CBB Matchups

Every D1 game with tempo-free ratings, four factors and market lines, one place.

College basketball is being built for the 2026-27 season (tip-off Nov 3). What's here fills in as games are played.
Non-conferenceMizzou Arena, Columbia, MO
Alcorn St
Efficiency #355
2025-26: 9-23 · 8-12 conf
@
Missouri
Efficiency #67
2025-26: 20-13 · 10-9 conf
Wed, Nov 18 · TBD
64.4
win 5%
Projected
83.5
win 95%
No line posted yet.
Model: MIZ −19.1 · total 147.9 · ratings as of Sat, Oct 3
Preseason ratings start from 2025-26's final adjusted ratings, regressed toward the D1 average. The stats below are 2025-26's too; both update once 2026-27 games are played.

How the projection is built

each step, from an average D-I game to this one
Projected total
Average D-I game
148.2
PaceAdjusted tempo: Missouri 67.7, Alcorn St 68.6 → 68.0 possessions
−0.7
Missouri offense vs Alcorn St defense
+7.8
Alcorn St offense vs Missouri defense
−7.4
Projected total
147.9
Axis starts at 140 pointsPoints added or removed at each step
Projected margin
Even game
0.0
Missouri offense vs Alcorn St defense
+7.8
Alcorn St offense vs Missouri defense
+7.4
Home court+2.9 points per 100 possessions to the home offense, −2.9 to the visitors
+3.9
Missouri by 19.1
19.1
Alcorn St side ◂▸ Missouri side

Steps are rounded to one decimal, so they can differ from the total by 0.1. The margin is the same build seen from the home side; positive numbers help Missouri.

Pace & total

possessions per 40 minutes
Tempo, possessions per 40 minutes

Projected possessions: 68.0, from each team's opponent-adjusted tempo. On raw 2025-26 season pace, Alcorn St is the faster team (69.4, #119 of 365) and Missouri the slower (68.3, #182). When tempos clash, the slower team usually pulls the pace harder (study weights 0.80 vs 0.66).

Projected possessions
68.0
per team, 40 min
Projected total
147.9
model
Projected team totals
64.4 / 83.5
Alcorn St / Missouri
Adjusted tempo, vs an average opponent
68.6#154
Alcorn St
67.7#235
Missouri

How this game plays

what the study found each side's numbers actually do when these two teams meet
AdvantageMissouri
Where Missouri scores: shooting
Missouri shoots an effective 55.0% (#36); Alcorn St allows 55.0% (#330). Expect about 55.4%, 4.1 points above an average D1 matchup — worth roughly +5.8 points per 100 possessions.
GlassMissouri
Missouri owns the glass
Projected offensive rebound rate of 36.1% is worth roughly +3.4 points per 100 possessions for Missouri's offense.
AdvantageAlcorn St
Where Alcorn St struggles: shooting
Alcorn St shoots an effective 47.7% (#320); Missouri allows 51.5% (#183). Expect about 49.3%, 2.0 points below an average D1 matchup — worth roughly -2.8 points per 100 possessions.
Watch for noise
3-point caution
A notable season 3-point number here (Missouri's defense) is close to a coin flip going forward — the study's model of next-game 3P% barely beats guessing the D1 average. Shot volume is what actually carries: expect Alcorn St at about 37.1% of its shots from three, Missouri about 34.2%.
TurnoversMissouri
Missouri turns it over
Projected turnover rate of 18.2% is worth roughly -1.8 points per 100 possessions against Missouri's offense.
TurnoversAlcorn St
Alcorn St turns it over
Projected turnover rate of 18.2% is worth roughly -1.7 points per 100 possessions against Alcorn St's offense.
Alcorn St has the ball
OffenseMissouri allowsvs D1 avg
47.7% #320
51.5% #183
-2.8 pt/100
19.6% #339
16.5% #186
-1.7 pt/100
26.9% #297
31.7% #238
-1.1 pt/100
31.8% #259
35.5% #193
-0.2 pt/100
70.8% #245
—
-0.1 pt/100
Alcorn St net across the four factors + FT%, vs. a D1-average matchup: -5.9 pts/100
Missouri has the ball
OffenseAlcorn St allowsvs D1 avg
55.0% #36
55.0% #330
+5.8 pt/100
17.8% #261
18.1% #93
-1.8 pt/100
34.9% #48
35.5% #347
+3.4 pt/100
42.1% #28
39.4% #293
+0.8 pt/100
69.1% #298
—
-0.3 pt/100
Missouri net across the four factors + FT%, vs. a D1-average matchup: +7.9 pts/100

