CBB Matchups

Every D1 game with tempo-free ratings, four factors and market lines, one place.

College basketball is being built for the 2026-27 season (tip-off Nov 3). What's here fills in as games are played.
Non-conferenceNeutral siteThe Reef, Jacksonville, FLScout Jacksonville Classic
Robert Morris
Efficiency #142
2025-26: 22-11 · 14-8 conf
vs
Lamar
Efficiency #236
2025-26: 12-19 · 7-15 conf
Tue, Nov 24 · 6:30 PM ET
71.5
win 61%
Projected
68.4
win 39%
No line posted yet.
Model: RMU −3.2 · total 139.9 · ratings as of Sat, Oct 3
Preseason ratings start from 2025-26's final adjusted ratings, regressed toward the D1 average. The stats below are 2025-26's too; both update once 2026-27 games are played.

How the projection is built

each step, from an average D-I game to this one
Projected total
Average D-I game
148.2
PaceAdjusted tempo: Lamar 67.0, Robert Morris 66.4 → 65.2 possessions
−6.9
Lamar offense vs Robert Morris defense
−2.3
Robert Morris offense vs Lamar defense
+0.9
Projected total
139.9
Axis starts at 135 pointsPoints added or removed at each step
Projected margin
Even game
0.0
Lamar offense vs Robert Morris defense
−2.3
Robert Morris offense vs Lamar defense
−0.9
Robert Morris by 3.2
3.2
Robert Morris side ◂▸ Lamar side

Steps are rounded to one decimal, so they can differ from the total by 0.1. The margin is the same build seen from the home side; positive numbers help Lamar.

Pace & total

possessions per 40 minutes
Tempo, possessions per 40 minutes

Projected possessions: 65.2, from each team's opponent-adjusted tempo. On raw 2025-26 season pace, Robert Morris is the faster team (66.1, #289 of 365) and Lamar the slower (65.8, #301). When tempos clash, the slower team usually pulls the pace harder (study weights 0.80 vs 0.66).

Projected possessions
65.2
per team, 40 min
Projected total
139.9
model
Projected team totals
71.5 / 68.4
Robert Morris / Lamar
Adjusted tempo, vs an average opponent
66.4#323
Robert Morris
67.0#287
Lamar

How this game plays

what the study found each side's numbers actually do when these two teams meet
AdvantageLamar
Where Lamar struggles: shooting
Lamar shoots an effective 47.8% (#318); Robert Morris allows 50.0% (#100). Expect about 48.6%, 2.7 points below an average D1 matchup — worth roughly -3.8 points per 100 possessions.
Pace
Half-court grind
Lamar averages 65.8 possessions per 40, Robert Morris 66.1. Slower teams pull the pace toward themselves more than fast teams push it (0.80 vs 0.66 in five seasons of games), so expect about 65 — more possessions mean more points in the total and more chances for the better team to separate.
ClashRobert Morris
Style match: ball movement
Robert Morris assists on 62.8% of its made baskets; Lamar allows assists on 57.7% of opponents' baskets (D1 average 52.4%). Expect about 62.6% — both habits push the same way.
AdvantageRobert Morris
Where Robert Morris scores: shooting
Robert Morris shoots an effective 54.9% (#39); Lamar allows 50.9% (#153). Expect about 53.2%, 1.9 points above an average D1 matchup — worth roughly +2.8 points per 100 possessions.
GlassRobert Morris
Robert Morris owns the glass
Projected offensive rebound rate of 34.9% is worth roughly +2.7 points per 100 possessions for Robert Morris's offense.
DefenseLamar
Lamar's shot-blocking
Lamar ranks #31 nationally in block rate — one of the few defensive numbers that travels. Expect about 11.9% of Robert Morris's two-point attempts to get blocked against this defense.
Robert Morris has the ball
OffenseLamar allowsvs D1 avg
54.9% #39
50.9% #153
+2.8 pt/100
18.6% #302
17.3% #130
-1.7 pt/100
37.5% #11
29.4% #130
+2.7 pt/100
28.0% #343
44.4% #347
+0.3 pt/100
69.4% #289
—
-0.3 pt/100
Robert Morris net across the four factors + FT%, vs. a D1-average matchup: +3.8 pts/100
Lamar has the ball
OffenseRobert Morris allowsvs D1 avg
47.8% #318
50.0% #100
-3.8 pt/100
18.1% #273
15.9% #225
-0.2 pt/100
35.7% #31
28.8% #98
+1.8 pt/100
27.9% #344
40.1% #303
-0.1 pt/100
70.7% #249
—
-0.2 pt/100
Lamar net across the four factors + FT%, vs. a D1-average matchup: -2.4 pts/100

