CBB Matchups

Every D1 game with tempo-free ratings, four factors and market lines, one place.

College basketball is being built for the 2026-27 season (tip-off Nov 3). What's here fills in as games are played.
Non-conferenceHinkle Fieldhouse, Indianapolis, IN
W Carolina
Efficiency #217
2025-26: 15-16 · 11-9 conf
@
Butler
Efficiency #87
2025-26: 16-16 · 7-14 conf
Tue, Nov 17 · TBD
73.4
win 23%
Projected
82.2
win 77%
No line posted yet.
Model: BTLR −8.7 · total 155.6 · ratings as of Sat, Oct 3
Preseason ratings start from 2025-26's final adjusted ratings, regressed toward the D1 average. The stats below are 2025-26's too; both update once 2026-27 games are played.

How the projection is built

each step, from an average D-I game to this one
Projected total
Average D-I game
148.2
PaceAdjusted tempo: Butler 69.3, W Carolina 68.7 → 69.7 possessions
+3.0
Butler offense vs W Carolina defense
+4.6
W Carolina offense vs Butler defense
−0.2
Projected total
155.6
Axis starts at 145 pointsPoints added or removed at each step
Projected margin
Even game
0.0
Butler offense vs W Carolina defense
+4.6
W Carolina offense vs Butler defense
+0.2
Home court+2.9 points per 100 possessions to the home offense, −2.9 to the visitors
+4.0
Butler by 8.7
8.7
W Carolina side ◂▸ Butler side

Steps are rounded to one decimal, so they can differ from the total by 0.1: the margin steps add to +8.8 against +8.7. The margin is the same build seen from the home side; positive numbers help Butler.

Pace & total

possessions per 40 minutes
Tempo, possessions per 40 minutes

Projected possessions: 69.7, from each team's opponent-adjusted tempo. On raw 2025-26 season pace, Butler is the faster team (70.0, #95 of 365) and W Carolina the slower (68.7, #164). When tempos clash, the slower team usually pulls the pace harder (study weights 0.80 vs 0.66).

Projected possessions
69.7
per team, 40 min
Projected total
155.6
model
Projected team totals
73.4 / 82.2
W Carolina / Butler
Adjusted tempo, vs an average opponent
68.7#147
W Carolina
69.3#97
Butler

How this game plays

what the study found each side's numbers actually do when these two teams meet
AdvantageButler
Where Butler scores: ball control
Butler turns it over on 15.9% of possessions (#132); W Carolina forces turnovers on 14.5% of opponent possessions (#319). Expect about 14.9%, 1.9 points below an average D1 matchup — worth roughly +2.4 points per 100 possessions.
AdvantageW Carolina
Where W Carolina scores: the offensive glass
W Carolina rebounds 35.4% of its own misses (#36); Butler lets opponents grab 30.0% of their own misses (#163). Expect about 33.7%, 3.3 points above an average D1 matchup — worth roughly +2.0 points per 100 possessions.
Watch for noise
3-point caution
A notable season 3-point number here (W Carolina's defense) is close to a coin flip going forward — the study's model of next-game 3P% barely beats guessing the D1 average. Shot volume is what actually carries: expect W Carolina at about 39.4% of its shots from three, Butler about 38.5%.
ClashButler
Strength vs strength: offensive rebounding
Butler (#58 in offensive rebounding) against W Carolina (#22 in the same stat allowed) — both rank inside the national top 60. Expect about 31.3%. Historically Butler's own number has carried a bit more weight in that exchange (0.70 vs 0.49).
ClashButler
Style clash: 3-point volume
Butler rarely shoots threes (34.9% of its shots); W Carolina lets opponents take 43.7% of their shots from three (D1 average 39.5%). Expect about 38.5% — the offense's habit usually carries a bit more weight (0.80 vs 0.64).
ClashButler
Style clash: paint scoring
Butler scores 46.6% of its points in the paint; W Carolina protects the paint (38.8% of opponents' points) (D1 average 42.8%). Expect about 42.4% — the offense's habit usually carries a bit more weight (0.25 vs 0.34).
W Carolina has the ball
OffenseButler allowsvs D1 avg
50.4% #218
51.9% #208
-0.2 pt/100
16.8% #184
15.1% #275
+1.3 pt/100
35.4% #36
30.0% #163
+2.0 pt/100
31.3% #274
24.9% #6
-1.0 pt/100
71.4% #229
—
-0.1 pt/100
W Carolina net across the four factors + FT%, vs. a D1-average matchup: +2.0 pts/100
Butler has the ball
OffenseW Carolina allowsvs D1 avg
50.9% #199
54.9% #327
+2.3 pt/100
15.9% #132
14.5% #319
+2.4 pt/100
34.6% #58
26.3% #22
+0.6 pt/100
42.1% #29
37.8% #255
+0.6 pt/100
71.9% #210
—
-0.0 pt/100
Butler net across the four factors + FT%, vs. a D1-average matchup: +5.8 pts/100

