CBB Matchups
Every D1 game with tempo-free ratings, four factors and market lines, one place.
| Projection | Spread | Total | Pace | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1Florida#52-0 | @Florida St#472-0 | — | Final score: 81–72 | 94%FLA | FLA−18.2 | open −10.0FLA−8.5 | — | open 165.0164.0 | 74.2 | Tempo tug-of-war | 68.5#254 | 74.7#71 | ||
Delaware St#3421-1 | @Georgetown#932-0 | — | Final score: 78–83 | 98%GTWN | GTWN−23.5 | open −27.5GTWN−30.0 | — | open 145.5143.0 | 68.4 | — | 70.1#200 | 68.1#266 | ||
NJIT#3431-2 | @Rutgers#1261-0 | — | Final score: 64–101 | 96%RUTG | RUTG−20.4 | open −24.0RUTG−25.5 | — | open 145.5142.5 | 67.5 | Slow game | 64.2#336 | 65.2#327 | ||
MD Eastern#3231-2 | @Boston College#1102-0 | — | Final score: 54–82 | 97%BC | BC−21.3 | open −24.5BC−26.0 | — | open 134.5128.0 | 64.7 | Tempo tug-of-war | 69.3#224 | 61.5#356 | ||
Youngstown St#1671-1 | @C Michigan#2542-0 | — | Final score: 78–91 | 55%CMU | CMU−1.3 | open −2.5CMU−3.5 | — | open 152.0151.5 | 70.6 | — | 71.8#143 | 71.7#148 | ||
Bradley#1691-1 | @Davidson#972-0 | — | Final score: 45–62 | 71%DAV | DAV−6.4 | open −11.5DAV−9.5 | — | open 140.8138.5 | 66.1 | Slow game | 63.3#343 | 66.3#304 | ||
Siena#1521-1 | @Dayton#991-1 | — | Final score: 99–89 | 92%DAY | DAY−16.6 | open −13.5DAY−14.0 | — | open 151.5159.0 | 73.6 | Tempo tug-of-war | 78.1#28 | 68.5#253 | ||
5Michigan St#82-0 | vs2Duke#12-0 | — | Final score: 79–73 | 74%DUKE | DUKE−7.3 | open −6.5DUKE−7.5 | — | open 149.0147.0 | 73.0 | — | 72.9#114 | 75.0#63 | ||
Washington St#2040-2 | @Duquesne#1382-0 | — | Final score: 71–72 | 66%DUQ | DUQ−4.7 | open −5.5DUQ−3.5 | — | open 148.0145.5 | 69.7 | Tempo tug-of-war | 64.8#330 | 71.1#167 | ||
Iona#2272-1 | @Fordham#1631-1 | — | Final score: 72–78 | 83%FOR | FOR−11.0 | open −12.0FOR−11.5 | — | open 143.5142.0 | 69.1 | Tempo tug-of-war | 66.1#308 | 72.3#127 | ||
Elon#1512-0 | @G Washington#392-0 | — | Final score: 50–69 | 90%GW | GW−15.2 | open −13.5GW−13.5 | — | open 148.8147.0 | 69.7 | — | 66.8#296 | 69.2#232 | ||
Mercer#2011-2 | @GA Southern#2071-1 | — | Final score: 97–91 | 57%MER | MER−2.0 | open −1.5GASO−1.0 | — | open 160.5164.5 | 73.1 | — | 69.9#207 | 73.4#98 | ||
E Kentucky#272 | @Georgia Tech#1402-0 | — | Final score: 71–85 | 86%GT | GT−12.6 | open −16.5GT−15.5 | — | open 160.0165.5 | 74.7 | Tempo tug-of-war | 68.6#167 | 76.9#41 | ||
Virginia Tech#502-0 | vsIowa#172-0 | — | Final score: 93–88 | 69%IOWA | IOWA−5.7 | open −4.0IOWA−4.0 | — | open 143.0140.0 | 67.0 | Tempo tug-of-war | 73.0#111 | 66.0#311 | ||
