La Salle Explorers vs Houston Cougars basketball final score

Mon, Nov 2 · 9:00 PM ET · Fertitta Center, Houston, TX

Non-conferenceCBSSNFertitta Center, Houston, TX
La Salle
2025-26: 9-23 · 5-14 conf
Efficiency #256
@
10Houston
2025-26: 30-7 · 16-5 conf
Efficiency #6
Final
5594
Final score
Projected 54.4 – 85.6
LAS win 0%HOU win 100%
MarketClose
Spread
HOU −29.5
open HOU −28.5
Total
134.5
open 140.0
Our line
HOU −31.1
as of Mon, Nov 2 · 8:51 PM ET

Our play

How our line is built

each step, from an even game to our line
Spread
Even game
0.0
Houstonrated 24.0 above average
+24.0
La Sallerated 3.7 below average
+3.7
Home court
+3.5
Our line
HOU −31.1
◂ La Salle sideHouston side ▸

Steps are rounded to one decimal, so they can differ from the line by 0.1. The spread is seen from the home side: a plus moves it toward Houston. Our total joins once both teams have played 3 games.

Pace & total

possessions per 40 minutes
Tempo, possessions per 40 minutes

Projected possessions: 64.5, from each team's opponent-adjusted tempo. On raw 2025-26 season pace, La Salle is the faster team (66.4, #280 of 365) and Houston the slower (64.8, #333). When tempos clash, the slower team usually pulls the pace harder (weights 0.80 vs 0.66).

Projected possessions
64.5
per team, 40 min
Market total
134.5
Market close · open 140.0
Adjusted tempo, vs an average opponent
67.3#270
La Salle
65.5#355
Houston

How this game plays

points this game from the four factors, vs an average D-I matchup
Our line
HOU −31.1
Four factors 12.2Not in these stats 18.9
From the four factors
Houston has the ball+5.3
La Salle has the ball−6.8
Houston has the ball
✓Shoots it welleFG% 51.9% #150 · LAS allows 55.0% #329+2.1
✓Wins second chancesOR% 35.7% #32 · LAS allows 32.4% #274+1.8
✓Takes care of the ballTO% 12.8% #3 · LAS forces 17.1% #137 · ~10 turnovers+1.7
✗Few trips to the lineFTR 26.3% #355 · LAS allows 31.5% #97 · FT 77.3% #28−0.2
La Salle has the ball
✗Tough shooting lookeFG% 45.4% #357 · HOU allows 46.2% #12−5.5
✗Coughs it upTO% 18.2% #284 · HOU forces 20.6% #14 · ~13 turnovers−2.5
✓Wins second chancesOR% 33.7% #75 · HOU allows 30.3% #173+0.9
✓Gets to the lineFTR 37.5% #113 · HOU allows 38.7% #277 · FT 72.5% #189+0.3

Shot diet

Where each offense shoots from and where each defense lets teams shoot · 2025-26 numbers
La Salleoffense vs#10Houstondefense
Share of shots by zone
La Salle shoots
Houston allows
D-I average
FG% by zone
ZoneD-I avg
Rim52.4%#34656.6%#10458.5%
Short 2 (≤9 ft)33.9%#30535.9%#9039.4%
Mid 2 (10 ft+)36.7%#24229.8%#638.1%
Three30.0%#34231.6%#4933.7%
#10Houstonoffense vsLa Salledefense
Share of shots by zone
Houston shoots
La Salle allows
D-I average
FG% by zone
ZoneD-I avg
Rim67.4%#661.1%#27158.5%
Short 2 (≤9 ft)40.9%#14942.0%#23139.4%
Mid 2 (10 ft+)39.1%#14340.1%#24638.1%
Three34.7%#13436.5%#32433.7%
RimShort 2 (≤9 ft)Mid 2 (10 ft+)Three

Zones from play-by-play shot descriptions; garbage time removed. Bars show the share of field-goal attempts in each zone; where a slice is too thin for its number, the shares are listed under the bar. FG% ranks: #1 = best for that side (most accurate shooting, stingiest defense).

