CBB Matchups
Every D1 game with tempo-free ratings, four factors and market lines, one place.
How the projection is built
each step, from an average D-I game to this oneSteps are rounded to one decimal, so they can differ from the total by 0.1. The margin is the same build seen from the home side; positive numbers help Iowa State.
Pace & total
possessions per 40 minutesProjected possessions: 68.5, from each team's opponent-adjusted tempo. On raw 2025-26 season pace, Alcorn St is the faster team (69.4, #119 of 365) and Iowa State the slower (68.5, #173). When tempos clash, the slower team usually pulls the pace harder (study weights 0.80 vs 0.66).
How this game plays
what the study found each side's numbers actually do when these two teams meetShot diet
Where each offense shoots from and where each defense lets teams shoot · 2025-26 numbers| Zone | D-I avg | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Rim | 54.2%#319 | 63.4%#332 | 58.6% |
| Short 2 (≤9 ft) | 41.4%#133 | 39.4%#168 | 39.5% |
| Mid 2 (10 ft+) | 30.4%#351 | 34.6%#64 | 38.0% |
| Three | 33.3%#208 | 32.0%#63 | 33.7% |
| Zone | D-I avg | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Rim | 65.2%#20 | 65.9%#356 | 58.6% |
| Short 2 (≤9 ft) | 38.1%#220 | 39.5%#175 | 39.5% |
| Mid 2 (10 ft+) | 37.3%#210 | 34.7%#68 | 38.0% |
| Three | 38.3%#12 | 33.0%#120 | 33.7% |
Zones from play-by-play shot descriptions; garbage time removed. Bars show the share of field-goal attempts in each zone; where a slice is too thin for its number, the shares are listed under the bar. FG% ranks: #1 = best for that side (most accurate shooting, stingiest defense).
Shot volume
Extra scoring chances from rebounds, turnovers and the foul line · 2025-26 numbersIowa State has more extra scoring chances per game: +9.2 (#2 of 365) to Alcorn St’s −5.5 (#352).
Grade = extra shots and foul-line trips per game compared with a D-I average team, built from six season rates. Cell shading is the national rank for each rate (greener = better for that team).
Rotation
| # | Player | Pos | Cl | Ht | GP-GS | MPG | PPG | RPG | APG | TOV | eFG% | 3P% | 3PA/g | FT% | Usage | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7 | Nick Woodard | SF | Sr | 6'6" | 32-32 | 28.7 | 8.6 | 4.2 | 1.3 | 1.6 | 46.5% | 30.8% | 3.3 | 61.7% | 21.1% | |
| 0 | Shane Lancaster | G | Jr | 6'4" | 32-26 | 28.6 | 10.8 | 2.3 | 2.2 | 1.2 | 53.6% | 43.0% | 4.4 | 72.5% | 21.8% | |
| 1 | Jameel Morris | PG | Jr | 6'1" | 30-25 | 29.5 | 11.2 | 2.5 | 2.9 | 2.2 | 48.5% | 29.0% | 2.3 | 78.9% | 24.9% | |
| 8 | Tycen McDaniels | F | Jr | 6'8" | 32-32 | 27.3 | 12.0 | 6.1 | 1.0 | 2.6 | 52.8% | 25.0% | 0.3 | 75.4% | 27.5% | |
| 3 | Davian Williams | PG | So | 5'10" | 32-16 | 26.4 | 7.8 | 2.9 | 1.3 | 1.6 | 44.2% | 32.5% | 3.8 | 68.0% | 21.7% | |
