Jacksonville State Gamecocks vs Louisiana Tech Bulldogs basketball preview & prediction

Tue, Nov 17 · 7:30 PM ET · Thomas Assembly Center, Ruston, LA

Non-conferenceESPN+Thomas Assembly Center, Ruston, LA
Jax State
1-1 · 0-0 conf
Efficiency #189
@
Louisiana Tech
2-1 · 0-0 conf
Efficiency #228
Tue, Nov 17 · 7:30 PM ET
Our projected score shows once the market opens.
No line posted yet.

Our play

Pace & total

possessions per 40 minutes
Tempo, possessions per 40 minutes

Projected possessions: 65.4, from each team's opponent-adjusted tempo. On raw season pace, Louisiana Tech is the faster team (70.6, #187 of 365) and Jax State the slower (61.7, #354). When tempos clash, the slower team usually pulls the pace harder (weights 0.80 vs 0.66).

Projected possessions
65.4
per team, 40 min
Adjusted tempo, vs an average opponent
67.5#343
Jax State
68.5#307
Louisiana Tech

How this game plays

points this game from the four factors, vs an average D-I matchup
From the four factors
Louisiana Tech has the ball−1.9
Jax State has the ball+3.7
Louisiana Tech has the ball
✗Tough shooting lookeFG% 45.9% #258 · JXST allows 50.0% #163−2.5
✓Takes care of the ballTO% 22.7% #307 · JXST forces 11.7% #336 · ~11 turnovers+1.3
✗Few trips to the lineFTR 44.1% #95 · JXST allows 23.9% #38 · FT 67.3% #226−0.5
✗Few second chancesOR% 35.1% #107 · JXST allows 25.0% #61−0.3
Jax State has the ball
✓Shoots it welleFG% 54.7% #115 · LT allows 50.8% #183+2.6
✓Takes care of the ballTO% 18.2% #186 · LT forces 14.9% #275 · ~10 turnovers+1.7
✗Few trips to the lineFTR 26.6% #294 · LT allows 39.5% #210 · FT 58.8% #323−0.9
✓Wins second chancesOR% 26.3% #268 · LT allows 40.5% #318+0.3

Shot diet

Where each offense shoots from and where each defense lets teams shoot
Jax Stateoffense vsLouisiana Techdefense
Share of shots by zone
Jax State shoots
Louisiana Tech allows
D-I average
FG% by zone
ZoneD-I avg
Rim75.0%#1461.4%#21758.0%
Short 2 (≤9 ft)25.0%#25033.3%#12538.2%
Mid 2 (10 ft+)20.0%#27933.3%#15534.7%
Three41.0%#5428.8%#10832.5%
Louisiana Techoffense vsJax Statedefense
Share of shots by zone
Louisiana Tech shoots
Jax State allows
D-I average
FG% by zone
ZoneD-I avg
Rim60.0%#14653.8%#12158.0%
Short 2 (≤9 ft)33.3%#18366.7%#32238.2%
Mid 2 (10 ft+)36.4%#15160.0%#32934.7%
Three26.3%#27418.5%#1132.5%
RimShort 2 (≤9 ft)Mid 2 (10 ft+)Three

Zones from play-by-play shot descriptions; garbage time removed. Bars show the share of field-goal attempts in each zone; where a slice is too thin for its number, the shares are listed under the bar. FG% ranks: #1 = best for that side (most accurate shooting, stingiest defense).

Shot volume

Extra scoring chances from rebounds, turnovers and the foul line
Jax State
−3.2extra scoring chances per game vs a D-I average team#225 of 365
Off reb %
26.3%
#268
Def reb %
75.0%
#61
Turnover %
18.2%
#186
Forced TO %
11.7%
#336
FT rate
26.6%
#294
FT allowed
23.9%
#38
Where the chances come from (per game)
Offensive rebounding−1.7
Defensive rebounding+2.2
Ball security+0.1
Forcing turnovers−4.5
Foul shots drawn−2.8
Foul shots allowed+3.6
Louisiana Tech
−5.8extra scoring chances per game vs a D-I average team#260 of 365
Off reb %
35.1%
#107
Def reb %
59.5%
#318
Turnover %
22.7%
#307
Forced TO %
14.9%
#275
FT rate
44.1%
#95
FT allowed
39.5%
#210
Where the chances come from (per game)
Offensive rebounding+1.2
Defensive rebounding−3.0
Ball security−3.1
Forcing turnovers−2.3
Foul shots drawn+1.8
Foul shots allowed−0.4

Jax State has more extra scoring chances per game: −3.2 (#225 of 365) to Louisiana Tech’s −5.8 (#260).

Grade = extra shots and foul-line trips per game compared with a D-I average team, built from six season rates. Cell shading is the national rank for each rate (greener = better for that team).

