CBB Matchups

Every D1 game with tempo-free ratings, four factors and market lines, one place.

College basketball is being built for the 2026-27 season (tip-off Nov 3). What's here fills in as games are played.
Non-conferenceCU Events Center, Boulder, CO
Colorado St
Efficiency #88
2025-26: 21-13 · 12-10 conf
@
Colorado
Efficiency #91
2025-26: 17-16 · 7-12 conf
Sat, Dec 5 · TBD
74.1
win 37%
Projected
77.9
win 63%
No line posted yet.
Model: COLO −3.8 · total 152.0 · ratings as of Sat, Oct 3
Preseason ratings start from 2025-26's final adjusted ratings, regressed toward the D1 average. The stats below are 2025-26's too; both update once 2026-27 games are played.

How the projection is built

each step, from an average D-I game to this one
Projected total
Average D-I game
148.2
PaceAdjusted tempo: Colorado 69.3, Colorado St 65.5 → 66.4 possessions
−4.1
Colorado offense vs Colorado St defense
+3.9
Colorado St offense vs Colorado defense
+3.9
Projected total
152.0
Axis starts at 140 pointsPoints added or removed at each step
Projected margin
Even game
0.0
Colorado offense vs Colorado St defense
+3.9
Colorado St offense vs Colorado defense
−3.9
Home court+2.9 points per 100 possessions to the home offense, −2.9 to the visitors
+3.8
Colorado by 3.8
3.8
Colorado St side ◂▸ Colorado side

Steps are rounded to one decimal, so they can differ from the total by 0.1: the total steps add to 151.9 against a projected 152.0. The margin is the same build seen from the home side; positive numbers help Colorado.

Pace & total

possessions per 40 minutes
Tempo, possessions per 40 minutes

Projected possessions: 66.4, from each team's opponent-adjusted tempo. On raw 2025-26 season pace, Colorado is the faster team (70.2, #87 of 365) and Colorado St the slower (64.4, #345). When tempos clash, the slower team usually pulls the pace harder (study weights 0.80 vs 0.66).

Projected possessions
66.4
per team, 40 min
Projected total
152.0
model
Projected team totals
74.1 / 77.9
Colorado St / Colorado
Adjusted tempo, vs an average opponent
65.5#358
Colorado St
69.3#102
Colorado

How this game plays

what the study found each side's numbers actually do when these two teams meet
AdvantageColorado St
Where Colorado St scores: shooting
Colorado St shoots an effective 57.5% (#12); Colorado allows 52.6% (#243). Expect about 55.5%, 4.2 points above an average D1 matchup — worth roughly +6.0 points per 100 possessions.
Pace
Tempo tug-of-war
Colorado averages 70.2 possessions per 40, Colorado St 64.4. Slower teams pull the pace toward themselves more than fast teams push it (0.80 vs 0.66 in five seasons of games), so expect about 66 — more possessions mean more points in the total and more chances for the better team to separate.
AdvantageColorado
Where Colorado scores: ball control
Colorado turns it over on 14.6% of possessions (#46); Colorado St forces turnovers on 15.5% of opponent possessions (#253). Expect about 14.7%, 2.1 points below an average D1 matchup — worth roughly +2.5 points per 100 possessions.
Watch for noise
3-point caution
A notable season 3-point number here (Colorado St, Colorado's defense) is close to a coin flip going forward — the study's model of next-game 3P% barely beats guessing the D1 average. Shot volume is what actually carries: expect Colorado St at about 45.2% of its shots from three, Colorado about 38.4%.
ClashColorado
Style clash: 3-point volume
Colorado rarely shoots threes (35.2% of its shots); Colorado St lets opponents take 43.0% of their shots from three (D1 average 39.5%). Expect about 38.4% — the offense's habit usually carries a bit more weight (0.80 vs 0.64).
Colorado St has the ball
OffenseColorado allowsvs D1 avg
57.5% #12
52.6% #243
+6.0 pt/100
18.5% #296
15.3% #267
-0.0 pt/100
30.0% #198
29.6% #144
-0.4 pt/100
39.4% #69
36.6% #228
+0.4 pt/100
77.0% #33
—
+0.4 pt/100
Colorado St net across the four factors + FT%, vs. a D1-average matchup: +6.4 pts/100
Colorado has the ball
OffenseColorado St allowsvs D1 avg
52.9% #108
52.9% #263
+2.5 pt/100
14.6% #46
15.5% #253
+2.5 pt/100
29.0% #235
29.3% #123
-0.9 pt/100
36.7% #139
34.2% #155
+0.0 pt/100
76.1% #50
—
+0.3 pt/100
Colorado net across the four factors + FT%, vs. a D1-average matchup: +4.5 pts/100

