Mercer Bears vs Davidson Wildcats basketball final score

Sat, Nov 7 · 7:00 PM ET · John M. Belk Arena, Davidson, NC

Non-conferenceESPN+John M. Belk Arena, Davidson, NC
Mercer
1-1 · 0-0 conf
Efficiency #203
@
Davidson
1-0 · 0-0 conf
Efficiency #103
Final
7688
Final score
Projected 67.9 – 80.6
MER win 14%DAV win 86%
MarketClose
Spread
DAV −11.5
open DAV −11.0
Total
148.0
open 148.5
Our line
DAV −12.7
as of Sat, Nov 7 · 6:51 PM ET

Our play

How our line is built

each step, from an even game to our line
Spread
Even game
0.0
Davidsonrated 3.5 above average
+3.5
Mercerrated 4.8 below average
+4.8
Home court
+4.3
Our line
DAV −12.7
◂ Mercer sideDavidson side ▸

Steps are rounded to one decimal, so they can differ from the line by 0.1. The spread is seen from the home side: a plus moves it toward Davidson. Our total joins once both teams have played 3 games.

Pace & total

possessions per 40 minutes
Tempo, possessions per 40 minutes

Projected possessions: 69.1, from each team's opponent-adjusted tempo. On raw season pace, Mercer is the faster team (73.6, #98 of 365) and Davidson the slower (66.5, #285). When tempos clash, the slower team usually pulls the pace harder (weights 0.80 vs 0.66).

Projected possessions
69.1
per team, 40 min
Market total
148.0
Market close · open 148.5
Adjusted tempo, vs an average opponent
72.1#99
Mercer
67.7#339
Davidson

How this game plays

points this game from the four factors, vs an average D-I matchup
Our line
DAV −12.6
Four factors +23.9 · not in these stats −11.3
From the four factors
Davidson has the ball+14.1
Mercer has the ball−9.9
Davidson has the ball
✓Shoots it welleFG% 66.0% #12 · MER allows 54.3% #218+11.1
✓Takes care of the ballTO% 21.1% #240 · MER forces 5.4% #329 · ~8 turnovers+5.6
✗Few trips to the lineFTR 22.6% #296 · MER allows 37.1% #175 · FT 50.0% #313−1.7
✗Few second chancesOR% 25.0% #256 · MER allows 36.8% #250−0.9
Mercer has the ball
✗Tough shooting lookeFG% 46.3% #221 · DAV allows 39.0% #30−7.9
✗Few trips to the lineFTR 50.0% #52 · DAV allows 16.2% #11 · FT 63.0% #246−0.9
✗Few second chancesOR% 28.6% #208 · DAV allows 32.6% #183−0.7
✗Coughs it upTO% 24.5% #288 · DAV forces 13.5% #277 · ~13 turnovers−0.4

Shot diet

Where each offense shoots from and where each defense lets teams shoot
Merceroffense vsDavidsondefense
Share of shots by zone
Mercer shoots
Davidson allows
D-I average
FG% by zone
ZoneD-I avg
Rim55.6%#19056.0%#13758.1%
Short 2 (≤9 ft)50.0%#690.0%#137.5%
Mid 2 (10 ft+)40.0%#11225.0%#8635.4%
Three30.0%#18520.8%#2532.3%
Davidsonoffense vsMercerdefense
Share of shots by zone
Davidson shoots
Mercer allows
D-I average
FG% by zone
ZoneD-I avg
Rim66.7%#8154.5%#11858.1%
Short 2 (≤9 ft)45.5%#12357.1%#25837.5%
Mid 2 (10 ft+)60.0%#3562.5%#29635.4%
Three52.2%#436.4%#23632.3%
RimShort 2 (≤9 ft)Mid 2 (10 ft+)Three

Zones from play-by-play shot descriptions; garbage time removed. Bars show the share of field-goal attempts in each zone; where a slice is too thin for its number, the shares are listed under the bar. FG% ranks: #1 = best for that side (most accurate shooting, stingiest defense).

