Ohio Bobcats vs New Mexico State Aggies basketball preview & prediction

Tue, Nov 24 · 11:00 AM ET · The Reef, Jacksonville, FL (neutral site)

Jacksonville ClassicNeutral siteNon-conferenceThe Reef, Jacksonville, FL
Ohio
2-0 · 0-0 conf
Efficiency #168
vs
New Mexico St
1-1 · 0-0 conf
Efficiency #231
Tue, Nov 24 · 11:00 AM ET
Our projected score shows once the market opens.
No line posted yet.

Our play

Pace & total

possessions per 40 minutes
Tempo, possessions per 40 minutes

Projected possessions: 71.0, from each team's opponent-adjusted tempo. On raw season pace, Ohio is the faster team (70.9, #178 of 365) and New Mexico St the slower (70.1, #202). When tempos clash, the slower team usually pulls the pace harder (weights 0.80 vs 0.66).

Projected possessions
71.0
per team, 40 min
Adjusted tempo, vs an average opponent
71.9#104
Ohio
69.7#248
New Mexico St

How this game plays

points this game from the four factors, vs an average D-I matchup
From the four factors
New Mexico St has the ball−3.7
Ohio has the ball+24.1
New Mexico St has the ball
✓Gets to the lineFTR 50.0% #55 · OHIO allows 46.5% #276 · FT 91.7% #2+2.4
✗Tough shooting lookeFG% 47.9% #224 · OHIO allows 48.7% #144−2.2
✗Few second chancesOR% 32.1% #167 · OHIO allows 20.5% #16−2.1
✗Coughs it upTO% 27.1% #346 · OHIO forces 13.4% #304 · ~14 turnovers−1.7
Ohio has the ball
✓Shoots it welleFG% 59.8% #38 · NMSU allows 71.8% #358+16.7
✓Takes care of the ballTO% 19.7% #240 · NMSU forces 8.6% #355 · ~9 turnovers+4.6
✓Wins second chancesOR% 32.8% #155 · NMSU allows 39.3% #308+2.0
✓Gets to the lineFTR 38.4% #159 · NMSU allows 46.8% #279 · FT 74.4% #114+0.8

Shot diet

Where each offense shoots from and where each defense lets teams shoot
Ohiooffense vsNew Mexico Stdefense
Share of shots by zone
Ohio shoots
New Mexico St allows
D-I average
FG% by zone
ZoneD-I avg
Rim60.8%#13771.4%#31858.0%
Short 2 (≤9 ft)20.0%#27540.0%#19338.2%
Mid 2 (10 ft+)40.0%#11780.0%#34934.7%
Three43.1%#3354.2%#35732.5%
New Mexico Stoffense vsOhiodefense
Share of shots by zone
New Mexico St shoots
Ohio allows
D-I average
FG% by zone
ZoneD-I avg
Rim61.1%#13467.4%#27958.0%
Short 2 (≤9 ft)57.1%#5330.0%#11138.2%
Mid 2 (10 ft+)33.3%#17441.2%#23034.7%
Three28.6%#23325.0%#4732.5%
RimShort 2 (≤9 ft)Mid 2 (10 ft+)Three

Zones from play-by-play shot descriptions; garbage time removed. Bars show the share of field-goal attempts in each zone; where a slice is too thin for its number, the shares are listed under the bar. FG% ranks: #1 = best for that side (most accurate shooting, stingiest defense).

Shot volume

Extra scoring chances from rebounds, turnovers and the foul line
Ohio
−2.2extra scoring chances per game vs a D-I average team#212 of 365
Off reb %
32.8%
#155
Def reb %
79.5%
#16
Turnover %
19.7%
#240
Forced TO %
13.4%
#304
FT rate
38.4%
#159
FT allowed
46.5%
#276
Where the chances come from (per game)
Offensive rebounding+0.4
Defensive rebounding+3.7
Ball security−1.1
Forcing turnovers−3.3
Foul shots drawn+0.3
Foul shots allowed−2.2
New Mexico St
−14.4extra scoring chances per game vs a D-I average team#342 of 365
Off reb %
32.1%
#167
Def reb %
60.7%
#308
Turnover %
27.1%
#346
Forced TO %
8.6%
#355
FT rate
50.0%
#55
FT allowed
46.8%
#279
Where the chances come from (per game)
Offensive rebounding+0.2
Defensive rebounding−2.6
Ball security−6.3
Forcing turnovers−6.7
Foul shots drawn+3.3
Foul shots allowed−2.3

Ohio has more extra scoring chances per game: −2.2 (#212 of 365) to New Mexico St’s −14.4 (#342).

Grade = extra shots and foul-line trips per game compared with a D-I average team, built from six season rates. Cell shading is the national rank for each rate (greener = better for that team).

