CBB Matchups

Every D1 game with tempo-free ratings, four factors and market lines, one place.

College basketball is being built for the 2026-27 season (tip-off Nov 3). What's here fills in as games are played.
Non-conferenceGallagher Center, Niagara Falls, NY
Morgan St
Efficiency #349
2025-26: 14-16 · 10-5 conf
@
Niagara
Efficiency #337
2025-26: 8-22 · 5-15 conf
Sat, Nov 7 · 6:30 PM ET
69.8
win 32%
Projected
75.3
win 68%
No line posted yet.
Model: NIA −5.5 · total 145.2 · ratings as of Sat, Oct 3
Preseason ratings start from 2025-26's final adjusted ratings, regressed toward the D1 average. The stats below are 2025-26's too; both update once 2026-27 games are played.

How the projection is built

each step, from an average D-I game to this one
Projected total
Average D-I game
148.2
PaceAdjusted tempo: Niagara 65.0, Morgan St 70.3 → 67.0 possessions
−2.9
Niagara offense vs Morgan St defense
+0.8
Morgan St offense vs Niagara defense
−0.9
Projected total
145.2
Axis starts at 142 pointsPoints added or removed at each step
Projected margin
Even game
0.0
Niagara offense vs Morgan St defense
+0.8
Morgan St offense vs Niagara defense
+0.9
Home court+2.9 points per 100 possessions to the home offense, −2.9 to the visitors
+3.9
Niagara by 5.5
5.5
Morgan St side ◂▸ Niagara side

Steps are rounded to one decimal, so they can differ from the total by 0.1: the margin steps add to +5.6 against +5.5. The margin is the same build seen from the home side; positive numbers help Niagara.

Pace & total

possessions per 40 minutes
Tempo, possessions per 40 minutes

Projected possessions: 67.0, from each team's opponent-adjusted tempo. On raw 2025-26 season pace, Morgan St is the faster team (70.7, #64 of 365) and Niagara the slower (63.1, #363). When tempos clash, the slower team usually pulls the pace harder (study weights 0.80 vs 0.66).

Projected possessions
67.0
per team, 40 min
Projected total
145.2
model
Projected team totals
69.8 / 75.3
Morgan St / Niagara
Adjusted tempo, vs an average opponent
70.3#31
Morgan St
65.0#364
Niagara

How this game plays

what the study found each side's numbers actually do when these two teams meet
Pace
Tempo tug-of-war
Niagara averages 63.1 possessions per 40, Morgan St 70.7. Slower teams pull the pace toward themselves more than fast teams push it (0.80 vs 0.66 in five seasons of games), so expect about 66 — more possessions mean more points in the total and more chances for the better team to separate.
AdvantageMorgan St
Where Morgan St struggles: shooting
Morgan St shoots an effective 45.8% (#351); Niagara allows 52.8% (#260). Expect about 48.9%, 2.4 points below an average D1 matchup — worth roughly -3.4 points per 100 possessions.
Watch for noise
3-point caution
A notable season 3-point number here (Morgan St's defense) is close to a coin flip going forward — the study's model of next-game 3P% barely beats guessing the D1 average. Shot volume is what actually carries: expect Morgan St at about 36.6% of its shots from three, Niagara about 35.4%.
Morgan St has the ball
OffenseNiagara allowsvs D1 avg
45.8% #351
52.8% #260
-3.4 pt/100
17.8% #260
16.6% #179
-0.6 pt/100
30.7% #172
32.9% #297
+0.9 pt/100
42.7% #22
33.8% #144
+0.4 pt/100
74.3% #113
—
+0.2 pt/100
Morgan St net across the four factors + FT%, vs. a D1-average matchup: -2.6 pts/100
Niagara has the ball
OffenseMorgan St allowsvs D1 avg
50.5% #214
51.7% #194
-0.4 pt/100
18.9% #319
16.5% #184
-1.3 pt/100
24.8% #344
35.2% #341
-1.0 pt/100
26.6% #353
50.9% #363
+0.7 pt/100
72.2% #203
—
-0.0 pt/100
Niagara net across the four factors + FT%, vs. a D1-average matchup: -2.0 pts/100