| 12 | Omari Hamilton | F | Sr | 6'6" | 32-13 | 21.4 | 7.8 | 4.5 | 0.5 | 1.2 | 48.5% | 35.4% | 1.5 | 69.6% | 23.4% | |
| 30 | Travis Roberts | SG | Sr | 6'6" | 31-10 | 16.5 | 3.6 | 1.7 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 41.5% | 29.1% | 2.5 | 50.0% | 16.6% | |
| 4 | Bryson Calamese | PG | Jr | 6'2" | 31-1 | 11.1 | 3.0 | 0.9 | 1.2 | 1.1 | 38.7% | 28.6% | 0.9 | 73.3% | 23.5% | |
| 22 | Mike Jones | SG | Fr | 6'7" | 13-5 | 15.0 | 3.5 | 3.4 | 1.1 | 1.2 | 40.2% | 11.1% | 0.7 | 47.1% | 19.5% | |
| 2 | Jeremy Ellis | PF | Jr | 6'6" | 22-0 | 6.3 | 1.0 | 0.9 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 42.9% | — | 0.0 | 83.3% | 11.8% | |
| 6 | William Henderson | F | Jr | 6'10" | 11-0 | 10.4 | 2.6 | 1.6 | 0.1 | 1.0 | 42.2% | 20.0% | 0.5 | 40.0% | 22.2% | |
| 10 | Alex Hawkins | SG | Jr | 6'4" | 0-0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | — | 0.0 | — | — | |
| 11 | Ray Glasgow | SG | Sr | 6'3" | 0-0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | — | 0.0 | — | — |
| # | Player | Pos | Cl | Ht | GP-GS | MPG | PPG | RPG | APG | TOV | eFG% | 3P% | 3PA/g | FT% | Usage | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 27 | Killyan Toure | G | Fr | 6'3" | 37-37 | 25.4 | 8.6 | 3.5 | 2.3 | 1.7 | 51.0% | 31.3% | 2.2 | 72.2% | 22.1% | |
| 0 | Nate Heise | G | Sr | 6'5" | 37-5 | 24.9 | 5.7 | 4.0 | 1.6 | 0.6 | 53.8% | 32.2% | 2.4 | 66.7% | 13.4% | |
| 23 | Blake Buchanan | F | Jr | 6'10" | 37-36 | 24.5 | 8.5 | 5.7 | 1.7 | 1.1 | 63.6% | 0.0% | 0.1 | 49.4% | 19.0% | |
| 1 | Jamarion Batemon | G | Fr | 6'3" | 37-0 | 15.6 | 6.6 | 1.2 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 51.4% | 37.0% | 3.9 | 78.8% | 24.8% | |
| 21 | Dominykas Pleta | F | Fr | 6'11" | 35-1 | 11.3 | 4.4 | 2.3 | 0.5 | 0.8 | 70.6% | — | 0.0 | 59.6% | 20.6% | |
| 11 | Dominick Nelson | G | Sr | 6'5" | 24-0 | 8.3 | 3.7 | 0.9 | 0.3 | 0.7 | 44.4% | 0.0% | 0.3 | 60.4% | 29.2% | |
| 4 | Eric Mulder | F | Sr | 6'9" | 20-0 | 3.6 | 0.9 | 1.6 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 53.6% | 100.0% | 0.1 | 44.4% | 17.6% | |
| 13 | Cade Kelderman | G | Jr | 6'1" | 18-0 | 3.8 | 0.9 | 0.2 | 0.7 | 0.1 | 60.0% | 40.0% | 0.6 | 50.0% | 12.1% | |
| 55 | Xzavion Mitchell | F | Fr | 6'6" | 7-0 | 3.3 | 1.0 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 37.5% | 33.3% | 0.9 | 50.0% | 23.4% | |
| 7 | Anthony Rise | G | Fr | 6'0" | 11-0 | 1.4 | 0.2 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 25.0% | — | 0.0 | — | 18.5% | |
| 2 | Mason Williams | G | Jr | 6'5" | 0-0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | — | 0.0 | — | — |
| # | Player | Pos | Cl | Ht | GP-GS | MPG | PPG | RPG | APG | TOV | eFG% | 3P% | 3PA/g | FT% | Usage | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7 | Nick Woodard | SF | Sr | 6'6" | 32-32 | 28.7 | 8.6 | 4.2 | 1.3 | 1.6 | 46.5% | 30.8% | 3.3 | 61.7% | 21.1% | |
