CBB Matchups

Every D1 game with tempo-free ratings, four factors and market lines, one place.

College basketball is being built for the 2026-27 season (tip-off Nov 3). What's here fills in as games are played.
Non-conferenceKnights Hall, Louisville, KY
N Illinois
Efficiency #341
2025-26: 9-21 · 4-14 conf
@
Bellarmine
Efficiency #281
2025-26: 13-19 · 8-12 conf
Sat, Nov 14 · TBD
72.2
win 26%
Projected
79.6
win 74%
No line posted yet.
Model: BELL −7.4 · total 151.9 · ratings as of Sat, Oct 3
Preseason ratings start from 2025-26's final adjusted ratings, regressed toward the D1 average. The stats below are 2025-26's too; both update once 2026-27 games are played.

How the projection is built

each step, from an average D-I game to this one
Projected total
Average D-I game
148.2
PaceAdjusted tempo: Bellarmine 66.5, N Illinois 68.5 → 66.7 possessions
−3.6
Bellarmine offense vs N Illinois defense
+5.4
N Illinois offense vs Bellarmine defense
+1.8
Projected total
151.9
Axis starts at 140 pointsPoints added or removed at each step
Projected margin
Even game
0.0
Bellarmine offense vs N Illinois defense
+5.4
N Illinois offense vs Bellarmine defense
−1.8
Home court+2.9 points per 100 possessions to the home offense, −2.9 to the visitors
+3.8
Bellarmine by 7.4
7.4
N Illinois side ◂▸ Bellarmine side

Steps are rounded to one decimal, so they can differ from the total by 0.1: the total steps add to 151.8 against a projected 151.9. The margin is the same build seen from the home side; positive numbers help Bellarmine.

Pace & total

possessions per 40 minutes
Tempo, possessions per 40 minutes

Projected possessions: 66.7, from each team's opponent-adjusted tempo. On raw 2025-26 season pace, N Illinois is the faster team (69.0, #149 of 365) and Bellarmine the slower (66.2, #287). When tempos clash, the slower team usually pulls the pace harder (study weights 0.80 vs 0.66).

Projected possessions
66.7
per team, 40 min
Projected total
151.9
model
Projected team totals
72.2 / 79.6
N Illinois / Bellarmine
Adjusted tempo, vs an average opponent
68.5#172
N Illinois
66.5#319
Bellarmine

How this game plays

what the study found each side's numbers actually do when these two teams meet
AdvantageBellarmine
Where Bellarmine scores: shooting
Bellarmine shoots an effective 59.4% (#3); N Illinois allows 55.6% (#342). Expect about 58.2%, 6.9 points above an average D1 matchup — worth roughly +9.9 points per 100 possessions.
GlassBellarmine
Bellarmine gets out-rebounded
Projected offensive rebound rate of 24.6% is worth roughly -3.5 points per 100 possessions against Bellarmine's offense.
ClashN Illinois
Style match: 3-point volume
N Illinois takes 45.0% of its shots from three; Bellarmine lets opponents take 50.5% of their shots from three (D1 average 39.5%). Expect about 51.0% — both habits push the same way.
AdvantageN Illinois
Where N Illinois scores: shooting
N Illinois shoots an effective 47.6% (#324); Bellarmine allows 59.4% (#365). Expect about 53.3%, 2.0 points above an average D1 matchup — worth roughly +2.8 points per 100 possessions.
TurnoversN Illinois
N Illinois turns it over
Projected turnover rate of 18.5% is worth roughly -2.2 points per 100 possessions against N Illinois's offense.
Watch for noise
3-point caution
A notable season 3-point number here (Bellarmine, N Illinois, Bellarmine's defense) is close to a coin flip going forward — the study's model of next-game 3P% barely beats guessing the D1 average. Shot volume is what actually carries: expect N Illinois at about 51.0% of its shots from three, Bellarmine about 39.7%.
N Illinois has the ball
OffenseBellarmine allowsvs D1 avg
47.6% #324
59.4% #365
+2.8 pt/100
21.8% #360
15.0% #287
-2.2 pt/100
30.3% #187
34.2% #320
+1.1 pt/100
38.3% #95
34.3% #157
+0.1 pt/100
65.7% #356
—
-0.6 pt/100
N Illinois net across the four factors + FT%, vs. a D1-average matchup: +1.3 pts/100
Bellarmine has the ball
OffenseN Illinois allowsvs D1 avg
59.4% #3
55.6% #342
+9.9 pt/100
15.5% #104
16.3% #205
+1.3 pt/100
22.4% #354
30.0% #161
-3.5 pt/100
35.0% #178
38.3% #267
+0.2 pt/100
78.8% #7
—
+0.6 pt/100
Bellarmine net across the four factors + FT%, vs. a D1-average matchup: +8.5 pts/100

