-012.21.71.11.10.645.6%25.9%0.873.7%11.2%
3Taison ChatmanGSo6'4"28-312.94.31.20.80.859.8%47.1%1.885.0%19.8%
7Ivan NjegovanCSo7'1"30-211.42.63.00.70.658.8%66.7%0.165.5%14.7%
14Brandon NoelFSr6'8"16-1018.96.63.70.91.065.1%20.0%0.973.3%18.3%
6Puff JohnsonGSr6'8"9-111.42.31.10.10.441.7%42.9%0.866.7%15.3%
9Mathieu GrujicicGFr6'6"6-05.51.00.80.30.218.8%14.3%1.242.9%20.7%
55Braylen NashGSo6'4"5-01.60.00.00.20.0——0.0—0.0%
17Josh OjianwunaFSr6'10"0-00.00.00.00.00.0——0.0——
8Myles HerroGFr6'3"0-00.00.00.00.00.0——0.0——
Rosters come from ESPN and are still filling in; incoming transfers and freshmen may be missing.

Tale of the tape

national rank toned left for away, right for home
Ohio StateBYU
Efficiency
117.4
118.2
104.9
104.5
67.5
69.9
—
—
Shooting
56.2%
54.4%
58.0%
56.2%
35.7%
34.5%
77.7%
74.7%
37.2%
34.4%
Ball control & glass
15.3%
15.2%
15.6%
16.4%
30.4%
34.3%
30.0%
29.6%
8.1%
8.9%
8.9%
8.1%
Style
40.1%
39.8%
43.4%
45.4%
8.5%
15.6%
52.6%
45.0%
23.7%
26.2%
Roster
2.19
2.08
6'5.5"
6'5.3"
66.1%
47.4%

Offseason

roster movement into this season — descriptive, not a model input
Ohio State
Returning minutes: 66.1%Returning production: 58.1%
Lost
  • Bruce Thornton 36.6 mpg, 19.9 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
  • Christoph Tilly 24.5 mpg, 10.4 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
  • Colin White 7.5 mpg, 0.7 ppg · transferred to Akron
Added
  • Myles Herro no D1 minutes last season
  • Josh Ojianwuna no D1 minutes last season

No incoming D1 transfers are listed on ESPN's roster yet — until they are, returning shares read high.

Returns 66% of last season's minutes; lost 2 of its top 5. Teams returning at least 65% of last season's minutes have historically gained about 2.2 points of AdjEM (n=156 team-seasons, 2022-2026).

BYU
Returning minutes: 47.4%Returning production: 37.8%
Lost
  • AJ Dybantsa 34.8 mpg, 25.5 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
  • Kennard Davis Jr. 27.0 mpg, 7.7 ppg · transferred to Missouri
  • Richie Saunders 22.3 mpg, 12.9 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
  • Keba Keita 21.3 mpg, 5.9 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
Added
  • Brody Kozlowski no D1 minutes last season
  • KJ Perry no D1 minutes last season
  • Nate Pickens no D1 minutes last season

No incoming D1 transfers are listed on ESPN's roster yet — until they are, returning shares read high.

Returns 47% of last season's minutes; lost 4 of its top 5 (1 transferred).

Head-to-head

this season and last
No meetings the last two seasons.

The CBB Matchups tab lays out the day's Division I slate: matchup, tip time, records and rank, and — once posted — Pinnacle's spread and total (the median across books when Pinnacle has no line). Three views switch the table between projected scores, pace and totals, and each team's offensive and defensive tendencies. Each game opens into opponent-adjusted possessions, efficiency and four-factor tendencies for both teams, plus recent form, rotation and head-to-head history. Every game also carries our projected score, spread and total, built bottom-up from those same numbers: expected possessions times each side's opponent-adjusted points per possession, plus home court.

What these numbers mean: line shopping.