CBB Matchups

Every D1 game with tempo-free ratings, four factors and market lines, one place.

College basketball is being built for the 2026-27 season (tip-off Nov 3). What's here fills in as games are played.
Non-conferenceMemorial Hall (DE), Dover, DE
UMBC
Efficiency #147
2025-26: 24-9 · 17-2 conf
@
Delaware St
Efficiency #358
2025-26: 8-23 · 3-13 conf
Sat, Dec 5 · TBD
72.0
win 75%
Projected
64.2
win 25%
No line posted yet.
Model: UMBC −7.8 · total 136.2 · ratings as of Sat, Oct 3
Preseason ratings start from 2025-26's final adjusted ratings, regressed toward the D1 average. The stats below are 2025-26's too; both update once 2026-27 games are played.

How the projection is built

each step, from an average D-I game to this one
Projected total
Average D-I game
148.2
PaceAdjusted tempo: Delaware St 67.1, UMBC 67.5 → 66.2 possessions
−4.5
Delaware St offense vs UMBC defense
−9.6
UMBC offense vs Delaware St defense
+2.0
Projected total
136.2
Axis starts at 120 pointsPoints added or removed at each step
Projected margin
Even game
0.0
Delaware St offense vs UMBC defense
−9.6
UMBC offense vs Delaware St defense
−2.0
Home court+2.9 points per 100 possessions to the home offense, −2.9 to the visitors
+3.8
UMBC by 7.8
7.8
UMBC side ◂▸ Delaware St side

Steps are rounded to one decimal, so they can differ from the total by 0.1: the total steps add to 136.1 against a projected 136.2. The margin is the same build seen from the home side; positive numbers help Delaware St.

Pace & total

possessions per 40 minutes
Tempo, possessions per 40 minutes

Projected possessions: 66.2, from each team's opponent-adjusted tempo. On raw 2025-26 season pace, UMBC is the faster team (66.5, #267 of 365) and Delaware St the slower (66.1, #293). When tempos clash, the slower team usually pulls the pace harder (study weights 0.80 vs 0.66).

Projected possessions
66.2
per team, 40 min
Projected total
136.2
model
Projected team totals
72.0 / 64.2
UMBC / Delaware St
Adjusted tempo, vs an average opponent
67.5#252
UMBC
67.1#279
Delaware St

How this game plays

what the study found each side's numbers actually do when these two teams meet
AdvantageDelaware St
Where Delaware St struggles: shooting
Delaware St shoots an effective 42.9% (#364); UMBC allows 49.4% (#79). Expect about 45.5%, 5.8 points below an average D1 matchup — worth roughly -8.3 points per 100 possessions.
AdvantageUMBC
Where UMBC scores: shooting
UMBC shoots an effective 54.1% (#64); Delaware St allows 52.9% (#265). Expect about 53.8%, 2.5 points above an average D1 matchup — worth roughly +3.5 points per 100 possessions.
ClashDelaware St
Style match: ball movement
Delaware St creates off the dribble (assists on 45.8% of its baskets); UMBC breaks up passing offenses (assists on 43.0% allowed) (D1 average 52.4%). Expect about 42.0% — both habits push the same way.
Pace
Half-court grind
Delaware St averages 66.1 possessions per 40, UMBC 66.5. Slower teams pull the pace toward themselves more than fast teams push it (0.80 vs 0.66 in five seasons of games), so expect about 65 — more possessions mean more points in the total and more chances for the better team to separate.
GlassDelaware St
Delaware St gets out-rebounded
Projected offensive rebound rate of 26.3% is worth roughly -2.5 points per 100 possessions against Delaware St's offense.
Watch for noise
3-point caution
A notable season 3-point number here (Delaware St) is close to a coin flip going forward — the study's model of next-game 3P% barely beats guessing the D1 average. Shot volume is what actually carries: expect UMBC at about 35.9% of its shots from three, Delaware St about 29.8%.
UMBC has the ball
OffenseDelaware St allowsvs D1 avg
54.1% #64
52.9% #265
+3.5 pt/100
14.0% #25
19.5% #33
-0.2 pt/100
24.9% #342
32.0% #257
-1.9 pt/100
34.1% #205
40.5% #307
+0.3 pt/100
76.0% #54
—
+0.3 pt/100
UMBC net across the four factors + FT%, vs. a D1-average matchup: +2.1 pts/100
Delaware St has the ball
OffenseUMBC allowsvs D1 avg
42.9% #364
49.4% #79
-8.3 pt/100
19.9% #347
15.1% #285
-0.8 pt/100
27.7% #277
25.8% #18
-2.5 pt/100
34.1% #204
25.7% #10
-0.7 pt/100
68.9% #301
—
-0.3 pt/100
Delaware St net across the four factors + FT%, vs. a D1-average matchup: -12.7 pts/100

