Charlotte 49ers vs Davidson Wildcats basketball preview & prediction

Tue, Nov 17 · 7:00 PM ET · John M. Belk Arena, Davidson, NC

Non-conferenceESPN+John M. Belk Arena, Davidson, NC
Charlotte
2-1 · 0-0 conf
Efficiency #146
@
Davidson
2-0 · 0-0 conf
Efficiency #97
Tue, Nov 17 · 7:00 PM ET
Our projected score shows once the market opens.
No line posted yet.

Our play

Pace & total

possessions per 40 minutes
Tempo, possessions per 40 minutes

Projected possessions: 64.1, from each team's opponent-adjusted tempo. On raw season pace, Charlotte is the faster team (66.3, #303 of 365) and Davidson the slower (66.3, #304). When tempos clash, the slower team usually pulls the pace harder (weights 0.80 vs 0.66).

Projected possessions
64.1
per team, 40 min
Adjusted tempo, vs an average opponent
67.2#351
Charlotte
67.5#342
Davidson

How this game plays

points this game from the four factors, vs an average D-I matchup
From the four factors
Davidson has the ball+5.9
Charlotte has the ball+0.9
Davidson has the ball
✓Shoots it welleFG% 61.0% #30 · CLT allows 48.2% #132+4.7
✓Takes care of the ballTO% 14.3% #67 · CLT forces 15.1% #263 · ~9 turnovers+3.3
✗Few trips to the lineFTR 18.7% #348 · CLT allows 34.9% #166 · FT 60.9% #302−1.3
✗Few second chancesOR% 32.3% #162 · CLT allows 26.2% #88−0.8
Charlotte has the ball
✓Shoots it welleFG% 57.1% #70 · DAV allows 45.0% #81+1.1
✗Few trips to the lineFTR 39.4% #143 · DAV allows 20.0% #20 · FT 65.6% #251−1.0
✓Takes care of the ballTO% 21.6% #288 · DAV forces 13.6% #299 · ~11 turnovers+0.8
✗Few second chancesOR% 30.4% #202 · DAV allows 32.5% #207−0.1

Shot diet

Where each offense shoots from and where each defense lets teams shoot
Charlotteoffense vsDavidsondefense
Share of shots by zone
Charlotte shoots
Davidson allows
D-I average
FG% by zone
ZoneD-I avg
Rim59.7%#15751.2%#9158.0%
Short 2 (≤9 ft)30.8%#22438.5%#18738.2%
Mid 2 (10 ft+)43.8%#9231.8%#15434.7%
Three42.2%#4130.6%#14032.5%
Davidsonoffense vsCharlottedefense
Share of shots by zone
Davidson shoots
Charlotte allows
D-I average
FG% by zone
ZoneD-I avg
Rim67.6%#7555.2%#13658.0%
Short 2 (≤9 ft)47.8%#12133.3%#12538.2%
Mid 2 (10 ft+)55.6%#3640.9%#22934.7%
Three44.4%#2134.4%#21532.5%
RimShort 2 (≤9 ft)Mid 2 (10 ft+)Three

Zones from play-by-play shot descriptions; garbage time removed. Bars show the share of field-goal attempts in each zone; where a slice is too thin for its number, the shares are listed under the bar. FG% ranks: #1 = best for that side (most accurate shooting, stingiest defense).

Shot volume

Extra scoring chances from rebounds, turnovers and the foul line
Charlotte
−1.8extra scoring chances per game vs a D-I average team#203 of 365
Off reb %
30.4%
#202
Def reb %
73.8%
#88
Turnover %
21.6%
#288
Forced TO %
15.1%
#263
FT rate
39.4%
#143
FT allowed
34.9%
#166
Where the chances come from (per game)
Offensive rebounding−0.4
Defensive rebounding+1.8
Ball security−2.4
Forcing turnovers−2.1
Foul shots drawn+0.5
Foul shots allowed+0.8
Davidson
−0.6extra scoring chances per game vs a D-I average team#184 of 365
Off reb %
32.3%
#162
Def reb %
67.5%
#207
Turnover %
14.3%
#67
Forced TO %
13.6%
#299
FT rate
18.7%
#348
FT allowed
20.0%
#20
Where the chances come from (per game)
Offensive rebounding+0.3
Defensive rebounding−0.3
Ball security+2.8
Forcing turnovers−3.2
Foul shots drawn−4.9
Foul shots allowed+4.7

Davidson has more extra scoring chances per game: −0.6 (#184 of 365) to Charlotte’s −1.8 (#203).

Grade = extra shots and foul-line trips per game compared with a D-I average team, built from six season rates. Cell shading is the national rank for each rate (greener = better for that team).