Winthrop#1820-2 | @Kennesaw St#1532-0 | — | Final score: 79–88 | 75%KENN | KENN−7.8 | open −9.5KENN−10.0 | — | open 167.5169.0 | 76.5 | Fast game | 77.2#37 | 75.0#64 | ||
Presbyterian#2590-2 | @NC State#432-0 | — | Final score: 60–94 | 98%NCSU | NCSU−22.9 | open −19.0NCSU−18.5 | — | open 145.5151.5 | 67.0 | Slow game | 67.3#280 | 66.2#305 | ||
Army#3121-1 | @New Haven#3260-2 | — | Final score: 55–63 | 58%NHVN | NHVN−2.4 | open +1.0ARMY−1.5 | — | open 137.0134.5 | 65.8 | Tempo tug-of-war | 70.3#196 | 64.6#331 | ||
Wyoming#852-0 | @North Carolina#372-0 | — | Final score: 63–76 | 87%UNC | UNC−13.0 | open −15.0UNC−12.5 | — | open 153.5155.5 | 71.5 | — | 70.1#204 | 74.7#72 | ||
Harvard#136 | @Northeastern#2630-2 | — | Final score: 70–74 | 51%HARV | HARV−0.4 | open −3.5HARV−2.0 | — | open 146.5143.0 | 71.1 | Tempo tug-of-war | 63.9#357 | 74.7#73 | ||
Bryant#3271-2 | @Providence#821-1 | — | Final score: 55–78 | 100%PROV | PROV−30.8 | open −29.5PROV−30.5 | — | open 148.5149.5 | 72.3 | — | 73.1#103 | 70.1#201 | ||
Maine#3301-2 | @Rhode Island#692-0 | — | Final score: 65–71 | 93%URI | URI−17.4 | open −17.5URI−20.0 | — | open 142.5140.5 | 69.3 | — | 70.4#195 | 72.0#134 | ||
Wright St#772-0 | @Toledo#1241-2 | — | Final score: 76–68 | 52%TOL | TOL−0.5 | open −1.5WRST−1.5 | — | open 159.5157.5 | 71.1 | — | 72.1#130 | 75.1#62 | ||
LMU#1931-1 | @Troy#2100-2 | — | Final score: 69–74 | 78%LMU | LMU−9.0 | open −1.5LMU−1.5 | — | open 148.5145.0 | 68.9 | — | 74.5#75 | 69.6#218 | ||
South Alabama#2161-1 | @UCF#892-0 | — | Final score: 69–76 | 92%UCF | UCF−16.3 | open −17.5UCF−14.0 | — | open 151.5151.0 | 69.0 | — | 65.8#317 | 69.3#229 | ||
La Salle#2661-1 | @Villanova#561-1 | — | Final score: 59–80 | 97%VILL | VILL−21.1 | open −23.0VILL−21.0 | — | open 156.0158.5 | 71.6 | — | 74.8#69 | 70.7#184 | ||
Charleston So#2291-1 | @Wake Forest#1091-1 | — | Final score: 64–82 | 97%WAKE | WAKE−21.6 | open −16.5WAKE−18.5 | — | open 155.5158.5 | 74.2 | Tempo tug-of-war | 77.8#30 | 68.6#245 | ||
Detroit Mercy#3240-1 | @Xavier#662-0 | — | Final score: 55–100 | 99%XAV | XAV−26.4 | open −31.5XAV−35.5 | — | open 158.0156.0 | 73.9 | Tempo tug-of-war | 67.3#279 | 75.3#60 | ||
Memphis#1162-0 | @22Vanderbilt#72-0 | — | Final score: 81–105 | 96%VAN | VAN−20.8 | open −16.5VAN−13.5 | — | open 158.5161.0 | 71.7 | — | 71.7#147 | 68.0#268 | ||
Evansville#3062-0 | @MTSU#2411-1 | — | Final score: 68–73 | 73%MTSU | MTSU−7.2 | open −8.0MTSU−9.5 | — | open 144.5143.0 | 67.4 | Slow game | 65.9#315 | 69.9#209 | ||
Nicholls#2251-1 | @Tulane#2691-1 | — | Final score: 63–77 | 70%TULN | TULN−6.2 | open −8.5TULN−9.0 | — | open 151.5153.0 | 72.3 | — | 72.9#112 | 72.3#126 | ||
