CBB Matchups

Every D1 game with tempo-free ratings, four factors and market lines, one place.

College basketball is being built for the 2026-27 season (tip-off Nov 3). What's here fills in as games are played.
Non-conferenceNeutral siteAcrisure Arena, Palm Springs, CAAcrisure Series
Oregon St
Efficiency #219
2025-26: 17-16 · 10-10 conf
vs
San Francisco
Efficiency #148
2025-26: 17-16 · 9-11 conf
Tue, Nov 24 · 2:00 PM ET
71.5
win 42%
Projected
73.8
win 58%
No line posted yet.
Model: SF −2.2 · total 145.3 · ratings as of Sat, Oct 3
Preseason ratings start from 2025-26's final adjusted ratings, regressed toward the D1 average. The stats below are 2025-26's too; both update once 2026-27 games are played.

How the projection is built

each step, from an average D-I game to this one
Projected total
Average D-I game
148.2
PaceAdjusted tempo: San Francisco 67.4, Oregon St 66.9 → 66.0 possessions
−5.1
San Francisco offense vs Oregon St defense
+2.2
Oregon St offense vs San Francisco defense
0.0
Projected total
145.3
Axis starts at 140 pointsPoints added or removed at each step
Projected margin
Even game
0.0
San Francisco offense vs Oregon St defense
+2.2
Oregon St offense vs San Francisco defense
0.0
San Francisco by 2.2
2.2
Oregon St side ◂▸ San Francisco side

Steps are rounded to one decimal, so they can differ from the total by 0.1. The margin is the same build seen from the home side; positive numbers help San Francisco.

Pace & total

possessions per 40 minutes
Tempo, possessions per 40 minutes

Projected possessions: 66.0, from each team's opponent-adjusted tempo. On raw 2025-26 season pace, San Francisco is the faster team (66.7, #256 of 365) and Oregon St the slower (66.2, #284). When tempos clash, the slower team usually pulls the pace harder (study weights 0.80 vs 0.66).

Projected possessions
66.0
per team, 40 min
Projected total
145.3
model
Projected team totals
71.5 / 73.8
Oregon St / San Francisco
Adjusted tempo, vs an average opponent
66.9#295
Oregon St
67.4#261
San Francisco

How this game plays

what the study found each side's numbers actually do when these two teams meet
Pace
Half-court grind
San Francisco averages 66.7 possessions per 40, Oregon St 66.2. Slower teams pull the pace toward themselves more than fast teams push it (0.80 vs 0.66 in five seasons of games), so expect about 66 — more possessions mean more points in the total and more chances for the better team to separate.
AdvantageOregon St
Where Oregon St struggles: the offensive glass
Oregon St rebounds 26.8% of its own misses (#303); San Francisco lets opponents grab 29.0% of their own misses (#105). Expect about 27.2%, 3.2 points below an average D1 matchup — worth roughly -2.0 points per 100 possessions.
AdvantageSan Francisco
Where San Francisco scores: ball control
San Francisco turns it over on 15.8% of possessions (#125); Oregon St forces turnovers on 15.3% of opponent possessions (#262). Expect about 15.3%, 1.5 points below an average D1 matchup — worth roughly +1.8 points per 100 possessions.
ClashOregon St
Style clash: 3-point volume
Oregon St takes 44.3% of its shots from three; San Francisco runs teams off the line (35.8% of shots allowed from three) (D1 average 39.5%). Expect about 40.9% — the offense's habit usually carries a bit more weight (0.80 vs 0.64).
ClashOregon St
Strength vs strength: free-throw rate
Oregon St (#20 in free-throw rate) against San Francisco (#51 in the same stat allowed) — both rank inside the national top 60. Expect about 35.7%. Historically San Francisco's own number has carried a bit more weight in that exchange (0.50 vs 0.61).
Oregon St has the ball
OffenseSan Francisco allowsvs D1 avg
50.5% #216
50.8% #143
-1.1 pt/100
17.7% #253
14.1% #330
+1.4 pt/100
26.8% #303
29.0% #105
-2.0 pt/100
43.1% #20
29.6% #51
+0.1 pt/100
77.2% #30
—
+0.4 pt/100
Oregon St net across the four factors + FT%, vs. a D1-average matchup: -1.1 pts/100
San Francisco has the ball
OffenseOregon St allowsvs D1 avg
51.2% #184
50.3% #119
-0.7 pt/100
15.8% #125
15.3% #262
+1.8 pt/100
31.3% #148
32.1% #265
+0.9 pt/100
40.1% #59
35.1% #180
+0.3 pt/100
70.9% #242
—
-0.1 pt/100
San Francisco net across the four factors + FT%, vs. a D1-average matchup: +2.2 pts/100