Shot diet

Where each offense shoots from and where each defense lets teams shoot · 2025-26 numbers
Morgan Stoffense vsNiagaradefense
Share of shots by zone
Morgan St shoots
Niagara allows
D-I average
FG% by zone
ZoneD-I avg
Rim53.0%#34058.7%#17658.6%
Short 2 (≤9 ft)32.1%#32641.5%#22539.5%
Mid 2 (10 ft+)35.1%#28940.6%#26038.0%
Three31.7%#29535.3%#26833.7%
Niagaraoffense vsMorgan Stdefense
Share of shots by zone
Niagara shoots
Morgan St allows
D-I average
FG% by zone
ZoneD-I avg
Rim54.1%#32058.6%#16858.6%
Short 2 (≤9 ft)31.3%#33926.9%#539.5%
Mid 2 (10 ft+)40.0%#10944.9%#34938.0%
Three33.7%#18831.5%#4333.7%
RimShort 2 (≤9 ft)Mid 2 (10 ft+)Three

Zones from play-by-play shot descriptions; garbage time removed. Bars show the share of field-goal attempts in each zone; where a slice is too thin for its number, the shares are listed under the bar. FG% ranks: #1 = best for that side (most accurate shooting, stingiest defense).

Shot volume

Extra scoring chances from rebounds, turnovers and the foul line · 2025-26 numbers
Morgan St
−4.3extra scoring chances per game vs a D-I average team#335 of 365
Off reb %
30.7%
#172
Def reb %
64.8%
#341
Turnover %
17.8%
#260
Forced TO %
16.5%
#184
FT rate
42.7%
#22
FT allowed
50.9%
#363
Where the chances come from (per game)
Offensive rebounding+0.1
Defensive rebounding−1.5
Ball security−0.7
Forcing turnovers−0.2
Foul shots drawn+2.0
Foul shots allowed−4.0
Niagara
−5.9extra scoring chances per game vs a D-I average team#356 of 365
Off reb %
24.8%
#344
Def reb %
67.1%
#297
Turnover %
18.9%
#319
Forced TO %
16.6%
#179
FT rate
26.6%
#353
FT allowed
33.8%
#144
Where the chances come from (per game)
Offensive rebounding−1.8
Defensive rebounding−0.7
Ball security−1.5
Forcing turnovers−0.1
Foul shots drawn−2.2
Foul shots allowed+0.4

Morgan St has more extra scoring chances per game: −4.3 (#335 of 365) to Niagara’s −5.9 (#356).

Grade = extra shots and foul-line trips per game compared with a D-I average team, built from six season rates. Cell shading is the national rank for each rate (greener = better for that team).

Rotation

Morgan St2025-26 numbers
ESPN hasn't posted Morgan St's 2026-27 roster yet — these are last season's players.
#PlayerPosClHtGP-GSMPGPPGRPGAPGTOVeFG%3P%3PA/gFT%UsageStatus
3Rob LawsonGSr5'11"30-2232.812.83.64.02.541.8%29.3%4.481.7%27.0%
2Elijah DavisGSr6'1"26-2634.913.83.35.92.645.9%21.7%0.972.5%25.5%
0Christian MeeksGJr6'6"30-2728.65.95.80.81.056.1%22.2%0.362.0%11.9%
1Alfred Worrell Jr.GSr6'4"30-2628.517.43.81.12.049.5%36.3%7.488.5%34.0%
55Eugene AlvinFJr6'7"29-1419.37.33.60.40.853.7%38.4%2.560.3%21.5%
52Walter Peggs Jr.GSr6'4"28-619.38.82.00.70.750.7%36.7%4.681.6%25.3%
21Christian OliverCSr6'10"26-914.34.33.00.40.557.3%22.2%0.367.9%16.6%
7Marland HarrisFSr6'9"20-612.93.93.80.30.854.7%—0.069.0%17.3%
4David BumpassGFr6'4"22-09.13.21.00.20.440.6%16.7%1.159.4%24.4%
22Manok LualFJr6'9"20-47.71.80.80.10.550.0%20.0%0.347.4%16.6%
42Dallas JamesCSr7'1"21-96.41.61.50.01.250.0%—0.072.7%23.4%
5Matar WadeFSo6'8"13-08.20.91.80.20.745.5%0.0%0.1100.0%11.3%
10Breon BarnettGFr6'1"13-03.40.30.50.20.211.1%0.0%0.2100.0%15.9%
13Trent EdwardsFJr6'8"2-117.03.53.50.00.542.9%0.0%0.533.3%17.0%
32Jayden SockaFSr6'9"6-02.70.70.50.50.033.3%—0.033.3%20.5%
Rosters come from ESPN and are still filling in; incoming transfers and freshmen may be missing.

