Hampton Pirates vs George Washington Revolutionaries basketball final score
Sat, Nov 7 · 6:00 PM ET · Charles E. Smith Center, Washington, DC
Non-conferenceESPN+Charles E. Smith Center, Washington, DC
Hampton
0-1 · 0-0 conf
Efficiency #277
@
G Washington
1-0 · 0-0 conf
Efficiency #33
Final
6175
Final score
Projected 62.9 – 82.6
HAMP win 4%GW win 96%
MarketClose
Spread
GW −20.0
open GW −17.5
Total
147.5
open 145.5
Our line
GW −19.7
as of Sat, Nov 7 · 5:51 PM ET
Our play
How our line is built
each step, from an even game to our lineSpread
Even game
0.0
G Washingtonrated 8.5 above average
+8.5
Hamptonrated 6.9 below average
+6.9
Home court
+4.3
Our line
GW −19.7
◂ Hampton sideG Washington side ▸
The spread is seen from the home side: a plus moves it toward G Washington. Our total joins once both teams have played 3 games.
Pace & total
possessions per 40 minutesTempo, possessions per 40 minutes
Projected possessions: 72.0, from each team's opponent-adjusted tempo. On raw season pace, Hampton is the faster team (77.1, #41 of 365) and G Washington the slower (71.4, #156). When tempos clash, the slower team usually pulls the pace harder (weights 0.80 vs 0.66).
Projected possessions
72.0
per team, 40 min
Market total
147.5
Market close · open 145.5
Adjusted tempo, vs an average opponent
70.7#188
Hampton
72.0#104
G Washington
How this game plays
points this game from the four factors, vs an average D-I matchupOur line
GW −19.7
Four factors +40.9 · not in these stats −21.2
From the four factors
G Washington has the ball+7.8
Hampton has the ball−33.1
G Washington has the ball
✓Shoots it welleFG% 67.9% #5 · HAMP allows 44.8% #80+7.6
✗Coughs it upTO% 18.2% #168 · HAMP forces 23.4% #49 · ~15 turnovers−2.8
✓Wins second chancesOR% 28.0% #225 · HAMP allows 45.2% #309+1.8
✓Gets to the lineFTR 28.6% #238 · HAMP allows 37.3% #178 · FT 93.8% #2+1.2
Hampton has the ball
✗Tough shooting lookeFG% 31.1% #327 · GW allows 25.9% #1−24.0
✗Few second chancesOR% 20.0% #303 · GW allows 23.3% #48−5.3
✗Coughs it upTO% 14.3% #63 · GW forces 26.6% #24 · ~15 turnovers−2.7
✗Few trips to the lineFTR 49.2% #59 · GW allows 22.4% #36 · FT 56.7% #292−1.0
Shot diet
Where each offense shoots from and where each defense lets teams shootHamptonoffense vsG Washingtondefense
Share of shots by zone
Hampton shoots
41.5
7.3
24.4
26.8
G Washington allows
34.3
8.6
20.0
37.1
D-I average
37.9
7.9
12.7
41.5
FG% by zone
| Zone | D-I avg | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Rim | 35.3%#319 | 41.7%#24 | 58.1% |
| Short 2 (≤9 ft) | 33.3%#157 | 0.0%#1 | 37.5% |
| Mid 2 (10 ft+) | 10.0%#286 | 0.0%#1 | 35.4% |
| Three | 20.0%#309 | 11.1%#1 | 32.3% |
G Washingtonoffense vsHamptondefense
Share of shots by zone
G Washington shoots
50.0
0.0
5.3
44.7
Hampton allows
40.0
8.9
8.9
42.2
D-I average
37.9
7.9
12.7
41.5
FG% by zone
| Zone | D-I avg | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Rim | 57.9%#173 | 72.2%#284 | 58.1% |
| Short 2 (≤9 ft) | — | 50.0%#214 | 37.5% |
| Mid 2 (10 ft+) | 0.0%#291 | 50.0%#243 | 35.4% |
| Three | 51.9%#6 | 14.3%#6 | 32.3% |
RimShort 2 (≤9 ft)Mid 2 (10 ft+)Three
Zones from play-by-play shot descriptions; garbage time removed. Bars show the share of field-goal attempts in each zone; where a slice is too thin for its number, the shares are listed under the bar. FG% ranks: #1 = best for that side (most accurate shooting, stingiest defense).
