CBB Matchups

Every D1 game with tempo-free ratings, four factors and market lines, one place.

College basketball is being built for the 2026-27 season (tip-off Nov 3). What's here fills in as games are played.
Non-conferenceKnights Hall, Louisville, KY
E Illinois
Efficiency #317
2025-26: 13-20 · 9-13 conf
@
Bellarmine
Efficiency #281
2025-26: 13-19 · 8-12 conf
Sat, Dec 5 · TBD
71.1
win 31%
Projected
76.7
win 69%
No line posted yet.
Model: BELL −5.6 · total 147.8 · ratings as of Sat, Oct 3
Preseason ratings start from 2025-26's final adjusted ratings, regressed toward the D1 average. The stats below are 2025-26's too; both update once 2026-27 games are played.

How the projection is built

each step, from an average D-I game to this one
Projected total
Average D-I game
148.2
PaceAdjusted tempo: Bellarmine 66.5, E Illinois 67.2 → 65.4 possessions
−6.4
Bellarmine offense vs E Illinois defense
+3.9
E Illinois offense vs Bellarmine defense
+2.1
Projected total
147.8
Axis starts at 135 pointsPoints added or removed at each step
Projected margin
Even game
0.0
Bellarmine offense vs E Illinois defense
+3.9
E Illinois offense vs Bellarmine defense
−2.1
Home court+2.9 points per 100 possessions to the home offense, −2.9 to the visitors
+3.8
Bellarmine by 5.6
5.6
E Illinois side ◂▸ Bellarmine side

Steps are rounded to one decimal, so they can differ from the total by 0.1. The margin is the same build seen from the home side; positive numbers help Bellarmine.

Pace & total

possessions per 40 minutes
Tempo, possessions per 40 minutes

Projected possessions: 65.4, from each team's opponent-adjusted tempo. On raw 2025-26 season pace, E Illinois is the faster team (66.2, #286 of 365) and Bellarmine the slower (66.2, #287). When tempos clash, the slower team usually pulls the pace harder (study weights 0.80 vs 0.66).

Projected possessions
65.4
per team, 40 min
Projected total
147.8
model
Projected team totals
71.1 / 76.7
E Illinois / Bellarmine
Adjusted tempo, vs an average opponent
67.2#277
E Illinois
66.5#319
Bellarmine

How this game plays

what the study found each side's numbers actually do when these two teams meet
AdvantageBellarmine
Where Bellarmine scores: shooting
Bellarmine shoots an effective 59.4% (#3); E Illinois allows 50.8% (#146). Expect about 55.7%, 4.5 points above an average D1 matchup — worth roughly +6.4 points per 100 possessions.
Pace
Half-court grind
Bellarmine averages 66.2 possessions per 40, E Illinois 66.2. Slower teams pull the pace toward themselves more than fast teams push it (0.80 vs 0.66 in five seasons of games), so expect about 65 — more possessions mean more points in the total and more chances for the better team to separate.
Watch for noise
3-point caution
A notable season 3-point number here (Bellarmine, Bellarmine's defense, E Illinois's defense) is close to a coin flip going forward — the study's model of next-game 3P% barely beats guessing the D1 average. Shot volume is what actually carries: expect E Illinois at about 38.9% of its shots from three, Bellarmine about 41.9%.
GlassBellarmine
Bellarmine gets out-rebounded
Projected offensive rebound rate of 27.2% is worth roughly -2.0 points per 100 possessions against Bellarmine's offense.
ClashBellarmine
Strength vs strength: 3-point shooting
Bellarmine (#17 in 3-point shooting) against E Illinois (#50 in the same stat allowed) — both rank inside the national top 60. Expect about 34.5%. Historically Bellarmine's own number has carried a bit more weight in that exchange (0.25 vs 0.16).
ClashE Illinois
Style clash: 3-point volume
E Illinois rarely shoots threes (29.9% of its shots); Bellarmine lets opponents take 50.5% of their shots from three (D1 average 39.5%). Expect about 38.9% — the offense's habit usually carries a bit more weight (0.80 vs 0.64).
E Illinois has the ball
OffenseBellarmine allowsvs D1 avg
45.7% #353
59.4% #365
+1.3 pt/100
18.6% #303
15.0% #287
+0.1 pt/100
28.2% #256
34.2% #320
+0.2 pt/100
33.5% #224
34.3% #157
-0.1 pt/100
74.4% #107
—
+0.2 pt/100
E Illinois net across the four factors + FT%, vs. a D1-average matchup: +1.6 pts/100
Bellarmine has the ball
OffenseE Illinois allowsvs D1 avg
59.4% #3
50.8% #146
+6.4 pt/100
15.5% #104
19.3% #39
-1.1 pt/100
22.4% #354
35.2% #343
-2.0 pt/100
35.0% #178
35.3% #187
+0.0 pt/100
78.8% #7
—
+0.6 pt/100
Bellarmine net across the four factors + FT%, vs. a D1-average matchup: +3.9 pts/100

