North Dakota State Bison vs Colorado State Rams basketball preview & prediction

Wed, Nov 18 · 9:00 PM ET · Moby Arena, Fort Collins, CO

Non-conferenceMoby Arena, Fort Collins, CO
N Dakota St
1-3 · 0-0 conf
Efficiency #223
@
Colorado St
2-0 · 0-0 conf
Efficiency #102
Wed, Nov 18 · 9:00 PM ET
Our projected score shows once the market opens.
No line posted yet.

Our play

Pace & total

possessions per 40 minutes
Tempo, possessions per 40 minutes

Projected possessions: 68.3, from each team's opponent-adjusted tempo. On raw season pace, Colorado St is the faster team (71.2, #162 of 365) and N Dakota St the slower (68.5, #250). When tempos clash, the slower team usually pulls the pace harder (weights 0.80 vs 0.66).

Projected possessions
68.3
per team, 40 min
Adjusted tempo, vs an average opponent
69.3#270
N Dakota St
69.5#256
Colorado St

How this game plays

points this game from the four factors, vs an average D-I matchup
From the four factors
Colorado St has the ball+14.0
N Dakota St has the ball−3.1
Colorado St has the ball
✓Shoots it welleFG% 57.9% #52 · NDSU allows 71.3% #357+14.7
✗Few second chancesOR% 24.1% #296 · NDSU allows 28.0% #124−2.9
✓Takes care of the ballTO% 16.9% #149 · NDSU forces 16.1% #235 · ~11 turnovers+1.8
✓Gets to the lineFTR 32.5% #227 · NDSU allows 33.5% #144 · FT 81.1% #40+0.3
N Dakota St has the ball
✗Tough shooting lookeFG% 46.9% #242 · CSU allows 48.4% #135−2.8
✓Takes care of the ballTO% 16.1% #119 · CSU forces 15.5% #258 · ~10 turnovers+2.5
✗Few second chancesOR% 33.3% #135 · CSU allows 21.5% #21−1.5
✗Few trips to the lineFTR 22.4% #329 · CSU allows 26.0% #56 · FT 68.2% #212−1.3

Shot diet

Where each offense shoots from and where each defense lets teams shoot
N Dakota Stoffense vsColorado Stdefense
Share of shots by zone
N Dakota St shoots
Colorado St allows
D-I average
FG% by zone
ZoneD-I avg
Rim45.6%#31446.4%#4858.0%
Short 2 (≤9 ft)18.8%#29257.1%#29538.2%
Mid 2 (10 ft+)66.7%#1638.1%#20034.7%
Three31.9%#18632.8%#18132.5%
Colorado Stoffense vsN Dakota Stdefense
Share of shots by zone
Colorado St shoots
N Dakota St allows
D-I average
FG% by zone
ZoneD-I avg
Rim77.6%#1171.7%#32158.0%
Short 2 (≤9 ft)33.3%#183100.0%#34838.2%
Mid 2 (10 ft+)20.0%#2798.3%#2334.7%
Three33.3%#15853.2%#35632.5%
RimShort 2 (≤9 ft)Mid 2 (10 ft+)Three

Zones from play-by-play shot descriptions; garbage time removed. Bars show the share of field-goal attempts in each zone; where a slice is too thin for its number, the shares are listed under the bar. FG% ranks: #1 = best for that side (most accurate shooting, stingiest defense).

Shot volume

Extra scoring chances from rebounds, turnovers and the foul line
N Dakota St
−0.8extra scoring chances per game vs a D-I average team#186 of 365
Off reb %
33.3%
#135
Def reb %
72.0%
#124
Turnover %
16.1%
#119
Forced TO %
16.1%
#235
FT rate
22.4%
#329
FT allowed
33.5%
#144
Where the chances come from (per game)
Offensive rebounding+0.6
Defensive rebounding+1.2
Ball security+1.6
Forcing turnovers−1.4
Foul shots drawn−3.9
Foul shots allowed+1.2
Colorado St
+1.9extra scoring chances per game vs a D-I average team#151 of 365
Off reb %
24.1%
#296
Def reb %
78.5%
#21
Turnover %
16.9%
#149
Forced TO %
15.5%
#258
FT rate
32.5%
#227
FT allowed
26.0%
#56
Where the chances come from (per game)
Offensive rebounding−2.5
Defensive rebounding+3.4
Ball security+1.0
Forcing turnovers−1.8
Foul shots drawn−1.3
Foul shots allowed+3.1

Colorado St has more extra scoring chances per game: +1.9 (#151 of 365) to N Dakota St’s −0.8 (#186).

Grade = extra shots and foul-line trips per game compared with a D-I average team, built from six season rates. Cell shading is the national rank for each rate (greener = better for that team).

