Towson Tigers vs Morgan State Bears basketball preview & prediction

Sat, Nov 14 · 1:00 PM ET · SECU Arena, Towson, MD (neutral site)

410 Invitational - ConsolationNeutral siteNon-conferenceSECU Arena, Towson, MD
Towson
1-2 · 0-0 conf
Efficiency #150
vs
Morgan St
3-0 · 0-0 conf
Efficiency #325
Sat, Nov 14 · 1:00 PM ET
Our projected score shows once the market opens.
No line posted yet.

Our play

Pace & total

possessions per 40 minutes
Tempo, possessions per 40 minutes

Projected possessions: 70.8, from each team's opponent-adjusted tempo. On raw season pace, Morgan St is the faster team (76.5, #46 of 365) and Towson the slower (68.2, #262). When tempos clash, the slower team usually pulls the pace harder (weights 0.80 vs 0.66).

Projected possessions
70.8
per team, 40 min
Adjusted tempo, vs an average opponent
67.3#349
Towson
74.0#32
Morgan St

How this game plays

points this game from the four factors, vs an average D-I matchup
From the four factors
Morgan St has the ball−8.7
Towson has the ball−8.4
Morgan St has the ball
✗Tough shooting lookeFG% 39.7% #326 · TOW allows 47.2% #114−7.8
✗Coughs it upTO% 22.2% #296 · TOW forces 22.5% #62 · ~16 turnovers−4.3
✓Wins second chancesOR% 40.5% #44 · TOW allows 28.4% #131+2.1
✓Gets to the lineFTR 42.9% #105 · TOW allows 40.0% #214 · FT 85.2% #13+1.3
Towson has the ball
✗Tough shooting lookeFG% 46.2% #255 · MORG allows 43.4% #57−5.9
✗Coughs it upTO% 20.5% #259 · MORG forces 19.6% #121 · ~14 turnovers−1.9
✗Few second chancesOR% 37.3% #83 · MORG allows 20.6% #17−0.6
✓Gets to the lineFTR 41.8% #120 · MORG allows 56.6% #333 · FT 50.7% #3490.0

Shot diet

Where each offense shoots from and where each defense lets teams shoot
Towsonoffense vsMorgan Stdefense
Share of shots by zone
Towson shoots
Morgan St allows
D-I average
FG% by zone
ZoneD-I avg
Rim47.2%#29838.1%#1358.0%
Short 2 (≤9 ft)37.5%#165—38.2%
Mid 2 (10 ft+)36.4%#1510.0%#134.7%
Three34.5%#13834.5%#21632.5%
Morgan Stoffense vsTowsondefense
Share of shots by zone
Morgan St shoots
Towson allows
D-I average
FG% by zone
ZoneD-I avg
Rim38.7%#34448.8%#6758.0%
Short 2 (≤9 ft)0.0%#32358.3%#30238.2%
Mid 2 (10 ft+)10.0%#32144.4%#25634.7%
Three38.1%#8230.5%#13632.5%
RimShort 2 (≤9 ft)Mid 2 (10 ft+)Three

Zones from play-by-play shot descriptions; garbage time removed. Bars show the share of field-goal attempts in each zone; where a slice is too thin for its number, the shares are listed under the bar. FG% ranks: #1 = best for that side (most accurate shooting, stingiest defense).

Shot volume

Extra scoring chances from rebounds, turnovers and the foul line
Towson
+5.1extra scoring chances per game vs a D-I average team#107 of 365
Off reb %
37.3%
#83
Def reb %
71.6%
#131
Turnover %
20.5%
#259
Forced TO %
22.5%
#62
FT rate
41.8%
#120
FT allowed
40.0%
#214
Where the chances come from (per game)
Offensive rebounding+1.9
Defensive rebounding+1.1
Ball security−1.6
Forcing turnovers+3.1
Foul shots drawn+1.1
Foul shots allowed−0.5
Morgan St
+1.5extra scoring chances per game vs a D-I average team#156 of 365
Off reb %
40.5%
#44
Def reb %
79.4%
#17
Turnover %
22.2%
#296
Forced TO %
19.6%
#121
FT rate
42.9%
#105
FT allowed
56.6%
#333
Where the chances come from (per game)
Offensive rebounding+3.0
Defensive rebounding+3.7
Ball security−2.8
Forcing turnovers+1.1
Foul shots drawn+1.4
Foul shots allowed−4.9

Towson has more extra scoring chances per game: +5.1 (#107 of 365) to Morgan St’s +1.5 (#156).

Grade = extra shots and foul-line trips per game compared with a D-I average team, built from six season rates. Cell shading is the national rank for each rate (greener = better for that team).