Shot diet

Where each offense shoots from and where each defense lets teams shoot · 2025-26 numbers
N Illinoisoffense vsBellarminedefense
Share of shots by zone
N Illinois shoots
Bellarmine allows
D-I average
FG% by zone
ZoneD-I avg
Rim51.9%#35067.7%#36358.6%
Short 2 (≤9 ft)31.3%#33935.6%#7939.5%
Mid 2 (10 ft+)32.8%#33339.5%#22138.0%
Three30.9%#32340.4%#36433.7%
Bellarmineoffense vsN Illinoisdefense
Share of shots by zone
Bellarmine shoots
N Illinois allows
D-I average
FG% by zone
ZoneD-I avg
Rim66.7%#962.9%#32358.6%
Short 2 (≤9 ft)41.4%#13733.9%#4239.5%
Mid 2 (10 ft+)36.8%#23440.6%#25938.0%
Three38.1%#1736.3%#31533.7%
RimShort 2 (≤9 ft)Mid 2 (10 ft+)Three

Zones from play-by-play shot descriptions; garbage time removed. Bars show the share of field-goal attempts in each zone; where a slice is too thin for its number, the shares are listed under the bar. FG% ranks: #1 = best for that side (most accurate shooting, stingiest defense).

Shot volume

Extra scoring chances from rebounds, turnovers and the foul line · 2025-26 numbers
N Illinois
−3.5extra scoring chances per game vs a D-I average team#315 of 365
Off reb %
30.3%
#187
Def reb %
70.0%
#161
Turnover %
21.8%
#360
Forced TO %
16.3%
#205
FT rate
38.3%
#95
FT allowed
38.3%
#267
Where the chances come from (per game)
Offensive rebounding0.0
Defensive rebounding+0.2
Ball security−3.4
Forcing turnovers−0.3
Foul shots drawn+0.8
Foul shots allowed−0.8
Bellarmine
−3.7extra scoring chances per game vs a D-I average team#324 of 365
Off reb %
22.4%
#354
Def reb %
65.8%
#320
Turnover %
15.5%
#104
Forced TO %
15.0%
#287
FT rate
35.0%
#178
FT allowed
34.3%
#157
Where the chances come from (per game)
Offensive rebounding−2.6
Defensive rebounding−1.2
Ball security+0.9
Forcing turnovers−1.1
Foul shots drawn0.0
Foul shots allowed+0.3

N Illinois has more extra scoring chances per game: −3.5 (#315 of 365) to Bellarmine’s −3.7 (#324).

Grade = extra shots and foul-line trips per game compared with a D-I average team, built from six season rates. Cell shading is the national rank for each rate (greener = better for that team).

