CBB Matchups
Every D1 game with tempo-free ratings, four factors and market lines, one place.
College basketball is being built for the 2026-27 season (tip-off Nov 3). What's here fills in as games are played.
Non-conferenceBrooklyn Athletic Center, Brooklyn, NY
St Thomas
Efficiency #84
2025-26: 24-10 · 13-5 conf
@
Long Island
Efficiency #195
2025-26: 24-11 · 18-3 conf
Mon, Nov 16 · TBD
75.1
win 51%
Projected
75.0
win 49%
No line posted yet.
Model: STMN −0.2 · total 150.1 · ratings as of Sat, Oct 3
Preseason ratings start from 2025-26's final adjusted ratings, regressed toward the D1 average. The stats below are 2025-26's too; both update once 2026-27 games are played.
How the projection is built
each step, from an average D-I game to this oneProjected total
Average D-I game
148.2
PaceAdjusted tempo: Long Island 68.6, St Thomas 69.0 → 69.3 possessions
+2.2
Long Island offense vs St Thomas defense
−2.2
St Thomas offense vs Long Island defense
+1.9
Projected total
150.1
Axis starts at 147 pointsPoints added or removed at each step
Projected margin
Even game
0.0
Long Island offense vs St Thomas defense
−2.2
St Thomas offense vs Long Island defense
−1.9
Home court+2.9 points per 100 possessions to the home offense, −2.9 to the visitors
+4.0
St Thomas by 0.2
0.2
St Thomas side ◂▸ Long Island side
Steps are rounded to one decimal, so they can differ from the total by 0.1: the margin steps add to −0.1 against −0.2. The margin is the same build seen from the home side; positive numbers help Long Island.
Pace & total
possessions per 40 minutesTempo, possessions per 40 minutes
Projected possessions: 69.3, from each team's opponent-adjusted tempo. On raw 2025-26 season pace, St Thomas is the faster team (69.7, #104 of 365) and Long Island the slower (68.2, #190). When tempos clash, the slower team usually pulls the pace harder (study weights 0.80 vs 0.66).
Projected possessions
69.3
per team, 40 min
Projected total
150.1
model
Projected team totals
75.1 / 75.0
St Thomas / Long Island
Adjusted tempo, vs an average opponent
69.0#122
St Thomas
68.6#152
Long Island
How this game plays
what the study found each side's numbers actually do when these two teams meetAdvantageSt Thomas
Where St Thomas scores: shooting
St Thomas shoots an effective 58.9% (#5); Long Island allows 50.0% (#102). Expect about 55.1%, 3.8 points above an average D1 matchup — worth roughly +5.4 points per 100 possessions.
GlassSt Thomas
St Thomas gets out-rebounded
Projected offensive rebound rate of 26.2% is worth roughly -2.5 points per 100 possessions against St Thomas's offense.
DefenseLong Island
Long Island's shot-blocking
Long Island ranks #16 nationally in block rate — one of the few defensive numbers that travels. Expect about 12.0% of St Thomas's two-point attempts to get blocked against this defense.
AdvantageLong Island
Where Long Island struggles: ball control
Long Island turns it over on 18.9% of possessions (#318); St Thomas forces turnovers on 17.0% of opponent possessions (#149). Expect about 18.2%, 1.4 points above an average D1 matchup — worth roughly -1.7 points per 100 possessions.
ClashSt Thomas
Style match: paint scoring
St Thomas scores 46.5% of its points in the paint; Long Island gives up 49.5% of opponents' points in the paint (D1 average 42.8%). Expect about 46.0% — both habits push the same way.
ClashSt Thomas
Strength vs strength: live-ball turnovers
St Thomas (#28 in live-ball turnovers) against Long Island (#43 in the same stat allowed) — both rank inside the national top 60. Expect about 10.0%. Historically Long Island's own number has carried a bit more weight in that exchange (0.40 vs 0.65).
