CBB Matchups
Every D1 game with tempo-free ratings, four factors and market lines, one place.
College basketball is being built for the 2026-27 season (tip-off Nov 3). What's here fills in as games are played.
Non-conferenceJack Stephens Center, Little Rock, AR
SE Louisiana
Efficiency #296
2025-26: 9-22 · 6-16 conf
@
Little Rock
Efficiency #300
2025-26: 12-20 · 9-12 conf
Sat, Nov 7 · TBD
68.2
win 38%
Projected
71.8
win 62%
No line posted yet.
Model: LR −3.6 · total 140.1 · ratings as of Sat, Oct 3
Preseason ratings start from 2025-26's final adjusted ratings, regressed toward the D1 average. The stats below are 2025-26's too; both update once 2026-27 games are played.
How the projection is built
each step, from an average D-I game to this oneProjected total
Average D-I game
148.2
PaceAdjusted tempo: Little Rock 67.7, SE Louisiana 67.1 → 66.4 possessions
−4.1
Little Rock offense vs SE Louisiana defense
−2.2
SE Louisiana offense vs Little Rock defense
−1.9
Projected total
140.1
Axis starts at 135 pointsPoints added or removed at each step
Projected margin
Even game
0.0
Little Rock offense vs SE Louisiana defense
−2.2
SE Louisiana offense vs Little Rock defense
+1.9
Home court+2.9 points per 100 possessions to the home offense, −2.9 to the visitors
+3.8
Little Rock by 3.6
3.6
SE Louisiana side ◂▸ Little Rock side
Steps are rounded to one decimal, so they can differ from the total by 0.1: the total steps add to 140.0 against a projected 140.1, and the margin steps add to +3.5 against +3.6. The margin is the same build seen from the home side; positive numbers help Little Rock.
Pace & total
possessions per 40 minutesTempo, possessions per 40 minutes
Projected possessions: 66.4, from each team's opponent-adjusted tempo. On raw 2025-26 season pace, Little Rock is the faster team (67.6, #217 of 365) and SE Louisiana the slower (65.6, #312). When tempos clash, the slower team usually pulls the pace harder (study weights 0.80 vs 0.66).
Projected possessions
66.4
per team, 40 min
Projected total
140.1
model
Projected team totals
68.2 / 71.8
SE Louisiana / Little Rock
Adjusted tempo, vs an average opponent
67.1#282
SE Louisiana
67.7#233
Little Rock
How this game plays
what the study found each side's numbers actually do when these two teams meetAdvantageSE Louisiana
Where SE Louisiana struggles: shooting
SE Louisiana shoots an effective 46.7% (#343); Little Rock allows 51.8% (#199). Expect about 48.9%, 2.4 points below an average D1 matchup — worth roughly -3.4 points per 100 possessions.
AdvantageLittle Rock
Where Little Rock struggles: ball control
Little Rock turns it over on 18.4% of possessions (#293); SE Louisiana forces turnovers on 19.1% of opponent possessions (#46). Expect about 19.2%, 2.4 points above an average D1 matchup — worth roughly -3.0 points per 100 possessions.
Pace
Half-court grind
Little Rock averages 67.6 possessions per 40, SE Louisiana 65.6. Slower teams pull the pace toward themselves more than fast teams push it (0.80 vs 0.66 in five seasons of games), so expect about 66 — more possessions mean more points in the total and more chances for the better team to separate.
TurnoversSE Louisiana
SE Louisiana turns it over
Projected turnover rate of 18.8% is worth roughly -2.5 points per 100 possessions against SE Louisiana's offense.
DefenseLittle Rock
Little Rock's shot-blocking
Little Rock ranks #37 nationally in block rate — one of the few defensive numbers that travels. Expect about 11.6% of SE Louisiana's two-point attempts to get blocked against this defense.
Watch for noise
3-point caution
A notable season 3-point number here (SE Louisiana) is close to a coin flip going forward — the study's model of next-game 3P% barely beats guessing the D1 average. Shot volume is what actually carries: expect SE Louisiana at about 40.0% of its shots from three, Little Rock about 31.6%.