Shot volume

Extra scoring chances from rebounds, turnovers and the foul line · 2025-26 numbers
La Salle
+1.4extra scoring chances per game vs a D-I average team#122 of 365
Off reb %
33.7%
#75
Def reb %
67.6%
#274
Turnover %
18.2%
#284
Forced TO %
17.1%
#137
FT rate
37.5%
#113
FT allowed
31.5%
#97
Where the chances come from (per game)
Offensive rebounding+1.1
Defensive rebounding−0.6
Ball security−1.0
Forcing turnovers+0.3
Foul shots drawn+0.6
Foul shots allowed+1.0
#10Houston
+4.1extra scoring chances per game vs a D-I average team#37 of 365
Off reb %
35.7%
#32
Def reb %
69.7%
#173
Turnover %
12.8%
#3
Forced TO %
20.6%
#14
FT rate
26.3%
#355
FT allowed
38.7%
#277
Where the chances come from (per game)
Offensive rebounding+1.7
Defensive rebounding+0.1
Ball security+2.7
Forcing turnovers+2.7
Foul shots drawn−2.2
Foul shots allowed−0.9

Houston has more extra scoring chances per game: +4.1 (#37 of 365) to La Salle’s +1.4 (#122).

Grade = extra shots and foul-line trips per game compared with a D-I average team, built from six season rates. Cell shading is the national rank for each rate (greener = better for that team).

Rotation

La Salle2025-26 numbers
#PlayerPosClHtGP-GSMPGPPGRPGAPGTOVeFG%3P%3PA/gFT%Usage
5FSr6'7"2-227.512.51.52.01.575.0%55.6%4.5100.0%18.5%
10GJr6'2"2-226.53.00.53.51.510.0%0.0%1.066.7%16.1%
0GSr6'3"2-226.513.03.00.01.050.0%35.0%10.083.3%26.1%
4GSo6'4"2-021.012.51.51.52.052.6%33.3%6.0100.0%32.2%
2GJr6'6"2-217.59.54.53.54.043.3%25.0%2.075.0%41.9%
7FSr6'9"2-216.56.03.50.51.050.0%—0.057.1%21.9%
25FSr7'0"2-015.05.07.51.01.042.9%—0.044.4%23.6%
8GSr6'3"2-015.04.01.00.51.033.3%33.3%3.0100.0%21.2%
3GFr5'9"2-013.51.51.53.01.510.0%0.0%3.550.0%27.6%
11FSr6'8"2-011.54.02.00.50.550.0%28.6%3.5—20.8%
12FJr6'11"2-08.50.51.50.00.00.0%—0.050.0%9.2%
21GFr6'7"1-02.00.01.00.00.0——0.0—0.0%

Team comparison

national rank toned left for away, right for home
La Salle#10Houston
Efficiency
104.9
117.4
109.7
96.2
67.3
65.5
Shooting
45.4%
51.9%
45.6%
51.7%
30.0%
34.7%
72.5%
77.3%
37.5%
26.3%
Ball control & glass
18.2%
12.8%
17.1%
20.6%
33.7%
35.7%
32.4%
30.3%
10.1%
6.9%
12.2%
6.4%
Style
31.5%
40.7%
46.1%
37.3%
11.4%
10.4%
56.0%
52.6%
34.8%
29.6%
Roster
3.51
3.65
6'6.2"
6'5.3"
33.1%
23.4%