| 0 | Shane Lancaster | G | Jr | 6'4" | 32-26 | 28.6 | 10.8 | 2.3 | 2.2 | 1.2 | 53.6% | 43.0% | 4.4 | 72.5% | 21.8% | |
| 1 | Jameel Morris | PG | Jr | 6'1" | 30-25 | 29.5 | 11.2 | 2.5 | 2.9 | 2.2 | 48.5% | 29.0% | 2.3 | 78.9% | 24.9% | |
| 8 | Tycen McDaniels | F | Jr | 6'8" | 32-32 | 27.3 | 12.0 | 6.1 | 1.0 | 2.6 | 52.8% | 25.0% | 0.3 | 75.4% | 27.5% | |
| 3 | Davian Williams | PG | So | 5'10" | 32-16 | 26.4 | 7.8 | 2.9 | 1.3 | 1.6 | 44.2% | 32.5% | 3.8 | 68.0% | 21.7% | |
| 12 | Omari Hamilton | F | Sr | 6'6" | 32-13 | 21.4 | 7.8 | 4.5 | 0.5 | 1.2 | 48.5% | 35.4% | 1.5 | 69.6% | 23.4% | |
| 30 | Travis Roberts | SG | Sr | 6'6" | 31-10 | 16.5 | 3.6 | 1.7 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 41.5% | 29.1% | 2.5 | 50.0% | 16.6% | |
| 4 | Bryson Calamese | PG | Jr | 6'2" | 31-1 | 11.1 | 3.0 | 0.9 | 1.2 | 1.1 | 38.7% | 28.6% | 0.9 | 73.3% | 23.5% | |
| 22 | Mike Jones | SG | Fr | 6'7" | 13-5 | 15.0 | 3.5 | 3.4 | 1.1 | 1.2 | 40.2% | 11.1% | 0.7 | 47.1% | 19.5% | |
| 2 | Jeremy Ellis | PF | Jr | 6'6" | 22-0 | 6.3 | 1.0 | 0.9 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 42.9% | — | 0.0 | 83.3% | 11.8% | |
| 6 | William Henderson | F | Jr | 6'10" | 11-0 | 10.4 | 2.6 | 1.6 | 0.1 | 1.0 | 42.2% | 20.0% | 0.5 | 40.0% | 22.2% | |
| 10 | Alex Hawkins | SG | Jr | 6'4" | 0-0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | — | 0.0 | — | — | |
| 11 | Ray Glasgow | SG | Sr | 6'3" | 0-0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | — | 0.0 | — | — |
Trends
Last 10 games of 2025-26| Date | Opponent | Site | Result | Total | PPP for | PPP vs | Pace | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 10 | Prairie View | N | L 56–65 | +6.0 | L−3.0 | 142.5 | U121 | 84.2 | 97.7 | 66.5 |
| Mar 9 | Alabama St | N | W 77–65 | +7.5 | W+19.5 | 142.0 | P142 | 109.4 | 92.4 | 70.4 |
| Mar 5 | AR-Pine Bluff | H | L 48–83 | +1.0 | L−34.0 | 144.0 | U131 | 64.5 | 111.6 | 74.4 |
| Mar 3 | Miss Valley St | H | W 67–64 | −9.5 | L−6.5 | 139.0 | U131 | 103.7 | 99.1 | 64.6 |
| Feb 28 | Prairie View | A | L 51–72 | +4.5 | L−16.5 | 150.0 | U123 | 72.5 | 102.3 | 70.4 |
| Feb 26 | Texas Southern | A | L 87–92 OT | +6.5 | W+1.5 | 145.0 | O179 | 109.3 | 115.6 | 79.6 |
| Feb 21 | Jackson St | H | W 83–65 | −1.0 | W+17.0 | 149.0 | U148 | 115.8 | 90.7 | 71.7 |
| Feb 16 | Florida A&M | H | L 78–86 | +1.5 | L−6.5 | 137.0 | O164 | 109.0 | 120.1 | 71.6 |
| Feb 14 | Bethune | H | W 57–55 | +8.0 | W+10.0 | 145.0 | U112 | 89.3 | 86.2 | 63.8 |
| Feb 9 | Miss Valley St | A | W 74–66 | −5.5 | W+2.5 | 140.0 | P140 | 126.0 | 112.4 | 58.7 |
