Howard Bison vs Duquesne Dukes basketball preview & prediction

Wed, Nov 18 · 7:00 PM ET · Ocean Center, Daytona Beach, FL (neutral site)

Sunshine SlamNeutral siteNon-conferenceESPN+Ocean Center, Daytona Beach, FL
Howard
1-2 · 0-0 conf
Efficiency #170
vs
Duquesne
2-0 · 0-0 conf
Efficiency #138
Wed, Nov 18 · 7:00 PM ET
Our projected score shows once the market opens.
No line posted yet.

Our play

Pace & total

possessions per 40 minutes
Tempo, possessions per 40 minutes

Projected possessions: 71.7, from each team's opponent-adjusted tempo. On raw season pace, Howard is the faster team (71.8, #145 of 365) and Duquesne the slower (71.1, #167). When tempos clash, the slower team usually pulls the pace harder (weights 0.80 vs 0.66).

Projected possessions
71.7
per team, 40 min
Adjusted tempo, vs an average opponent
70.9#160
Howard
71.3#128
Duquesne

How this game plays

points this game from the four factors, vs an average D-I matchup
From the four factors
Duquesne has the ball+3.2
Howard has the ball−3.2
Duquesne has the ball
✓Shoots it welleFG% 57.3% #66 · HOW allows 49.5% #158+3.7
✗Coughs it upTO% 21.1% #275 · HOW forces 20.0% #110 · ~15 turnovers−2.4
✓Wins second chancesOR% 30.8% #194 · HOW allows 40.4% #317+1.6
✓Gets to the lineFTR 36.4% #185 · HOW allows 36.6% #183 · FT 75.0% #98+0.2
Howard has the ball
✗Coughs it upTO% 19.5% #229 · DUQ forces 19.7% #115 · ~14 turnovers−1.5
✗Few trips to the lineFTR 36.8% #177 · DUQ allows 19.7% #18 · FT 61.8% #291−1.5
✗Tough shooting lookeFG% 48.4% #207 · DUQ allows 50.0% #163−1.3
✓Wins second chancesOR% 38.9% #55 · DUQ allows 25.6% #73+1.0

Shot diet

Where each offense shoots from and where each defense lets teams shoot
Howardoffense vsDuquesnedefense
Share of shots by zone
Howard shoots
Duquesne allows
D-I average
FG% by zone
ZoneD-I avg
Rim56.1%#20938.5%#1558.0%
Short 2 (≤9 ft)18.8%#2920.0%#138.2%
Mid 2 (10 ft+)41.7%#10920.0%#5934.7%
Three30.9%#21250.0%#35232.5%
Duquesneoffense vsHowarddefense
Share of shots by zone
Duquesne shoots
Howard allows
D-I average
FG% by zone
ZoneD-I avg
Rim67.7%#7454.0%#12958.0%
Short 2 (≤9 ft)50.0%#7541.7%#21538.2%
Mid 2 (10 ft+)25.0%#24543.3%#25034.7%
Three31.3%#20334.7%#22032.5%
RimShort 2 (≤9 ft)Mid 2 (10 ft+)Three

Zones from play-by-play shot descriptions; garbage time removed. Bars show the share of field-goal attempts in each zone; where a slice is too thin for its number, the shares are listed under the bar. FG% ranks: #1 = best for that side (most accurate shooting, stingiest defense).

Shot volume

Extra scoring chances from rebounds, turnovers and the foul line
Howard
+0.2extra scoring chances per game vs a D-I average team#171 of 365
Off reb %
38.9%
#55
Def reb %
59.6%
#317
Turnover %
19.5%
#229
Forced TO %
20.0%
#110
FT rate
36.8%
#177
FT allowed
36.6%
#183
Where the chances come from (per game)
Offensive rebounding+2.5
Defensive rebounding−2.9
Ball security−0.9
Forcing turnovers+1.4
Foul shots drawn−0.2
Foul shots allowed+0.4
Duquesne
+5.4extra scoring chances per game vs a D-I average team#105 of 365
Off reb %
30.8%
#194
Def reb %
74.4%
#73
Turnover %
21.1%
#275
Forced TO %
19.7%
#115
FT rate
36.4%
#185
FT allowed
19.7%
#18
Where the chances come from (per game)
Offensive rebounding−0.3
Defensive rebounding+2.0
Ball security−2.0
Forcing turnovers+1.2
Foul shots drawn−0.3
Foul shots allowed+4.8

Duquesne has more extra scoring chances per game: +5.4 (#105 of 365) to Howard’s +0.2 (#171).

Grade = extra shots and foul-line trips per game compared with a D-I average team, built from six season rates. Cell shading is the national rank for each rate (greener = better for that team).

