CBB Matchups

Every D1 game with tempo-free ratings, four factors and market lines, one place.

College basketball is being built for the 2026-27 season (tip-off Nov 3). What's here fills in as games are played.
Non-conferenceGlobal Credit Union Arena, Phoenix, AZ
Santa Clara
Efficiency #33
2025-26: 26-9 · 17-4 conf
@
Grand Canyon
Efficiency #65
2025-26: 20-12 · 13-8 conf
Sat, Dec 5 · 8:00 PM ET
75.1
win 47%
Projected
76.0
win 53%
No line posted yet.
Model: GCU −1.0 · total 151.1 · ratings as of Sat, Oct 3
Preseason ratings start from 2025-26's final adjusted ratings, regressed toward the D1 average. The stats below are 2025-26's too; both update once 2026-27 games are played.

How the projection is built

each step, from an average D-I game to this one
Projected total
Average D-I game
148.2
PaceAdjusted tempo: Grand Canyon 68.8, Santa Clara 69.5 → 69.9 possessions
+3.5
Grand Canyon offense vs Santa Clara defense
−1.8
Santa Clara offense vs Grand Canyon defense
+1.3
Projected total
151.1
Axis starts at 146 pointsPoints added or removed at each step
Projected margin
Even game
0.0
Grand Canyon offense vs Santa Clara defense
−1.8
Santa Clara offense vs Grand Canyon defense
−1.3
Home court+2.9 points per 100 possessions to the home offense, −2.9 to the visitors
+4.0
Grand Canyon by 1.0
1.0
Santa Clara side ◂▸ Grand Canyon side

Steps are rounded to one decimal, so they can differ from the total by 0.1: the total steps add to 151.2 against a projected 151.1, and the margin steps add to +0.9 against +1.0. The margin is the same build seen from the home side; positive numbers help Grand Canyon.

Pace & total

possessions per 40 minutes
Tempo, possessions per 40 minutes

Projected possessions: 69.9, from each team's opponent-adjusted tempo. On raw 2025-26 season pace, Santa Clara is the faster team (69.5, #113 of 365) and Grand Canyon the slower (69.0, #150). When tempos clash, the slower team usually pulls the pace harder (study weights 0.80 vs 0.66).

Projected possessions
69.9
per team, 40 min
Projected total
151.1
model
Projected team totals
75.1 / 76.0
Santa Clara / Grand Canyon
Adjusted tempo, vs an average opponent
69.5#84
Santa Clara
68.8#139
Grand Canyon

How this game plays

what the study found each side's numbers actually do when these two teams meet
AdvantageGrand Canyon
Where Grand Canyon struggles: ball control
Grand Canyon turns it over on 17.6% of possessions (#246); Santa Clara forces turnovers on 19.9% of opponent possessions (#25). Expect about 19.3%, 2.5 points above an average D1 matchup — worth roughly -3.1 points per 100 possessions.
DefenseSanta Clara
Santa Clara's ball-hawking
Santa Clara ranks #17 nationally in steal rate — one of the few defensive numbers that travels. Expect about 11.4% of Grand Canyon's possessions to end in a steal against this defense.
ClashSanta Clara
Strength vs strength: offensive rebounding
Santa Clara (#20 in offensive rebounding) against Grand Canyon (#12 in the same stat allowed) — both rank inside the national top 60. Expect about 32.1%. Historically Santa Clara's own number has carried a bit more weight in that exchange (0.70 vs 0.49).
ClashSanta Clara
Strength vs strength: 2-point shooting
Santa Clara (#42 in 2-point shooting) against Grand Canyon (#32 in the same stat allowed) — both rank inside the national top 60. Expect about 51.9%. Historically Santa Clara's own number has carried a bit more weight in that exchange (0.61 vs 0.55).
ClashSanta Clara
Strength vs strength: eFG%
Santa Clara (#53 in eFG%) against Grand Canyon (#28 in the same stat allowed) — both rank inside the national top 60. Expect about 51.2%. Historically Santa Clara's own number has carried a bit more weight in that exchange (0.58 vs 0.51).
Santa Clara has the ball
OffenseGrand Canyon allowsvs D1 avg
54.4% #53
47.4% #28
-0.2 pt/100
15.4% #99
17.3% #129
+0.5 pt/100
36.4% #20
25.3% #12
+1.1 pt/100
25.5% #363
39.0% #285
-0.3 pt/100
74.4% #106
—
+0.2 pt/100
Santa Clara net across the four factors + FT%, vs. a D1-average matchup: +1.3 pts/100
Grand Canyon has the ball
OffenseSanta Clara allowsvs D1 avg
51.7% #162
52.0% #213
+0.9 pt/100
17.6% #246
19.9% #25
-3.1 pt/100
31.3% #150
32.1% #262
+0.9 pt/100
39.5% #67
38.2% #264
+0.5 pt/100
75.3% #72
—
+0.3 pt/100
Grand Canyon net across the four factors + FT%, vs. a D1-average matchup: -0.5 pts/100