Shot diet

Where each offense shoots from and where each defense lets teams shoot · 2025-26 numbers
Colorado Stoffense vsColoradodefense
Share of shots by zone
Colorado St shoots
Colorado allows
D-I average
FG% by zone
ZoneD-I avg
Rim66.1%#1557.7%#13658.6%
Short 2 (≤9 ft)32.0%#33135.7%#8139.5%
Mid 2 (10 ft+)42.5%#4543.6%#33738.0%
Three38.6%#936.3%#31933.7%
Coloradooffense vsColorado Stdefense
Share of shots by zone
Colorado shoots
Colorado St allows
D-I average
FG% by zone
ZoneD-I avg
Rim59.1%#15759.3%#20358.6%
Short 2 (≤9 ft)39.5%#18748.7%#34739.5%
Mid 2 (10 ft+)42.5%#4840.6%#26338.0%
Three35.2%#10434.2%#19633.7%
RimShort 2 (≤9 ft)Mid 2 (10 ft+)Three

Zones from play-by-play shot descriptions; garbage time removed. Bars show the share of field-goal attempts in each zone; where a slice is too thin for its number, the shares are listed under the bar. FG% ranks: #1 = best for that side (most accurate shooting, stingiest defense).

Shot volume

Extra scoring chances from rebounds, turnovers and the foul line · 2025-26 numbers
Colorado St
−0.3extra scoring chances per game vs a D-I average team#190 of 365
Off reb %
30.0%
#198
Def reb %
70.7%
#123
Turnover %
18.5%
#296
Forced TO %
15.5%
#253
FT rate
39.4%
#69
FT allowed
34.2%
#155
Where the chances come from (per game)
Offensive rebounding−0.1
Defensive rebounding+0.4
Ball security−1.2
Forcing turnovers−0.8
Foul shots drawn+1.1
Foul shots allowed+0.3
Colorado
+0.5extra scoring chances per game vs a D-I average team#164 of 365
Off reb %
29.0%
#235
Def reb %
70.4%
#144
Turnover %
14.6%
#46
Forced TO %
15.3%
#267
FT rate
36.7%
#139
FT allowed
36.6%
#228
Where the chances come from (per game)
Offensive rebounding−0.4
Defensive rebounding+0.3
Ball security+1.5
Forcing turnovers−1.0
Foul shots drawn+0.4
Foul shots allowed−0.4

Colorado has more extra scoring chances per game: +0.5 (#164 of 365) to Colorado St’s −0.3 (#190).

Grade = extra shots and foul-line trips per game compared with a D-I average team, built from six season rates. Cell shading is the national rank for each rate (greener = better for that team).