Shot diet

Where each offense shoots from and where each defense lets teams shoot · 2025-26 numbers
Alcorn Stoffense vsMissouridefense
Share of shots by zone
Alcorn St shoots
Missouri allows
D-I average
FG% by zone
ZoneD-I avg
Rim54.2%#31955.4%#7258.6%
Short 2 (≤9 ft)41.4%#13339.5%#17239.5%
Mid 2 (10 ft+)30.4%#35136.2%#11638.0%
Three33.3%#20836.8%#34133.7%
Missourioffense vsAlcorn Stdefense
Share of shots by zone
Missouri shoots
Alcorn St allows
D-I average
FG% by zone
ZoneD-I avg
Rim65.0%#2165.9%#35658.6%
Short 2 (≤9 ft)36.8%#24739.5%#17539.5%
Mid 2 (10 ft+)34.5%#30134.7%#6838.0%
Three35.0%#11233.0%#12033.7%
RimShort 2 (≤9 ft)Mid 2 (10 ft+)Three

Zones from play-by-play shot descriptions; garbage time removed. Bars show the share of field-goal attempts in each zone; where a slice is too thin for its number, the shares are listed under the bar. FG% ranks: #1 = best for that side (most accurate shooting, stingiest defense).

Shot volume

Extra scoring chances from rebounds, turnovers and the foul line · 2025-26 numbers
Alcorn St
−5.5extra scoring chances per game vs a D-I average team#352 of 365
Off reb %
26.9%
#297
Def reb %
64.5%
#347
Turnover %
19.6%
#339
Forced TO %
18.1%
#93
FT rate
31.8%
#259
FT allowed
39.4%
#293
Where the chances come from (per game)
Offensive rebounding−1.1
Defensive rebounding−1.6
Ball security−1.9
Forcing turnovers+0.9
Foul shots drawn−0.8
Foul shots allowed−1.1
Missouri
+2.0extra scoring chances per game vs a D-I average team#97 of 365
Off reb %
34.9%
#48
Def reb %
68.3%
#238
Turnover %
17.8%
#261
Forced TO %
16.5%
#186
FT rate
42.1%
#28
FT allowed
35.5%
#193
Where the chances come from (per game)
Offensive rebounding+1.5
Defensive rebounding−0.3
Ball security−0.7
Forcing turnovers−0.2
Foul shots drawn+1.8
Foul shots allowed−0.1

Missouri has more extra scoring chances per game: +2.0 (#97 of 365) to Alcorn St’s −5.5 (#352).

Grade = extra shots and foul-line trips per game compared with a D-I average team, built from six season rates. Cell shading is the national rank for each rate (greener = better for that team).

