Oral Roberts Golden Eagles vs Tulsa Golden Hurricane basketball prediction & odds
Wed, Nov 11 · 8:00 PM ET · Reynolds Center, Tulsa, OK
Non-conferenceESPN+Reynolds Center, Tulsa, OK
Oral Roberts
1-1 · 0-0 conf
Efficiency #328
@
Tulsa
2-0 · 0-0 conf
Efficiency #57
Wed, Nov 11 · 8:00 PM ET
68.185.4
Projected score
ORU win 7%TLSA win 93%
Consensus
Spread
TLSA −18.5
open TLSA −19.0
Total
153.5
open 153.5
Our line
TLSA −17.3
ML Oral Roberts
+1000
ML Tulsa
-1895
Median of 7 books · as of Tue, Nov 10 · 9:27 PM ET
Our play
How our line is built
each step, from an even game to our lineSpread
Even game
0.0
Tulsarated 5.2 above average
+5.2
Oral Robertsrated 7.9 below average
+7.9
Home court
+4.2
Our line
TLSA −17.3
◂ Oral Roberts sideTulsa side ▸
The spread is seen from the home side: a plus moves it toward Tulsa. Our total joins once both teams have played 3 games.
Pace & total
possessions per 40 minutesTempo, possessions per 40 minutes
Projected possessions: 70.7, from each team's opponent-adjusted tempo. On raw season pace, Oral Roberts is the faster team (71.2, #161 of 365) and Tulsa the slower (68.1, #265). When tempos clash, the slower team usually pulls the pace harder (weights 0.80 vs 0.66).
Projected possessions
70.7
per team, 40 min
Market total
153.5
Consensus · open 153.5
Adjusted tempo, vs an average opponent
70.8#166
Oral Roberts
70.5#192
Tulsa
How this game plays
points this game from the four factors, vs an average D-I matchupOur line
TLSA −17.3
Four factors +23.9 · not in these stats −6.6
From the four factors
Tulsa has the ball+15.2
Oral Roberts has the ball−8.8
Tulsa has the ball
✓Shoots it welleFG% 61.4% #27 · ORU allows 55.6% #271+9.2
✓Wins second chancesOR% 38.9% #56 · ORU allows 33.3% #217+2.6
✓Takes care of the ballTO% 14.7% #79 · ORU forces 16.9% #212 · ~11 turnovers+2.5
✓Gets to the lineFTR 59.6% #15 · ORU allows 33.9% #148 · FT 70.6% #165+0.8
Oral Roberts has the ball
✗Tough shooting lookeFG% 35.0% #354 · TLSA allows 52.7% #216−7.7
✗Few second chancesOR% 38.3% #66 · TLSA allows 12.5% #2−1.9
✓Takes care of the ballTO% 25.3% #336 · TLSA forces 8.8% #354 · ~11 turnovers+1.7
✗Few trips to the lineFTR 36.7% #179 · TLSA allows 33.9% #150 · FT 59.1% #320−0.9
Shot diet
Where each offense shoots from and where each defense lets teams shootOral Robertsoffense vsTulsadefense
Share of shots by zone
Oral Roberts shoots
35.3
3.9
5.9
54.9
Tulsa allows
33.3
2.8
11.1
52.8
D-I average
37.8
8.0
12.4
41.8
FG% by zone
| Zone | D-I avg | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Rim | 61.1%#134 | 58.3%#180 | 58.0% |
| Short 2 (≤9 ft) | 0.0%#323 | 0.0%#1 | 38.2% |
| Mid 2 (10 ft+) | 0.0%#327 | 0.0%#1 | 34.7% |
| Three | 16.7%#355 | 37.9%#291 | 32.5% |
Tulsaoffense vsOral Robertsdefense
Share of shots by zone
Tulsa shoots
30.6
2.8
5.6
61.1
Oral Roberts allows
26.9
3.8
1.9
67.3
D-I average
37.8
8.0
12.4
41.8
FG% by zone
| Zone | D-I avg | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Rim | 63.6%#113 | 78.6%#352 | 58.0% |
| Short 2 (≤9 ft) | 100.0%#1 | 0.0%#1 | 38.2% |
| Mid 2 (10 ft+) | 100.0%#1 | 100.0%#352 | 34.7% |
| Three | 41.2%#50 | 33.3%#185 | 32.5% |
RimShort 2 (≤9 ft)Mid 2 (10 ft+)Three
Zones from play-by-play shot descriptions; garbage time removed. Bars show the share of field-goal attempts in each zone; where a slice is too thin for its number, the shares are listed under the bar. FG% ranks: #1 = best for that side (most accurate shooting, stingiest defense).
