CBB Matchups

Every D1 game with tempo-free ratings, four factors and market lines, one place.

College basketball is being built for the 2026-27 season (tip-off Nov 3). What's here fills in as games are played.
Non-conferenceJack Stephens Center, Little Rock, AR
N'Western St
Efficiency #299
2025-26: 10-22 · 8-15 conf
@
Little Rock
Efficiency #300
2025-26: 12-20 · 9-12 conf
Sat, Nov 14 · 8:00 PM ET
69.1
win 37%
Projected
72.8
win 63%
No line posted yet.
Model: LR −3.7 · total 141.8 · ratings as of Sat, Oct 3
Preseason ratings start from 2025-26's final adjusted ratings, regressed toward the D1 average. The stats below are 2025-26's too; both update once 2026-27 games are played.

How the projection is built

each step, from an average D-I game to this one
Projected total
Average D-I game
148.2
PaceAdjusted tempo: Little Rock 67.7, N'Western St 66.6 → 66.0 possessions
−5.0
Little Rock offense vs N'Western St defense
−0.7
N'Western St offense vs Little Rock defense
−0.7
Projected total
141.8
Axis starts at 135 pointsPoints added or removed at each step
Projected margin
Even game
0.0
Little Rock offense vs N'Western St defense
−0.7
N'Western St offense vs Little Rock defense
+0.7
Home court+2.9 points per 100 possessions to the home offense, −2.9 to the visitors
+3.8
Little Rock by 3.7
3.7
N'Western St side ◂▸ Little Rock side

Steps are rounded to one decimal, so they can differ from the total by 0.1: the margin steps add to +3.8 against +3.7. The margin is the same build seen from the home side; positive numbers help Little Rock.

Pace & total

possessions per 40 minutes
Tempo, possessions per 40 minutes

Projected possessions: 66.0, from each team's opponent-adjusted tempo. On raw 2025-26 season pace, Little Rock is the faster team (67.6, #217 of 365) and N'Western St the slower (65.2, #329). When tempos clash, the slower team usually pulls the pace harder (study weights 0.80 vs 0.66).

Projected possessions
66.0
per team, 40 min
Projected total
141.8
model
Projected team totals
69.1 / 72.8
N'Western St / Little Rock
Adjusted tempo, vs an average opponent
66.6#314
N'Western St
67.7#233
Little Rock

How this game plays

what the study found each side's numbers actually do when these two teams meet
Pace
Half-court grind
Little Rock averages 67.6 possessions per 40, N'Western St 65.2. Slower teams pull the pace toward themselves more than fast teams push it (0.80 vs 0.66 in five seasons of games), so expect about 65 — more possessions mean more points in the total and more chances for the better team to separate.
AdvantageN'Western St
Where N'Western St struggles: ball control
N'Western St turns it over on 18.3% of possessions (#288); Little Rock forces turnovers on 18.5% of opponent possessions (#71). Expect about 18.8%, 2.0 points above an average D1 matchup — worth roughly -2.4 points per 100 possessions.
DefenseLittle Rock
Little Rock's shot-blocking
Little Rock ranks #37 nationally in block rate — one of the few defensive numbers that travels. Expect about 11.6% of N'Western St's two-point attempts to get blocked against this defense.
N'Western St has the ball
OffenseLittle Rock allowsvs D1 avg
48.6% #301
51.8% #199
-1.9 pt/100
18.3% #288
18.5% #71
-2.4 pt/100
26.1% #321
36.6% #357
-0.0 pt/100
40.1% #58
33.1% #134
+0.2 pt/100
74.0% #135
—
+0.1 pt/100
N'Western St net across the four factors + FT%, vs. a D1-average matchup: -4.0 pts/100
Little Rock has the ball
OffenseN'Western St allowsvs D1 avg
49.4% #273
53.0% #270
-0.2 pt/100
18.4% #293
16.9% #163
-1.2 pt/100
31.5% #143
32.6% #286
+1.1 pt/100
27.7% #345
36.3% #218
-0.3 pt/100
68.0% #327
—
-0.4 pt/100
Little Rock net across the four factors + FT%, vs. a D1-average matchup: -1.1 pts/100

Shot diet

Where each offense shoots from and where each defense lets teams shoot · 2025-26 numbers
N'Western Stoffense vsLittle Rockdefense
Share of shots by zone
N'Western St shoots
Little Rock allows
D-I average
FG% by zone
ZoneD-I avg
Rim53.7%#32362.6%#31558.6%
Short 2 (≤9 ft)40.3%#16828.7%#1039.5%
Mid 2 (10 ft+)41.6%#6429.6%#538.0%
Three33.2%#21834.4%#21133.7%
Little Rockoffense vsN'Western Stdefense
Share of shots by zone
Little Rock shoots
N'Western St allows
D-I average
FG% by zone
ZoneD-I avg
Rim62.8%#5760.4%#24758.6%
Short 2 (≤9 ft)32.4%#32335.7%#8339.5%
Mid 2 (10 ft+)30.6%#34941.4%#28938.0%
Three35.3%#9635.5%#27833.7%
RimShort 2 (≤9 ft)Mid 2 (10 ft+)Three

Zones from play-by-play shot descriptions; garbage time removed. Bars show the share of field-goal attempts in each zone; where a slice is too thin for its number, the shares are listed under the bar. FG% ranks: #1 = best for that side (most accurate shooting, stingiest defense).