Shot diet

Where each offense shoots from and where each defense lets teams shoot · 2025-26 numbers
W Carolinaoffense vsButlerdefense
Share of shots by zone
W Carolina shoots
Butler allows
D-I average
FG% by zone
ZoneD-I avg
Rim53.4%#33062.3%#30558.6%
Short 2 (≤9 ft)42.5%#11247.7%#33739.5%
Mid 2 (10 ft+)40.2%#10633.6%#3938.0%
Three33.5%#19833.3%#14133.7%
Butleroffense vsW Carolinadefense
Share of shots by zone
Butler shoots
W Carolina allows
D-I average
FG% by zone
ZoneD-I avg
Rim57.3%#21661.6%#29158.6%
Short 2 (≤9 ft)36.2%#26550.0%#35439.5%
Mid 2 (10 ft+)36.9%#22541.9%#29638.0%
Three32.7%#24236.7%#33733.7%
RimShort 2 (≤9 ft)Mid 2 (10 ft+)Three

Zones from play-by-play shot descriptions; garbage time removed. Bars show the share of field-goal attempts in each zone; where a slice is too thin for its number, the shares are listed under the bar. FG% ranks: #1 = best for that side (most accurate shooting, stingiest defense).

Shot volume

Extra scoring chances from rebounds, turnovers and the foul line · 2025-26 numbers
W Carolina
−0.1extra scoring chances per game vs a D-I average team#182 of 365
Off reb %
35.4%
#36
Def reb %
73.7%
#22
Turnover %
16.8%
#184
Forced TO %
14.5%
#319
FT rate
31.3%
#274
FT allowed
37.8%
#255
Where the chances come from (per game)
Offensive rebounding+1.6
Defensive rebounding+1.4
Ball security0.0
Forcing turnovers−1.5
Foul shots drawn−1.0
Foul shots allowed−0.7
Butler
+5.5extra scoring chances per game vs a D-I average team#16 of 365
Off reb %
34.6%
#58
Def reb %
70.0%
#163
Turnover %
15.9%
#132
Forced TO %
15.1%
#275
FT rate
42.1%
#29
FT allowed
24.9%
#6
Where the chances come from (per game)
Offensive rebounding+1.3
Defensive rebounding+0.2
Ball security+0.6
Forcing turnovers−1.1
Foul shots drawn+1.8
Foul shots allowed+2.7

Butler has more extra scoring chances per game: +5.5 (#16 of 365) to W Carolina’s −0.1 (#182).

Grade = extra shots and foul-line trips per game compared with a D-I average team, built from six season rates. Cell shading is the national rank for each rate (greener = better for that team).