Shot volume
Extra scoring chances from rebounds, turnovers and the foul lineOral Roberts
−3.3extra scoring chances per game vs a D-I average team#227 of 365
Off reb %
38.3%
#66
Def reb %
66.7%
#217
Turnover %
25.3%
#336
Forced TO %
16.9%
#212
FT rate
36.7%
#179
FT allowed
33.9%
#148
Where the chances come from (per game)
Offensive rebounding+2.3
Defensive rebounding−0.6
Ball security−5.0
Forcing turnovers−0.9
Foul shots drawn−0.2
Foul shots allowed+1.1
Tulsa
+11.6extra scoring chances per game vs a D-I average team#38 of 365
Off reb %
38.9%
#56
Def reb %
87.5%
#2
Turnover %
14.7%
#79
Forced TO %
8.8%
#354
FT rate
59.6%
#15
FT allowed
33.9%
#150
Where the chances come from (per game)
Offensive rebounding+2.4
Defensive rebounding+6.4
Ball security+2.5
Forcing turnovers−6.6
Foul shots drawn+5.8
Foul shots allowed+1.0
Tulsa has more extra scoring chances per game: +11.6 (#38 of 365) to Oral Roberts’s −3.3 (#227).
Grade = extra shots and foul-line trips per game compared with a D-I average team, built from six season rates. Cell shading is the national rank for each rate (greener = better for that team).
Rotation
Oral Roberts2026-27 numbers
| # | Player | Pos | Cl | Ht | GP-GS | MPG | PPG | RPG | APG | TOV | eFG% | 3P% | 3PA/g | FT% | Usage | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | G | Fr | 6'2" | 2-2 | 30.5 | 9.0 | 4.0 | 2.5 | 1.5 | 32.7% | 17.6% | 8.5 | 100.0% | 27.0% | Active | |
| 25 | F | Jr | 6'6" | 2-2 | 25.0 | 22.5 | 6.0 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 64.3% | 20.0% | 5.0 | 64.3% | 42.0% | Active | |
| 6 | G | So | 5'10" | 2-2 | 24.0 | 9.0 | 3.0 | 5.5 | 1.0 | 61.5% | 44.4% | 4.5 | 100.0% | 18.5% | Active | |
| 7 | G | So | 6'4" | 2-2 | 20.5 | 4.5 | 4.5 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 38.9% | 16.7% | 3.0 | 66.7% | 19.7% | Active | |
| 2 | G | Sr | 6'4" | 2-2 | 20.0 | 5.0 | 3.5 | 2.5 | 2.0 | 66.7% | 0.0% | 1.0 | 100.0% | 15.2% | Active | |
| 8 | G | Fr | 6'1" | 2-0 | 18.5 | 4.0 | 3.5 | 1.5 | 1.0 | 18.8% | 14.3% | 7.0 | 66.7% | 29.2% | Active | |
| 22 | G | Jr | 6'3" | 2-0 | 12.5 | 4.0 | 5.0 | 1.5 | 1.0 | 42.9% | 33.3% | 3.0 | 50.0% | 23.9% | Active | |
| 10 | G | Fr | 6'5" | 2-0 | 11.5 | 3.0 | 3.5 | 1.5 | 1.0 | 60.0% | — | 0.0 | 0.0% | 18.5% | Active | |
| 18 | F | Jr | 6'9" | 2-0 | 11.5 | 9.0 | 2.0 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 77.8% | — | 0.0 | 80.0% | 29.8% | Active | |
| 21 | F | So | 6'9" | 2-0 | 8.5 | 0.0 | 1.5 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.0% | — | 0.0 | — | 6.5% | Active | |
| 43 | G | Sr | 6'6" | 2-0 | 6.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.0% | — | 0.0 | 100.0% | 17.9% | Active | |
| 23 | F | So | 6'6" | 2-0 | 5.5 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0% | 0.0% | 1.5 | — | 25.2% | Active | |
