CBB Matchups

Every D1 game with tempo-free ratings, four factors and market lines, one place.

College basketball is being built for the 2026-27 season (tip-off Nov 3). What's here fills in as games are played.
Non-conferenceDean E. Smith Center, Chapel Hill, NC
Wofford
Efficiency #235
2025-26: 19-13 · 11-8 conf
@
North Carolina
Efficiency #29
2025-26: 24-9 · 12-7 conf
Fri, Nov 6 · TBD
69.3
win 10%
Projected
84.4
win 90%
No line posted yet.
Model: UNC −15.1 · total 153.7 · ratings as of Sat, Oct 3
Preseason ratings start from 2025-26's final adjusted ratings, regressed toward the D1 average. The stats below are 2025-26's too; both update once 2026-27 games are played.

How the projection is built

each step, from an average D-I game to this one
Projected total
Average D-I game
148.2
PaceAdjusted tempo: North Carolina 68.7, Wofford 68.6 → 69.0 possessions
+1.4
North Carolina offense vs Wofford defense
+7.6
Wofford offense vs North Carolina defense
−3.6
Projected total
153.7
Axis starts at 140 pointsPoints added or removed at each step
Projected margin
Even game
0.0
North Carolina offense vs Wofford defense
+7.6
Wofford offense vs North Carolina defense
+3.6
Home court+2.9 points per 100 possessions to the home offense, −2.9 to the visitors
+4.0
North Carolina by 15.1
15.1
Wofford side ◂▸ North Carolina side

Steps are rounded to one decimal, so they can differ from the total by 0.1: the total steps add to 153.6 against a projected 153.7, and the margin steps add to +15.2 against +15.1. The margin is the same build seen from the home side; positive numbers help North Carolina.

Pace & total

possessions per 40 minutes
Tempo, possessions per 40 minutes

Projected possessions: 69.0, from each team's opponent-adjusted tempo. On raw 2025-26 season pace, North Carolina is the faster team (68.8, #162 of 365) and Wofford the slower (68.4, #178). When tempos clash, the slower team usually pulls the pace harder (study weights 0.80 vs 0.66).

Projected possessions
69.0
per team, 40 min
Projected total
153.7
model
Projected team totals
69.3 / 84.4
Wofford / North Carolina
Adjusted tempo, vs an average opponent
68.6#156
Wofford
68.7#144
North Carolina

How this game plays

what the study found each side's numbers actually do when these two teams meet
AdvantageWofford
Where Wofford scores: ball control
Wofford turns it over on 13.4% of possessions (#13); North Carolina forces turnovers on 13.6% of opponent possessions (#344). Expect about 12.8%, 3.9 points below an average D1 matchup — worth roughly +4.8 points per 100 possessions.
AdvantageNorth Carolina
Where North Carolina scores: shooting
North Carolina shoots an effective 54.3% (#57); Wofford allows 53.8% (#294). Expect about 54.3%, 3.1 points above an average D1 matchup — worth roughly +4.3 points per 100 possessions.
TurnoversNorth Carolina
North Carolina protects the ball
Projected turnover rate of 14.0% is worth roughly +3.4 points per 100 possessions for North Carolina's offense.
Watch for noise
3-point caution
A notable season 3-point number here (Wofford's defense) is close to a coin flip going forward — the study's model of next-game 3P% barely beats guessing the D1 average. Shot volume is what actually carries: expect Wofford at about 40.8% of its shots from three, North Carolina about 40.7%.
Wofford has the ball
OffenseNorth Carolina allowsvs D1 avg
52.5% #127
48.3% #44
-1.1 pt/100
13.4% #13
13.6% #344
+4.8 pt/100
29.8% #212
27.8% #59
-1.0 pt/100
36.2% #144
23.8% #3
-0.8 pt/100
70.9% #243
—
-0.1 pt/100
Wofford net across the four factors + FT%, vs. a D1-average matchup: +1.8 pts/100
North Carolina has the ball
OffenseWofford allowsvs D1 avg
54.3% #57
53.8% #294
+4.3 pt/100
13.9% #19
14.9% #293
+3.4 pt/100
31.2% #159
29.0% #101
-0.1 pt/100
37.1% #127
36.8% #232
+0.3 pt/100
68.2% #322
—
-0.4 pt/100
North Carolina net across the four factors + FT%, vs. a D1-average matchup: +7.6 pts/100