Shot volume

Extra scoring chances from rebounds, turnovers and the foul line
Mercer
−12.7extra scoring chances per game vs a D-I average team#288 of 365
Off reb %
28.6%
#208
Def reb %
63.2%
#250
Turnover %
24.5%
#288
Forced TO %
5.4%
#329
FT rate
50.0%
#52
FT allowed
37.1%
#175
Where the chances come from (per game)
Offensive rebounding−1.1
Defensive rebounding−1.7
Ball security−4.3
Forcing turnovers−9.2
Foul shots drawn+3.4
Foul shots allowed+0.1
Davidson
−6.0extra scoring chances per game vs a D-I average team#237 of 365
Off reb %
25.0%
#256
Def reb %
67.4%
#183
Turnover %
21.1%
#240
Forced TO %
13.5%
#277
FT rate
22.6%
#296
FT allowed
16.2%
#11
Where the chances come from (per game)
Offensive rebounding−2.3
Defensive rebounding−0.2
Ball security−1.9
Forcing turnovers−3.4
Foul shots drawn−3.7
Foul shots allowed+5.6

Davidson has more extra scoring chances per game: −6.0 (#237 of 365) to Mercer’s −12.7 (#288).

Grade = extra shots and foul-line trips per game compared with a D-I average team, built from six season rates. Cell shading is the national rank for each rate (greener = better for that team).

Rotation

Mercer2026-27 numbers through Sat, Nov 7
#PlayerPosClHtGP-GSMPGPPGRPGAPGTOVeFG%3P%3PA/gFT%Usage
11GJr6'6"3-328.73.77.71.31.335.7%25.0%1.360.0%10.3%
3GSr6'2"3-326.014.01.03.32.356.3%42.1%6.3100.0%29.9%
23GJr6'4"3-325.714.02.71.00.361.3%35.3%5.757.1%25.9%
1GJr6'3"3-325.013.02.71.73.038.7%33.3%2.075.0%36.5%
35FJr6'11"3-325.06.74.70.31.758.8%0.0%0.3—16.5%
0FSr6'6"3-024.010.05.71.00.354.8%37.5%2.777.8%20.4%
2GSo5'11"3-015.310.01.70.32.052.2%30.8%4.366.7%39.5%
12FSr6'8"3-09.00.72.70.01.0100.0%—0.0—8.2%
25FSr6'10"2-011.52.55.50.02.050.0%—0.050.0%20.7%
5G——2-010.01.01.01.50.514.3%0.0%2.5—21.3%
0GSr6'4"2-09.04.02.51.00.557.1%33.3%3.0—23.7%
16G—5'10"1-02.02.00.00.00.0100.0%—0.00.0%39.1%
10GSr5'10"1-02.00.00.00.00.00.0%0.0%1.0—26.5%

Team comparison

national rank toned left for away, right for home
MercerDavidson
Efficiency
107.3
107.1
109.6
101.1
72.1
67.7
12.5
-3.1
Shooting
46.3%
66.0%
47.1%
56.7%
30.0%
52.2%
63.0%
50.0%
50.0%
22.6%
Ball control & glass
24.5%
21.1%
5.4%
13.5%
28.6%
25.0%
36.8%
32.6%
10.9%
10.5%
8.8%
3.3%
Style
37.0%
43.4%
44.8%
31.6%
3.0%
6.6%
50.0%
62.1%
41.4%
22.5%
Roster
3.23
2.73
6'4.8"
6'5.8"
24.2%
44.6%