| 11 | F | Fr | 6'9" | 2-0 | 4.5 | 2.5 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 50.0% | 50.0% | 1.0 | 50.0% | 54.5% | Active | |
| 1 | G | Sr | 6'2" | 1-0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0% | 0.0% | 2.0 | — | 22.9% | Missed last |
Trends
Results against the closing spread and total, last ten gamesOral Roberts
Against the spread
Season
0-1
Home
0-0
Road
0-1
Last 10
0-1
avg cover −21.5
Missed the spread in the last game
Over / under
Season
0-1
Home
0-0
Road
0-1
Last 10
0-1
avg vs total −14.5
Under in the last game
Last 10 games, newest first
| Date | Opponent | Site | Result | Total | PPP for | PPP vs | Pace | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 7 | Northwestern (OK) Rangers | H | W 94–39 | — | — | — | — | 129.2 | 53.6 | 72.7 |
| Nov 2 | C Arkansas | A | L 55–85 | +8.5 | L−21.5 | 154.5 | U140 | 77.2 | 119.4 | 71.2 |
| Mar 5 | N Dakota St | N | L 65–76 | +12.0 | W+1.0 | 147.5 | U141 | 96.9 | 113.3 | 67.1 |
| Mar 4 | Kansas City | N | W 84–62 | −8.5 | W+13.5 | 149.0 | U146 | 120.5 | 88.9 | 69.7 |
| Feb 28 | Kansas City | A | W 94–70 | −3.5 | W+20.5 | 149.5 | O164 | 127.7 | 95.1 | 73.6 |
| Feb 26 | Denver | H | W 102–80 | +2.5 | W+24.5 | 156.5 | O182 | 142.7 | 111.9 | 71.5 |
| Feb 21 | South Dakota | H | W 67–62 | +1.0 | W+6.0 | 151.5 | U129 | 92.2 | 85.4 | 72.6 |
| Feb 18 | Omaha | A | L 71–80 | +6.5 | L−2.5 | 152.0 | U151 | 107.6 | 121.2 | 66.0 |
| Feb 14 | S Dakota St | H | L 69–87 | +5.5 | L−12.5 | 147.5 | O156 | 104.3 | 131.5 | 66.2 |
| Feb 12 | Kansas City | H | W 69–60 | −6.0 | W+3.0 | 149.5 | U129 | 106.0 | 92.2 | 65.1 |
Tulsa
Against the spread
Season
1-0
Home
1-0
Road
0-0
Last 10
1-0
avg cover +4.5
Covered the last game
Over / under
Season
1-0
Home
1-0
Road
0-0
Last 10
1-0
avg vs total +14.5
Over in the last game
Last 10 games, newest first
| Date | Opponent | Site | Result | Total | PPP for | PPP vs | Pace | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 5 | N Illinois | H | W 94–75 | −14.5 | W+4.5 | 154.5 | O169 | 138.1 | 110.2 | 68.1 |
| Nov 2 | Ottawa (KS) Braves | H | W 98–50 | — | — | — | — | 140.3 | 71.6 | 69.9 |
| Apr 5 | Auburn | N | L 86–92 OT | +5.5 | L−0.5 | 159.5 | O178 | 105.2 | 112.5 | 81.8 |
| Apr 2 | New Mexico | N | W 74–69 | −3.0 | W+2.0 | 162.5 | U143 | 104.2 | 97.1 | 71.0 |
| Mar 24 | Wichita St | H | W 83–79 | −4.5 | L−0.5 | 154.0 | O162 | 110.6 | 105.2 | 75.1 |
| Mar 22 | UNLV | H | W 77–66 | −5.0 | W+6.0 | 161.5 | U143 | 117.0 | 100.3 | 65.8 |
| Mar 17 | SF Austin | H | W 89–84 OT | −6.5 | L−1.5 | 150.5 | O173 | 113.3 | 107.0 | 78.5 |
| Mar 14 | Wichita St | N | L 68–81 | −1.5 | L−14.5 | 152.0 | U149 | 104.9 | 124.9 | 64.8 |
| Mar 13 | North Texas | N | W 90–84 3OT | −8.5 | L−2.5 | 142.0 | O174 | 98.7 | 92.1 | 91.2 |
| Mar 8 | Temple | H | W 78–76 | −11.5 | L−9.5 | 150.5 | O154 | 116.6 | 113.6 | 66.9 |
Records vs the closing line describe the past; ten games is a small sample.