SE Louisiana has the ball
OffenseLittle Rock allowsvs D1 avg
46.7% #343
51.8% #199
-3.4 pt/100
18.4% #291
18.5% #71
-2.5 pt/100
28.6% #245
36.6% #357
+1.1 pt/100
40.3% #56
33.1% #134
+0.2 pt/100
68.4% #318
—
-0.4 pt/100
SE Louisiana net across the four factors + FT%, vs. a D1-average matchup: -5.0 pts/100
Little Rock has the ball
OffenseSE Louisiana allowsvs D1 avg
49.4% #273
52.4% #233
-0.7 pt/100
18.4% #293
19.1% #46
-3.0 pt/100
31.5% #143
31.4% #225
+0.8 pt/100
27.7% #345
41.2% #314
+0.0 pt/100
68.0% #327
—
-0.4 pt/100
Little Rock net across the four factors + FT%, vs. a D1-average matchup: -3.3 pts/100
Shot diet
Where each offense shoots from and where each defense lets teams shoot · 2025-26 numbersSE Louisianaoffense vsLittle Rockdefense
Share of shots by zone
SE Louisiana shoots
35.9
5.4
19.4
39.3
Little Rock allows
41.3
5.8
12.8
40.1
D-I average
38.5
6.4
15.8
39.3
FG% by zone
| Zone | D-I avg | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Rim | 58.7%#171 | 62.6%#315 | 58.6% |
| Short 2 (≤9 ft) | 33.8%#309 | 28.7%#10 | 39.5% |
| Mid 2 (10 ft+) | 34.1%#309 | 29.6%#5 | 38.0% |
| Three | 28.4%#362 | 34.4%#211 | 33.7% |
Little Rockoffense vsSE Louisianadefense
Share of shots by zone
Little Rock shoots
36.0
6.9
25.9
31.2
SE Louisiana allows
38.3
5.0
19.5
37.2
D-I average
38.5
6.4
15.8
39.3
FG% by zone
| Zone | D-I avg | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Rim | 62.8%#57 | 59.1%#195 | 58.6% |
| Short 2 (≤9 ft) | 32.4%#323 | 46.7%#328 | 39.5% |
| Mid 2 (10 ft+) | 30.6%#349 | 36.9%#127 | 38.0% |
| Three | 35.3%#96 | 36.0%#301 | 33.7% |
RimShort 2 (≤9 ft)Mid 2 (10 ft+)Three
Zones from play-by-play shot descriptions; garbage time removed. Bars show the share of field-goal attempts in each zone; where a slice is too thin for its number, the shares are listed under the bar. FG% ranks: #1 = best for that side (most accurate shooting, stingiest defense).
Shot volume
Extra scoring chances from rebounds, turnovers and the foul line · 2025-26 numbersSE Louisiana
−0.5extra scoring chances per game vs a D-I average team#200 of 365
Off reb %
28.6%
#245
Def reb %
68.6%
#225
Turnover %
18.4%
#291
Forced TO %
19.1%
#46
FT rate
40.3%
#56
FT allowed
41.2%
#314
Where the chances come from (per game)
Offensive rebounding−0.6
Defensive rebounding−0.3
Ball security−1.1
Forcing turnovers+1.6
Foul shots drawn+1.4
Foul shots allowed−1.5
Little Rock
−2.8extra scoring chances per game vs a D-I average team#296 of 365
Off reb %
31.5%
#143
Def reb %
63.4%
#357
Turnover %
18.4%
#293
Forced TO %
18.5%
#71
FT rate
27.7%
#345
FT allowed
33.1%
#134
Where the chances come from (per game)
Offensive rebounding+0.3
Defensive rebounding−1.9
Ball security−1.1
Forcing turnovers+1.3
Foul shots drawn−1.9
Foul shots allowed+0.6
SE Louisiana has more extra scoring chances per game: −0.5 (#200 of 365) to Little Rock’s −2.8 (#296).
Grade = extra shots and foul-line trips per game compared with a D-I average team, built from six season rates. Cell shading is the national rank for each rate (greener = better for that team).