St Thomas has the ball
OffenseLong Island allowsvs D1 avg
58.9% #5
50.0% #102
+5.4 pt/100
14.3% #36
18.8% #58
+0.1 pt/100
22.6% #353
33.0% #299
-2.5 pt/100
33.8% #220
34.7% #171
-0.1 pt/100
68.7% #305
—
-0.3 pt/100
St Thomas net across the four factors + FT%, vs. a D1-average matchup: +2.5 pts/100
Long Island has the ball
OffenseSt Thomas allowsvs D1 avg
52.8% #112
50.7% #139
+0.8 pt/100
18.9% #318
17.0% #149
-1.7 pt/100
33.9% #70
26.6% #25
+0.4 pt/100
34.0% #207
30.7% #78
-0.4 pt/100
66.7% #346
—
-0.5 pt/100
Long Island net across the four factors + FT%, vs. a D1-average matchup: -1.4 pts/100
Shot diet
Where each offense shoots from and where each defense lets teams shoot · 2025-26 numbersSt Thomasoffense vsLong Islanddefense
Share of shots by zone
St Thomas shoots
44.3
3.7
5.5
46.5
Long Island allows
43.8
6.1
16.9
33.1
D-I average
38.5
6.4
15.8
39.3
FG% by zone
| Zone | D-I avg | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Rim | 68.5%#3 | 55.3%#70 | 58.6% |
| Short 2 (≤9 ft) | 46.6%#44 | 49.1%#350 | 39.5% |
| Mid 2 (10 ft+) | 36.8%#234 | 40.4%#256 | 38.0% |
| Three | 36.0%#57 | 32.2%#72 | 33.7% |
Long Islandoffense vsSt Thomasdefense
Share of shots by zone
Long Island shoots
46.2
8.3
16.6
29.0
St Thomas allows
39.8
4.7
14.0
41.5
D-I average
38.5
6.4
15.8
39.3
FG% by zone
| Zone | D-I avg | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Rim | 59.7%#133 | 58.4%#158 | 58.6% |
| Short 2 (≤9 ft) | 37.8%#224 | 33.8%#41 | 39.5% |
| Mid 2 (10 ft+) | 38.7%#162 | 37.9%#156 | 38.0% |
| Three | 35.8%#67 | 31.7%#52 | 33.7% |
RimShort 2 (≤9 ft)Mid 2 (10 ft+)Three
Zones from play-by-play shot descriptions; garbage time removed. Bars show the share of field-goal attempts in each zone; where a slice is too thin for its number, the shares are listed under the bar. FG% ranks: #1 = best for that side (most accurate shooting, stingiest defense).
Shot volume
Extra scoring chances from rebounds, turnovers and the foul line · 2025-26 numbersSt Thomas
+1.5extra scoring chances per game vs a D-I average team#120 of 365
Off reb %
22.6%
#353
Def reb %
73.4%
#25
Turnover %
14.3%
#36
Forced TO %
17.0%
#149
FT rate
33.8%
#220
FT allowed
30.7%
#78
Where the chances come from (per game)
Offensive rebounding−2.5
Defensive rebounding+1.3
Ball security+1.7
Forcing turnovers+0.2
Foul shots drawn−0.3
Foul shots allowed+1.2
Long Island
+0.2extra scoring chances per game vs a D-I average team#172 of 365
Off reb %
33.9%
#70
Def reb %
67.0%
#299
Turnover %
18.9%
#318
Forced TO %
18.8%
#58
FT rate
34.0%
#207
FT allowed
34.7%
#171
Where the chances come from (per game)
Offensive rebounding+1.1
Defensive rebounding−0.8
Ball security−1.5
Forcing turnovers+1.4
Foul shots drawn−0.2
Foul shots allowed+0.1
St Thomas has more extra scoring chances per game: +1.5 (#120 of 365) to Long Island’s +0.2 (#172).
Grade = extra shots and foul-line trips per game compared with a D-I average team, built from six season rates. Cell shading is the national rank for each rate (greener = better for that team).
Rotation
St Thomas2025-26 numbers
ESPN hasn't posted St Thomas's 2026-27 roster yet — these are last season's players.
