Robert Morris Colonials vs UIC Flames basketball final score

Fri, Nov 6 · 8:00 PM ET · Credit Union 1 Arena, Chicago, IL

Non-conferenceESPN+Credit Union 1 Arena, Chicago, IL
Robert Morris
0-1 · 0-0 conf
Efficiency #236
@
UIC
2025-26: 19-16 · 14-9 conf
Efficiency #110
Final
5679
Final score
Projected 68.0 – 75.5
RMU win 26%UIC win 74%
MarketClose
Spread
UIC −10.5
open UIC −11.0
Total
142.0
open 143.5
Our line
UIC −7.6
as of Fri, Nov 6 · 7:51 PM ET

Our play

How our line is built

each step, from an even game to our line
Spread
Even game
0.0
UICrated 1.7 above average
+1.7
Robert Morrisrated 1.2 below average
+1.2
Home court
+4.7
Our line
UIC −7.6
◂ Robert Morris sideUIC side ▸

The spread is seen from the home side: a plus moves it toward UIC. Our total joins once both teams have played 3 games.

Pace & total

possessions per 40 minutes
Tempo, possessions per 40 minutes

Projected possessions: 67.9, from each team's opponent-adjusted tempo. On raw 2025-26 season pace, UIC is the faster team (67.1, #241 of 365) and Robert Morris the slower (66.9, #251). When tempos clash, the slower team usually pulls the pace harder (weights 0.80 vs 0.66).

Projected possessions
67.9
per team, 40 min
Market total
142.0
Market close · open 143.5
Adjusted tempo, vs an average opponent
68.5#321
Robert Morris
69.9#242
UIC

How this game plays

points this game from the four factors, vs an average D-I matchup
Our line
UIC −7.6
Four factors +26.0 · not in these stats −18.4
From the four factors
UIC has the ball+9.7
Robert Morris has the ball−16.3
UIC has the ball
✓Wins second chancesOR% 36.3% #22 · RMU allows 50.0% #295+5.1
✓Takes care of the ballTO% 17.6% #243 · RMU forces 12.0% #281 · ~9 turnovers+3.6
✓Shoots it welleFG% 49.8% #245 · RMU allows 52.9% #188+1.0
✗Few trips to the lineFTR 36.2% #145 · RMU allows 33.8% #129 · FT 72.5% #1860.0
Robert Morris has the ball
✗Tough shooting lookeFG% 29.6% #305 · UIC allows 50.5% #125−11.6
✗Coughs it upTO% 28.4% #294 · UIC forces 19.7% #31 · ~17 turnovers−5.6
✓Gets to the lineFTR 46.9% #75 · UIC allows 33.9% #149 · FT 87.0% #12+1.3
✗Few second chancesOR% 29.7% #171 · UIC allows 32.0% #255−0.4

Shot diet

Where each offense shoots from and where each defense lets teams shoot · 2025-26 numbers
Robert Morrisoffense vsUICdefense
Share of shots by zone
Robert Morris shoots
UIC allows
D-I average
FG% by zone
ZoneD-I avg
Rim44.4%#26357.9%#14458.9%
Short 2 (≤9 ft)0.0%#23432.6%#2536.0%
Mid 2 (10 ft+)40.0%#11139.9%#23936.2%
Three16.7%#29233.4%#14732.1%
UICoffense vsRobert Morrisdefense
Share of shots by zone
UIC shoots
Robert Morris allows
D-I average
FG% by zone
ZoneD-I avg
Rim57.2%#22166.7%#21258.9%
Short 2 (≤9 ft)45.1%#6333.3%#12136.0%
Mid 2 (10 ft+)37.1%#21925.0%#8536.2%
Three31.6%#30030.8%#14032.1%
RimShort 2 (≤9 ft)Mid 2 (10 ft+)Three

Zones from play-by-play shot descriptions; garbage time removed. Bars show the share of field-goal attempts in each zone; where a slice is too thin for its number, the shares are listed under the bar. FG% ranks: #1 = best for that side (most accurate shooting, stingiest defense).

Shot volume

Extra scoring chances from rebounds, turnovers and the foul line · 2025-26 numbers
Robert Morris
−15.2extra scoring chances per game vs a D-I average team#280 of 365
Off reb %
29.7%
#171
Def reb %
50.0%
#295
Turnover %
28.4%
#294
Forced TO %
12.0%
#281
FT rate
46.9%
#75
FT allowed
33.8%
#129
Where the chances come from (per game)
Offensive rebounding−0.7
Defensive rebounding−6.1
Ball security−7.1
Forcing turnovers−4.7
Foul shots drawn+2.5
Foul shots allowed+0.9
UIC
+3.6extra scoring chances per game vs a D-I average team#46 of 365
Off reb %
36.3%
#22
Def reb %
68.0%
#255
Turnover %
17.6%
#243
Forced TO %
19.7%
#31
FT rate
36.2%
#145
FT allowed
33.9%
#149
Where the chances come from (per game)
Offensive rebounding+1.9
Defensive rebounding−0.4
Ball security−0.6
Forcing turnovers+2.1
Foul shots drawn+0.3
Foul shots allowed+0.3

UIC has more extra scoring chances per game: +3.6 (#46 of 365) to Robert Morris’s −15.2 (#280).

Grade = extra shots and foul-line trips per game compared with a D-I average team, built from six season rates. Cell shading is the national rank for each rate (greener = better for that team).