Rotation

N Illinois2025-26 numbers
#PlayerPosClHtGP-GSMPGPPGRPGAPGTOVeFG%3P%3PA/gFT%UsageStatus
1Makhai ValentineGSo6'3"29-2930.713.35.31.01.253.1%35.8%6.781.3%24.0%
0Gianni CobbGSo6'0"30-1929.09.82.73.92.446.2%26.8%2.459.8%24.3%
6Taj WaltersGFr6'5"29-2327.18.55.40.61.352.4%38.3%2.878.3%18.8%
96Gustav WintherFFr6'10"30-2121.28.14.20.91.464.5%42.9%0.254.7%21.2%
3Daemar KellyGJr6'5"29-1520.65.63.11.21.235.2%25.6%2.876.7%21.9%
7Hassan WashingtonFJr6'8"29-1416.64.73.20.61.959.9%43.8%0.644.4%20.6%
10Jao ItukaGJr6'1"15-014.16.92.50.90.348.9%34.4%4.181.0%27.4%
2Carlos CoronadoGFr6'3"20-110.33.90.80.61.041.2%20.8%1.268.9%26.2%
8Ladji KanteFFr6'7"17-09.22.81.20.40.643.8%20.0%0.965.0%21.2%
23Jaylen WhartonFJr6'9"18-07.02.01.70.10.345.2%—0.042.1%20.2%
11Isaiah WashingtonGFr6'5"11-08.92.71.30.50.538.9%11.1%0.864.3%22.3%
16Isaiah StewartGFr6'6"13-05.51.20.90.30.260.0%40.0%0.466.7%11.0%
4JJ TaylorFJr6'8"3-221.08.72.70.33.041.7%11.1%3.068.8%29.3%
21Max LaskeyGFr6'5"6-02.50.50.20.20.250.0%33.3%0.5—13.9%
15Lataevyon TaylorGSo6'0"0-00.00.00.00.00.0——0.0——
Rosters come from ESPN and are still filling in; incoming transfers and freshmen may be missing.

Tale of the tape

national rank toned left for away, right for home
N IllinoisBellarmine
Efficiency
100.3
113.2
111.9
119.4
68.5
66.5
—
—
Shooting
47.6%
59.4%
48.5%
61.0%
30.9%
38.1%
65.7%
78.8%
38.3%
35.0%
Ball control & glass
21.8%
15.5%
16.3%
15.0%
30.3%
22.4%
30.0%
34.2%
11.7%
9.1%
14.5%
9.1%
Style
45.0%
41.2%
41.5%
47.0%
12.7%
9.2%
51.8%
53.4%
31.5%
28.4%
Roster
1.91
2.70
6'4.7"
6'5.8"
86.8%
93.7%

Offseason

roster movement into this season — descriptive, not a model input
N Illinois
Returning minutes: 86.8%Returning production: 90.1%
Lost
  • Dylan Ducommun 26.5 mpg, 9.3 ppg · transferred to Buffalo
Added
  • Lataevyon Taylor no D1 minutes last season

No incoming D1 transfers are listed on ESPN's roster yet — until they are, returning shares read high.

Returns 87% of last season's minutes; lost 1 of its top 5 (1 transferred). Teams returning at least 65% of last season's minutes have historically gained about 2.2 points of AdjEM (n=156 team-seasons, 2022-2026).

Bellarmine
Returning minutes: 93.7%Returning production: 94.6%
Lost
  • Michael Wilson Jr. 12.7 mpg, 5.3 ppg · transferred to Canisius
Added
  • Ant McAfee no D1 minutes last season

No incoming D1 transfers are listed on ESPN's roster yet — until they are, returning shares read high.

Returns 94% of last season's minutes. Teams returning at least 65% of last season's minutes have historically gained about 2.2 points of AdjEM (n=156 team-seasons, 2022-2026).

Head-to-head

this season and last
DateSeasonResult
Sat, Nov 292025-26Bellarmine 0 – 0 N Illinois

The CBB Matchups tab lays out the day's Division I slate: matchup, tip time, records and rank, and — once posted — Pinnacle's spread and total (the median across books when Pinnacle has no line). Three views switch the table between projected scores, pace and totals, and each team's offensive and defensive tendencies. Each game opens into opponent-adjusted possessions, efficiency and four-factor tendencies for both teams, plus recent form, rotation and head-to-head history. Every game also carries our projected score, spread and total, built bottom-up from those same numbers: expected possessions times each side's opponent-adjusted points per possession, plus home court.

What these numbers mean: line shopping.