Shot diet

Where each offense shoots from and where each defense lets teams shoot · 2025-26 numbers
UMBCoffense vsDelaware Stdefense
Share of shots by zone
UMBC shoots
Delaware St allows
D-I average
FG% by zone
ZoneD-I avg
Rim60.8%#10063.0%#32558.6%
Short 2 (≤9 ft)47.8%#2535.4%#7139.5%
Mid 2 (10 ft+)38.5%#17132.4%#1938.0%
Three36.1%#5533.0%#12333.7%
Delaware Stoffense vsUMBCdefense
Share of shots by zone
Delaware St shoots
UMBC allows
D-I average
FG% by zone
ZoneD-I avg
Rim50.7%#35554.5%#5058.6%
Short 2 (≤9 ft)32.0%#33239.5%#17539.5%
Mid 2 (10 ft+)35.5%#27536.5%#12138.0%
Three28.4%#36132.7%#9833.7%
RimShort 2 (≤9 ft)Mid 2 (10 ft+)Three

Zones from play-by-play shot descriptions; garbage time removed. Bars show the share of field-goal attempts in each zone; where a slice is too thin for its number, the shares are listed under the bar. FG% ranks: #1 = best for that side (most accurate shooting, stingiest defense).

Shot volume

Extra scoring chances from rebounds, turnovers and the foul line · 2025-26 numbers
UMBC
+2.7extra scoring chances per game vs a D-I average team#64 of 365
Off reb %
24.9%
#342
Def reb %
74.2%
#18
Turnover %
14.0%
#25
Forced TO %
15.1%
#285
FT rate
34.1%
#205
FT allowed
25.7%
#10
Where the chances come from (per game)
Offensive rebounding−1.8
Defensive rebounding+1.5
Ball security+1.9
Forcing turnovers−1.1
Foul shots drawn−0.2
Foul shots allowed+2.4
Delaware St
−3.1extra scoring chances per game vs a D-I average team#306 of 365
Off reb %
27.7%
#277
Def reb %
68.0%
#257
Turnover %
19.9%
#347
Forced TO %
19.5%
#33
FT rate
34.1%
#204
FT allowed
40.5%
#307
Where the chances come from (per game)
Offensive rebounding−0.9
Defensive rebounding−0.4
Ball security−2.1
Forcing turnovers+1.9
Foul shots drawn−0.2
Foul shots allowed−1.4

UMBC has more extra scoring chances per game: +2.7 (#64 of 365) to Delaware St’s −3.1 (#306).

Grade = extra shots and foul-line trips per game compared with a D-I average team, built from six season rates. Cell shading is the national rank for each rate (greener = better for that team).

