James Madison Dukes vs Towson Tigers basketball preview & prediction

Wed, Nov 18 · 7:00 PM ET · SECU Arena, Towson, MD

Non-conferenceSECU Arena, Towson, MD
James Madison
0-2 · 0-0 conf
Efficiency #187
@
Towson
1-2 · 0-0 conf
Efficiency #150
Wed, Nov 18 · 7:00 PM ET
Our projected score shows once the market opens.
No line posted yet.

Our play

Pace & total

possessions per 40 minutes
Tempo, possessions per 40 minutes

Projected possessions: 66.9, from each team's opponent-adjusted tempo. On raw season pace, James Madison is the faster team (71.0, #176 of 365) and Towson the slower (68.2, #262). When tempos clash, the slower team usually pulls the pace harder (weights 0.80 vs 0.66).

Projected possessions
66.9
per team, 40 min
Adjusted tempo, vs an average opponent
70.1#217
James Madison
67.3#349
Towson

How this game plays

points this game from the four factors, vs an average D-I matchup
From the four factors
Towson has the ball+2.7
James Madison has the ball−2.7
Towson has the ball
✓Wins second chancesOR% 37.3% #83 · JMU allows 34.8% #250+2.3
✓Takes care of the ballTO% 20.5% #259 · JMU forces 12.7% #320 · ~11 turnovers+1.8
✗Few trips to the lineFTR 41.8% #120 · JMU allows 27.5% #69 · FT 50.7% #349−1.4
✓Shoots it welleFG% 46.2% #255 · JMU allows 55.0% #2590.0
James Madison has the ball
✗Tough shooting lookeFG% 49.6% #188 · TOW allows 47.2% #114−1.9
✗Few trips to the lineFTR 22.5% #328 · TOW allows 40.0% #214 · FT 64.5% #261−0.8
✗Few second chancesOR% 33.3% #135 · TOW allows 28.4% #131−0.1
✓Takes care of the ballTO% 13.4% #51 · TOW forces 22.5% #62 · ~12 turnovers0.0

Shot diet

Where each offense shoots from and where each defense lets teams shoot
James Madisonoffense vsTowsondefense
Share of shots by zone
James Madison shoots
Towson allows
D-I average
FG% by zone
ZoneD-I avg
Rim50.0%#26148.8%#6758.0%
Short 2 (≤9 ft)12.5%#31458.3%#30238.2%
Mid 2 (10 ft+)40.0%#11744.4%#25634.7%
Three36.7%#10230.5%#13632.5%
Towsonoffense vsJames Madisondefense
Share of shots by zone
Towson shoots
James Madison allows
D-I average
FG% by zone
ZoneD-I avg
Rim47.2%#29861.1%#21258.0%
Short 2 (≤9 ft)37.5%#16557.1%#29538.2%
Mid 2 (10 ft+)36.4%#15140.0%#21234.7%
Three34.5%#13834.6%#21932.5%
RimShort 2 (≤9 ft)Mid 2 (10 ft+)Three

Zones from play-by-play shot descriptions; garbage time removed. Bars show the share of field-goal attempts in each zone; where a slice is too thin for its number, the shares are listed under the bar. FG% ranks: #1 = best for that side (most accurate shooting, stingiest defense).

Shot volume

Extra scoring chances from rebounds, turnovers and the foul line
James Madison
−2.0extra scoring chances per game vs a D-I average team#209 of 365
Off reb %
33.3%
#135
Def reb %
65.2%
#250
Turnover %
13.4%
#51
Forced TO %
12.7%
#320
FT rate
22.5%
#328
FT allowed
27.5%
#69
Where the chances come from (per game)
Offensive rebounding+0.6
Defensive rebounding−1.1
Ball security+3.4
Forcing turnovers−3.8
Foul shots drawn−3.9
Foul shots allowed+2.7
Towson
+5.1extra scoring chances per game vs a D-I average team#107 of 365
Off reb %
37.3%
#83
Def reb %
71.6%
#131
Turnover %
20.5%
#259
Forced TO %
22.5%
#62
FT rate
41.8%
#120
FT allowed
40.0%
#214
Where the chances come from (per game)
Offensive rebounding+1.9
Defensive rebounding+1.1
Ball security−1.6
Forcing turnovers+3.1
Foul shots drawn+1.1
Foul shots allowed−0.5

Towson has more extra scoring chances per game: +5.1 (#107 of 365) to James Madison’s −2.0 (#209).

Grade = extra shots and foul-line trips per game compared with a D-I average team, built from six season rates. Cell shading is the national rank for each rate (greener = better for that team).