Shot diet

Where each offense shoots from and where each defense lets teams shoot · 2025-26 numbers
Oregon Stoffense vsSan Franciscodefense
Share of shots by zone
Oregon St shoots
San Francisco allows
D-I average
FG% by zone
ZoneD-I avg
Rim56.6%#25359.3%#20558.6%
Short 2 (≤9 ft)36.1%#26745.5%#31239.5%
Mid 2 (10 ft+)37.0%#22035.0%#7838.0%
Three35.0%#11534.1%#18733.7%
San Franciscooffense vsOregon Stdefense
Share of shots by zone
San Francisco shoots
Oregon St allows
D-I average
FG% by zone
ZoneD-I avg
Rim57.1%#22956.0%#8558.6%
Short 2 (≤9 ft)41.5%#13242.5%#23739.5%
Mid 2 (10 ft+)35.4%#27841.0%#27538.0%
Three34.6%#14032.9%#11633.7%
RimShort 2 (≤9 ft)Mid 2 (10 ft+)Three

Zones from play-by-play shot descriptions; garbage time removed. Bars show the share of field-goal attempts in each zone; where a slice is too thin for its number, the shares are listed under the bar. FG% ranks: #1 = best for that side (most accurate shooting, stingiest defense).

Shot volume

Extra scoring chances from rebounds, turnovers and the foul line · 2025-26 numbers
Oregon St
−1.1extra scoring chances per game vs a D-I average team#239 of 365
Off reb %
26.8%
#303
Def reb %
67.9%
#265
Turnover %
17.7%
#253
Forced TO %
15.3%
#262
FT rate
43.1%
#20
FT allowed
35.1%
#180
Where the chances come from (per game)
Offensive rebounding−1.2
Defensive rebounding−0.5
Ball security−0.6
Forcing turnovers−0.9
Foul shots drawn+2.1
Foul shots allowed0.0
San Francisco
+2.5extra scoring chances per game vs a D-I average team#78 of 365
Off reb %
31.3%
#148
Def reb %
71.0%
#105
Turnover %
15.8%
#125
Forced TO %
14.1%
#330
FT rate
40.1%
#59
FT allowed
29.6%
#51
Where the chances come from (per game)
Offensive rebounding+0.3
Defensive rebounding+0.5
Ball security+0.7
Forcing turnovers−1.8
Foul shots drawn+1.3
Foul shots allowed+1.5

San Francisco has more extra scoring chances per game: +2.5 (#78 of 365) to Oregon St’s −1.1 (#239).

Grade = extra shots and foul-line trips per game compared with a D-I average team, built from six season rates. Cell shading is the national rank for each rate (greener = better for that team).