Team comparison
national rank toned left for away, right for homeOral RobertsTulsa
Efficiency
98.4
116.5
110.7
105.7
70.8
70.5
1.0
-8.1
Shooting
35.0%
61.4%
50.0%
60.9%
16.7%
41.2%
59.1%
70.6%
36.7%
59.6%
Ball control & glass
25.3%
14.7%
16.9%
8.8%
38.3%
38.9%
33.3%
12.5%
16.9%
5.9%
12.5%
13.0%
Style
60.0%
59.6%
43.6%
27.7%
3.6%
10.6%
55.6%
39.3%
40.3%
47.3%
Roster
2.20
3.08
6'3.6"
6'6.2"
35.8%
15.1%
Offseason
roster movement into this season — descriptive, not a model inputOral Roberts
Returning minutes: 51.6%Returning production: 48.0%
Lost
- Ofri Naveh 28.0 mpg, 10.8 ppg · transferred to MTSU
- Ty Harper 28.0 mpg, 17.2 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
- Jack Turner 16.7 mpg, 4.9 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
- Yuto Yamanouchi-Williams 16.2 mpg, 6.7 ppg · transferred to S Indiana
- Baron Smith Jr. 5.7 mpg, 1.2 ppg · transferred to Wagner
- Aaron Jacob 2.5 mpg, 1.3 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
Added
- Cam Haffner from Western KY · 11.0 mpg, 3.8 ppg last season
- Amire Robinson from Nevada · 9.1 mpg, 2.6 ppg last season
- Alex Couto no D1 minutes last season
- Mihail Gavazov no D1 minutes last season
- Boden Williams no D1 minutes last season
- Marko Pavlovic no D1 minutes last season
Returns 52% of last season's minutes; lost 2 of its top 5 (1 transferred).
Tulsa
Returning minutes: 15.1%Returning production: 15.2%
Lost
- Miles Barnstable 30.3 mpg, 14.6 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
- Ade Popoola 28.7 mpg, 10.8 ppg · transferred to DePaul
- Tylen Riley 27.7 mpg, 15.0 ppg · transferred to Cincinnati
- David Green 25.6 mpg, 15.1 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
- Tyler Behrend 21.7 mpg, 6.5 ppg · transferred to Grand Canyon
- Romad Dean 16.0 mpg, 4.8 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
Added
- Macon Emory from Delaware · 37.1 mpg, 11.3 ppg last season
- Kobi Williams from Missouri St · 34.4 mpg, 14.0 ppg last season
- Jeremiah Johnson from Campbell · 32.4 mpg, 15.2 ppg last season
- Brent Moss from UTSA · 25.9 mpg, 9.3 ppg last season
- Chris Loofe from MTSU · 24.9 mpg, 7.3 ppg last season
- Mike Williams III from Seton Hall · 20.9 mpg, 7.0 ppg last season
Returns 15% of last season's minutes; lost 5 of its top 5 (3 transferred). Teams returning under 40% of last season's minutes have historically fallen about 0.8 points of AdjEM (n=716 team-seasons, 2022-2026).