Rotation

Robert Morris2026-27 numbers through Fri, Nov 6
#PlayerPosClHtGP-GSMPGPPGRPGAPGTOVeFG%3P%3PA/gFT%Usage
1GSr6'3"2-230.54.53.03.55.528.6%25.0%4.033.3%25.7%
12GSo6'2"2-128.56.50.51.01.533.3%25.0%8.050.0%22.8%
22GSo6'6"2-227.013.54.00.51.043.8%33.3%3.0100.0%26.5%
5GSo6'6"2-125.05.55.01.00.557.1%66.7%1.575.0%11.7%
13FSo6'10"2-025.03.04.52.53.040.0%0.0%0.5100.0%14.2%
3GJr6'3"2-124.07.51.51.02.030.0%14.3%3.575.0%28.1%
23FSr6'8"2-221.06.03.01.53.555.6%—0.0100.0%23.9%
11FJr6'7"1-118.08.02.00.01.037.5%—0.0100.0%32.6%
4GFr6'3"2-08.02.02.50.01.040.0%0.0%0.5—25.9%
8GFr6'4"1-04.00.01.00.02.0——0.0—29.4%

Team comparison

national rank toned left for away, right for home
Robert MorrisUIC
Efficiency
103.4
106.1
107.3
102.2
68.5
69.9
12.5
—
Shooting
29.6%
49.8%
32.3%
51.0%
16.7%
31.6%
87.0%
72.5%
46.9%
36.2%
Ball control & glass
28.4%
17.6%
12.0%
19.7%
29.7%
36.3%
50.0%
32.0%
12.0%
9.5%
6.5%
10.3%
Style
36.7%
32.8%
32.7%
48.4%
4.1%
14.2%
46.2%
53.6%
39.5%
39.3%
Roster
2.58
3.03
6'5.3"
6'4.6"
24.1%
44.5%

Offseason

roster movement into this season — descriptive, not a model input
Robert Morris
Returning minutes: 24.1%Returning production: 18.2%
Lost
  • Ryan Prather Jr. 34.0 mpg, 15.7 ppg · transferred to Iowa State
  • DeSean Goode 31.0 mpg, 15.2 ppg · transferred to Miami
  • Nikos Chitikoudis 25.3 mpg, 11.0 ppg · transferred to Xavier
  • Albert Vargas 20.5 mpg, 6.4 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
  • Kaleb Brown 19.1 mpg, 3.9 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
  • Josh Hill 11.3 mpg, 5.0 ppg · transferred to Oakland
Added
  • Ace Valentine from UMBC · 31.7 mpg, 11.6 ppg last season
  • Jalik Dunkley from Nicholls · 25.9 mpg, 11.3 ppg last season
  • KC Ugwuakazi from Merrimack · 17.8 mpg, 4.9 ppg last season
  • KJ Garris Jr. from Fullerton · 13.6 mpg, 7.0 ppg last season
  • Michael Parlow no D1 minutes last season
  • Will Occomy no D1 minutes last season

Returns 24% of last season's minutes; lost 4 of its top 5 (3 transferred). Teams returning under 40% of last season's minutes have historically fallen about 0.8 points of AdjEM (n=716 team-seasons, 2022-2026).

UIC
Returning minutes: 58.6%Returning production: 58.3%
Lost
  • Abdul Momoh 23.3 mpg, 7.9 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
  • Sam Silverstein 21.3 mpg, 2.8 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
  • Elijah Crawford 17.0 mpg, 9.3 ppg · transferred to Villanova
  • Josiah Hammons 14.2 mpg, 6.2 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
  • Ante Beljan 5.5 mpg, 2.6 ppg · transferred to UNC Greensboro
  • Tai Walters-Whitaker 2.2 mpg, 0.3 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
Added
  • Benny Gealer from Stanford · 29.5 mpg, 10.9 ppg last season
  • Nicolas Ortiz new to D1 · 25.5 mpg, 11.5 ppg last season
  • Asa Thomas from Furman · 21.9 mpg, 9.5 ppg last season
  • Lucas Scroggins from Saint Peter's · 16.2 mpg, 5.4 ppg last season
  • Gabe Cupps from Ohio State · 11.9 mpg, 1.6 ppg last season
  • Mario Wooden Jr. no D1 minutes last season

Returns 59% of last season's minutes; lost 1 of its top 5.

Line history

Market line, home spread or game total

Lines by book

BookSpread (home) open → nowTotal open → nowML homeML away
DraftKings-11.5→-10.5-108143.5→142.5o-105 u-115-650+470
FanDuel-10.5-110143.5→142.5o-115 u-105-610+440
BetMGM-10.5-110143.5→142.5o-110 u-110-625+450
BetRivers-10.5-110143.5o-109 u-114-625+420
Fanatics-10.5-110144→142.5o-110 u-110-650+460
BetOnline-10→-11-110143.5→142.5o-110 u-110-675+491
Bovada-11→-10.5-110143.5→142o-110 u-110-675+460
theScore Bet-10.5-110143.5→142.5o-105 u-115-700+450
Hard Rock-10.5-110143.5o-110 u-110-650+425
Kalshi-10.5+104141.5o-108 u+104-525+488
Polymarket-10.5+100142.5o+100 u-108-525+488
Novig-10.5-102143.5→141.5o-106 u+104-525+488
open = first-sighted line for this event · now = latest capture

Head-to-head

this season and last
DateSeasonResult
Wed, Nov 262025-26UIC 74 – 88 Robert Morris

More games on Fri, Nov 6

← Thu, Nov 5 · Sat, Nov 7 → · Full season schedule

The CBB Matchups tab lays out the day's Division I slate: matchup, tip time, records and rank, and — once posted — the market spread and total (the median across books when no market line is up). Three views switch the table between projected scores, pace and totals, and each team's offensive and defensive tendencies. Each game opens into opponent-adjusted possessions, efficiency and four-factor tendencies for both teams, plus recent form, rotation and head-to-head history. Every game also carries our projected score, spread and total, from our line: the same view our bets are made from.

What these numbers mean: line shopping.