Shot volume
Extra scoring chances from rebounds, turnovers and the foul lineHampton
+1.4extra scoring chances per game vs a D-I average team#144 of 365
Off reb %
20.0%
#303
Def reb %
54.8%
#309
Turnover %
14.3%
#63
Forced TO %
23.4%
#49
FT rate
49.2%
#59
FT allowed
37.3%
#178
Where the chances come from (per game)
Offensive rebounding−4.0
Defensive rebounding−4.5
Ball security+2.9
Forcing turnovers+3.6
Foul shots drawn+3.2
Foul shots allowed+0.1
G Washington
+9.5extra scoring chances per game vs a D-I average team#64 of 365
Off reb %
28.0%
#225
Def reb %
76.7%
#48
Turnover %
18.2%
#168
Forced TO %
26.6%
#24
FT rate
28.6%
#238
FT allowed
22.4%
#36
Where the chances come from (per game)
Offensive rebounding−1.3
Defensive rebounding+2.9
Ball security+0.1
Forcing turnovers+5.9
Foul shots drawn−2.2
Foul shots allowed+4.0
G Washington has more extra scoring chances per game: +9.5 (#64 of 365) to Hampton’s +1.4 (#144).
Grade = extra shots and foul-line trips per game compared with a D-I average team, built from six season rates. Cell shading is the national rank for each rate (greener = better for that team).
Rotation
Hampton2026-27 numbers through Sat, Nov 7
| # | Player | Pos | Cl | Ht | GP-GS | MPG | PPG | RPG | APG | TOV | eFG% | 3P% | 3PA/g | FT% | Usage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8 | F | Sr | 6'10" | 2-2 | 34.0 | 8.0 | 6.0 | 2.5 | 2.0 | 37.5% | — | 0.0 | 50.0% | 19.5% | |
| 0 | G | Fr | 5'5" | 2-1 | 27.0 | 8.0 | 2.5 | 3.5 | 1.0 | 50.0% | 50.0% | 3.0 | 62.5% | 17.3% | |
| 5 | G | Sr | 6'3" | 2-1 | 22.0 | 8.0 | 2.0 | 2.5 | 1.0 | 23.5% | 0.0% | 2.5 | 72.7% | 30.7% | |
| 12 | G | Sr | 6'4" | 2-1 | 22.0 | 11.5 | 1.5 | 0.0 | 1.5 | 40.0% | 33.3% | 3.0 | 87.5% | 33.9% | |
| 1 | G | Sr | 6'7" | 2-2 | 21.5 | 7.0 | 2.5 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 38.2% | 25.0% | 6.0 | 33.3% | 28.9% | |
| 3 | G | Sr | 6'5" | 2-2 | 21.5 | 5.5 | 3.0 | 0.0 | 1.5 | 35.0% | 25.0% | 2.0 | 50.0% | 21.6% | |
| 23 | F | Sr | 6'7" | 2-0 | 19.5 | 2.5 | 4.5 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 33.3% | 0.0% | 0.5 | 33.3% | 12.0% | |
| 2 | G | So | 6'2" | 2-0 | 11.5 | 4.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 44.4% | 40.0% | 2.5 | — | 22.0% | |
| 7 | F | So | 6'9" | 2-0 | 9.5 | 1.5 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 16.7% | 0.0% | 0.5 | 50.0% | 21.4% | |
| 4 | G | So | 6'3" | 2-1 | 5.5 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.5 | — | 10.1% | |
| 15 | F | Fr | 6'7" | 2-0 | 5.5 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 66.7% | — | 0.0 | — | 14.6% | |
| 9 | F | Fr | 6'10" | 2-0 | 1.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | — | 0.0 | — | 0.0% |