Shot diet

Where each offense shoots from and where each defense lets teams shoot · 2025-26 numbers
Robert Morrisoffense vsLamardefense
Share of shots by zone
Robert Morris shoots
Lamar allows
D-I average
FG% by zone
ZoneD-I avg
Rim61.2%#8659.0%#18958.6%
Short 2 (≤9 ft)35.8%#27132.9%#2739.5%
Mid 2 (10 ft+)40.7%#8533.6%#4038.0%
Three38.0%#1835.3%#26633.7%
Lamaroffense vsRobert Morrisdefense
Share of shots by zone
Lamar shoots
Robert Morris allows
D-I average
FG% by zone
ZoneD-I avg
Rim53.3%#33755.8%#8058.6%
Short 2 (≤9 ft)44.1%#7739.3%#16339.5%
Mid 2 (10 ft+)38.0%#18837.5%#14138.0%
Three32.9%#23833.2%#13533.7%
RimShort 2 (≤9 ft)Mid 2 (10 ft+)Three

Zones from play-by-play shot descriptions; garbage time removed. Bars show the share of field-goal attempts in each zone; where a slice is too thin for its number, the shares are listed under the bar. FG% ranks: #1 = best for that side (most accurate shooting, stingiest defense).

Shot volume

Extra scoring chances from rebounds, turnovers and the foul line · 2025-26 numbers
Robert Morris
−1.9extra scoring chances per game vs a D-I average team#267 of 365
Off reb %
37.5%
#11
Def reb %
71.2%
#98
Turnover %
18.6%
#302
Forced TO %
15.9%
#225
FT rate
28.0%
#343
FT allowed
40.1%
#303
Where the chances come from (per game)
Offensive rebounding+2.3
Defensive rebounding+0.6
Ball security−1.2
Forcing turnovers−0.6
Foul shots drawn−1.8
Foul shots allowed−1.2
Lamar
−2.5extra scoring chances per game vs a D-I average team#284 of 365
Off reb %
35.7%
#31
Def reb %
70.6%
#130
Turnover %
18.1%
#273
Forced TO %
17.3%
#130
FT rate
27.9%
#344
FT allowed
44.4%
#347
Where the chances come from (per game)
Offensive rebounding+1.7
Defensive rebounding+0.4
Ball security−0.9
Forcing turnovers+0.4
Foul shots drawn−1.8
Foul shots allowed−2.4

Robert Morris has more extra scoring chances per game: −1.9 (#267 of 365) to Lamar’s −2.5 (#284).

Grade = extra shots and foul-line trips per game compared with a D-I average team, built from six season rates. Cell shading is the national rank for each rate (greener = better for that team).

