SIU Edwardsville Cougars vs North Dakota Fighting Hawks basketball preview & prediction

Mon, Nov 16 · 8:00 PM ET · Betty Engelstad Sioux Center, Grand Forks, ND

Non-conferenceBetty Engelstad Sioux Center, Grand Forks, ND
SIUE
2-2 · 0-0 conf
Efficiency #262
@
North Dakota
1-2 · 0-0 conf
Efficiency #289
Mon, Nov 16 · 8:00 PM ET
Our projected score shows once the market opens.
No line posted yet.

Our play

Pace & total

possessions per 40 minutes
Tempo, possessions per 40 minutes

Projected possessions: 67.9, from each team's opponent-adjusted tempo. On raw season pace, North Dakota is the faster team (69.0, #235 of 365) and SIUE the slower (68.5, #251). When tempos clash, the slower team usually pulls the pace harder (weights 0.80 vs 0.66).

Projected possessions
67.9
per team, 40 min
Adjusted tempo, vs an average opponent
68.2#320
SIUE
70.3#205
North Dakota

How this game plays

points this game from the four factors, vs an average D-I matchup
From the four factors
North Dakota has the ball+7.6
SIUE has the ball+6.5
North Dakota has the ball
✓Takes care of the ballTO% 14.5% #72 · SIUE forces 15.3% #261 · ~10 turnovers+3.3
✓Shoots it welleFG% 45.1% #265 · SIUE allows 60.7% #329+2.3
✓Gets to the lineFTR 39.9% #138 · SIUE allows 52.3% #316 · FT 75.3% #96+1.2
✓Wins second chancesOR% 33.9% #128 · SIUE allows 32.1% #198+0.8
SIUE has the ball
✓Shoots it welleFG% 48.4% #208 · UND allows 65.3% #347+6.4
✗Few trips to the lineFTR 19.5% #344 · UND allows 35.8% #174 · FT 66.7% #229−1.0
✓Wins second chancesOR% 30.6% #200 · UND allows 36.4% #269+0.7
✓Takes care of the ballTO% 18.2% #188 · UND forces 17.4% #198 · ~12 turnovers+0.4

Shot diet

Where each offense shoots from and where each defense lets teams shoot
SIUEoffense vsNorth Dakotadefense
Share of shots by zone
SIUE shoots
North Dakota allows
D-I average
FG% by zone
ZoneD-I avg
Rim58.5%#17871.2%#31758.0%
Short 2 (≤9 ft)69.2%#2827.3%#9738.2%
Mid 2 (10 ft+)38.9%#13380.0%#34934.7%
Three21.2%#34441.7%#31432.5%
North Dakotaoffense vsSIUEdefense
Share of shots by zone
North Dakota shoots
SIUE allows
D-I average
FG% by zone
ZoneD-I avg
Rim58.6%#17775.0%#34058.0%
Short 2 (≤9 ft)12.5%#31445.5%#23138.2%
Mid 2 (10 ft+)29.4%#22140.0%#21234.7%
Three25.3%#29837.7%#29032.5%
RimShort 2 (≤9 ft)Mid 2 (10 ft+)Three

Zones from play-by-play shot descriptions; garbage time removed. Bars show the share of field-goal attempts in each zone; where a slice is too thin for its number, the shares are listed under the bar. FG% ranks: #1 = best for that side (most accurate shooting, stingiest defense).

Shot volume

Extra scoring chances from rebounds, turnovers and the foul line
SIUE
−10.8extra scoring chances per game vs a D-I average team#322 of 365
Off reb %
30.6%
#200
Def reb %
67.9%
#198
Turnover %
18.2%
#188
Forced TO %
15.3%
#261
FT rate
19.5%
#344
FT allowed
52.3%
#316
Where the chances come from (per game)
Offensive rebounding−0.3
Defensive rebounding−0.2
Ball security0.0
Forcing turnovers−1.9
Foul shots drawn−4.7
Foul shots allowed−3.7
North Dakota
+2.6extra scoring chances per game vs a D-I average team#139 of 365
Off reb %
33.9%
#128
Def reb %
63.6%
#269
Turnover %
14.5%
#72
Forced TO %
17.4%
#198
FT rate
39.9%
#138
FT allowed
35.8%
#174
Where the chances come from (per game)
Offensive rebounding+0.8
Defensive rebounding−1.6
Ball security+2.7
Forcing turnovers−0.5
Foul shots drawn+0.7
Foul shots allowed+0.6

North Dakota has more extra scoring chances per game: +2.6 (#139 of 365) to SIUE’s −10.8 (#322).

Grade = extra shots and foul-line trips per game compared with a D-I average team, built from six season rates. Cell shading is the national rank for each rate (greener = better for that team).

