CBB Matchups

Every D1 game with tempo-free ratings, four factors and market lines, one place.

College basketball is being built for the 2026-27 season (tip-off Nov 3). What's here fills in as games are played.
Non-conferenceSchottenstein Center, Columbus, OH
Youngstown St
Efficiency #204
2025-26: 15-17 · 8-13 conf
@
Ohio State
Efficiency #31
2025-26: 21-13 · 13-9 conf
Fri, Nov 6 · TBD
67.7
win 13%
Projected
80.9
win 87%
No line posted yet.
Model: OSU −13.3 · total 148.6 · ratings as of Sat, Oct 3
Preseason ratings start from 2025-26's final adjusted ratings, regressed toward the D1 average. The stats below are 2025-26's too; both update once 2026-27 games are played.

How the projection is built

each step, from an average D-I game to this one
Projected total
Average D-I game
148.2
PaceAdjusted tempo: Ohio State 67.5, Youngstown St 68.3 → 67.4 possessions
−2.0
Ohio State offense vs Youngstown St defense
+5.9
Youngstown St offense vs Ohio State defense
−3.5
Projected total
148.6
Axis starts at 140 pointsPoints added or removed at each step
Projected margin
Even game
0.0
Ohio State offense vs Youngstown St defense
+5.9
Youngstown St offense vs Ohio State defense
+3.5
Home court+2.9 points per 100 possessions to the home offense, −2.9 to the visitors
+3.9
Ohio State by 13.3
13.3
Youngstown St side ◂▸ Ohio State side

Steps are rounded to one decimal, so they can differ from the total by 0.1. The margin is the same build seen from the home side; positive numbers help Ohio State.

Pace & total

possessions per 40 minutes
Tempo, possessions per 40 minutes

Projected possessions: 67.4, from each team's opponent-adjusted tempo. On raw 2025-26 season pace, Youngstown St is the faster team (68.6, #169 of 365) and Ohio State the slower (66.4, #278). When tempos clash, the slower team usually pulls the pace harder (study weights 0.80 vs 0.66).

Projected possessions
67.4
per team, 40 min
Projected total
148.6
model
Projected team totals
67.7 / 80.9
Youngstown St / Ohio State
Adjusted tempo, vs an average opponent
68.3#187
Youngstown St
67.5#253
Ohio State

How this game plays

what the study found each side's numbers actually do when these two teams meet
AdvantageOhio State
Where Ohio State scores: shooting
Ohio State shoots an effective 56.2% (#19); Youngstown St allows 52.3% (#228). Expect about 54.7%, 3.4 points above an average D1 matchup — worth roughly +4.8 points per 100 possessions.
Youngstown St has the ball
OffenseOhio State allowsvs D1 avg
53.7% #76
50.2% #114
+1.2 pt/100
18.8% #313
15.6% #242
-0.5 pt/100
30.4% #182
30.0% #160
-0.1 pt/100
31.4% #272
34.7% #170
-0.2 pt/100
73.3% #159
—
+0.1 pt/100
Youngstown St net across the four factors + FT%, vs. a D1-average matchup: +0.4 pts/100
Ohio State has the ball
OffenseYoungstown St allowsvs D1 avg
56.2% #19
52.3% #228
+4.8 pt/100
15.3% #91
17.8% #106
+0.2 pt/100
30.4% #185
30.7% #191
+0.1 pt/100
37.2% #122
36.0% #210
+0.2 pt/100
77.7% #21
—
+0.5 pt/100
Ohio State net across the four factors + FT%, vs. a D1-average matchup: +5.8 pts/100

Shot diet

Where each offense shoots from and where each defense lets teams shoot · 2025-26 numbers
Youngstown Stoffense vsOhio Statedefense
Share of shots by zone
Youngstown St shoots
Ohio State allows
D-I average
FG% by zone
ZoneD-I avg
Rim61.9%#7559.8%#22058.6%
Short 2 (≤9 ft)31.3%#33738.4%#14339.5%
Mid 2 (10 ft+)38.4%#17642.7%#32838.0%
Three33.8%#18431.9%#5733.7%
Ohio Stateoffense vsYoungstown Stdefense
Share of shots by zone
Ohio State shoots
Youngstown St allows
D-I average
FG% by zone
ZoneD-I avg
Rim66.1%#1459.8%#21758.6%
Short 2 (≤9 ft)50.3%#1237.4%#12339.5%
Mid 2 (10 ft+)47.6%#433.6%#4138.0%
Three35.7%#7235.5%#28033.7%
RimShort 2 (≤9 ft)Mid 2 (10 ft+)Three

Zones from play-by-play shot descriptions; garbage time removed. Bars show the share of field-goal attempts in each zone; where a slice is too thin for its number, the shares are listed under the bar. FG% ranks: #1 = best for that side (most accurate shooting, stingiest defense).