Rotation

Who has been playing, and who has not
Ohio2026-27 numbers · last game: NC A&T, Nov 7
#PlayerPosClHtGP-GSMPGMin/40, last 8Last 3 vs beforeStatusPPGRPGAPGTOVeFG%3P%3PA/gFT%Usage
13FFr6'8"2-235.535—Started last10.012.04.03.056.7%60.0%2.575.0%18.4%
3GSr6'2"2-235.533—Started last15.05.06.54.573.1%100.0%1.573.3%23.4%
1FSr6'7"2-231.026—Started last14.05.51.02.570.6%0.0%0.566.7%22.9%
10GSr6'7"2-229.031—Started last11.54.52.50.545.7%27.3%5.5100.0%24.5%
14GJr6'1"2-227.525—Started last13.51.02.50.563.2%42.1%9.560.0%23.2%
12GSr6'1"2-013.012—Bench2.02.00.50.025.0%25.0%2.050.0%15.2%
24GSr6'4"2-09.010—Bench5.50.50.00.091.7%60.0%2.5—19.0%
4GFr6'5"2-08.012—Bench10.02.01.01.0108.3%100.0%0.5100.0%40.1%
17FSo6'9"2-08.09—Bench0.52.50.01.00.0%0.0%0.550.0%28.3%
5FSo6'7"1-07.07—Bench2.02.00.01.050.0%0.0%1.0—24.2%

Competitive minutes leave out garbage time (provisional rule: a second-half lead of 25+ inside 15:00, 20+ inside 10:00, 15+ inside 5:00 or 10+ inside 2:00, held to the end) and are shown per 40 minutes. Status says only whether a player appeared; the reason is not published.

Team comparison

national rank toned left for away, right for home
OhioNew Mexico St
Efficiency
107.7
106.9
107.9
111.2
71.9
69.7
-4.8
23.9
Shooting
59.8%
47.9%
55.7%
50.0%
43.1%
28.6%
74.4%
91.7%
38.4%
50.0%
Ball control & glass
19.7%
27.1%
13.4%
8.6%
32.8%
32.1%
20.5%
39.3%
12.0%
14.3%
8.2%
8.8%
Style
45.5%
29.2%
38.6%
50.0%
10.8%
5.9%
64.3%
28.6%
20.8%
37.3%
Roster
3.10
2.82
6'4.9"
6'4.9"
34.9%
21.5%

Offseason

roster movement into this season — descriptive, not a model input
Ohio
Returning minutes: 38.6%Returning production: 47.2%
Lost
  • Aidan Hadaway 31.8 mpg, 14.4 ppg · transferred to Green Bay
  • Ajay Sheldon 30.8 mpg, 7.5 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
  • JJ Kelly 25.8 mpg, 8.3 ppg · transferred to UTSA
  • Jalen Breath 11.8 mpg, 3.3 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
  • Dior Conners 11.2 mpg, 4.0 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
  • Elijah Elliott 8.7 mpg, 1.7 ppg · transferred to North Florida
Added
  • Kyler D'Augustino from IU Indy · 30.3 mpg, 17.3 ppg last season
  • Kolton Mitchell from Idaho · 27.9 mpg, 12.6 ppg last season
  • Christian Trudic no D1 minutes last season
  • Ché Brogan no D1 minutes last season
  • Jordie Bowens no D1 minutes last season
  • Dusan Makitan no D1 minutes last season

Returns 39% of last season's minutes; lost 3 of its top 5 (2 transferred). Teams returning under 40% of last season's minutes have historically fallen about 0.8 points of AdjEM (n=716 team-seasons, 2022-2026).

New Mexico St
Returning minutes: 21.5%Returning production: 16.7%
Lost
  • Jemel Jones 28.4 mpg, 17.8 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
  • Julius Mims 26.6 mpg, 10.3 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
  • Anthony Wrzeszcz 24.6 mpg, 7.4 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
  • Jayland Randall 19.9 mpg, 8.9 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
  • Elijah Elliott 18.1 mpg, 8.0 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
  • Chris Terrell 12.4 mpg, 4.1 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
Added
  • Gabe Warren from Holy Cross · 31.6 mpg, 12.5 ppg last season
  • DJ Dudley from Louisiana Tech · 30.4 mpg, 13.8 ppg last season
  • Jermaine Washington from San José St · 26.3 mpg, 8.7 ppg last season
  • Mark Lavrenov from Sacramento St · 26.0 mpg, 9.9 ppg last season
  • Stephon Payne from Seton Hall · 20.2 mpg, 5.9 ppg last season
  • Leopold Levillain from Long Beach St · 18.1 mpg, 4.5 ppg last season

Returns 21% of last season's minutes; lost 3 of its top 5. Teams returning under 40% of last season's minutes have historically fallen about 0.8 points of AdjEM (n=716 team-seasons, 2022-2026).

Head-to-head

this season and last
No meetings the last two seasons.

More games on Tue, Nov 24

← Mon, Nov 23 · Wed, Nov 25 → · Full season schedule

The CBB Matchups tab lays out the day's Division I slate: matchup, tip time, records and rank, and — once posted — the market spread and total (the median across books when no market line is up). Three views switch the table between projected scores, pace and totals, and each team's offensive and defensive tendencies. Each game opens into opponent-adjusted possessions, efficiency and four-factor tendencies for both teams, plus recent form, rotation and head-to-head history. Every game also carries our projected score, spread and total, from our line: the same view our bets are made from.

What these numbers mean: line shopping.