Shot diet

Where each offense shoots from and where each defense lets teams shoot · 2025-26 numbers
Santa Claraoffense vsGrand Canyondefense
Share of shots by zone
Santa Clara shoots
Grand Canyon allows
D-I average
FG% by zone
ZoneD-I avg
Rim61.3%#8451.6%#1258.6%
Short 2 (≤9 ft)47.2%#3734.4%#5039.5%
Mid 2 (10 ft+)44.1%#2442.6%#32038.0%
Three34.9%#12531.9%#6033.7%
Grand Canyonoffense vsSanta Claradefense
Share of shots by zone
Grand Canyon shoots
Santa Clara allows
D-I average
FG% by zone
ZoneD-I avg
Rim60.6%#10461.4%#28158.6%
Short 2 (≤9 ft)30.4%#34538.4%#14439.5%
Mid 2 (10 ft+)36.7%#24032.9%#2638.0%
Three31.8%#28633.1%#12733.7%
RimShort 2 (≤9 ft)Mid 2 (10 ft+)Three

Zones from play-by-play shot descriptions; garbage time removed. Bars show the share of field-goal attempts in each zone; where a slice is too thin for its number, the shares are listed under the bar. FG% ranks: #1 = best for that side (most accurate shooting, stingiest defense).

Shot volume

Extra scoring chances from rebounds, turnovers and the foul line · 2025-26 numbers
Santa Clara
+1.4extra scoring chances per game vs a D-I average team#123 of 365
Off reb %
36.4%
#20
Def reb %
67.9%
#262
Turnover %
15.4%
#99
Forced TO %
19.9%
#25
FT rate
25.5%
#363
FT allowed
38.2%
#264
Where the chances come from (per game)
Offensive rebounding+1.9
Defensive rebounding−0.5
Ball security+0.9
Forcing turnovers+2.2
Foul shots drawn−2.4
Foul shots allowed−0.8
Grand Canyon
+2.0extra scoring chances per game vs a D-I average team#96 of 365
Off reb %
31.3%
#150
Def reb %
74.7%
#12
Turnover %
17.6%
#246
Forced TO %
17.3%
#129
FT rate
39.5%
#67
FT allowed
39.0%
#285
Where the chances come from (per game)
Offensive rebounding+0.3
Defensive rebounding+1.7
Ball security−0.6
Forcing turnovers+0.4
Foul shots drawn+1.1
Foul shots allowed−1.0

Grand Canyon has more extra scoring chances per game: +2.0 (#96 of 365) to Santa Clara’s +1.4 (#123).

Grade = extra shots and foul-line trips per game compared with a D-I average team, built from six season rates. Cell shading is the national rank for each rate (greener = better for that team).