Trends
Results against the closing spread and total, last ten games, entering this gameHampton
Against the spread
Season
0-1
Home
0-0
Road
0-1
Last 10
0-1
avg cover −6.0
Missed the spread in the last game
Over / under
Season
0-1
Home
0-0
Road
0-1
Last 10
0-1
avg vs total −19.0
Under in the last game
Last 10 games, newest first
| Date | Opponent | Site | Result | Total | PPP for | PPP vs | Pace | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | Georgia Tech | A | L 55–75 | +14.0 | L−6.0 | 149.0 | U130 | 71.4 | 97.3 | 77.1 |
| Mar 7 | Towson | N | L 68–74 | +7.5 | W+1.5 | 132.0 | O142 | 100.1 | 108.9 | 67.9 |
| Mar 3 | William & Mary | A | L 85–94 | +11.5 | W+2.5 | 154.0 | O179 | 117.9 | 130.3 | 72.1 |
| Feb 28 | Northeastern | H | W 76–65 | −4.5 | W+6.5 | 146.5 | U141 | 115.2 | 98.6 | 65.9 |
| Feb 26 | Charleston | H | L 71–85 | +5.5 | L−8.5 | 139.5 | O156 | 103.8 | 124.3 | 68.4 |
| Feb 21 | Stony Brook | A | L 72–79 | +5.0 | L−2.0 | 135.5 | O151 | 104.5 | 114.6 | 68.9 |
| Feb 19 | Hofstra | A | L 43–79 | +11.0 | L−25.0 | 133.5 | U122 | 70.5 | 129.5 | 61.0 |
| Feb 13 | NC A&T | N | L 70–71 | −3.0 | L−4.0 | 138.0 | O141 | 105.6 | 107.1 | 66.3 |
| Feb 7 | William & Mary | H | W 77–74 | +5.5 | W+8.5 | 152.0 | U151 | 107.7 | 103.6 | 71.5 |
| Feb 5 | Elon | H | W 87–79 2OT | +1.5 | W+9.5 | 142.5 | O166 | 110.2 | 100.1 | 78.9 |
G Washington
Against the spread
Season
1-0
Home
1-0
Road
0-0
Last 10
1-0
avg cover +33.0
Covered the last game
Over / under
Season
0-1
Home
0-1
Road
0-0
Last 10
0-1
avg vs total −19.5
Under in the last game
Last 10 games, newest first
| Date | Opponent | Site | Result | Total | PPP for | PPP vs | Pace | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 2 | Navy | H | W 91–39 | −19.0 | W+33.0 | 149.5 | U130 | 127.5 | 54.6 | 71.4 |
| Mar 22 | New Mexico | A | L 61–86 | +7.0 | L−18.0 | 161.5 | U147 | 89.2 | 125.8 | 68.4 |
| Mar 18 | Utah Valley | A | W 79–78 | +1.5 | W+2.5 | 153.0 | O157 | 114.5 | 113.1 | 69.0 |
| Mar 13 | Saint Louis | N | L 81–88 | +6.5 | L−0.5 | 162.5 | O169 | 108.8 | 118.2 | 74.4 |
| Mar 12 | Fordham | N | W 66–62 | −6.0 | L−2.0 | 141.0 | U128 | 103.5 | 97.2 | 63.8 |
| Mar 7 | Loyola Chicago | A | L 62–68 | −9.5 | L−15.5 | 148.0 | U130 | 97.4 | 106.8 | 63.7 |
| Mar 4 | St Bonaventure | H | W 91–82 OT | −7.5 | W+1.5 | 157.0 | O173 | 115.1 | 103.7 | 79.1 |
| Feb 27 | Dayton | H | L 66–68 | −2.5 | L−4.5 | 152.0 | U134 | 98.7 | 101.7 | 66.9 |
| Feb 24 | La Salle | A | W 104–77 | −7.5 | W+19.5 | 148.0 | O181 | 143.5 | 106.3 | 72.5 |
| Feb 17 | VCU | A | L 75–89 | +6.0 | L−8.0 | 161.5 | O164 | 109.7 | 130.2 | 68.3 |
Records vs the closing line describe the past; ten games is a small sample.