Offseason

roster movement into this season — descriptive, not a model input
La Salle
Returning minutes: 33.1%Returning production: 37.5%
Lost
  • Ashton Walker 27.6 mpg, 8.2 ppg · transferred to Monmouth
  • Jaeden Marshall 21.7 mpg, 9.3 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
  • Truth Harris 17.2 mpg, 4.7 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
  • Josiah Harris 16.7 mpg, 7.1 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
  • Eric Acker 15.4 mpg, 4.8 ppg · transferred to N Kentucky
  • Edwin Daniel 14.0 mpg, 3.8 ppg · transferred to SF Austin
Added
  • Jamison Lynam new to D1 · 31.0 mpg, 16.0 ppg last season
  • Vice Zanki from Niagara · 20.3 mpg, 7.8 ppg last season
  • Kam Burton from SF Austin · 18.6 mpg, 7.9 ppg last season
  • Anthony Finkley from Saint Joseph's · 18.5 mpg, 5.3 ppg last season
  • Eunique Rink from Hampton · 11.0 mpg, 1.8 ppg last season
  • Devin Booker from George Mason · 6.3 mpg, 1.4 ppg last season

Returns 33% of last season's minutes; lost 3 of its top 5 (1 transferred). Teams returning under 40% of last season's minutes have historically fallen about 0.8 points of AdjEM (n=716 team-seasons, 2022-2026).

#10Houston
Returning minutes: 23.4%Returning production: 25.7%
Lost
  • Milos Uzan 33.0 mpg, 11.1 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
  • Kingston Flemings 31.6 mpg, 16.1 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
  • Emanuel Sharp 29.4 mpg, 15.5 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
  • Chris Cenac Jr. 24.9 mpg, 9.5 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
  • Isiah Harwell 11.9 mpg, 3.1 ppg · transferred to Gonzaga
  • Kalifa Sakho 11.8 mpg, 2.2 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
Added
  • Corey Hadnot II from Purdue FW · 33.2 mpg, 20.4 ppg last season
  • Delrecco Gillespie from Kent State · 32.2 mpg, 17.7 ppg last season
  • Braden East from Lamar · 23.1 mpg, 12.4 ppg last season
  • Chendall Weaver from Texas · 20.9 mpg, 5.8 ppg last season
  • Dedan Thomas Jr. from LSU · 14.7 mpg, 7.6 ppg last season
  • Tyus Thomas no D1 minutes last season

Returns 23% of last season's minutes; lost 4 of its top 5. Teams returning under 40% of last season's minutes have historically fallen about 0.8 points of AdjEM (n=716 team-seasons, 2022-2026).

Line history

Market line, home spread or game total

Lines by book

BookSpread (home) open → nowTotal open → nowML homeML away
DraftKings-27.5→-29.5-110140.5→134.5o-108 u-112——
FanDuel-28.5→-29.5-110139.5→134.5o-115 u-105——
BetMGM-29.5-110139.5→134.5o-110 u-110—+3300
BetRivers-28.5→-30.5-110140.5→135.5o-110 u-113——
Caesars-27.5→-29.5-110141→133o-110 u-110——
Fanatics-28.5→-29.5-115140→135o-110 u-110——
BetOnline-28.5→-29.5-107140→134.5o-110 u-110——
Bovada-29.5-115139.5→134.5o-115 u-105—+3500
theScore Bet-29.5-110139.5→134.5o-110 u-110——
Hard Rock-27.5→-30.5-110140.5→135.5o-110 u-110——
Kalshi-30.5+104135.5o+113 u-122—+4900
Polymarket————
Novig-27.5→-29.5-106140.5→134.5o+100 u-106——
open = first-sighted line for this event · now = latest capture

Head-to-head

this season and last
No meetings the last two seasons.

More games on Mon, Nov 2

← Sun, Nov 1 · Tue, Nov 3 → · Full season schedule

The CBB Matchups tab lays out the day's Division I slate: matchup, tip time, records and rank, and — once posted — the market spread and total (the median across books when no market line is up). Three views switch the table between projected scores, pace and totals, and each team's offensive and defensive tendencies. Each game opens into opponent-adjusted possessions, efficiency and four-factor tendencies for both teams, plus recent form, rotation and head-to-head history. Every game also carries our projected score, spread and total, from our line: the same view our bets are made from.

What these numbers mean: line shopping.