Tale of the tape

national rank toned left for away, right for home
Morgan StNiagara
Efficiency
102.0
102.5
115.6
113.6
70.3
65.0
—
—
Shooting
45.8%
50.5%
44.9%
50.5%
31.7%
33.7%
74.3%
72.2%
42.7%
26.6%
Ball control & glass
17.8%
18.9%
16.5%
16.6%
30.7%
24.8%
35.2%
32.9%
9.4%
10.4%
10.4%
9.7%
Style
35.2%
40.5%
37.2%
45.0%
18.3%
10.1%
52.2%
60.0%
32.6%
37.6%
Roster
3.58
3.67
6'4.3"
6'3.4"
—
10.2%

Offseason

roster movement into this season — descriptive, not a model input
Morgan St
Returning minutes: 100.0%Returning production: 100.0%
ESPN hasn't posted Morgan St's roster for this season yet — no movement to show.

Returns 100% of last season's minutes. Teams returning at least 65% of last season's minutes have historically gained about 2.2 points of AdjEM (n=156 team-seasons, 2022-2026). (ESPN hasn't posted this season's roster yet -- this may still be last season's list.)

Niagara
Returning minutes: 10.2%Returning production: 8.3%
Lost
  • Reggie Prudhomme 26.4 mpg, 6.1 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
  • Justin Hawkins 26.2 mpg, 8.3 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
  • Justin Page 21.1 mpg, 8.5 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
  • Vice Zanki 20.3 mpg, 7.8 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
  • Josiah Sabino 19.6 mpg, 6.6 ppg · transferred to Manhattan
  • Will Shortt 19.5 mpg, 6.5 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
Added
  • Cole Farrell from Long Beach St · 20.7 mpg, 6.4 ppg last season
  • Logan Woods from Wright St · 18.4 mpg, 5.3 ppg last season
  • Bastien Rieber from Fresno St · 16.4 mpg, 4.0 ppg last season
  • Tae Blackshear from Youngstown St · 13.7 mpg, 6.3 ppg last season
  • Vukasin Todorovic from Green Bay · 5.9 mpg, 1.7 ppg last season
  • Brian Angeletti no D1 minutes last season

Returns 10% of last season's minutes; lost 5 of its top 5 (1 transferred). Teams returning under 40% of last season's minutes have historically fallen about 0.8 points of AdjEM (n=716 team-seasons, 2022-2026).

Head-to-head

this season and last
DateSeasonResult
Sat, Dec 132025-26Niagara 73 – 81 Morgan St

The CBB Matchups tab lays out the day's Division I slate: matchup, tip time, records and rank, and — once posted — Pinnacle's spread and total (the median across books when Pinnacle has no line). Three views switch the table between projected scores, pace and totals, and each team's offensive and defensive tendencies. Each game opens into opponent-adjusted possessions, efficiency and four-factor tendencies for both teams, plus recent form, rotation and head-to-head history. Every game also carries our projected score, spread and total, built bottom-up from those same numbers: expected possessions times each side's opponent-adjusted points per possession, plus home court.

What these numbers mean: line shopping.