Shot volume

Extra scoring chances from rebounds, turnovers and the foul line · 2025-26 numbers
Youngstown St
−1.8extra scoring chances per game vs a D-I average team#263 of 365
Off reb %
30.4%
#182
Def reb %
69.3%
#191
Turnover %
18.8%
#313
Forced TO %
17.8%
#106
FT rate
31.4%
#272
FT allowed
36.0%
#210
Where the chances come from (per game)
Offensive rebounding0.0
Defensive rebounding0.0
Ball security−1.4
Forcing turnovers+0.8
Foul shots drawn−0.9
Foul shots allowed−0.2
Ohio State
+1.2extra scoring chances per game vs a D-I average team#132 of 365
Off reb %
30.4%
#185
Def reb %
70.0%
#160
Turnover %
15.3%
#91
Forced TO %
15.6%
#242
FT rate
37.2%
#122
FT allowed
34.7%
#170
Where the chances come from (per game)
Offensive rebounding0.0
Defensive rebounding+0.2
Ball security+1.0
Forcing turnovers−0.7
Foul shots drawn+0.6
Foul shots allowed+0.1

Ohio State has more extra scoring chances per game: +1.2 (#132 of 365) to Youngstown St’s −1.8 (#263).

Grade = extra shots and foul-line trips per game compared with a D-I average team, built from six season rates. Cell shading is the national rank for each rate (greener = better for that team).

Rotation

Youngstown St2025-26 numbers
#PlayerPosClHtGP-GSMPGPPGRPGAPGTOVeFG%3P%3PA/gFT%UsageStatus
15Cris CarrollFSr6'6"32-3230.317.45.21.82.759.4%39.6%7.178.0%32.7%
9Bryson DawkinsGSr6'2"32-3226.812.64.61.41.556.9%30.7%3.261.4%27.5%
2Rich RolfFJr6'7"31-3026.69.14.52.11.056.7%36.8%4.088.1%19.4%
0Jason NelsonGSr5'10"31-3125.06.92.82.91.644.1%28.0%2.475.0%20.3%
6Drew KingGJr6'3"32-117.42.83.12.91.250.9%29.4%0.571.1%12.5%
1Cam PolakGSr6'2"29-1017.25.81.60.61.155.3%38.5%3.679.3%21.5%
7Vlad SalaridzeFSr6'7"27-417.78.44.31.51.050.9%33.3%2.477.6%28.3%
10Imanuel ZorgvolCSr7'0"32-1414.75.72.80.30.965.2%33.3%0.469.6%21.7%
8Jaiden HaynesGFr6'3"21-216.04.81.50.50.352.9%33.3%2.381.8%18.5%
4Tyler RobinettFSr6'8"11-412.53.02.70.50.544.1%16.7%1.150.0%18.5%
5Shaheed SoleboGFr6'4"7-06.72.31.30.90.740.9%16.7%0.953.8%35.7%
3Derrick AndersonGSr6'1"6-05.52.70.71.00.057.7%16.7%1.050.0%38.7%
21Connor SwiderFFr6'9"0-00.00.00.00.00.0——0.0——
13Markus NavarraFFr6'8"0-00.00.00.00.00.0——0.0——
Rosters come from ESPN and are still filling in; incoming transfers and freshmen may be missing.

Tale of the tape

national rank toned left for away, right for home
Youngstown StOhio State
Efficiency
106.8
117.4
108.3
104.9
68.3
67.5
—
—
Shooting
53.7%
56.2%
56.6%
58.0%
33.8%
35.7%
73.3%
77.7%
31.4%
37.2%
Ball control & glass
18.8%
15.3%
17.8%
15.6%
30.4%
30.4%
30.7%
30.0%
10.8%
8.1%
9.7%
8.9%
Style
49.4%
40.1%
42.0%
43.4%
14.0%
8.5%
53.8%
52.6%
36.9%
23.7%
Roster
3.58
2.19
6'4.3"
6'5.5"
93.2%
66.1%

Offseason

roster movement into this season — descriptive, not a model input
Youngstown St
Returning minutes: 93.2%Returning production: 94.3%
Lost
  • Tae Blackshear 13.7 mpg, 6.3 ppg · transferred to Niagara
Added
  • Connor Swider no D1 minutes last season
  • Markus Navarra no D1 minutes last season

No incoming D1 transfers are listed on ESPN's roster yet — until they are, returning shares read high.

Returns 93% of last season's minutes. Teams returning at least 65% of last season's minutes have historically gained about 2.2 points of AdjEM (n=156 team-seasons, 2022-2026).

Ohio State
Returning minutes: 66.1%Returning production: 58.1%
Lost
  • Bruce Thornton 36.6 mpg, 19.9 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
  • Christoph Tilly 24.5 mpg, 10.4 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
  • Colin White 7.5 mpg, 0.7 ppg · transferred to Akron
Added
  • Myles Herro no D1 minutes last season
  • Josh Ojianwuna no D1 minutes last season

No incoming D1 transfers are listed on ESPN's roster yet — until they are, returning shares read high.

Returns 66% of last season's minutes; lost 2 of its top 5. Teams returning at least 65% of last season's minutes have historically gained about 2.2 points of AdjEM (n=156 team-seasons, 2022-2026).

Head-to-head

this season and last
No meetings the last two seasons.

The CBB Matchups tab lays out the day's Division I slate: matchup, tip time, records and rank, and — once posted — Pinnacle's spread and total (the median across books when Pinnacle has no line). Three views switch the table between projected scores, pace and totals, and each team's offensive and defensive tendencies. Each game opens into opponent-adjusted possessions, efficiency and four-factor tendencies for both teams, plus recent form, rotation and head-to-head history. Every game also carries our projected score, spread and total, built bottom-up from those same numbers: expected possessions times each side's opponent-adjusted points per possession, plus home court.

What these numbers mean: line shopping.