Shot diet

Where each offense shoots from and where each defense lets teams shoot · 2025-26 numbers
E Illinoisoffense vsBellarminedefense
Share of shots by zone
E Illinois shoots
Bellarmine allows
D-I average
FG% by zone
ZoneD-I avg
Rim53.1%#33967.7%#36358.6%
Short 2 (≤9 ft)31.8%#33435.6%#7939.5%
Mid 2 (10 ft+)33.5%#32339.5%#22138.0%
Three31.7%#29240.4%#36433.7%
Bellarmineoffense vsE Illinoisdefense
Share of shots by zone
Bellarmine shoots
E Illinois allows
D-I average
FG% by zone
ZoneD-I avg
Rim66.7%#960.7%#25758.6%
Short 2 (≤9 ft)41.4%#13737.0%#11139.5%
Mid 2 (10 ft+)36.8%#23433.5%#3738.0%
Three38.1%#1731.7%#5033.7%
RimShort 2 (≤9 ft)Mid 2 (10 ft+)Three

Zones from play-by-play shot descriptions; garbage time removed. Bars show the share of field-goal attempts in each zone; where a slice is too thin for its number, the shares are listed under the bar. FG% ranks: #1 = best for that side (most accurate shooting, stingiest defense).

Shot volume

Extra scoring chances from rebounds, turnovers and the foul line · 2025-26 numbers
E Illinois
−2.0extra scoring chances per game vs a D-I average team#271 of 365
Off reb %
28.2%
#256
Def reb %
64.8%
#343
Turnover %
18.6%
#303
Forced TO %
19.3%
#39
FT rate
33.5%
#224
FT allowed
35.3%
#187
Where the chances come from (per game)
Offensive rebounding−0.7
Defensive rebounding−1.5
Ball security−1.2
Forcing turnovers+1.8
Foul shots drawn−0.4
Foul shots allowed0.0
Bellarmine
−3.7extra scoring chances per game vs a D-I average team#324 of 365
Off reb %
22.4%
#354
Def reb %
65.8%
#320
Turnover %
15.5%
#104
Forced TO %
15.0%
#287
FT rate
35.0%
#178
FT allowed
34.3%
#157
Where the chances come from (per game)
Offensive rebounding−2.6
Defensive rebounding−1.2
Ball security+0.9
Forcing turnovers−1.1
Foul shots drawn0.0
Foul shots allowed+0.3

E Illinois has more extra scoring chances per game: −2.0 (#271 of 365) to Bellarmine’s −3.7 (#324).

Grade = extra shots and foul-line trips per game compared with a D-I average team, built from six season rates. Cell shading is the national rank for each rate (greener = better for that team).