Rotation

Colorado St2025-26 numbers
ESPN hasn't posted Colorado St's 2026-27 roster yet — these are last season's players.
#PlayerPosClHtGP-GSMPGPPGRPGAPGTOVeFG%3P%3PA/gFT%UsageStatus
55Jevin MunizGSr6'6"34-2630.59.44.04.91.554.9%35.9%3.070.1%19.8%
2Brandon RechsteinerGJr6'1"34-3427.712.02.22.51.758.7%40.0%6.380.9%26.0%
4Jase ButlerGSo6'4"34-1725.99.33.11.81.157.1%41.1%3.381.6%20.1%
0Carey BoothFJr6'10"34-3024.610.75.60.71.060.4%40.7%2.582.8%23.1%
1Josh PascarelliGJr6'3"27-2526.510.22.81.40.860.1%41.5%5.487.0%21.3%
35Kyle JorgensenFSo6'9"28-2725.511.54.32.21.461.5%40.2%3.680.0%25.3%
11Augustinas KiudulasFJr6'8"34-414.65.92.70.81.159.3%41.2%1.069.0%24.3%
8Jojo McIverGFr6'3"33-012.42.71.81.00.945.1%18.8%1.074.3%17.9%
21Rashaan MbembaFJr6'7"21-617.58.13.70.91.462.4%50.0%0.572.0%27.0%
23Nikola DjapaCJr6'11"18-19.82.51.90.71.068.5%25.0%0.250.0%18.1%
3Darnez SlaterGFr6'3"22-07.11.60.60.20.241.7%10.0%0.590.9%15.7%
5Jon MekonnenFFr6'8"11-04.92.11.30.40.425.0%0.0%0.892.9%33.7%
30Charlie DortchFSo6'7"5-03.20.80.60.40.466.7%—0.0—17.9%
41Docker TedeschiFFr6'9"0-00.00.00.00.00.0——0.0——
Rosters come from ESPN and are still filling in; incoming transfers and freshmen may be missing.

Tale of the tape

national rank toned left for away, right for home
Colorado StColorado
Efficiency
114.2
113.2
109.6
108.7
65.5
69.3
—
—
Shooting
57.5%
52.9%
57.1%
53.0%
38.6%
35.2%
77.0%
76.1%
39.4%
36.7%
Ball control & glass
18.5%
14.6%
15.5%
15.3%
30.0%
29.0%
29.3%
29.6%
10.5%
8.4%
9.0%
9.2%
Style
49.1%
35.2%
35.6%
43.9%
11.1%
16.7%
62.9%
55.2%
30.9%
34.7%
Roster
2.73
1.94
6'5.6"
6'5.6"
—
87.8%

Offseason

roster movement into this season — descriptive, not a model input
Colorado St
Returning minutes: 100.0%Returning production: 100.0%
ESPN hasn't posted Colorado St's roster for this season yet — no movement to show.

Returns 100% of last season's minutes. Teams returning at least 65% of last season's minutes have historically gained about 2.2 points of AdjEM (n=156 team-seasons, 2022-2026). (ESPN hasn't posted this season's roster yet -- this may still be last season's list.)

Colorado
Returning minutes: 87.8%Returning production: 87.0%
Lost
  • Sebastian Rancik 24.6 mpg, 10.8 ppg · transferred to Florida St
Added
  • Leonardo Van Elswyk no D1 minutes last season
  • Jon Mani no D1 minutes last season

No incoming D1 transfers are listed on ESPN's roster yet — until they are, returning shares read high.

Returns 88% of last season's minutes; lost 1 of its top 5 (1 transferred). Teams returning at least 65% of last season's minutes have historically gained about 2.2 points of AdjEM (n=156 team-seasons, 2022-2026).

Head-to-head

this season and last
DateSeasonResult
Sat, Dec 62025-26Colorado 86 – 91 Colorado St

The CBB Matchups tab lays out the day's Division I slate: matchup, tip time, records and rank, and — once posted — Pinnacle's spread and total (the median across books when Pinnacle has no line). Three views switch the table between projected scores, pace and totals, and each team's offensive and defensive tendencies. Each game opens into opponent-adjusted possessions, efficiency and four-factor tendencies for both teams, plus recent form, rotation and head-to-head history. Every game also carries our projected score, spread and total, built bottom-up from those same numbers: expected possessions times each side's opponent-adjusted points per possession, plus home court.

What these numbers mean: line shopping.