Team comparison
national rank toned left for away, right for homeHamptonG Washington
Efficiency
98.0
113.5
105.2
98.5
70.7
72.0
1.5
-5.3
Shooting
31.1%
67.9%
31.7%
58.6%
20.0%
51.9%
56.7%
93.8%
49.2%
28.6%
Ball control & glass
14.3%
18.2%
23.4%
26.6%
20.0%
28.0%
45.2%
23.3%
7.8%
8.4%
17.1%
6.9%
Style
32.8%
48.2%
40.0%
37.4%
21.8%
23.1%
52.9%
64.5%
45.5%
49.5%
Roster
3.27
3.08
6'4.3"
6'6.2"
9.3%
12.2%
Offseason
roster movement into this season — descriptive, not a model inputHampton
Returning minutes: 15.6%Returning production: 14.0%
Lost
- Xzavier Long 32.4 mpg, 9.2 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
- Daniel Johnson 25.1 mpg, 10.0 ppg · transferred to Bethune
- Jalyke Gaines-Wyatt 23.8 mpg, 10.2 ppg · transferred to Southern Miss
- Josh Ogundele 14.8 mpg, 5.7 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
- Kody Williams 14.5 mpg, 2.5 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
- Michael Eley 13.8 mpg, 9.3 ppg · transferred to Prairie View
Added
- Jayme Mitchell Jr. from Jackson St · 31.8 mpg, 14.1 ppg last season
- Max Frazier from C Connecticut · 28.2 mpg, 12.0 ppg last season
- Cornelius Robinson III from Monmouth · 24.1 mpg, 7.7 ppg last season
- Aaron Davis III from Bryant · 22.5 mpg, 9.2 ppg last season
- Tyler Jackson from E Kentucky · 10.0 mpg, 5.1 ppg last season
- Seth Hubbard from Milwaukee · 8.6 mpg, 4.7 ppg last season
Returns 16% of last season's minutes; lost 4 of its top 5 (2 transferred). Teams returning under 40% of last season's minutes have historically fallen about 0.8 points of AdjEM (n=716 team-seasons, 2022-2026).
G Washington
Returning minutes: 12.2%Returning production: 12.6%
Lost
- Trey Autry 27.9 mpg, 10.7 ppg · transferred to Wisconsin
- Christian Jones 25.6 mpg, 9.7 ppg · transferred to Murray St
- Rafael Castro 22.6 mpg, 12.7 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
- Tyrone Marshall Jr. 22.2 mpg, 8.3 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
- Tre Dinkins 21.1 mpg, 8.8 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
- Garrett Johnson 18.7 mpg, 9.5 ppg · transferred to South Florida
Added
- Andrew Phillips from Lafayette · 33.4 mpg, 13.9 ppg last season
- Omari Witherspoon from Pitt · 27.8 mpg, 7.5 ppg last season
- Aidan Shaw from Boston College · 25.5 mpg, 4.5 ppg last season
- Dylan James from Georgia · 15.0 mpg, 4.5 ppg last season
- Terrance Arceneaux from NC State · 14.0 mpg, 3.4 ppg last season
- Felix Kossaras from Colorado · 13.9 mpg, 3.9 ppg last season
Returns 12% of last season's minutes; lost 4 of its top 5 (2 transferred). Teams returning under 40% of last season's minutes have historically fallen about 0.8 points of AdjEM (n=716 team-seasons, 2022-2026).