Rotation

Who has been playing, and who has not
Towson2026-27 numbers · last game: Long Island, Nov 9
#PlayerPosClHtGP-GSMPGMin/40, last 8Last 3 vs beforeStatusPPGRPGAPGTOVeFG%3P%3PA/gFT%Usage
24GSo6'7"3-330.028—Started last13.37.00.31.761.3%50.0%4.022.2%26.5%
1GSr6'6"3-330.028—Started last11.34.70.34.037.1%36.4%3.772.7%34.3%
2GSo6'4"3-327.034—Started last8.73.74.01.050.0%25.0%2.754.5%20.9%
11GSo6'5"3-326.332—Started last10.71.72.01.348.2%25.0%4.055.6%27.6%
5GFr6'3"3-019.022—Bench7.02.01.32.044.4%40.0%1.762.5%28.7%
23FJr6'10"3-318.718—Started last5.04.00.30.383.3%—0.045.5%12.9%
13GSo6'8"3-017.715—Bench4.36.71.00.028.6%0.0%1.050.0%21.0%
12FJr6'10"3-014.017—Bench3.34.00.31.345.5%100.0%0.7—21.1%
30FFr6'9"3-07.05—Bench0.01.00.00.30.0%—0.0—5.8%
3GFr6'5"3-05.30—Bench0.70.00.00.020.0%0.0%0.7—18.1%
4FFr6'5"2-02.50—Bench0.00.50.00.0——0.0—0.0%
15GFr6'8"2-02.0——Missed last0.01.00.00.0——0.0—0.0%
0GFr6'1"2-01.5——Active0.00.00.01.00.0%—0.00.0%79.0%
22GSr6'5"1-02.0——Active0.01.00.01.0——0.0—31.3%

Competitive minutes leave out garbage time (provisional rule: a second-half lead of 25+ inside 15:00, 20+ inside 10:00, 15+ inside 5:00 or 10+ inside 2:00, held to the end) and are shown per 40 minutes. Status says only whether a player appeared; the reason is not published.

Team comparison

national rank toned left for away, right for home
TowsonMorgan St
Efficiency
101.5
98.6
100.4
110.6
67.3
74.0
2.4
-16.6
Shooting
46.2%
39.7%
43.5%
31.0%
34.5%
38.1%
50.7%
85.2%
41.8%
42.9%
Ball control & glass
20.5%
22.2%
22.5%
19.6%
37.3%
40.5%
28.4%
20.6%
10.8%
9.1%
15.7%
9.5%
Style
32.4%
33.3%
46.6%
35.6%
9.3%
26.0%
42.0%
33.3%
33.9%
39.7%
Roster
2.29
3.48
6'6.3"
6'5.3"
25.7%
23.2%

Offseason

roster movement into this season — descriptive, not a model input
Towson
Returning minutes: 25.7%Returning production: 21.8%
Lost
  • Dylan Williamson 35.9 mpg, 14.6 ppg · transferred to Rhode Island
  • Tyler Tejada 33.4 mpg, 16.7 ppg · transferred to Cincinnati
  • Jack Doumbia Jr. 22.5 mpg, 10.1 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
  • Tyler Coleman 18.8 mpg, 5.0 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
  • Mor Seck 14.5 mpg, 3.2 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
  • Tyler Schmidt 13.2 mpg, 2.9 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
Added
  • Ben Roseborough from San José St · 9.2 mpg, 4.0 ppg last season
  • Denis Badalau from Rutgers · 8.8 mpg, 2.2 ppg last season
  • Zion Stanford from Villanova · 1.5 mpg, 0.4 ppg last season
  • Jon Barton no D1 minutes last season
  • Devan Kirk no D1 minutes last season
  • Alex Atkinson no D1 minutes last season

Returns 26% of last season's minutes; lost 4 of its top 5 (2 transferred). Teams returning under 40% of last season's minutes have historically fallen about 0.8 points of AdjEM (n=716 team-seasons, 2022-2026).

Morgan St
Returning minutes: 23.2%Returning production: 23.1%
Lost
  • Rob Lawson 32.8 mpg, 12.8 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
  • Elijah Davis 30.2 mpg, 12.0 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
  • Christian Meeks 28.6 mpg, 5.9 ppg · transferred to NC Central
  • Eugene Alvin 18.7 mpg, 7.0 ppg · transferred to Delaware
  • Walter Peggs Jr. 18.0 mpg, 8.2 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
  • Christian Oliver 12.4 mpg, 3.8 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
Added
  • Trey Pettigrew new to D1 · 29.0 mpg, 16.0 ppg last season
  • Oliver Spence new to D1 · 27.0 mpg, 19.0 ppg last season
  • John Awoke from Wagner · 24.5 mpg, 6.7 ppg last season
  • Khali Horton from Coppin St · 19.8 mpg, 7.4 ppg last season
  • Ibrahima Traore from Utah · 1.8 mpg, 0.4 ppg last season
  • Keith Richard no D1 minutes last season

Returns 23% of last season's minutes; lost 4 of its top 5 (2 transferred). Teams returning under 40% of last season's minutes have historically fallen about 0.8 points of AdjEM (n=716 team-seasons, 2022-2026).

Head-to-head

this season and last
No meetings the last two seasons.

More games on Sat, Nov 14

← Fri, Nov 13 · Sun, Nov 15 → · Full season schedule

The CBB Matchups tab lays out the day's Division I slate: matchup, tip time, records and rank, and — once posted — the market spread and total (the median across books when no market line is up). Three views switch the table between projected scores, pace and totals, and each team's offensive and defensive tendencies. Each game opens into opponent-adjusted possessions, efficiency and four-factor tendencies for both teams, plus recent form, rotation and head-to-head history. Every game also carries our projected score, spread and total, from our line: the same view our bets are made from.

What these numbers mean: line shopping.