Rotation

E Illinois2025-26 numbers
ESPN hasn't posted E Illinois's 2026-27 roster yet — these are last season's players.
#PlayerPosClHtGP-GSMPGPPGRPGAPGTOVeFG%3P%3PA/gFT%UsageStatus
40Kooper JacobiFSr6'7"33-3233.311.16.41.81.244.8%24.0%3.052.2%23.9%
3Meechie WhiteGJr6'1"33-3330.410.53.73.11.849.8%38.0%2.885.7%22.2%
5Zion FrusterGSr6'2"30-2231.714.53.22.31.945.1%30.3%3.381.4%31.3%
24Terry McMorrisFSo6'7"33-2426.17.65.81.51.646.1%16.7%0.475.7%19.9%
10Preston TurnerGJr6'6"31-920.87.71.70.91.559.5%44.8%3.181.5%21.7%
13Nazareth FisherFSr6'10"29-2615.24.14.10.41.155.3%—0.068.4%18.2%
1Markus BlackwellGFr6'2"23-016.64.71.10.91.047.4%43.6%1.777.8%20.2%
4Andre WashingtonGSr5'11"14-1224.110.51.91.11.046.7%28.6%3.570.0%29.0%
7Prince JohnsonFJr6'8"31-210.82.02.40.10.248.8%—0.068.8%11.0%
11Malik OlafioyeGSo6'2"20-216.43.91.91.31.539.6%15.0%1.064.0%21.5%
15Andrew AustinFSo6'7"24-311.42.40.80.90.641.7%21.7%1.961.5%17.6%
2JT ElderGJr6'7"1-017.08.00.00.01.066.7%50.0%4.0—24.6%
6Kyle LaytonGJr6'0"0-00.00.00.00.00.0——0.0——
23Shane SimsGFr6'4"0-00.00.00.00.00.0——0.0——
Rosters come from ESPN and are still filling in; incoming transfers and freshmen may be missing.

Tale of the tape

national rank toned left for away, right for home
E IllinoisBellarmine
Efficiency
100.7
113.2
109.7
119.4
67.2
66.5
—
—
Shooting
45.7%
59.4%
44.9%
61.0%
31.7%
38.1%
74.4%
78.8%
33.5%
35.0%
Ball control & glass
18.6%
15.5%
19.3%
15.0%
28.2%
22.4%
35.2%
34.2%
9.5%
9.1%
11.7%
9.1%
Style
29.9%
41.2%
44.3%
47.0%
18.7%
9.2%
48.7%
53.4%
32.6%
28.4%
Roster
3.09
2.70
6'4.6"
6'5.8"
—
93.7%

Offseason

roster movement into this season — descriptive, not a model input
E Illinois
Returning minutes: 100.0%Returning production: 100.0%
ESPN hasn't posted E Illinois's roster for this season yet — no movement to show.

Returns 100% of last season's minutes. Teams returning at least 65% of last season's minutes have historically gained about 2.2 points of AdjEM (n=156 team-seasons, 2022-2026). (ESPN hasn't posted this season's roster yet -- this may still be last season's list.)

Bellarmine
Returning minutes: 93.7%Returning production: 94.6%
Lost
  • Michael Wilson Jr. 12.7 mpg, 5.3 ppg · transferred to Canisius
Added
  • Ant McAfee no D1 minutes last season

No incoming D1 transfers are listed on ESPN's roster yet — until they are, returning shares read high.

Returns 94% of last season's minutes. Teams returning at least 65% of last season's minutes have historically gained about 2.2 points of AdjEM (n=156 team-seasons, 2022-2026).

Head-to-head

this season and last
No meetings the last two seasons.

The CBB Matchups tab lays out the day's Division I slate: matchup, tip time, records and rank, and — once posted — Pinnacle's spread and total (the median across books when Pinnacle has no line). Three views switch the table between projected scores, pace and totals, and each team's offensive and defensive tendencies. Each game opens into opponent-adjusted possessions, efficiency and four-factor tendencies for both teams, plus recent form, rotation and head-to-head history. Every game also carries our projected score, spread and total, built bottom-up from those same numbers: expected possessions times each side's opponent-adjusted points per possession, plus home court.

What these numbers mean: line shopping.