Shot diet

Where each offense shoots from and where each defense lets teams shoot · 2025-26 numbers
Woffordoffense vsNorth Carolinadefense
Share of shots by zone
Wofford shoots
North Carolina allows
D-I average
FG% by zone
ZoneD-I avg
Rim57.1%#23355.8%#7958.6%
Short 2 (≤9 ft)42.1%#11841.1%#21139.5%
Mid 2 (10 ft+)35.8%#26633.5%#3838.0%
Three35.0%#11934.7%#23433.7%
North Carolinaoffense vsWofforddefense
Share of shots by zone
North Carolina shoots
Wofford allows
D-I average
FG% by zone
ZoneD-I avg
Rim65.0%#2256.2%#9158.6%
Short 2 (≤9 ft)42.3%#11448.3%#34239.5%
Mid 2 (10 ft+)42.1%#5140.8%#27138.0%
Three34.2%#15936.4%#32133.7%
RimShort 2 (≤9 ft)Mid 2 (10 ft+)Three

Zones from play-by-play shot descriptions; garbage time removed. Bars show the share of field-goal attempts in each zone; where a slice is too thin for its number, the shares are listed under the bar. FG% ranks: #1 = best for that side (most accurate shooting, stingiest defense).

Shot volume

Extra scoring chances from rebounds, turnovers and the foul line · 2025-26 numbers
Wofford
+1.4extra scoring chances per game vs a D-I average team#124 of 365
Off reb %
29.8%
#212
Def reb %
71.0%
#101
Turnover %
13.4%
#13
Forced TO %
14.9%
#293
FT rate
36.2%
#144
FT allowed
36.8%
#232
Where the chances come from (per game)
Offensive rebounding−0.2
Defensive rebounding+0.5
Ball security+2.3
Forcing turnovers−1.2
Foul shots drawn+0.3
Foul shots allowed−0.4
North Carolina
+4.5extra scoring chances per game vs a D-I average team#31 of 365
Off reb %
31.2%
#159
Def reb %
72.2%
#59
Turnover %
13.9%
#19
Forced TO %
13.6%
#344
FT rate
37.1%
#127
FT allowed
23.8%
#3
Where the chances come from (per game)
Offensive rebounding+0.3
Defensive rebounding+0.9
Ball security+2.0
Forcing turnovers−2.1
Foul shots drawn+0.5
Foul shots allowed+2.9

North Carolina has more extra scoring chances per game: +4.5 (#31 of 365) to Wofford’s +1.4 (#124).

Grade = extra shots and foul-line trips per game compared with a D-I average team, built from six season rates. Cell shading is the national rank for each rate (greener = better for that team).

Rotation

Wofford2025-26 numbers
ESPN hasn't posted Wofford's 2026-27 roster yet — these are last season's players.
#PlayerPosClHtGP-GSMPGPPGRPGAPGTOVeFG%3P%3PA/gFT%UsageStatus
21Nils MachowskiGJr6'3"32-3233.717.25.72.61.754.2%38.2%7.479.0%28.9%
0Cayden VaskoGJr6'6"32-3231.910.44.54.11.149.3%32.1%5.380.0%20.1%
11Kahmare HolmesGSo6'3"26-2631.919.55.72.71.954.6%35.2%4.965.5%34.8%
4Chace WatleyGFr6'2"32-1524.89.73.31.31.145.8%30.6%3.176.7%24.8%
1Brian SumpterFFr6'8"31-2122.76.64.90.80.960.6%16.7%0.461.5%16.3%
2Luke FlynnGSo6'1"21-1826.05.73.91.20.545.6%33.8%3.775.8%13.6%
25Rex StirlingFJr6'8"30-914.55.13.10.90.957.3%0.0%0.061.4%21.6%
5Brendan RigsbeeGJr6'2"25-515.84.21.70.80.554.3%22.2%1.469.2%15.9%
8Jayden TylerGFr5'10"25-013.25.41.00.50.460.6%47.5%2.453.7%22.0%
10Maximo OrtegaGFr6'2"22-09.23.51.10.50.559.0%41.2%0.865.4%20.9%
32Callum RichardCJr6'10"7-17.12.31.40.40.772.7%—0.0—19.8%
7Cannon RichardsFSo6'7"2-17.53.02.00.50.537.5%50.0%1.075.0%27.8%
12Grayson CollinsGSo5'11"8-01.80.00.00.10.00.0%0.0%0.3—12.5%
14Davis MillerGJr6'3"6-01.70.50.30.00.075.0%100.0%0.2—12.0%
9Alessandro PerottiFJr6'10"0-00.00.00.00.00.0——0.0——
Rosters come from ESPN and are still filling in; incoming transfers and freshmen may be missing.