Rotation

Santa Clara2025-26 numbers
#PlayerPosClHtGP-GSMPGPPGRPGAPGTOVeFG%3P%3PA/gFT%UsageStatus
1Christian HammondGSo6'4"34-3430.315.63.02.51.754.9%39.3%4.078.7%28.7%
44Jake EnsmingerGJr6'9"32-3228.86.55.52.90.966.1%39.8%2.866.7%11.6%
0Brenton KnapperGSr6'0"33-3321.57.51.82.21.245.6%27.4%3.479.2%23.4%
2Sash GavalyugovGFr6'3"35-220.09.01.92.71.451.6%35.8%5.372.0%28.4%
15Thierry DarlanGJr6'8"35-117.96.13.60.91.450.3%33.9%3.488.6%22.0%
7KJ CochranGFr6'5"34-011.84.71.40.60.451.4%27.1%2.565.2%23.5%
3Francis ChukwudebeluCFr6'10"24-06.81.41.30.70.052.0%40.0%0.250.0%11.5%
50Brendan YarussoGSr6'1"8-01.32.00.30.00.050.0%36.4%1.4100.0%77.2%
51Juan ReynaGSr6'3"1-02.00.02.00.01.0——0.0—27.7%
4Brad Longcor IIIGFr6'4"0-00.00.00.00.00.0——0.0——
14Chris TadjoFSo6'7"0-00.00.00.00.00.0——0.0——
9Gehrig NormandGSo6'6"0-00.00.00.00.00.0——0.0——
54Malachi DouyonGSr6'3"0-00.00.00.00.00.0——0.0——
10Noah BadibangaFFr6'8"0-00.00.00.00.00.0——0.0——
Rosters come from ESPN and are still filling in; incoming transfers and freshmen may be missing.

Tale of the tape

national rank toned left for away, right for home
Santa ClaraGrand Canyon
Efficiency
117.3
109.0
105.4
101.5
69.5
68.8
—
—
Shooting
54.4%
51.7%
56.1%
54.2%
34.9%
31.8%
74.4%
75.3%
25.5%
39.5%
Ball control & glass
15.4%
17.6%
19.9%
17.3%
36.4%
31.3%
32.1%
25.3%
9.2%
9.3%
9.0%
7.9%
Style
45.0%
38.9%
43.7%
43.2%
15.2%
13.9%
55.0%
49.6%
35.7%
29.1%
Roster
2.38
3.03
6'5.1"
6'6.7"
65.0%
84.3%

Offseason

roster movement into this season — descriptive, not a model input
Santa Clara
Returning minutes: 65.0%Returning production: 55.6%
Lost
  • Elijah Mahi 30.4 mpg, 14.1 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
  • Allen Graves 22.6 mpg, 11.8 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
  • Bukky Oboye 17.3 mpg, 7.7 ppg · transferred to Auburn
Added
  • Brad Longcor III no D1 minutes last season
  • Malachi Douyon no D1 minutes last season
  • Noah Badibanga no D1 minutes last season
  • Chris Tadjo no D1 minutes last season
  • Gehrig Normand no D1 minutes last season

No incoming D1 transfers are listed on ESPN's roster yet — until they are, returning shares read high.

Returns 65% of last season's minutes; lost 2 of its top 5. Teams returning at least 65% of last season's minutes have historically gained about 2.2 points of AdjEM (n=156 team-seasons, 2022-2026).

Grand Canyon
Returning minutes: 84.3%Returning production: 79.1%
Lost
  • Jaden Henley 31.5 mpg, 17.7 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
Added
  • Luke Shaw no D1 minutes last season
  • Jack Sawyer no D1 minutes last season
  • Braylon Johnson no D1 minutes last season

No incoming D1 transfers are listed on ESPN's roster yet — until they are, returning shares read high.

Returns 84% of last season's minutes; lost 1 of its top 5. Teams returning at least 65% of last season's minutes have historically gained about 2.2 points of AdjEM (n=156 team-seasons, 2022-2026).

Head-to-head

this season and last
No meetings the last two seasons.

The CBB Matchups tab lays out the day's Division I slate: matchup, tip time, records and rank, and — once posted — Pinnacle's spread and total (the median across books when Pinnacle has no line). Three views switch the table between projected scores, pace and totals, and each team's offensive and defensive tendencies. Each game opens into opponent-adjusted possessions, efficiency and four-factor tendencies for both teams, plus recent form, rotation and head-to-head history. Every game also carries our projected score, spread and total, built bottom-up from those same numbers: expected possessions times each side's opponent-adjusted points per possession, plus home court.

What these numbers mean: line shopping.