Rotation
SE Louisiana2025-26 numbers
ESPN hasn't posted SE Louisiana's 2026-27 roster yet — these are last season's players.
| # | Player | Pos | Cl | Ht | GP-GS | MPG | PPG | RPG | APG | TOV | eFG% | 3P% | 3PA/g | FT% | Usage | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | Jeremy Elyzee | F | So | 6'7" | 31-31 | 29.5 | 11.1 | 4.5 | 1.8 | 1.9 | 48.9% | 21.2% | 1.7 | 70.3% | 25.7% | |
| 23 | Isaiah Gaines | F | Sr | 6'8" | 31-31 | 28.3 | 10.6 | 6.2 | 1.6 | 1.9 | 54.9% | 9.1% | 0.4 | 63.4% | 23.9% | |
| 1 | Makhi Myles | F | So | 6'7" | 31-18 | 21.0 | 7.7 | 3.6 | 0.6 | 0.9 | 50.5% | 34.3% | 3.3 | 82.8% | 22.7% | |
| 10 | Jaiden Lawrence | G | Jr | 6'4" | 31-18 | 20.3 | 5.1 | 2.4 | 0.6 | 0.5 | 45.9% | 29.9% | 3.5 | 66.7% | 17.2% | |
| 4 | CJ Booker | PG | So | 5'10" | 30-22 | 20.5 | 4.7 | 1.3 | 2.0 | 0.8 | 45.4% | 39.7% | 1.9 | 72.2% | 17.3% | |
| 8 | Peter Hemschemeier | G | Fr | 6'5" | 27-12 | 20.3 | 6.4 | 1.6 | 1.9 | 1.6 | 40.7% | 27.5% | 4.4 | 73.1% | 27.2% | |
| 3 | Ethan Pickett | G | Sr | 6'5" | 31-21 | 17.6 | 5.1 | 2.4 | 1.3 | 1.1 | 44.4% | 16.0% | 0.8 | 68.4% | 21.4% | |
| 2 | Jalen Forrest | G | Jr | 6'4" | 28-0 | 17.2 | 7.9 | 2.6 | 0.6 | 1.0 | 44.0% | 26.5% | 2.4 | 78.8% | 29.6% | |
| 5 | Kyle Edison | G | So | 6'3" | 25-2 | 9.8 | 3.2 | 1.5 | 0.9 | 0.8 | 43.8% | 23.1% | 1.6 | 64.9% | 25.4% | |
| 6 | Ubong-Abasi Etim | C | Sr | 6'9" | 31-0 | 7.4 | 1.2 | 1.5 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 51.5% | — | 0.0 | 16.7% | 12.1% | |
| 32 | Garrett Shoemaker | F | Fr | 6'9" | 24-0 | 7.1 | 1.9 | 1.4 | 0.1 | 0.4 | 51.5% | 29.4% | 0.7 | 35.7% | 20.5% | |
| 12 | Ahmed Essahaty | G | Sr | 6'2" | 16-0 | 10.1 | 2.2 | 1.4 | 0.8 | 0.9 | 38.9% | 21.1% | 1.2 | 58.3% | 21.1% | |
| 7 | Seth Jones | G | Jr | 6'1" | 8-0 | 19.8 | 7.3 | 2.8 | 1.0 | 2.3 | 41.7% | 27.9% | 5.4 | 80.0% | 30.3% | |
| 11 | Amir Chaney | PG | Fr | 5'10" | 0-0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | — | 0.0 | — | — | |
| 9 | Cody Al-Naziat | G | Fr | 6'2" | 0-0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | — | 0.0 | — | — |
Rosters come from ESPN and are still filling in; incoming transfers and freshmen may be missing.
Little Rock2025-26 numbers
ESPN hasn't posted Little Rock's 2026-27 roster yet — these are last season's players.