Rotation

Oregon St2025-26 numbers
#PlayerPosClHtGP-GSMPGPPGRPGAPGTOVeFG%3P%3PA/gFT%UsageStatus
2Josiah Lake IIGJr6'2"33-3334.213.14.14.22.352.9%38.1%2.982.4%23.2%
13Isaiah SyFJr6'7"33-2928.010.04.61.71.345.8%35.4%5.587.1%23.6%
0Dez WhiteGJr6'2"30-2829.69.72.72.11.350.6%37.9%5.879.1%21.4%
24Johan MunchFSo6'11"31-2321.17.95.11.01.553.0%12.5%0.363.5%24.5%
37Olavi SuutelaFFr6'10"33-1817.55.52.70.81.062.5%36.7%0.965.5%18.3%
7Keziah EkissiGFr6'3"27-117.44.71.71.81.142.5%34.0%1.764.6%21.1%
26Matija SamarGFr6'6"28-516.44.71.91.40.842.3%28.9%3.291.7%21.9%
40Noah AmenhauserCJr7'2"29-812.25.12.20.40.857.7%0.0%0.070.0%24.6%
3Malcolm ChristieGSr6'5"15-013.24.61.00.20.354.3%39.6%3.575.0%20.3%
1Ja'Quavis WillifordGSo6'7"11-05.72.20.80.00.232.8%15.8%1.775.0%34.2%
12Stephen OlowoniyiFJr6'8"8-04.61.40.50.00.341.7%—0.050.0%23.9%
6Kaan YarkutFSo6'6"1-01.00.00.00.00.00.0%—0.0—66.9%
8Gavin MarrsFJr7'0"0-00.00.00.00.00.0——0.0——
Rosters come from ESPN and are still filling in; incoming transfers and freshmen may be missing.

Tale of the tape

national rank toned left for away, right for home
Oregon StSan Francisco
Efficiency
107.7
110.5
109.8
109.2
66.9
67.4
—
—
Shooting
50.5%
51.2%
48.8%
50.7%
35.0%
34.6%
77.2%
70.9%
43.1%
40.1%
Ball control & glass
17.7%
15.8%
15.3%
14.1%
26.8%
31.3%
32.1%
29.0%
10.7%
9.2%
9.3%
8.7%
Style
44.3%
46.1%
34.1%
36.9%
9.2%
10.1%
61.2%
55.6%
34.1%
34.2%
Roster
2.39
2.61
6'6"
6'4.8"
85.8%
81.0%

Offseason

roster movement into this season — descriptive, not a model input
Oregon St
Returning minutes: 85.8%Returning production: 82.5%
Lost
  • Jorge Diaz Graham 17.4 mpg, 5.8 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
  • Yaak Yaak 11.3 mpg, 5.0 ppg · transferred to Oklahoma
Added
  • Gavin Marrs no D1 minutes last season

No incoming D1 transfers are listed on ESPN's roster yet — until they are, returning shares read high.

Returns 86% of last season's minutes. Teams returning at least 65% of last season's minutes have historically gained about 2.2 points of AdjEM (n=156 team-seasons, 2022-2026).

San Francisco
Returning minutes: 81.0%Returning production: 76.4%
Lost
  • David Fuchs 21.1 mpg, 11.2 ppg · transferred to Clemson
  • Guillermo Diaz Graham 17.2 mpg, 5.2 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
Added
  • Ndewedo Newbury no D1 minutes last season
  • Isa Silva no D1 minutes last season

No incoming D1 transfers are listed on ESPN's roster yet — until they are, returning shares read high.

Returns 81% of last season's minutes; lost 1 of its top 5 (1 transferred). Teams returning at least 65% of last season's minutes have historically gained about 2.2 points of AdjEM (n=156 team-seasons, 2022-2026).

Head-to-head

this season and last
DateSeasonResult
Sun, Mar 82025-26San Francisco 77 – 78 Oregon St(N)
Thu, Feb 122025-26Oregon St 90 – 63 San Francisco
Tue, Dec 302025-26San Francisco 62 – 70 Oregon St

The CBB Matchups tab lays out the day's Division I slate: matchup, tip time, records and rank, and — once posted — Pinnacle's spread and total (the median across books when Pinnacle has no line). Three views switch the table between projected scores, pace and totals, and each team's offensive and defensive tendencies. Each game opens into opponent-adjusted possessions, efficiency and four-factor tendencies for both teams, plus recent form, rotation and head-to-head history. Every game also carries our projected score, spread and total, built bottom-up from those same numbers: expected possessions times each side's opponent-adjusted points per possession, plus home court.

What these numbers mean: line shopping.