Rotation

W Carolina2025-26 numbers
#PlayerPosClHtGP-GSMPGPPGRPGAPGTOVeFG%3P%3PA/gFT%UsageStatus
23Marcus KellFJr6'8"31-3129.413.64.80.91.151.0%29.7%4.769.0%27.1%
3Julien SoumaoroGSr5'11"27-2326.111.63.12.21.754.4%39.8%6.076.9%26.4%
22Tidjiane DioumassiGSr6'4"29-2424.28.92.72.71.749.3%36.4%2.372.5%25.0%
8Tahlan PettwayGFr6'2"30-1022.08.52.22.31.355.4%39.4%4.276.2%22.9%
12Samuel DadaFFr6'9"31-1220.36.67.60.70.769.0%0.0%0.078.9%15.4%
7Abdulai Fanta KabbaCSo7'0"29-1917.34.75.80.40.967.4%—0.032.4%15.7%
4Justin JohnsonGSo6'8"30-315.66.72.50.90.944.0%22.7%1.563.5%29.2%
2CJ HylandGSo6'1"20-414.66.21.11.11.249.5%42.1%1.981.6%26.2%
21Tayeshaun SmithFFr6'7"30-09.71.51.70.20.443.6%16.7%0.478.6%11.4%
20Fischer BrownGSo6'4"10-09.62.21.10.40.345.8%13.3%1.5—15.1%
1Chase McKeyFSr6'10"4-09.32.01.80.30.360.0%—0.0100.0%10.0%
33Vernon CollinsFSr6'10"5-06.01.22.80.20.250.0%0.0%0.2—13.0%
11Drew HollifieldGFr5'11"6-02.52.20.30.00.350.0%28.6%1.250.0%55.4%
17Max WilliamsGFr6'6"6-02.00.00.30.00.00.0%—0.0—9.6%
5Titian DeRosaGFr5'9"0-00.00.00.00.00.0——0.0——
Rosters come from ESPN and are still filling in; incoming transfers and freshmen may be missing.

Tale of the tape

national rank toned left for away, right for home
W CarolinaButler
Efficiency
109.3
112.2
111.3
107.4
68.7
69.3
—
—
Shooting
50.4%
50.9%
50.6%
51.9%
33.5%
32.7%
71.4%
71.9%
31.3%
42.1%
Ball control & glass
16.8%
15.9%
14.5%
15.1%
35.4%
34.6%
26.3%
30.0%
8.9%
9.5%
7.7%
11.9%
Style
40.9%
34.9%
41.2%
46.6%
9.6%
15.0%
44.3%
57.2%
33.4%
32.1%
Roster
2.42
2.54
6'5.5"
6'6.1"
85.6%
83.4%

Offseason

roster movement into this season — descriptive, not a model input
W Carolina
Returning minutes: 85.6%Returning production: 86.9%
Lost
  • Cord Stansberry 29.1 mpg, 13.7 ppg · transferred to Missouri
Added
  • Titian DeRosa no D1 minutes last season

No incoming D1 transfers are listed on ESPN's roster yet — until they are, returning shares read high.

Returns 86% of last season's minutes; lost 1 of its top 5 (1 transferred). Teams returning at least 65% of last season's minutes have historically gained about 2.2 points of AdjEM (n=156 team-seasons, 2022-2026).

Butler
Returning minutes: 83.4%Returning production: 78.3%
Lost
  • Michael Ajayi 33.6 mpg, 16.4 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
Added
  • Bryson Cardinal no D1 minutes last season
  • Kevin Ndzie no D1 minutes last season

No incoming D1 transfers are listed on ESPN's roster yet — until they are, returning shares read high.

Returns 83% of last season's minutes; lost 1 of its top 5. Teams returning at least 65% of last season's minutes have historically gained about 2.2 points of AdjEM (n=156 team-seasons, 2022-2026).

Head-to-head

this season and last
No meetings the last two seasons.

The CBB Matchups tab lays out the day's Division I slate: matchup, tip time, records and rank, and — once posted — Pinnacle's spread and total (the median across books when Pinnacle has no line). Three views switch the table between projected scores, pace and totals, and each team's offensive and defensive tendencies. Each game opens into opponent-adjusted possessions, efficiency and four-factor tendencies for both teams, plus recent form, rotation and head-to-head history. Every game also carries our projected score, spread and total, built bottom-up from those same numbers: expected possessions times each side's opponent-adjusted points per possession, plus home court.

What these numbers mean: line shopping.