Rotation

Who has been playing, and who has not
James Madison2026-27 numbers · last game: Kentucky, Nov 6
#PlayerPosClHtGP-GSMPGMin/40, last 8Last 3 vs beforeStatusPPGRPGAPGTOVeFG%3P%3PA/gFT%Usage
4GSr6'6"2-226.024—Started last7.55.53.00.544.1%37.5%4.00.0%19.9%
12FJr6'11"2-225.524—Started last11.55.01.50.591.7%75.0%4.033.3%15.9%
24GJr6'3"2-225.525—Started last8.53.03.54.034.1%23.1%6.550.0%35.2%
15GSo6'4"2-225.028—Started last16.53.01.01.547.7%37.5%4.075.0%36.8%
13FSo6'8"2-225.025—Started last4.05.51.00.025.0%9.1%5.5100.0%16.3%
1GJr6'3"2-022.522—Bench13.01.51.50.571.9%46.7%7.5100.0%23.0%
11GJr6'1"2-017.516—Bench2.52.02.01.520.8%14.3%3.5—23.9%
6GFr6'0"2-017.018—Bench9.51.01.51.079.2%50.0%3.0—23.1%
5FJr6'9"2-014.516—Bench5.54.01.00.045.5%66.7%1.533.3%24.1%
0FSo6'7"1-01.00—Missed last game0.00.00.00.0——0.0—0.0%

Competitive minutes leave out garbage time (provisional rule: a second-half lead of 25+ inside 15:00, 20+ inside 10:00, 15+ inside 5:00 or 10+ inside 2:00, held to the end) and are shown per 40 minutes. Status says only whether a player appeared; the reason is not published.

Team comparison

national rank toned left for away, right for home
James MadisonTowson
Efficiency
108.6
101.5
110.2
100.4
70.1
67.3
10.4
2.4
Shooting
49.6%
46.2%
42.4%
43.5%
36.7%
34.5%
64.5%
50.7%
22.5%
41.8%
Ball control & glass
13.4%
20.5%
12.7%
22.5%
33.3%
37.3%
34.8%
28.4%
11.3%
10.8%
13.6%
15.7%
Style
57.2%
32.4%
28.0%
46.6%
9.6%
9.3%
59.3%
42.0%
36.2%
33.9%
Roster
2.71
2.29
6'5.2"
6'6.3"
14.8%
25.7%

Offseason

roster movement into this season — descriptive, not a model input
James Madison
Returning minutes: 14.8%Returning production: 10.4%
Lost
  • Cliff Davis 31.3 mpg, 15.6 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
  • Bradley Douglas 26.8 mpg, 11.8 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
  • Eddie Ricks III 25.9 mpg, 6.9 ppg · transferred to Loyola Chicago
  • Justin McBride 25.5 mpg, 14.3 ppg · transferred to Kentucky
  • Gabe Newhof 18.9 mpg, 8.1 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
  • Christian Brown 13.3 mpg, 3.0 ppg · transferred to Ole Miss
Added
  • Gage Lattimore from NC Central · 35.7 mpg, 16.1 ppg last season
  • Jacob Hogarth from Gardner-Webb · 25.0 mpg, 10.7 ppg last season
  • Adrian Myers from San José St · 24.2 mpg, 9.4 ppg last season
  • Garrett Sundra from Notre Dame · 17.9 mpg, 3.5 ppg last season
  • Marley Curtis from North Dakota · 14.3 mpg, 5.1 ppg last season
  • K.J. Windham from Northwestern · 5.1 mpg, 1.4 ppg last season

Returns 15% of last season's minutes; lost 4 of its top 5 (2 transferred). Teams returning under 40% of last season's minutes have historically fallen about 0.8 points of AdjEM (n=716 team-seasons, 2022-2026).

Towson
Returning minutes: 25.7%Returning production: 21.8%
Lost
  • Dylan Williamson 35.9 mpg, 14.6 ppg · transferred to Rhode Island
  • Tyler Tejada 33.4 mpg, 16.7 ppg · transferred to Cincinnati
  • Jack Doumbia Jr. 22.5 mpg, 10.1 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
  • Tyler Coleman 18.8 mpg, 5.0 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
  • Mor Seck 14.5 mpg, 3.2 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
  • Tyler Schmidt 13.2 mpg, 2.9 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
Added
  • Ben Roseborough from San José St · 9.2 mpg, 4.0 ppg last season
  • Denis Badalau from Rutgers · 8.8 mpg, 2.2 ppg last season
  • Zion Stanford from Villanova · 1.5 mpg, 0.4 ppg last season
  • Jon Barton no D1 minutes last season
  • Devan Kirk no D1 minutes last season
  • Alex Atkinson no D1 minutes last season

Returns 26% of last season's minutes; lost 4 of its top 5 (2 transferred). Teams returning under 40% of last season's minutes have historically fallen about 0.8 points of AdjEM (n=716 team-seasons, 2022-2026).

Head-to-head

this season and last
DateSeasonResult
Tue, Nov 182025-26Towson 75 – 81 James Madison

More games on Wed, Nov 18

← Tue, Nov 17 · Thu, Nov 19 → · Full season schedule

The CBB Matchups tab lays out the day's Division I slate: matchup, tip time, records and rank, and — once posted — the market spread and total (the median across books when no market line is up). Three views switch the table between projected scores, pace and totals, and each team's offensive and defensive tendencies. Each game opens into opponent-adjusted possessions, efficiency and four-factor tendencies for both teams, plus recent form, rotation and head-to-head history. Every game also carries our projected score, spread and total, from our line: the same view our bets are made from.

What these numbers mean: line shopping.