Texas St#1902-0 | @UT Rio Grande#1342-0 | — | Final score: 72–65 | 53%TXST | TXST−0.8 | open −7.5TXST−5.5 | — | open 148.5138.0 | 65.6 | Slow game | 62.8#349 | 64.2#334 | ||
UT Martin#1770-2 | @Arkansas St#1301-1 | — | Final score: 82–65 | 77%ARST | ARST−8.7 | open −8.5ARST−5.5 | — | open 151.5155.5 | 72.5 | Tempo tug-of-war | 68.9#239 | 80.4#14 | ||
Yale#901-1 | @Baylor#422-0 | — | Final score: 61–90 | 93%BAY | BAY−17.4 | open −21.5BAY−19.5 | — | open 157.0157.5 | 72.1 | Tempo tug-of-war | 67.4#275 | 79.8#17 | ||
Southern#3070-3 | @Iowa State#211-1 | — | Final score: 47–84 | 100%ISU | ISU−34.6 | open −32.5ISU−35.5 | — | open 147.5146.5 | 71.3 | — | 73.2#101 | 70.6#188 | ||
Belmont#712-0 | @Lipscomb#2001-2 | — | Final score: 75–88 | 58%BEL | BEL−2.3 | open −4.5BEL−4.0 | — | open 159.5158.0 | 74.6 | Fast game | 73.0#106 | 72.1#132 | ||
Alcorn St#3580-2 | @Murray St#782-0 | — | Final score: 57–94 | 99%MUR | MUR−26.6 | open −24.5MUR−31.0 | — | open 162.5165.5 | 77.0 | Fast game | 74.0#86 | 78.3#26 | ||
Green Bay#1662-1 | @Northern Iowa#1131-1 | — | Final score: 76–89 | 67%UNI | UNI−5.3 | open −3.5UNI−3.5 | — | open 150.5151.0 | 66.6 | Tempo tug-of-war | 67.2#283 | 75.0#66 | ||
N Kentucky#1712-1 | @Saint Louis#292-0 | — | Final score: 63–125 | 96%SLU | SLU−20.1 | open −23.5SLU−23.0 | — | open 166.5168.0 | 77.0 | Fast game | 77.5#34 | 73.4#97 | ||
Prairie View#2712-1 | @SMU#722-0 | — | Final score: 63–98 | 99%SMU | SMU−25.9 | open −23.5SMU−27.0 | — | open 159.5161.0 | 75.0 | Tempo tug-of-war | 64.2#334 | 79.7#18 | ||
Hou Christian#2752-0 | @South Dakota#2931-2 | — | Final score: 87–76 | 57%SDAK | SDAK−2.1 | open −2.5SDAK−4.0 | — | open 155.5155.5 | 73.3 | Tempo tug-of-war | 73.3#99 | 80.4#15 | ||
3Illinois#22-0 | @16Texas Tech#352-0 | — | Final score: 78–84 | 62%TTU | TTU−3.5 | open −1.5ILL−2.5 | — | open 161.5166.5 | 72.9 | Tempo tug-of-war | 81.2#10 | 70.1#203 | ||
SE Louisiana#2831-1 | @Ole Miss#462-0 | — | Final score: 51–91 | 98%MISS | MISS−24.3 | open −25.5MISS−26.0 | — | open 146.5147.0 | 70.4 | — | 69.4#221 | 73.9#87 | ||
Fairfield#2361-1 | @Wisconsin#642-0 | — | Final score: 42–89 | 99%WIS | WIS−25.4 | open −23.5WIS−26.0 | — | open 148.5150.0 | 71.1 | — | 68.5#249 | 69.3#226 | ||
Hofstra#1051-1 | @Arizona St#732-0 | — | 59–76 | 93%ASU | ASU−16.8 | open −16.0ASU−19.0 | — | open 134.5133.5 | 66.1 | Slow game | 62.9#347 | 64.4#332 | ||
N Arizona#3200-2 | @12Arizona#131-1 | — | 60–96 | 100%ARIZ | ARIZ−36.2 | open −36.5ARIZ−36.0 | — | open 155.5156.0 | 69.7 | Tempo tug-of-war | 67.5#273 | 77.5#33 | ||
Queens#2342-1 | @23BYU#192-0 | — | 78–101 | 98%BYU | BYU−23.8 | open −25.5BYU−29.0 | — | open 179.0182.0 | 74.4 | Tempo tug-of-war | 78.2#27 | 69.6#216 | ||