| # | Player | Pos | Cl | Ht | GP-GS | MPG | PPG | RPG | APG | TOV | eFG% | 3P% | 3PA/g | FT% | Usage | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 23 | Nick Janowski | G | Fr | 6'4" | 34-34 | 31.5 | 16.1 | 5.1 | 2.1 | 1.3 | 57.0% | 33.9% | 5.4 | 64.1% | 27.6% | |
| 4 | Nolan Minessale | G | So | 6'5" | 34-34 | 31.0 | 19.8 | 4.6 | 4.3 | 2.2 | 55.4% | 30.6% | 4.2 | 75.0% | 34.7% | |
| 32 | Carter Bjerke | F | Jr | 6'9" | 34-34 | 24.9 | 9.4 | 3.4 | 1.2 | 0.7 | 67.3% | 44.9% | 5.2 | 58.8% | 17.9% | |
| 34 | Ben Oosterbaan | F | So | 6'6" | 34-34 | 24.0 | 7.6 | 4.2 | 1.6 | 0.8 | 59.5% | 36.8% | 3.1 | 69.2% | 16.9% | |
| 0 | Isaiah Johnson-Arigu | F | So | 6'7" | 33-0 | 21.4 | 10.5 | 4.0 | 1.1 | 1.3 | 60.0% | 32.5% | 2.4 | 66.7% | 26.2% | |
| 11 | Austin Herro | G | So | 6'3" | 27-24 | 23.9 | 5.5 | 4.0 | 3.5 | 1.3 | 60.2% | 37.8% | 1.4 | 72.0% | 13.8% | |
| 12 | Ryan Dufault | G | Sr | 6'0" | 33-9 | 17.7 | 5.7 | 2.3 | 1.8 | 0.7 | 68.9% | 33.3% | 0.3 | 66.0% | 15.6% | |
| 2 | Jermaine Coleman | G | So | 6'7" | 34-0 | 13.9 | 4.4 | 1.9 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 54.7% | 34.0% | 3.0 | 64.7% | 17.7% | |
| 1 | Hayden Tibbits | G | So | 5'11" | 26-1 | 11.0 | 3.1 | 1.0 | 1.1 | 0.3 | 53.9% | 34.1% | 1.7 | 52.4% | 16.2% | |
| 3 | Ryan Lafferty | G | So | 6'5" | 11-0 | 13.5 | 1.0 | 1.9 | 1.3 | 1.1 | 45.8% | 20.0% | 0.5 | 0.0% | 9.5% | |
| 5 | Tim Franks | G | Fr | 6'5" | 16-0 | 4.0 | 2.1 | 0.8 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 66.7% | 60.0% | 0.6 | 71.4% | 22.6% | |
| 10 | Tommy Humphries Jr. | G | So | 6'5" | 9-0 | 4.2 | 1.1 | 0.7 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 34.6% | 25.0% | 0.4 | 33.3% | 20.4% | |
| 15 | Adam Tauer | G | So | 6'3" | 12-0 | 2.8 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 40.0% | 0.0% | 0.1 | 50.0% | 11.3% | |
| 20 | Jack Tauer | G | Sr | 6'2" | 11-0 | 1.7 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 75.0% | 100.0% | 0.1 | 0.0% | 9.9% | |
| 24 | Kyle Counts | F | Fr | 6'7" | 5-0 | 3.8 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 83.3% | 50.0% | 0.4 | — | 12.3% | |
| 13 | Luka Momcilovic | F | Fr | 6'8" | 0-0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | — | 0.0 | — | — |
Rosters come from ESPN and are still filling in; incoming transfers and freshmen may be missing.
Long Island2025-26 numbers
ESPN hasn't posted Long Island's 2026-27 roster yet — these are last season's players.
| # | Player | Pos | Cl | Ht | GP-GS | MPG | PPG | RPG | APG | TOV | eFG% | 3P% | 3PA/g | FT% | Usage | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | Greg Gordon | G | Sr | 6'5" | 35-35 | 34.1 | 14.0 | 5.5 | 2.9 | 1.9 | 57.2% | 20.7% | 0.8 | 40.7% | 25.1% | |
| 33 | Jamal Fuller | G | Sr | 6'5" | 34-33 | 33.6 | 16.2 | 5.5 | 2.6 | 2.1 | 59.6% | 43.0% | 3.8 | 77.1% | 26.4% | |
| 0 | Malachi Davis | G | Sr | 6'4" | 35-34 | 30.9 | 14.0 | 3.5 | 3.4 | 2.8 | 46.1% | 31.4% | 4.0 | 62.1% | 32.9% | |
| 1 | Jomo Goings | G | Jr | 6'5" | 35-34 | 30.8 | 9.8 | 4.5 | 2.2 | 2.2 | 46.5% | 36.3% | 2.9 | 84.2% | 21.9% | |