Rotation

UMBC2025-26 numbers
#PlayerPosClHtGP-GSMPGPPGRPGAPGTOVeFG%3P%3PA/gFT%UsageStatus
1Ace ValentineGJr6'3"32-3232.711.94.13.91.358.6%38.1%3.577.0%20.2%
4Jah'Likai KingGJr6'2"32-3232.214.03.31.51.448.3%32.2%4.782.5%27.1%
11Caden DiggsFSo6'8"32-222.810.03.80.91.353.4%35.6%2.375.8%26.7%
2Josh OdunowoFSr6'6"30-2823.08.45.20.91.053.2%—0.073.7%21.6%
14Jose Roberto TanchynFJr6'10"32-1719.26.55.70.80.855.7%35.7%2.264.9%20.5%
23Riley JacobsFFr6'8"32-1615.54.33.80.70.848.6%0.0%0.455.9%19.4%
21Cougar DowningGSr6'2"31-012.53.90.90.60.355.7%37.8%2.481.3%17.3%
5Daylon DickersonFJr6'6"21-414.05.63.31.31.059.4%25.0%0.474.5%22.1%
10Paul GreeneFSr6'6"20-17.41.92.30.20.645.5%—0.060.0%20.6%
7Tim EzeFSo6'7"15-05.61.81.10.10.345.8%0.0%0.362.5%22.1%
12Jake StoutFSo6'7"10-03.51.30.30.20.150.0%25.0%0.8100.0%21.7%
13Devin CeaserGSr6'1"3-07.74.31.00.31.754.2%37.5%2.7—42.3%
30Saahil ThakkarGFr6'1"5-02.00.60.20.00.237.5%25.0%0.8—27.6%
0Regimantas CiunysFSr6'6"0-00.00.00.00.00.0——0.0——
Rosters come from ESPN and are still filling in; incoming transfers and freshmen may be missing.

Tale of the tape

national rank toned left for away, right for home
UMBCDelaware St
Efficiency
109.3
94.5
108.0
110.7
67.5
67.1
—
—
Shooting
54.1%
42.9%
54.1%
43.1%
36.1%
28.4%
76.0%
68.9%
34.1%
34.1%
Ball control & glass
14.0%
19.9%
15.1%
19.5%
24.9%
27.7%
25.8%
32.0%
7.8%
9.7%
6.4%
11.0%
Style
38.8%
28.9%
44.0%
41.6%
12.7%
17.6%
44.8%
45.8%
29.7%
35.2%
Roster
2.89
3.20
6'5.3"
6'4.6"
83.9%
—

Offseason

roster movement into this season — descriptive, not a model input
UMBC
Returning minutes: 83.9%Returning production: 82.9%
Lost
  • DJ Armstrong Jr. 32.4 mpg, 13.3 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
Added
  • Regimantas Ciunys no D1 minutes last season

No incoming D1 transfers are listed on ESPN's roster yet — until they are, returning shares read high.

Returns 84% of last season's minutes; lost 1 of its top 5. Teams returning at least 65% of last season's minutes have historically gained about 2.2 points of AdjEM (n=156 team-seasons, 2022-2026).

Delaware St
Returning minutes: 100.0%Returning production: 100.0%
ESPN hasn't posted Delaware St's roster for this season yet — no movement to show.

Returns 100% of last season's minutes. Teams returning at least 65% of last season's minutes have historically gained about 2.2 points of AdjEM (n=156 team-seasons, 2022-2026). (ESPN hasn't posted this season's roster yet -- this may still be last season's list.)

Head-to-head

this season and last
DateSeasonResult
Sat, Nov 292025-26Delaware St 57 – 71 UMBC

The CBB Matchups tab lays out the day's Division I slate: matchup, tip time, records and rank, and — once posted — Pinnacle's spread and total (the median across books when Pinnacle has no line). Three views switch the table between projected scores, pace and totals, and each team's offensive and defensive tendencies. Each game opens into opponent-adjusted possessions, efficiency and four-factor tendencies for both teams, plus recent form, rotation and head-to-head history. Every game also carries our projected score, spread and total, built bottom-up from those same numbers: expected possessions times each side's opponent-adjusted points per possession, plus home court.

What these numbers mean: line shopping.