| # | Player | Pos | Cl | Ht | GP-GS | MPG | PPG | RPG | APG | TOV | eFG% | 3P% | 3PA/g | FT% | Usage | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11 | Johnathan Lawson | G | Sr | 6'7" | 31-31 | 36.7 | 16.2 | 4.1 | 4.1 | 2.0 | 48.7% | 34.7% | 7.2 | 82.8% | 27.3% | |
| 0 | Braxton Bayless | G | Sr | 6'2" | 32-32 | 33.0 | 10.3 | 3.9 | 3.3 | 2.4 | 46.5% | 35.1% | 3.0 | 70.4% | 22.7% | |
| 24 | Cameron Wallace | F | Jr | 6'8" | 32-22 | 28.6 | 12.7 | 6.9 | 1.8 | 1.7 | 49.0% | 5.3% | 0.6 | 57.4% | 29.0% | |
| 32 | Tuongthach Gatkek | F | Sr | 6'9" | 29-29 | 31.4 | 9.4 | 5.9 | 2.0 | 1.8 | 59.1% | 25.0% | 0.1 | 66.2% | 17.6% | |
| 15 | Kachi Nzeh | F | Jr | 6'8" | 32-32 | 28.4 | 11.7 | 4.8 | 1.3 | 1.8 | 54.9% | 41.5% | 3.7 | 69.9% | 24.9% | |
| 22 | Truman Claytor IV | F | Jr | 6'6" | 28-0 | 16.2 | 6.3 | 1.5 | 0.7 | 1.2 | 47.0% | 34.3% | 2.4 | 72.4% | 27.5% | |
| 10 | Caleb Pennyfeather | F | So | 6'9" | 29-4 | 11.8 | 2.2 | 2.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 45.5% | 100.0% | 0.0 | 33.3% | 14.2% | |
| 12 | Tracy Steele Jr. | G | Sr | 6'3" | 24-0 | 10.9 | 1.7 | 1.3 | 0.6 | 0.8 | 43.6% | 38.1% | 0.9 | 35.3% | 14.6% | |
| 23 | Terrion Burgess | F | Fr | 6'9" | 6-4 | 23.5 | 7.5 | 3.2 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 71.2% | 42.9% | 1.2 | 66.7% | 15.9% | |
| 1 | Joseph Thomas | G | So | 6'3" | 13-1 | 10.5 | 3.2 | 0.8 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 50.0% | 45.5% | 1.7 | 80.0% | 19.7% | |
| 5 | Christian Hughes | G | So | 6'2" | 9-5 | 15.0 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 0.6 | 0.3 | 18.4% | 14.3% | 0.8 | 25.0% | 9.9% | |
| 4 | Kellen Robinson | G | Fr | 6'3" | 0-0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | — | 0.0 | — | — | |
| 3 | Khasen Robinson | G | So | 6'1" | 0-0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | — | 0.0 | — | — | |
| 2 | KK Robinson | G | Sr | 6'0" | 0-0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | — | 0.0 | — | — | |
| 8 | Travonne Jackson | G | So | 6'7" | 0-0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | — | 0.0 | — | — |
Rosters come from ESPN and are still filling in; incoming transfers and freshmen may be missing.
SE Louisiana2025-26 numbers
ESPN hasn't posted SE Louisiana's 2026-27 roster yet — these are last season's players.
| # | Player | Pos | Cl | Ht | GP-GS | MPG | PPG | RPG | APG | TOV | eFG% | 3P% | 3PA/g | FT% | Usage | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | Jeremy Elyzee | F | So | 6'7" | 31-31 | 29.5 | 11.1 | 4.5 | 1.8 | 1.9 | 48.9% | 21.2% | 1.7 | 70.3% | 25.7% | |
| 23 | Isaiah Gaines | F | Sr | 6'8" | 31-31 | 28.3 | 10.6 | 6.2 | 1.6 | 1.9 | 54.9% | 9.1% | 0.4 | 63.4% | 23.9% | |
| 1 | Makhi Myles | F | So | 6'7" | 31-18 | 21.0 | 7.7 | 3.6 | 0.6 | 0.9 | 50.5% | 34.3% | 3.3 | 82.8% | 22.7% | |
| 10 | Jaiden Lawrence | G | Jr | 6'4" | 31-18 | 20.3 | 5.1 | 2.4 | 0.6 | 0.5 | 45.9% | 29.9% | 3.5 | 66.7% | 17.2% | |
| 4 | CJ Booker | PG | So | 5'10" | 30-22 | 20.5 | 4.7 | 1.3 | 2.0 | 0.8 | 45.4% | 39.7% | 1.9 | 72.2% | 17.3% | |