Line history
Market line, home spread or game totalLines by book
| Book | Spread (home) open → now | Total open → now | ML home | ML away |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DraftKings | -18.5-102 | 153.5o-115 u-105 | — | — |
| BetMGM | -17.5-110 | 153.5o-115 u-105 | -2000 | +1000 |
| Caesars | -18.5-110 | 153.5o-110 u-110 | — | — |
| Fanatics | -19→-18.5-105 | 154o-110 u-110 | -1800 | +1000 |
| BetOnline | -19→-17-110 | 153.5o-115 u-105 | — | — |
| Bovada | -18.5+100 | 153.5o-115 u-105 | — | — |
| theScore Bet | -18.5→-17.5-115 | 154.5o-105 u-115 | — | — |
| Kalshi | — | 153.5o-113 u-108 | -1567 | +1329 |
| Polymarket | — | — | -2400 | +733 |
| Novig | — | — | — | — |
DraftKings
BetMGM
Caesars
Fanatics
BetOnline
Bovada
theScore Bet
Kalshi
Polymarket
Novigopen = first-sighted line for this event · now = latest capture
Head-to-head
this season and last| Date | Season | Result |
|---|---|---|
| Wed, Nov 12 | 2025-26 | Tulsa 88 – 87 Oral Roberts |
More games on Wed, Nov 11
- FDU at East Texas A&M · 11:30 AM ET
- Kansas City vs Florida A&M · 12:00 PM ET
- Dartmouth at UAlbany · 1:00 PM ET
- Incarnate Word at UC Davis · 2:00 PM ET
- Loyola Chicago at Air Force · 3:00 PM ET
- Saint Joseph's vs South Florida · 3:00 PM ET
- NC A&T at East Carolina · 4:00 PM ET
- Bethune at San Diego St · 5:00 PM ET
- Penn at Navy · 5:30 PM ET
- NC Central at VMI · 6:00 PM ET
- S Indiana at IU Indy · 6:30 PM ET
- Charleston at Temple · 6:30 PM ET
- Marquette at Michigan · 7:00 PM ET
- UMass Lowell at UMass · 7:00 PM ET
- Cornell at St Bonaventure · 7:00 PM ET
- American at Drexel · 7:00 PM ET
- UNC Asheville at West Georgia · 7:00 PM ET
- William & Mary at FAU · 7:00 PM ET
- NJIT at VCU · 7:00 PM ET
- Colgate at St John's · 7:00 PM ET
- Campbell at ETSU · 7:00 PM ET
- James Madison at Delaware · 7:00 PM ET
- Furman at Holy Cross · 7:00 PM ET
- Saint Peter's at South Carolina · 7:00 PM ET
- Stony Brook at Princeton · 7:00 PM ET
- SC State at Notre Dame · 7:00 PM ET
- Old Dominion at Norfolk St · 7:00 PM ET
- Kent State at UNC Wilmington · 7:00 PM ET
- Milwaukee at Indiana St · 7:00 PM ET
- Pepperdine at Sam Houston · 7:30 PM ET
- Santa Clara at North Texas · 8:00 PM ET
- Jackson St at Southern Miss · 8:00 PM ET
- Jax State at Houston · 8:00 PM ET
- Robert Morris at Arkansas · 8:00 PM ET
- Valparaiso at S Dakota St · 8:00 PM ET
- Cal Poly at Grand Canyon · 9:00 PM ET
- Nevada at Santa Barbara · 9:00 PM ET
- SF Austin at Abilene Chrstn · 9:00 PM ET
- Portland St at Colorado St · 9:00 PM ET
- Lindenwood at Nebraska · 9:00 PM ET
- Oakland at Boise St · 9:00 PM ET
- AR-Pine Bluff at UCLA · 9:00 PM ET
- UTSA at Seattle U · 10:00 PM ET
- Pacific at Long Beach St · 10:00 PM ET
- Chicago St at CA Baptist · 10:00 PM ET
- Miss Valley St at Oregon · 10:00 PM ET
- USC at California · 11:00 PM ET
The CBB Matchups tab lays out the day's Division I slate: matchup, tip time, records and rank, and — once posted — the market spread and total (the median across books when no market line is up). Three views switch the table between projected scores, pace and totals, and each team's offensive and defensive tendencies. Each game opens into opponent-adjusted possessions, efficiency and four-factor tendencies for both teams, plus recent form, rotation and head-to-head history. Every game also carries our projected score, spread and total, from our line: the same view our bets are made from.
What these numbers mean: line shopping.