Rotation

Who has been playing, and who has not
N Dakota St2026-27 numbers · last game: Bakersfield, Nov 8
#PlayerPosClHtGP-GSMPGMin/40, last 8Last 3 vs beforeStatusPPGRPGAPGTOVeFG%3P%3PA/gFT%Usage
0GSr6'1"4-426.330—Started last14.03.02.51.553.0%26.3%4.860.0%31.8%
44FJr6'9"4-424.025—Started last9.54.01.01.050.0%47.1%4.357.1%24.7%
4GFr6'3"4-122.535—Started last10.50.81.00.862.5%47.4%4.870.0%22.8%
1GSo6'4"4-422.022—Started last6.82.00.51.529.6%25.0%2.055.0%27.7%
5GJr6'2"3-326.30—Missed last game8.72.35.02.352.5%35.7%4.783.3%21.8%
2GSo6'3"4-019.326—Bench11.53.02.81.361.5%46.2%3.387.5%28.7%
7GJr6'6"4-017.319—Bench5.35.00.00.552.8%11.1%2.366.7%17.8%
3FJr6'6"4-415.015—Started last3.56.00.30.543.8%0.0%0.3—17.2%
23FJr6'8"4-014.012—Bench5.32.30.81.550.0%28.6%1.8100.0%27.2%
13GFr6'0"4-08.810—Bench1.51.00.00.337.5%25.0%2.0—14.8%
14GSo6'7"4-07.36—Bench1.81.80.00.050.0%0.0%0.533.3%14.8%
11GJr6'6"2-05.5——Missed last0.00.50.00.00.0%0.0%0.5—5.3%
35FFr7'0"1-02.0——Out L30.00.00.00.0——0.0—0.0%
22FFr6'8"1-02.0——Out L30.00.00.00.00.0%—0.0—28.6%
12FFr6'8"1-01.0——Out L30.00.00.00.0——0.0—0.0%
Into the starting lineup: Max Iversen.Out of the starting lineup: Andy Stefonowicz.

Competitive minutes leave out garbage time (provisional rule: a second-half lead of 25+ inside 15:00, 20+ inside 10:00, 15+ inside 5:00 or 10+ inside 2:00, held to the end) and are shown per 40 minutes. Status says only whether a player appeared; the reason is not published.

Team comparison

national rank toned left for away, right for home
N Dakota StColorado St
Efficiency
107.8
111.7
111.6
105.6
69.3
69.5
3.6
1.4
Shooting
46.9%
57.9%
46.1%
62.5%
31.9%
33.3%
68.2%
81.1%
22.4%
32.5%
Ball control & glass
16.1%
16.9%
16.1%
15.5%
33.3%
24.1%
28.0%
21.5%
6.3%
10.5%
21.6%
2.8%
Style
48.0%
36.8%
42.1%
50.6%
7.0%
9.9%
48.1%
52.5%
42.1%
24.7%
Roster
2.56
3.12
6'4.4"
6'5.8"
23.2%
57.7%

Offseason

roster movement into this season — descriptive, not a model input
N Dakota St
Returning minutes: 23.2%Returning production: 18.0%
Lost
  • Trevian Carson 31.6 mpg, 11.9 ppg · transferred to Cincinnati
  • Damari Wheeler-Thomas 27.9 mpg, 13.2 ppg · transferred to Boise St
  • Markhi Strickland 24.3 mpg, 11.6 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
  • Noah Feddersen 21.1 mpg, 9.3 ppg · transferred to Colorado
  • Tay Smith 19.8 mpg, 7.7 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
  • Treyson Anderson 18.3 mpg, 10.4 ppg · transferred to Butler
Added
  • Melvin Bell Jr. from San José St · 33.4 mpg, 8.7 ppg last season
  • Rob Diaz III from Long Beach St · 21.9 mpg, 8.1 ppg last season
  • Karl Poom from N Arizona · 19.6 mpg, 8.9 ppg last season
  • Jack Robison from Wisconsin · 0.9 mpg, 0.5 ppg last season
  • Oliver Junker no D1 minutes last season
  • Colin Stack no D1 minutes last season

Returns 23% of last season's minutes; lost 4 of its top 5 (3 transferred). Teams returning under 40% of last season's minutes have historically fallen about 0.8 points of AdjEM (n=716 team-seasons, 2022-2026).

Colorado St
Returning minutes: 57.9%Returning production: 59.7%
Lost
  • Jevin Muniz 30.5 mpg, 9.4 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
  • Brandon Rechsteiner 27.7 mpg, 12.0 ppg · transferred to Kansas St
  • Augustinas Kiudulas 14.6 mpg, 5.9 ppg · transferred to W Michigan
  • Nikola Djapa 5.2 mpg, 1.3 ppg · transferred to Wright St
  • Darnez Slater 4.6 mpg, 1.0 ppg · transferred to Montana St
  • Jon Mekonnen 1.6 mpg, 0.7 ppg · transferred to S Dakota St
Added
  • Justin Menard from Marist · 29.3 mpg, 12.9 ppg last season
  • Pops Dunson no D1 minutes last season
  • Eric Fiedler no D1 minutes last season
  • River Sawyer no D1 minutes last season
  • Amondo Miller Jr. no D1 minutes last season
  • Docker Tedeschi no D1 minutes last season

Returns 58% of last season's minutes; lost 2 of its top 5 (1 transferred).

Head-to-head

this season and last
No meetings the last two seasons.

More games on Wed, Nov 18

← Tue, Nov 17 · Thu, Nov 19 → · Full season schedule

The CBB Matchups tab lays out the day's Division I slate: matchup, tip time, records and rank, and — once posted — the market spread and total (the median across books when no market line is up). Three views switch the table between projected scores, pace and totals, and each team's offensive and defensive tendencies. Each game opens into opponent-adjusted possessions, efficiency and four-factor tendencies for both teams, plus recent form, rotation and head-to-head history. Every game also carries our projected score, spread and total, from our line: the same view our bets are made from.

What these numbers mean: line shopping.