| 8 | Peter Hemschemeier | G | Fr | 6'5" | 27-12 | 20.3 | 6.4 | 1.6 | 1.9 | 1.6 | 40.7% | 27.5% | 4.4 | 73.1% | 27.2% | |
| 3 | Ethan Pickett | G | Sr | 6'5" | 31-21 | 17.6 | 5.1 | 2.4 | 1.3 | 1.1 | 44.4% | 16.0% | 0.8 | 68.4% | 21.4% | |
| 2 | Jalen Forrest | G | Jr | 6'4" | 28-0 | 17.2 | 7.9 | 2.6 | 0.6 | 1.0 | 44.0% | 26.5% | 2.4 | 78.8% | 29.6% | |
| 5 | Kyle Edison | G | So | 6'3" | 25-2 | 9.8 | 3.2 | 1.5 | 0.9 | 0.8 | 43.8% | 23.1% | 1.6 | 64.9% | 25.4% | |
| 6 | Ubong-Abasi Etim | C | Sr | 6'9" | 31-0 | 7.4 | 1.2 | 1.5 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 51.5% | — | 0.0 | 16.7% | 12.1% | |
| 32 | Garrett Shoemaker | F | Fr | 6'9" | 24-0 | 7.1 | 1.9 | 1.4 | 0.1 | 0.4 | 51.5% | 29.4% | 0.7 | 35.7% | 20.5% | |
| 12 | Ahmed Essahaty | G | Sr | 6'2" | 16-0 | 10.1 | 2.2 | 1.4 | 0.8 | 0.9 | 38.9% | 21.1% | 1.2 | 58.3% | 21.1% | |
| 7 | Seth Jones | G | Jr | 6'1" | 8-0 | 19.8 | 7.3 | 2.8 | 1.0 | 2.3 | 41.7% | 27.9% | 5.4 | 80.0% | 30.3% | |
| 11 | Amir Chaney | PG | Fr | 5'10" | 0-0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | — | 0.0 | — | — | |
| 9 | Cody Al-Naziat | G | Fr | 6'2" | 0-0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | — | 0.0 | — | — |
Rosters come from ESPN and are still filling in; incoming transfers and freshmen may be missing.
Trends
Last 10 games of 2025-26SE Louisiana
Against the spread
Season
14-16
Home
5-6
Road
7-10
Last 10
3-7
avg cover −4.6
Covered the last gameCovered 1 of 8 as an underdog
Over / under
Season
13-17
Home
6-5
Road
6-11
Last 10
5-5
avg vs total +0.5
Over in the last gameOver in 5 of 8 as an underdog
Last 10 games, newest first
| Date | Opponent | Site | Result | Total | PPP for | PPP vs | Pace | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 2 | LSU N Orleans | A | W 82–78 | +7.0 | W+11.0 | 144.0 | O160 | 110.2 | 104.8 | 74.4 |
| Feb 28 | Nicholls | A | L 60–68 | +4.5 | L−3.5 | 140.0 | U128 | 91.8 | 104.0 | 65.4 |
| Feb 23 | Texas A&M-CC | H | L 68–73 | +2.0 | L−3.0 | 130.5 | O141 | 105.2 | 112.9 | 64.7 |
| Feb 21 | UT Rio Grande | H | L 75–96 | +4.0 | L−17.0 | 139.5 | O171 | 117.5 | 150.4 | 63.8 |
| Feb 16 | East Texas A&M | A | L 53–70 | +1.5 | L−15.5 | 136.5 | U123 | 78.2 | 103.3 | 67.7 |
| Feb 14 | N'Western St | A | L 66–69 | +1.0 | L−2.0 | 131.0 | O135 | 105.6 | 110.4 | 62.5 |
| Feb 9 | Incarnate Word | H | W 74–62 | −1.0 | W+11.0 | 137.5 | U136 | 121.1 | 101.5 | 61.1 |
| Feb 7 | Hou Christian | H | W 55–47 | −4.5 | W+3.5 | 133.5 | U102 | 97.4 | 83.2 | 56.5 |
| Feb 2 | Lamar | A | L 54–73 | +6.0 | L−13.0 | 133.5 | U127 | 89.0 | 120.3 | 60.7 |
| Jan 31 | SF Austin | A | L 58–85 | +9.5 | L−17.5 | 135.5 | O143 | 95.6 | 140.1 | 60.7 |
Little Rock
Against the spread
Season
12-18
Home
4-7
Road
8-10
Last 10
4-6
avg cover −0.7
Missed the spread in the last gameCovered 2 of 5 as a favoriteCovered 2 of 5 as an underdog
Over / under
Season
15-15
Home
7-4
Road
8-10
Last 10
4-6
avg vs total −2.4
Under in the last gameOver in 3 of 5 as a favoriteOver in 1 of 5 as an underdog
Last 10 games, newest first