Line history
Market line, home spread or game totalLines by book
| Book | Spread (home) open → now | Total open → now | ML home | ML away |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DraftKings | -19.5→-20.5-110 | 147.5o-105 u-115 | -3200 | +1400 |
| FanDuel | -18.5→-20.5-110 | 147.5o-110 u-110 | — | +2000 |
| BetMGM | -19.5→-20.5-110 | 147.5o-105 u-115 | — | +1400 |
| BetRivers | -19.5→-20.5-112 | 147.5→146.5o-117 u-107 | — | — |
| Caesars | -20.5-110 | 147.5→147o-110 u-110 | — | — |
| Fanatics | -17.5→-20.5-110 | 145.5→147o-110 u-110 | -4000 | +1800 |
| BetOnline | -16.5→-20.5-110 | 145.5→146.5o-115 u-105 | -3500 | +1356 |
| Bovada | -19.5→-20.5-110 | 147.5→147o-110 u-110 | — | — |
| theScore Bet | -16.5→-20.5-110 | 145.5→147.5o-105 u-115 | — | +1800 |
| Hard Rock | -19.5→-20.5-110 | 147.5→146.5o-115 u-105 | — | — |
| Kalshi | -19.5-117 | 147.5o+104 u-113 | -3233 | +2400 |
| Polymarket | -17.5→-20.5+100 | 145.5→147.5o+104 u-108 | -3025 | +2464 |
| Novig | -20.5-102 | 147.5→146.5o-117 u+100 | -2678 | +2339 |
DraftKings
FanDuel
BetMGM
BetRivers
Caesars
Fanatics
BetOnline
Bovada
theScore Bet
Hard Rock
Kalshi
Polymarket
Novigopen = first-sighted line for this event · now = latest capture
Head-to-head
this season and lastNo meetings the last two seasons.
More games on Sat, Nov 7
- Morehead St at Louisville · 12:00 PM ET
- North Dakota at Winthrop · 12:00 PM ET
- NC A&T at Ohio · 1:00 PM ET
- Lamar at Abilene Chrstn · 2:00 PM ET
- UNC Wilmington at East Carolina · 2:00 PM ET
- Fullerton at South Dakota · 2:00 PM ET
- Colgate at Drexel · 2:00 PM ET
- Toledo at Marshall · 2:00 PM ET
- VCU at Memphis · 3:00 PM ET
- NC Central at Longwood · 3:00 PM ET
- Long Beach St at Montana St · 3:00 PM ET
- San Diego St vs Colorado · 3:30 PM ET
- Long Island at La Salle · 3:30 PM ET
- Monmouth vs Rhode Island · 4:00 PM ET
- Lafayette at Saint Joseph's · 4:00 PM ET
- Samford at UNLV · 4:00 PM ET
- Oakland at Santa Barbara · 4:00 PM ET
- Omaha at Utah State · 4:00 PM ET
- Bellarmine at Miami OH · 5:00 PM ET
- Washington St at High Point · 5:00 PM ET
- SIUE at Lipscomb · 5:00 PM ET
- UT Martin at IU Indy · 5:00 PM ET
- Old Dominion at Bucknell · 5:00 PM ET
- Northern Iowa at Furman · 5:00 PM ET
- VMI at UTSA · 5:00 PM ET
- New Mexico St at Gonzaga · 5:00 PM ET
- W Carolina at UNC Asheville · 5:30 PM ET
- Prairie View at UT Rio Grande · 5:30 PM ET
- N Arizona at New Mexico · 6:00 PM ET
- Morgan St at Niagara · 6:30 PM ET
- Providence vs Nebraska · 7:00 PM ET
- N Illinois at Dayton · 7:00 PM ET
- St Bonaventure at Canisius · 7:00 PM ET
- Hou Christian vs W Illinois · 7:00 PM ET
- Mercer at Davidson · 7:00 PM ET
- Maryland at Georgetown · 7:30 PM ET
- Denver at UC Riverside · 7:30 PM ET
- Bethune at Grand Canyon · 8:00 PM ET
- Pacific at Bradley · 8:00 PM ET
- SE Louisiana at Little Rock · 8:00 PM ET
- S Indiana at Evansville · 8:00 PM ET
- N'Western St at Murray St · 8:00 PM ET
- Utah Valley at Weber St · 9:00 PM ET
- San José St at UC Irvine · 10:00 PM ET
- Portland St at Seattle U · 10:00 PM ET
- Sacramento St at Santa Clara · 10:00 PM ET
- Fresno St at UC San Diego · 10:00 PM ET
The CBB Matchups tab lays out the day's Division I slate: matchup, tip time, records and rank, and — once posted — the market spread and total (the median across books when no market line is up). Three views switch the table between projected scores, pace and totals, and each team's offensive and defensive tendencies. Each game opens into opponent-adjusted possessions, efficiency and four-factor tendencies for both teams, plus recent form, rotation and head-to-head history. Every game also carries our projected score, spread and total, from our line: the same view our bets are made from.
What these numbers mean: line shopping.