Rotation

Who has been playing, and who has not
SIUE2026-27 numbers · last game: Missouri, Nov 9
#PlayerPosClHtGP-GSMPGMin/40, last 8Last 3 vs beforeStatusPPGRPGAPGTOVeFG%3P%3PA/gFT%Usage
1GSr6'3"4-428.032—Started last11.51.81.81.548.9%42.1%4.80.0%27.3%
11GSo6'3"4-426.334—Started last8.54.32.81.343.9%14.3%1.8100.0%22.0%
0FJr6'7"4-424.532—Started last10.55.80.80.564.8%20.0%1.358.3%20.3%
2GJr6'0"4-424.522—Started last10.01.33.02.041.1%9.1%2.860.0%32.2%
23FFr6'7"4-020.316—Bench9.36.50.50.872.7%0.0%0.362.5%20.3%
4FSr6'8"4-417.021—Started last6.81.81.50.366.7%28.6%1.875.0%17.6%
55GFr6'2"4-015.010—Bench3.32.83.31.329.2%25.0%1.075.0%20.0%
7GSo6'4"4-011.57—Bench3.30.80.30.855.6%40.0%1.375.0%17.1%
21FSr6'9"4-010.816—Bench3.83.50.30.860.0%0.0%0.342.9%22.0%
5GSr6'5"4-08.57—Bench4.81.30.30.073.1%37.5%2.00.0%22.9%
15FFr6'10"4-05.5——Active2.82.30.00.862.5%—0.0100.0%29.7%
20FSo6'8"3-06.30—Bench1.00.30.30.725.0%0.0%0.750.0%21.2%
13GFr6'2"3-03.7——Active3.70.31.30.087.5%50.0%0.7100.0%31.2%
25CSo6'10"1-04.0——Active0.01.00.00.00.0%—0.0—15.5%

Competitive minutes leave out garbage time (provisional rule: a second-half lead of 25+ inside 15:00, 20+ inside 10:00, 15+ inside 5:00 or 10+ inside 2:00, held to the end) and are shown per 40 minutes. Status says only whether a player appeared; the reason is not published.

Team comparison

national rank toned left for away, right for home
SIUENorth Dakota
Efficiency
101.2
105.9
107.4
114.3
68.2
70.3
7.8
6.2
Shooting
48.4%
45.1%
54.4%
50.0%
21.2%
25.3%
66.7%
75.3%
19.5%
39.9%
Ball control & glass
18.2%
14.5%
15.3%
17.4%
30.6%
33.9%
32.1%
36.4%
10.2%
6.8%
8.9%
13.9%
Style
26.8%
41.0%
69.6%
45.5%
8.9%
11.8%
41.1%
39.7%
40.0%
40.7%
Roster
2.67
2.81
6'4.7"
6'4.5"
25.5%
19.3%

Offseason

roster movement into this season — descriptive, not a model input
SIUE
Returning minutes: 35.3%Returning production: 31.8%
ESPN hasn't posted SIUE's roster for this season yet — no movement to show.

Returns 35% of last season's minutes; lost 3 of its top 5. Teams returning under 40% of last season's minutes have historically fallen about 0.8 points of AdjEM (n=716 team-seasons, 2022-2026). (ESPN hasn't posted this season's roster yet -- this may still be last season's list.)

North Dakota
Returning minutes: 20.5%Returning production: 14.1%
Lost
  • Eli King 31.7 mpg, 11.9 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
  • Greyson Uelmen 27.8 mpg, 16.8 ppg · transferred to Northern Iowa
  • Garrett Anderson 26.7 mpg, 9.4 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
  • George Natsvlishvili 18.7 mpg, 7.8 ppg · transferred to Winthrop
  • Anthony Smith III 17.2 mpg, 7.6 ppg · transferred to Winthrop
  • Marley Curtis 14.3 mpg, 5.1 ppg · transferred to James Madison
Added
  • Samuel Hincapie from Le Moyne · 14.6 mpg, 4.6 ppg last season
  • Tyler Wagner from Austin Peay · 5.3 mpg, 1.9 ppg last season
  • Carter Evanson no D1 minutes last season
  • Zack Parks no D1 minutes last season
  • DeAngelo Dungey no D1 minutes last season
  • Luke Winkel no D1 minutes last season

Returns 20% of last season's minutes; lost 4 of its top 5 (2 transferred). Teams returning under 40% of last season's minutes have historically fallen about 0.8 points of AdjEM (n=716 team-seasons, 2022-2026).

Head-to-head

this season and last
No meetings the last two seasons.

The CBB Matchups tab lays out the day's Division I slate: matchup, tip time, records and rank, and — once posted — the market spread and total (the median across books when no market line is up). Three views switch the table between projected scores, pace and totals, and each team's offensive and defensive tendencies. Each game opens into opponent-adjusted possessions, efficiency and four-factor tendencies for both teams, plus recent form, rotation and head-to-head history. Every game also carries our projected score, spread and total, from our line: the same view our bets are made from.

What these numbers mean: line shopping.