| Date | Opponent | Site | Result | Total | PPP for | PPP vs | Pace | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 4 | Lindenwood | N | L 62–72 | +4.5 | L−5.5 | 148.5 | U134 | 80.1 | 93.0 | 77.4 |
| Feb 28 | S Indiana | H | W 89–70 | −6.0 | W+13.0 | 139.5 | O159 | 132.8 | 104.5 | 67.0 |
| Feb 26 | Morehead St | H | L 70–76 | −2.5 | L−8.5 | 139.0 | O146 | 108.5 | 117.8 | 64.5 |
| Feb 21 | SE Missouri | H | L 65–70 | +2.5 | L−2.5 | 144.0 | U135 | 95.3 | 102.6 | 68.2 |
| Feb 19 | UT Martin | H | W 67–65 | +2.5 | W+4.5 | 136.0 | U132 | 112.3 | 109.0 | 59.6 |
| Feb 14 | E Illinois | A | L 72–78 | −1.5 | L−7.5 | 135.5 | O150 | 108.4 | 117.5 | 66.4 |
| Feb 12 | W Illinois | A | W 77–58 | −7.5 | W+11.5 | 142.0 | U135 | 108.7 | 81.8 | 70.9 |
| Feb 7 | SIUE | H | L 61–71 | −1.5 | L−11.5 | 133.0 | U132 | 90.5 | 105.3 | 67.4 |
| Feb 5 | Lindenwood | H | L 74–79 | +1.5 | L−3.5 | 150.5 | O153 | 109.2 | 116.6 | 67.8 |
| Feb 3 | UT Martin | A | L 52–55 | +6.5 | W+3.5 | 138.5 | U107 | 83.8 | 88.6 | 62.1 |
Records vs the closing line describe the past; ten games is a small sample.
Tale of the tape
national rank toned left for away, right for homeSE LouisianaLittle Rock
Efficiency
102.1
104.6
109.1
111.9
67.1
67.7
—
—
Shooting
46.7%
49.4%
49.4%
47.9%
28.4%
35.3%
68.4%
68.0%
40.3%
27.7%
Ball control & glass
18.4%
18.4%
19.1%
18.5%
28.6%
31.5%
31.4%
36.6%
10.1%
10.6%
9.7%
5.6%
Style
39.5%
31.0%
43.8%
47.2%
12.2%
16.2%
51.6%
52.2%
37.4%
20.6%
Roster
2.67
3.39
6'5.1"
6'6.5"
—
—
Offseason
roster movement into this season — descriptive, not a model inputSE Louisiana
Returning minutes: 100.0%Returning production: 100.0%
ESPN hasn't posted SE Louisiana's roster for this season yet — no movement to show.
Returns 100% of last season's minutes. Teams returning at least 65% of last season's minutes have historically gained about 2.2 points of AdjEM (n=156 team-seasons, 2022-2026). (ESPN hasn't posted this season's roster yet -- this may still be last season's list.)
Little Rock
Returning minutes: 100.0%Returning production: 100.0%
ESPN hasn't posted Little Rock's roster for this season yet — no movement to show.
Returns 100% of last season's minutes. Teams returning at least 65% of last season's minutes have historically gained about 2.2 points of AdjEM (n=156 team-seasons, 2022-2026). (ESPN hasn't posted this season's roster yet -- this may still be last season's list.)
Head-to-head
this season and lastNo meetings the last two seasons.
The CBB Matchups tab lays out the day's Division I slate: matchup, tip time, records and rank, and — once posted — Pinnacle's spread and total (the median across books when Pinnacle has no line). Three views switch the table between projected scores, pace and totals, and each team's offensive and defensive tendencies. Each game opens into opponent-adjusted possessions, efficiency and four-factor tendencies for both teams, plus recent form, rotation and head-to-head history. Every game also carries our projected score, spread and total, built bottom-up from those same numbers: expected possessions times each side's opponent-adjusted points per possession, plus home court.
What these numbers mean: line shopping.