San Diego#2452-0 | @Colorado#841-1 | — | 70–82 | 85%COLO | COLO−12.2 | open −12.5COLO−12.5 | — | open 151.5150.5 | 71.0 | — | 70.7#185 | 71.8#144 | ||
Georgia St#2851-2 | @Fresno St#1851-1 | — | 72–77 | 66%FRES | FRES−4.9 | open −6.5FRES−6.0 | — | open 149.5145.5 | 70.7 | — | 69.0#236 | 67.1#290 | ||
Creighton#1002-0 | @Kansas St#1331-1 | — | 79–77 | 59%CREI | CREI−2.8 | open −3.5CREI−3.5 | — | open 156.0159.5 | 73.4 | — | 72.0#137 | 74.2#80 | ||
Little Rock#2840-2 | @New Mexico#322-0 | — | 68–89 | 97%UNM | UNM−21.5 | open −20.8UNM−23.0 | — | open 156.5158.0 | 71.2 | — | 68.7#244 | 71.3#157 | ||
UL Monroe#3501-2 | @TCU#202-0 | — | 63–97 | 100%TCU | TCU−33.7 | open −33.5TCU−33.5 | — | open 159.5160.0 | 74.3 | Fast game | 77.6#31 | 74.2#81 | ||
Utah Tech#2551-1 | @Utah State#232-0 | — | 64–89 | 98%USU | USU−25.1 | open −25.5USU−26.0 | — | open 153.5156.5 | 72.1 | — | 76.5#47 | 72.4#123 | ||
Weber St#2810-2 | @Utah#1582-0 | — | 70–84 | 90%UTAH | UTAH−14.6 | open −18.5UTAH−16.5 | — | open 154.0154.5 | 73.0 | Tempo tug-of-war | 79.4#19 | 65.6#321 | ||
Bucknell#3530-2 | @6Virginia#113-0 | — | 53–96 | 100%UVA | UVA−42.6 | open −36.5UVA−38.5 | — | open 148.5151.0 | 70.0 | Tempo tug-of-war | 68.0#267 | 73.5#96 | ||
15Kansas#102-0 | vs24Kentucky#402-0 | — | 79–77 | 55%KU | KU−1.6 | open −5.0KU−5.0 | — | open 155.5159.0 | 71.0 | Tempo tug-of-war | 73.0#105 | 66.8#297 | ||
Montana#2111-1 | @San Francisco#1252-0 | — | 68–80 | 86%SF | SF−12.7 | open −11.8SF−11.5 | — | open 148.0147.5 | 69.0 | — | 68.3#257 | 67.7#272 | ||
Ratings as of the morning of Tue, Nov 10 · teams have played 1 to 3 games so far · market numbers are the no-vig market line (the closing line once a game has tipped), with the opening number beside it; the consensus across books stands in where no market line is up yet · tendency chips use provisional definitions.
This page is part of All Access. Plans are paid: your first monthly plan starts with 7 days for $1. See plans
The CBB Matchups tab lays out the day's Division I slate: matchup, tip time, records and rank, and — once posted — the market spread and total (the median across books when no market line is up). Three views switch the table between projected scores, pace and totals, and each team's offensive and defensive tendencies. Each game opens into opponent-adjusted possessions, efficiency and four-factor tendencies for both teams, plus recent form, rotation and head-to-head history. Every game also carries our projected score, spread and total, from our line: the same view our bets are made from.
What these numbers mean: line shopping.