Rotation

Who has been playing, and who has not
Jax State2026-27 numbers
#PlayerPosClHtGP-GSMPGPPGRPGAPGTOVeFG%3P%3PA/gFT%UsageStatus
1GJr6'5"2-234.017.03.09.01.076.3%64.3%7.083.3%20.7%Active
2GSr6'5"2-232.522.03.51.52.065.5%41.7%12.075.0%33.4%Active
6GJr6'5"2-228.58.53.52.51.546.7%0.0%2.042.9%21.5%Active
3FSo6'7"2-026.511.52.54.02.543.8%35.7%7.050.0%34.5%Active
10FSo6'8"2-222.08.07.01.00.563.6%0.0%0.566.7%17.9%Active
0FSr6'10"2-017.55.04.01.00.071.4%—0.0—11.0%Active
11FFr6'9"2-215.05.05.50.00.070.0%100.0%0.575.0%12.8%Active
4FJr6'8"2-012.08.01.00.01.0116.7%80.0%2.5100.0%20.6%Active
5GSo6'0"2-010.01.52.01.51.020.0%0.0%1.550.0%19.2%Active
8GFr5'11"2-08.03.02.01.50.060.0%66.7%1.5—15.2%Active
20FFr6'10"1-014.012.06.01.01.071.4%—0.050.0%33.7%Missed last
12GFr6'5"1-010.08.00.02.01.057.1%33.3%6.0—38.2%Missed last
7GFr6'1"1-09.04.02.00.01.033.3%0.0%2.0100.0%26.2%Missed last
9GFr6'4"1-04.00.02.00.00.0——0.0—0.0%Active

Competitive minutes leave out garbage time (provisional rule: a second-half lead of 25+ inside 15:00, 20+ inside 10:00, 15+ inside 5:00 or 10+ inside 2:00, held to the end) and are shown per 40 minutes. Status says only whether a player appeared; the reason is not published.

Team comparison

national rank toned left for away, right for home
Jax StateLouisiana Tech
Efficiency
103.6
101.5
105.4
105.6
67.5
68.5
-3.4
8.5
Shooting
54.7%
45.9%
44.0%
49.3%
41.0%
26.3%
58.8%
67.3%
26.6%
44.1%
Ball control & glass
18.2%
22.7%
11.7%
14.9%
26.3%
35.1%
25.0%
40.5%
9.1%
15.6%
0.0%
6.8%
Style
60.9%
34.2%
27.5%
45.9%
17.5%
13.3%
74.1%
50.0%
41.2%
42.7%
Roster
2.59
2.58
6'6"
6'4.4"
0.0%
10.0%

Offseason

roster movement into this season — descriptive, not a model input
Jax State
Returning minutes: 0.0%Returning production: 0.0%
Lost
  • Jacoby Hill 30.5 mpg, 10.0 ppg · transferred to Kennesaw St
  • Mostapha El Moutaouakkil 29.9 mpg, 19.5 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
  • AC Bryant 26.8 mpg, 11.4 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
  • Jaye Nash 25.8 mpg, 5.1 ppg · transferred to UConn
  • Emondrek Erkins-Ford 21.5 mpg, 8.3 ppg · transferred to Western KY
  • Iaroslav Niagu 18.8 mpg, 3.8 ppg · transferred to Colorado
Added
  • Jordan Stiemke from Loyola MD · 27.5 mpg, 9.9 ppg last season
  • Chris Lockett Jr. from Jacksonville · 24.5 mpg, 9.3 ppg last season
  • Ma'Shy Hill from Abilene Chrstn · 10.1 mpg, 2.7 ppg last season
  • Naas Cunningham from UNLV · 8.0 mpg, 3.0 ppg last season
  • Leon Horner from Texas Tech · 6.1 mpg, 1.9 ppg last season
  • Brandon Walker from Mississippi St · 5.3 mpg, 2.8 ppg last season

Returns 0% of last season's minutes; lost 5 of its top 5 (3 transferred). Teams returning under 40% of last season's minutes have historically fallen about 0.8 points of AdjEM (n=716 team-seasons, 2022-2026).

Louisiana Tech
Returning minutes: 10.0%Returning production: 7.1%
Lost
  • AJ Bates 33.4 mpg, 12.1 ppg · transferred to Utah State
  • DJ Dudley 30.4 mpg, 13.8 ppg · transferred to New Mexico St
  • Avery Thomas II 24.4 mpg, 8.8 ppg · transferred to Kennesaw St
  • Kaden Cooper 22.1 mpg, 8.3 ppg · transferred to East Carolina
  • Scooter Williams 17.4 mpg, 8.2 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
  • Will Allen 15.4 mpg, 3.2 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
Added
  • Ethan Blackmon new to D1 · 23.0 mpg, 14.0 ppg last season
  • Jay Tyler no D1 minutes last season
  • Linwood Rowe no D1 minutes last season
  • Kyran Tilley no D1 minutes last season
  • Izuchukwu Emelife no D1 minutes last season
  • James Sanderson no D1 minutes last season

No incoming D1 transfers are listed on ESPN's roster yet — until they are, returning shares read high.

Returns 10% of last season's minutes; lost 4 of its top 5 (4 transferred). Teams returning under 40% of last season's minutes have historically fallen about 0.8 points of AdjEM (n=716 team-seasons, 2022-2026).

Head-to-head

this season and last
DateSeasonResult
Wed, Feb 182025-26Jax State 71 – 77 Louisiana Tech
Sat, Jan 172025-26Louisiana Tech 60 – 64 Jax State

More games on Tue, Nov 17

← Mon, Nov 16 · Wed, Nov 18 → · Full season schedule

The CBB Matchups tab lays out the day's Division I slate: matchup, tip time, records and rank, and — once posted — the market spread and total (the median across books when no market line is up). Three views switch the table between projected scores, pace and totals, and each team's offensive and defensive tendencies. Each game opens into opponent-adjusted possessions, efficiency and four-factor tendencies for both teams, plus recent form, rotation and head-to-head history. Every game also carries our projected score, spread and total, from our line: the same view our bets are made from.

What these numbers mean: line shopping.