Rotation

Robert Morris2025-26 numbers
#PlayerPosClHtGP-GSMPGPPGRPGAPGTOVeFG%3P%3PA/gFT%UsageStatus
2Ryan Prather Jr.GJr6'5"33-3334.015.73.93.60.854.3%36.8%6.984.7%25.8%
16Nikolaos ChitikoudisFJr6'9"32-2726.111.37.71.81.354.7%0.0%0.139.8%27.8%
12Darius LivingstonGFr6'2"27-725.89.62.03.02.652.5%38.4%5.964.3%27.3%
20Albert VargasGSr5'10"28-2624.17.52.34.02.047.6%38.9%3.287.5%22.3%
4Kaleb BrownGSr6'7"32-2019.74.12.52.31.350.4%30.0%2.260.0%16.2%
3Ta'Zir SmithGJr6'3"31-1119.26.52.21.31.047.1%30.6%2.777.4%23.3%
1Josh HillFSo6'11"22-616.97.54.40.41.551.7%29.0%2.851.9%30.7%
5Cam WildsGJr6'6"24-313.14.01.60.60.757.4%48.3%1.275.0%18.3%
13Samuel ObenjoFFr6'10"23-09.01.71.40.60.460.0%—0.043.5%13.2%
6Eddie Cooke IIIFFr6'5"14-08.62.62.61.20.647.6%0.0%0.294.1%19.2%
35Ubong OkonCSr7'1"17-06.20.81.20.10.366.7%—0.0100.0%8.6%
21Jeremiah LittlejohnGJr6'5"5-04.23.60.40.20.650.0%40.0%1.080.0%54.0%
9Cyril ArvanitisGSr6'3"3-02.30.70.00.00.033.3%0.0%0.3—25.1%
8Tanner O'GradyGSr6'0"0-00.00.00.00.00.0——0.0——
14Vasilije SerafimoskiGJr6'6"0-00.00.00.00.00.0——0.0——
Rosters come from ESPN and are still filling in; incoming transfers and freshmen may be missing.

Tale of the tape

national rank toned left for away, right for home
Robert MorrisLamar
Efficiency
110.0
105.0
108.4
108.3
66.4
67.0
—
—
Shooting
54.9%
47.8%
53.5%
47.0%
38.0%
32.9%
69.4%
70.7%
28.0%
27.9%
Ball control & glass
18.6%
18.1%
15.9%
17.3%
37.5%
35.7%
28.8%
29.4%
10.3%
11.4%
10.0%
8.5%
Style
40.7%
33.9%
43.9%
40.5%
8.4%
14.2%
62.8%
55.4%
32.8%
34.7%
Roster
2.82
2.88
6'5.2"
6'4.4"
84.8%
85.8%

Offseason

roster movement into this season — descriptive, not a model input
Robert Morris
Returning minutes: 84.8%Returning production: 77.0%
Lost
  • DeSean Goode 31.0 mpg, 15.2 ppg · transferred to Miami
Added
  • Tanner O'Grady no D1 minutes last season
  • Vasilije Serafimoski no D1 minutes last season

No incoming D1 transfers are listed on ESPN's roster yet — until they are, returning shares read high.

Returns 85% of last season's minutes; lost 1 of its top 5 (1 transferred). Teams returning at least 65% of last season's minutes have historically gained about 2.2 points of AdjEM (n=156 team-seasons, 2022-2026).

Lamar
Returning minutes: 85.8%Returning production: 84.0%
Lost
  • Andrew Holifield 28.6 mpg, 11.7 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
Added
  • Christian Thomas no D1 minutes last season
  • Izuchukwu Emelife no D1 minutes last season
  • Quinton Sanders no D1 minutes last season

No incoming D1 transfers are listed on ESPN's roster yet — until they are, returning shares read high.

Returns 86% of last season's minutes; lost 1 of its top 5. Teams returning at least 65% of last season's minutes have historically gained about 2.2 points of AdjEM (n=156 team-seasons, 2022-2026).

Head-to-head

this season and last
No meetings the last two seasons.

The CBB Matchups tab lays out the day's Division I slate: matchup, tip time, records and rank, and — once posted — Pinnacle's spread and total (the median across books when Pinnacle has no line). Three views switch the table between projected scores, pace and totals, and each team's offensive and defensive tendencies. Each game opens into opponent-adjusted possessions, efficiency and four-factor tendencies for both teams, plus recent form, rotation and head-to-head history. Every game also carries our projected score, spread and total, built bottom-up from those same numbers: expected possessions times each side's opponent-adjusted points per possession, plus home court.

What these numbers mean: line shopping.