Offseason

roster movement into this season — descriptive, not a model input
Mercer
Returning minutes: 24.2%Returning production: 20.8%
Lost
  • Baraka Okojie 33.0 mpg, 19.1 ppg · transferred to George Mason
  • Armani Mighty 31.1 mpg, 13.2 ppg · transferred to Pitt
  • Zaire Williams 28.5 mpg, 13.1 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
  • Connor Serven 18.5 mpg, 5.6 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
  • Kyle Cuffe Jr. 15.9 mpg, 7.1 ppg · transferred to St John's
  • Tristan Gross 11.9 mpg, 3.7 ppg · transferred to Radford
Added
  • Keelan Steele from Maine · 15.5 mpg, 6.1 ppg last season
  • Makoi Mabor Makoi from UNC Wilmington · 8.5 mpg, 1.5 ppg last season
  • Dimitrije Kovacevic no D1 minutes last season
  • KJ Lamonte no D1 minutes last season
  • Ryder Cate no D1 minutes last season
  • Josh Jackson no D1 minutes last season

Returns 24% of last season's minutes; lost 3 of its top 5 (2 transferred). Teams returning under 40% of last season's minutes have historically fallen about 0.8 points of AdjEM (n=716 team-seasons, 2022-2026).

Davidson
Returning minutes: 45.0%Returning production: 43.3%
Lost
  • Parker Friedrichsen 25.3 mpg, 10.8 ppg · transferred to Washington
  • Devin Brown 23.4 mpg, 6.4 ppg · transferred to Notre Dame
  • Roberts Blums 21.0 mpg, 11.7 ppg · transferred to Penn State
  • Hunter Adam 15.2 mpg, 5.5 ppg · transferred to Portland
  • Sean Logan 12.0 mpg, 2.9 ppg · transferred to Saint Joseph's
  • Manie Joses 8.6 mpg, 1.7 ppg · transferred to Hawai'i
Added
  • Nick Janowski from St Thomas · 31.5 mpg, 16.1 ppg last season
  • Jackson Keith from Butler · 7.0 mpg, 1.6 ppg last season
  • Malik Davis no D1 minutes last season
  • Tom Stoiber no D1 minutes last season
  • Eetu Heinonen no D1 minutes last season
  • John Carter Jr. no D1 minutes last season

Returns 45% of last season's minutes; lost 3 of its top 5 (3 transferred).

Line history

Market line, home spread or game total

Lines by book

BookSpread (home) open → nowTotal open → nowML homeML away
DraftKings-11.5-108147.5→148.5o-105 u-115-750+525
FanDuel-11.5-110150.5→147.5o-115 u-105-780+530
BetMGM-11.5-105147.5o-115 u-105-700+500
BetRivers-10.5→-11.5-107151.5→147.5o-114 u-108-715+460
Caesars-11.5-110147.5→148o-110 u-110-700+500
Fanatics-11→-11.5-105149.5→148o-110 u-110-750+525
BetOnline-11-112146.5→148.5o-105 u-115-725+520
Bovada-11.5-105148.5→147.5o-110 u-110-750+500
theScore Bet-11.5-110146.5→148.5o-105 u-115-900+550
Hard Rock-11.5-105149.5→147.5o-110 u-110-750+475
Kalshi-10.5-113147.5o+100 u-104-614+525
Polymarket-11.5+104150.5→147.5o+100 u-104-614+567
Novig-11.5+106150.5→147.5o+100 u-104-567+525
open = first-sighted line for this event · now = latest capture

Head-to-head

this season and last
No meetings the last two seasons.

More games on Sat, Nov 7

← Fri, Nov 6 · Sun, Nov 8 → · Full season schedule

The CBB Matchups tab lays out the day's Division I slate: matchup, tip time, records and rank, and — once posted — the market spread and total (the median across books when no market line is up). Three views switch the table between projected scores, pace and totals, and each team's offensive and defensive tendencies. Each game opens into opponent-adjusted possessions, efficiency and four-factor tendencies for both teams, plus recent form, rotation and head-to-head history. Every game also carries our projected score, spread and total, from our line: the same view our bets are made from.

What these numbers mean: line shopping.