Rotation

Alcorn St2025-26 numbers
ESPN hasn't posted Alcorn St's 2026-27 roster yet — these are last season's players.
#PlayerPosClHtGP-GSMPGPPGRPGAPGTOVeFG%3P%3PA/gFT%UsageStatus
7Nick WoodardSFSr6'6"32-3228.78.64.21.31.646.5%30.8%3.361.7%21.1%
0Shane LancasterGJr6'4"32-2628.610.82.32.21.253.6%43.0%4.472.5%21.8%
1Jameel MorrisPGJr6'1"30-2529.511.22.52.92.248.5%29.0%2.378.9%24.9%
8Tycen McDanielsFJr6'8"32-3227.312.06.11.02.652.8%25.0%0.375.4%27.5%
3Davian WilliamsPGSo5'10"32-1626.47.82.91.31.644.2%32.5%3.868.0%21.7%
12Omari HamiltonFSr6'6"32-1321.47.84.50.51.248.5%35.4%1.569.6%23.4%
30Travis RobertsSGSr6'6"31-1016.53.61.70.40.541.5%29.1%2.550.0%16.6%
4Bryson CalamesePGJr6'2"31-111.13.00.91.21.138.7%28.6%0.973.3%23.5%
22Mike JonesSGFr6'7"13-515.03.53.41.11.240.2%11.1%0.747.1%19.5%
2Jeremy EllisPFJr6'6"22-06.31.00.90.10.242.9%—0.083.3%11.8%
6William HendersonFJr6'10"11-010.42.61.60.11.042.2%20.0%0.540.0%22.2%
10Alex HawkinsSGJr6'4"0-00.00.00.00.00.0——0.0——
11Ray GlasgowSGSr6'3"0-00.00.00.00.00.0——0.0——
Rosters come from ESPN and are still filling in; incoming transfers and freshmen may be missing.

Tale of the tape

national rank toned left for away, right for home
Alcorn StMissouri
Efficiency
99.6
114.0
114.4
106.5
68.6
67.7
—
—
Shooting
47.7%
55.0%
46.5%
56.4%
33.3%
35.0%
70.8%
69.1%
31.8%
42.1%
Ball control & glass
19.6%
17.8%
18.1%
16.5%
26.9%
34.9%
35.5%
31.7%
10.5%
9.6%
11.1%
9.7%
Style
33.7%
36.4%
45.4%
48.3%
14.8%
14.1%
46.6%
51.2%
30.7%
32.1%
Roster
3.14
3.39
6'4.1"
6'6.9"
—
19.4%

Offseason

roster movement into this season — descriptive, not a model input
Alcorn St
Returning minutes: 100.0%Returning production: 100.0%
ESPN hasn't posted Alcorn St's roster for this season yet — no movement to show.

Returns 100% of last season's minutes. Teams returning at least 65% of last season's minutes have historically gained about 2.2 points of AdjEM (n=156 team-seasons, 2022-2026). (ESPN hasn't posted this season's roster yet -- this may still be last season's list.)

Missouri
Returning minutes: 19.4%Returning production: 13.8%
Lost
  • Mark Mitchell Jr. 33.8 mpg, 18.3 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
  • Anthony Robinson II 27.0 mpg, 8.9 ppg · transferred to Florida St
  • Jayden Stone 23.6 mpg, 10.6 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
  • T.O. Barrett 22.8 mpg, 8.6 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
  • Jacob Crews 20.7 mpg, 8.4 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
  • Shawn Phillips Jr. 19.3 mpg, 7.2 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
Added
  • Jordan Crawford from South Dakota · 31.2 mpg, 14.4 ppg last season
  • Cord Stansberry from W Carolina · 29.1 mpg, 13.7 ppg last season
  • Kennard Davis Jr. from BYU · 27.0 mpg, 7.7 ppg last season
  • Bryson Tiller from Kansas · 25.9 mpg, 7.9 ppg last season
  • Jamier Jones from Providence · 24.2 mpg, 11.2 ppg last season
  • Jaylen Carey from Tennessee · 18.4 mpg, 7.4 ppg last season

Returns 19% of last season's minutes; lost 5 of its top 5 (1 transferred). Teams returning under 40% of last season's minutes have historically fallen about 0.8 points of AdjEM (n=716 team-seasons, 2022-2026).

Head-to-head

this season and last
No meetings the last two seasons.

The CBB Matchups tab lays out the day's Division I slate: matchup, tip time, records and rank, and — once posted — Pinnacle's spread and total (the median across books when Pinnacle has no line). Three views switch the table between projected scores, pace and totals, and each team's offensive and defensive tendencies. Each game opens into opponent-adjusted possessions, efficiency and four-factor tendencies for both teams, plus recent form, rotation and head-to-head history. Every game also carries our projected score, spread and total, built bottom-up from those same numbers: expected possessions times each side's opponent-adjusted points per possession, plus home court.

What these numbers mean: line shopping.