Tale of the tape

national rank toned left for away, right for home
WoffordNorth Carolina
Efficiency
109.2
115.5
112.4
102.6
68.6
68.7
—
—
Shooting
52.5%
54.3%
52.5%
56.5%
35.0%
34.2%
70.9%
68.2%
36.2%
37.1%
Ball control & glass
13.4%
13.9%
14.9%
13.6%
29.8%
31.2%
29.0%
27.8%
8.1%
8.3%
9.5%
9.1%
Style
43.1%
42.2%
42.9%
42.6%
10.7%
14.4%
51.2%
57.2%
26.7%
28.4%
Roster
2.15
3.37
6'3.8"
6'6.7"
—
17.0%

Offseason

roster movement into this season — descriptive, not a model input
Wofford
Returning minutes: 100.0%Returning production: 100.0%
ESPN hasn't posted Wofford's roster for this season yet — no movement to show.

Returns 100% of last season's minutes. Teams returning at least 65% of last season's minutes have historically gained about 2.2 points of AdjEM (n=156 team-seasons, 2022-2026). (ESPN hasn't posted this season's roster yet -- this may still be last season's list.)

North Carolina
Returning minutes: 17.0%Returning production: 13.2%
Lost
  • Henri Veesaar 29.5 mpg, 16.0 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
  • Luka Bogavac 24.4 mpg, 9.8 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
  • Seth Trimble 23.6 mpg, 10.2 ppg · transferred to Louisville
  • Caleb Wilson 22.9 mpg, 14.4 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
  • Derek Dixon 22.3 mpg, 6.5 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
  • Kyan Evans 17.6 mpg, 4.0 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
Added
  • Terrence Brown from Utah · 31.5 mpg, 19.9 ppg last season
  • Neo Avdalas from Virginia Tech · 30.8 mpg, 11.7 ppg last season
  • Angelo Brizzi from Buffalo · 29.8 mpg, 14.5 ppg last season
  • Cameron Fens from South Dakota · 25.3 mpg, 14.4 ppg last season
  • Matt Able from NC State · 21.7 mpg, 8.8 ppg last season
  • Kevin Thomas no D1 minutes last season

Returns 17% of last season's minutes; lost 4 of its top 5 (1 transferred). Teams returning under 40% of last season's minutes have historically fallen about 0.8 points of AdjEM (n=716 team-seasons, 2022-2026).

Head-to-head

this season and last
No meetings the last two seasons.

The CBB Matchups tab lays out the day's Division I slate: matchup, tip time, records and rank, and — once posted — Pinnacle's spread and total (the median across books when Pinnacle has no line). Three views switch the table between projected scores, pace and totals, and each team's offensive and defensive tendencies. Each game opens into opponent-adjusted possessions, efficiency and four-factor tendencies for both teams, plus recent form, rotation and head-to-head history. Every game also carries our projected score, spread and total, built bottom-up from those same numbers: expected possessions times each side's opponent-adjusted points per possession, plus home court.

What these numbers mean: line shopping.