Shot volume

Extra scoring chances from rebounds, turnovers and the foul line · 2025-26 numbers
N'Western St
−1.9extra scoring chances per game vs a D-I average team#266 of 365
Off reb %
26.1%
#321
Def reb %
67.4%
#286
Turnover %
18.3%
#288
Forced TO %
16.9%
#163
FT rate
40.1%
#58
FT allowed
36.3%
#218
Where the chances come from (per game)
Offensive rebounding−1.4
Defensive rebounding−0.6
Ball security−1.0
Forcing turnovers+0.1
Foul shots drawn+1.3
Foul shots allowed−0.3
Little Rock
−2.8extra scoring chances per game vs a D-I average team#296 of 365
Off reb %
31.5%
#143
Def reb %
63.4%
#357
Turnover %
18.4%
#293
Forced TO %
18.5%
#71
FT rate
27.7%
#345
FT allowed
33.1%
#134
Where the chances come from (per game)
Offensive rebounding+0.3
Defensive rebounding−1.9
Ball security−1.1
Forcing turnovers+1.3
Foul shots drawn−1.9
Foul shots allowed+0.6

N'Western St has more extra scoring chances per game: −1.9 (#266 of 365) to Little Rock’s −2.8 (#296).

Grade = extra shots and foul-line trips per game compared with a D-I average team, built from six season rates. Cell shading is the national rank for each rate (greener = better for that team).

Rotation

N'Western St2025-26 numbers
ESPN hasn't posted N'Western St's 2026-27 roster yet — these are last season's players.
#PlayerPosClHtGP-GSMPGPPGRPGAPGTOVeFG%3P%3PA/gFT%UsageStatus
5Micah ThomasGSr6'0"32-3130.216.82.02.72.348.3%37.0%4.292.0%35.1%
11Chris MubiruGJr6'5"32-2826.86.83.91.91.050.6%27.7%2.984.9%16.2%
0Izzy MilesGJr6'2"32-1924.410.52.51.31.649.6%39.7%2.372.7%27.8%
23Willie WilliamsFSr6'6"26-2629.89.88.51.51.462.0%50.0%0.244.4%19.8%
3Landyn JumawanGSr6'4"30-2020.04.62.00.80.639.6%27.4%3.977.1%17.8%
4CJ LarryPGFr6'3"25-1618.22.61.41.51.437.7%46.7%0.653.6%15.5%
10Kordrick TurnerFJr6'6"32-613.74.22.60.30.553.5%0.0%0.059.7%18.9%
13Justin RedmondGSo6'2"23-217.16.91.61.30.944.8%34.2%3.385.3%27.6%
1Chip BruntGJr6'5"29-211.73.41.20.80.858.2%53.8%0.473.0%18.3%
25Omar AdegbolaGSo6'4"21-214.65.42.10.50.844.5%28.1%1.582.5%24.4%
8Moustapha LoumFSo6'10"21-411.32.42.00.20.561.8%—0.036.4%13.7%
21J.C. Riley Jr.CSr6'10"21-411.03.42.40.60.452.8%50.0%0.188.2%18.2%
33Quentin BoltonGSr6'6"8-06.31.01.00.30.522.2%15.4%1.6—26.0%
15Seth NedGFr5'10"0-00.00.00.00.00.0——0.0——
Rosters come from ESPN and are still filling in; incoming transfers and freshmen may be missing.

Tale of the tape

national rank toned left for away, right for home
N'Western StLittle Rock
Efficiency
104.1
104.6
111.3
111.9
66.6
67.7
—
—
Shooting
48.6%
49.4%
48.0%
47.9%
33.2%
35.3%
74.0%
68.0%
40.1%
27.7%
Ball control & glass
18.3%
18.4%
16.9%
18.5%
26.1%
31.5%
32.6%
36.6%
10.6%
10.6%
9.6%
5.6%
Style
33.9%
31.0%
40.8%
47.2%
12.4%
16.2%
50.7%
52.2%
36.8%
20.6%
Roster
3.12
3.39
6'4"
6'6.5"
—
—

Offseason

roster movement into this season — descriptive, not a model input
N'Western St
Returning minutes: 100.0%Returning production: 100.0%
ESPN hasn't posted N'Western St's roster for this season yet — no movement to show.

Returns 100% of last season's minutes. Teams returning at least 65% of last season's minutes have historically gained about 2.2 points of AdjEM (n=156 team-seasons, 2022-2026). (ESPN hasn't posted this season's roster yet -- this may still be last season's list.)

Little Rock
Returning minutes: 100.0%Returning production: 100.0%
ESPN hasn't posted Little Rock's roster for this season yet — no movement to show.

Returns 100% of last season's minutes. Teams returning at least 65% of last season's minutes have historically gained about 2.2 points of AdjEM (n=156 team-seasons, 2022-2026). (ESPN hasn't posted this season's roster yet -- this may still be last season's list.)

Head-to-head

this season and last
No meetings the last two seasons.

The CBB Matchups tab lays out the day's Division I slate: matchup, tip time, records and rank, and — once posted — Pinnacle's spread and total (the median across books when Pinnacle has no line). Three views switch the table between projected scores, pace and totals, and each team's offensive and defensive tendencies. Each game opens into opponent-adjusted possessions, efficiency and four-factor tendencies for both teams, plus recent form, rotation and head-to-head history. Every game also carries our projected score, spread and total, built bottom-up from those same numbers: expected possessions times each side's opponent-adjusted points per possession, plus home court.

What these numbers mean: line shopping.