| Date | Opponent | Site | Result | Total | PPP for | PPP vs | Pace | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 27 | #6Tennessee | N | L 62–76 | −3.0 | L−17.0 | 139.5 | U138 | 91.2 | 111.8 | 68.0 |
| Mar 22 | #7Kentucky | N | W 82–63 | −4.5 | W+14.5 | 146.5 | U145 | 118.4 | 91.0 | 69.2 |
| Mar 20 | #15Tennessee St | N | W 108–74 | −25.0 | W+9.0 | 147.5 | O182 | 137.7 | 94.4 | 78.4 |
| Mar 13 | #2Arizona | N | L 80–82 | +3.5 | W+1.5 | 144.5 | O162 | 120.8 | 123.9 | 66.2 |
| Mar 12 | #16Texas Tech | N | W 75–53 | −5.5 | W+16.5 | 143.5 | U128 | 115.9 | 81.9 | 64.7 |
| Mar 11 | Arizona St | N | W 91–42 | −12.5 | W+36.5 | 149.5 | U133 | 132.3 | 61.1 | 68.8 |
| Mar 7 | Arizona St | H | W 86–65 | −16.5 | W+4.5 | 148.0 | O151 | 117.9 | 89.1 | 73.0 |
| Mar 2 | #2Arizona | A | L 57–73 | +7.0 | L−9.0 | 149.0 | U130 | 85.4 | 109.3 | 66.8 |
| Feb 28 | #16Texas Tech | H | L 73–82 | −9.5 | L−18.5 | 145.0 | O155 | 113.1 | 127.1 | 64.5 |
| Feb 24 | Utah | A | W 75–59 | −14.0 | W+2.0 | 144.5 | U134 | 110.2 | 86.7 | 68.1 |
Records vs the closing line describe the past; ten games is a small sample.
Tale of the tape
national rank toned left for away, right for homeOffseason
roster movement into this season — descriptive, not a model inputReturns 100% of last season's minutes. Teams returning at least 65% of last season's minutes have historically gained about 2.2 points of AdjEM (n=156 team-seasons, 2022-2026). (ESPN hasn't posted this season's roster yet -- this may still be last season's list.)
- Milan Momcilovic 30.4 mpg, 16.9 ppg · transferred to Kentucky
- Joshua Jefferson 29.3 mpg, 15.5 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
- Tamin Lipsey 29.0 mpg, 12.4 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
- Mason Williams no D1 minutes last season
No incoming D1 transfers are listed on ESPN's roster yet — until they are, returning shares read high.
Returns 56% of last season's minutes; lost 3 of its top 5 (1 transferred).
Head-to-head
this season and last| Date | Season | Result |
|---|---|---|
| Wed, Dec 3 | 2025-26 | Alcorn St 68 – 132 Iowa State |
The CBB Matchups tab lays out the day's Division I slate: matchup, tip time, records and rank, and — once posted — Pinnacle's spread and total (the median across books when Pinnacle has no line). Three views switch the table between projected scores, pace and totals, and each team's offensive and defensive tendencies. Each game opens into opponent-adjusted possessions, efficiency and four-factor tendencies for both teams, plus recent form, rotation and head-to-head history. Every game also carries our projected score, spread and total, built bottom-up from those same numbers: expected possessions times each side's opponent-adjusted points per possession, plus home court.
What these numbers mean: line shopping.