Rotation

Who has been playing, and who has not
Howard2026-27 numbers · last game: Penn, Nov 9
#PlayerPosClHtGP-GSMPGMin/40, last 8Last 3 vs beforeStatusPPGRPGAPGTOVeFG%3P%3PA/gFT%Usage
2GSr5'11"3-336.334—Started last16.74.33.33.067.9%61.5%4.363.2%23.6%
12GSr6'7"3-331.337—Started last16.76.32.74.746.3%33.3%4.070.6%36.9%
13CJr6'10"3-325.326—Started last9.05.71.71.052.2%0.0%0.737.5%22.0%
4GSr6'5"3-323.018—Started last4.02.01.01.022.7%11.8%5.750.0%22.0%
8FJr6'7"3-022.319—Bench7.72.71.00.340.4%23.1%4.366.7%23.8%
1FFr6'7"3-022.032—Bench9.34.31.70.379.4%75.0%1.333.3%16.0%
6CSo6'10"3-321.017—Started last4.36.01.32.033.3%0.0%0.7100.0%18.1%
10GSo6'3"3-06.03—Bench0.70.70.30.325.0%0.0%0.3—15.8%
3GSo6'0"3-05.710—Bench3.01.00.70.743.8%50.0%0.766.7%35.9%
21FJr6'5"2-05.52—Bench1.00.50.00.0——0.050.0%9.6%
0GJr6'1"2-03.00—Missed last game1.50.00.00.033.3%0.0%1.050.0%39.3%
7FSo6'9"1-03.0——Active2.01.00.01.0100.0%—0.0—34.4%

Competitive minutes leave out garbage time (provisional rule: a second-half lead of 25+ inside 15:00, 20+ inside 10:00, 15+ inside 5:00 or 10+ inside 2:00, held to the end) and are shown per 40 minutes. Status says only whether a player appeared; the reason is not published.

Team comparison

national rank toned left for away, right for home
HowardDuquesne
Efficiency
104.0
106.7
104.7
105.0
70.9
71.3
-3.7
-4.6
Shooting
48.4%
57.3%
49.6%
61.5%
30.9%
31.3%
61.8%
75.0%
36.8%
36.4%
Ball control & glass
19.5%
21.1%
20.0%
19.7%
38.9%
30.8%
40.4%
25.6%
8.4%
8.4%
12.0%
5.1%
Style
36.8%
29.1%
48.0%
59.0%
18.1%
20.5%
51.9%
62.1%
31.4%
35.3%
Roster
3.07
2.85
6'5.6"
6'5.8"
51.3%
12.7%

Offseason

roster movement into this season — descriptive, not a model input
Howard
Returning minutes: 64.9%Returning production: 61.7%
Lost
  • Bryce Harris 32.3 mpg, 17.3 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
  • Travelle Bryson 16.5 mpg, 7.8 ppg · transferred to W Carolina
  • Danas Kazakevicius 14.1 mpg, 3.6 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
  • Ed Holland III 6.6 mpg, 1.3 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
  • Stefan Isailovic 1.0 mpg, 0.3 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
Added
  • Josiah Lawson new to D1 · 27.0 mpg, 11.0 ppg last season
  • Gasper Kocevar from Fresno St · 10.9 mpg, 2.7 ppg last season
  • James Brown from North Carolina · 1.5 mpg, 0.3 ppg last season
  • Drew Harris no D1 minutes last season

Returns 65% of last season's minutes; lost 1 of its top 5.

Duquesne
Returning minutes: 28.8%Returning production: 26.0%
Lost
  • Jimmie Williams 29.7 mpg, 15.1 ppg · transferred to Ohio State
  • Jakub Necas 23.7 mpg, 6.7 ppg · transferred to South Carolina
  • David Dixon 22.4 mpg, 8.2 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
  • Cam Crawford 18.0 mpg, 4.5 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
  • Alex Williams 16.8 mpg, 8.7 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
  • John Hugley IV 13.1 mpg, 6.3 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
Added
  • Yoav Berman from Queens · 29.2 mpg, 12.3 ppg last season
  • Josh Smith from West Georgia · 26.3 mpg, 15.7 ppg last season
  • Kerem Konan from Creighton · 7.4 mpg, 2.3 ppg last season
  • Ege Demir from Oregon · 5.3 mpg, 1.3 ppg last season
  • Izaiah Pasha from Virginia Tech · 4.6 mpg, 1.1 ppg last season
  • Stephen Olowoniyi from Oregon St · 1.1 mpg, 0.3 ppg last season

Returns 29% of last season's minutes; lost 4 of its top 5 (2 transferred). Teams returning under 40% of last season's minutes have historically fallen about 0.8 points of AdjEM (n=716 team-seasons, 2022-2026).

Head-to-head

this season and last
No meetings the last two seasons.

More games on Wed, Nov 18

← Tue, Nov 17 · Thu, Nov 19 → · Full season schedule

The CBB Matchups tab lays out the day's Division I slate: matchup, tip time, records and rank, and — once posted — the market spread and total (the median across books when no market line is up). Three views switch the table between projected scores, pace and totals, and each team's offensive and defensive tendencies. Each game opens into opponent-adjusted possessions, efficiency and four-factor tendencies for both teams, plus recent form, rotation and head-to-head history. Every game also carries our projected score, spread and total, from our line: the same view our bets are made from.

What these numbers mean: line shopping.