Rotation

Who has been playing, and who has not
Charlotte2026-27 numbers · last game: Seton Hall, Nov 9
#PlayerPosClHtGP-GSMPGMin/40, last 8Last 3 vs beforeStatusPPGRPGAPGTOVeFG%3P%3PA/gFT%Usage
11GSo6'1"3-333.334—Started last24.33.03.33.763.0%50.0%6.783.3%39.5%
1GSr6'5"3-328.726—Started last8.35.04.02.047.1%40.0%1.775.0%20.1%
3CSr6'11"3-319.026—Started last6.34.00.71.073.1%60.0%1.7—16.9%
8GFr6'8"3-018.716—Bench8.02.30.70.059.4%41.7%4.0100.0%19.8%
21FFr6'9"3-017.022—Bench5.73.31.00.770.0%0.0%0.3100.0%15.8%
7GSo6'6"3-316.015—Started last2.72.70.30.340.0%22.2%3.00.0%15.0%
9FJr6'8"3-315.713—Started last4.03.70.71.055.0%50.0%0.725.0%19.1%
24FSo6'9"3-015.012—Bench3.72.70.30.366.7%—0.033.3%15.1%
2GSr6'5"3-012.718—Bench3.02.00.71.725.0%0.0%1.050.0%31.5%
12FJr6'8"3-09.711—Bench4.00.00.00.385.7%57.1%2.3—16.6%
0FSo6'9"3-09.77—Bench1.73.70.70.740.0%—0.050.0%16.6%
6CJr7'0"2-05.0——Missed last1.01.00.01.550.0%—0.0—30.4%
10GFr6'4"1-03.0——Missed last0.00.00.00.00.0%—0.0—19.9%

Competitive minutes leave out garbage time (provisional rule: a second-half lead of 25+ inside 15:00, 20+ inside 10:00, 15+ inside 5:00 or 10+ inside 2:00, held to the end) and are shown per 40 minutes. Status says only whether a player appeared; the reason is not published.

Team comparison

national rank toned left for away, right for home
CharlotteDavidson
Efficiency
109.6
109.2
108.4
102.8
67.2
67.5
-0.6
-2.9
Shooting
57.1%
61.0%
52.7%
57.7%
42.2%
44.4%
65.6%
60.9%
39.4%
18.7%
Ball control & glass
21.6%
14.3%
15.1%
13.6%
30.4%
32.3%
26.2%
32.5%
10.1%
8.3%
12.1%
5.1%
Style
41.3%
36.6%
41.5%
41.5%
13.4%
5.5%
49.3%
47.7%
43.6%
22.3%
Roster
2.56
2.73
6'6.6"
6'5.7"
9.0%
44.6%

Offseason

roster movement into this season — descriptive, not a model input
Charlotte
Returning minutes: 9.0%Returning production: 7.2%
Lost
  • Ben Bradford 28.2 mpg, 13.5 ppg · transferred to Charleston
  • Dezayne Mingo 26.9 mpg, 12.2 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
  • Anton Bonke 25.6 mpg, 10.6 ppg · transferred to Michigan St
  • Damoni Harrison 18.3 mpg, 8.6 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
  • Spencer Elliott 17.2 mpg, 4.1 ppg · transferred to UNC Wilmington
  • Major Freeman 14.1 mpg, 5.1 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
Added
  • Chaze Harris from South Alabama · 31.8 mpg, 19.2 ppg last season
  • Dorian Finister from Louisiana · 30.5 mpg, 14.0 ppg last season
  • Dylan Grant from Rutgers · 24.1 mpg, 9.5 ppg last season
  • Michael Walz from Richmond · 21.2 mpg, 7.9 ppg last season
  • Jayden Fort from Georgetown · 13.6 mpg, 3.3 ppg last season
  • Keyshuan Tillery from Cincinnati · 11.6 mpg, 3.5 ppg last season

Returns 9% of last season's minutes; lost 4 of its top 5 (2 transferred). Teams returning under 40% of last season's minutes have historically fallen about 0.8 points of AdjEM (n=716 team-seasons, 2022-2026).

Davidson
Returning minutes: 45.0%Returning production: 43.3%
Lost
  • Parker Friedrichsen 25.3 mpg, 10.8 ppg · transferred to Washington
  • Devin Brown 23.4 mpg, 6.4 ppg · transferred to Notre Dame
  • Roberts Blums 21.0 mpg, 11.7 ppg · transferred to Penn State
  • Hunter Adam 15.2 mpg, 5.5 ppg · transferred to Portland
  • Sean Logan 12.0 mpg, 2.9 ppg · transferred to Saint Joseph's
  • Manie Joses 8.6 mpg, 1.7 ppg · transferred to Hawai'i
Added
  • Nick Janowski from St Thomas · 31.5 mpg, 16.1 ppg last season
  • Jackson Keith from Butler · 7.0 mpg, 1.6 ppg last season
  • Honor Withers Carello no D1 minutes last season
  • Eetu Heinonen no D1 minutes last season
  • Quadri Bashiru no D1 minutes last season
  • John Carter Jr. no D1 minutes last season

Returns 45% of last season's minutes; lost 3 of its top 5 (3 transferred).

Head-to-head

this season and last
DateSeasonResult
Tue, Nov 112025-26Davidson 62 – 55 Charlotte

More games on Tue, Nov 17

← Mon, Nov 16 · Wed, Nov 18 → · Full season schedule

The CBB Matchups tab lays out the day's Division I slate: matchup, tip time, records and rank, and — once posted — the market spread and total (the median across books when no market line is up). Three views switch the table between projected scores, pace and totals, and each team's offensive and defensive tendencies. Each game opens into opponent-adjusted possessions, efficiency and four-factor tendencies for both teams, plus recent form, rotation and head-to-head history. Every game also carries our projected score, spread and total, from our line: the same view our bets are made from.

What these numbers mean: line shopping.