| 22 | Shadrak Lasu | F | So | 6'8" | 33-33 | 22.9 | 5.2 | 5.4 | 0.4 | 0.8 | 56.9% | 42.9% | 0.6 | 63.8% | 13.6% | |
| 6 | Mason Porter-Brown | F | Jr | 6'6" | 35-6 | 20.0 | 7.8 | 3.2 | 0.6 | 1.0 | 57.1% | 40.4% | 2.7 | 71.3% | 22.2% | |
| 3 | Faheim Meran | G | Jr | 6'6" | 18-0 | 14.6 | 3.1 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 0.9 | 51.0% | 36.7% | 1.7 | 58.3% | 15.4% | |
| 15 | Caleb Johnson | F | Sr | 6'7" | 23-0 | 11.0 | 2.5 | 2.1 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 52.3% | 0.0% | 0.5 | 75.0% | 13.9% | |
| 4 | Tre'shawn Sheppard | G | So | 6'6" | 26-0 | 9.7 | 2.1 | 2.7 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 54.5% | 33.3% | 0.2 | 53.8% | 14.0% | |
| 10 | A.J. Neal Jr. | G | Sr | 6'2" | 15-0 | 7.7 | 1.9 | 0.4 | 0.7 | 0.6 | 52.2% | 50.0% | 0.5 | 66.7% | 17.2% | |
| 7 | Isaiah Miranda | F | Jr | 7'1" | 13-0 | 8.1 | 3.7 | 1.5 | 0.2 | 0.6 | 42.6% | 15.4% | 1.0 | 66.7% | 31.3% | |
| 5 | Max Ndlovu-Fraser | G | Fr | 6'5" | 7-0 | 7.9 | 0.7 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 35.7% | 33.3% | 0.4 | — | 11.7% | |
| 34 | Xinyi Li | F | Jr | 6'9" | 8-0 | 3.6 | 0.6 | 0.8 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 35.7% | 33.3% | 0.4 | — | 23.4% | |
| 14 | Eddie Munyak | G | So | 6'1" | 2-0 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 150.0% | 100.0% | 0.5 | — | 17.8% | |
| 24 | Gavin Pendergast | G | So | 6'4" | 0-0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | — | 0.0 | — | — |
Rosters come from ESPN and are still filling in; incoming transfers and freshmen may be missing.
St Thomas2025-26 numbers
ESPN hasn't posted St Thomas's 2026-27 roster yet — these are last season's players.
| # | Player | Pos | Cl | Ht | GP-GS | MPG | PPG | RPG | APG | TOV | eFG% | 3P% | 3PA/g | FT% | Usage | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 23 | Nick Janowski | G | Fr | 6'4" | 34-34 | 31.5 | 16.1 | 5.1 | 2.1 | 1.3 | 57.0% | 33.9% | 5.4 | 64.1% | 27.6% | |
| 4 | Nolan Minessale | G | So | 6'5" | 34-34 | 31.0 | 19.8 | 4.6 | 4.3 | 2.2 | 55.4% | 30.6% | 4.2 | 75.0% | 34.7% | |
| 32 | Carter Bjerke | F | Jr | 6'9" | 34-34 | 24.9 | 9.4 | 3.4 | 1.2 | 0.7 | 67.3% | 44.9% | 5.2 | 58.8% | 17.9% | |
| 34 | Ben Oosterbaan | F | So | 6'6" | 34-34 | 24.0 | 7.6 | 4.2 | 1.6 | 0.8 | 59.5% | 36.8% | 3.1 | 69.2% | 16.9% | |
| 0 | Isaiah Johnson-Arigu | F | So | 6'7" | 33-0 | 21.4 | 10.5 | 4.0 | 1.1 | 1.3 | 60.0% | 32.5% | 2.4 | 66.7% | 26.2% | |
| 11 | Austin Herro | G | So | 6'3" | 27-24 | 23.9 | 5.5 | 4.0 | 3.5 | 1.3 | 60.2% | 37.8% | 1.4 | 72.0% | 13.8% | |
| 12 | Ryan Dufault | G | Sr | 6'0" | 33-9 | 17.7 | 5.7 | 2.3 | 1.8 | 0.7 | 68.9% | 33.3% | 0.3 | 66.0% | 15.6% | |
| 2 | Jermaine Coleman | G | So | 6'7" | 34-0 | 13.9 | 4.4 | 1.9 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 54.7% | 34.0% | 3.0 | 64.7% | 17.7% | |
| 1 | Hayden Tibbits | G | So | 5'11" | 26-1 | 11.0 | 3.1 | 1.0 | 1.1 | 0.3 | 53.9% | 34.1% | 1.7 | 52.4% | 16.2% | |
| 3 | Ryan Lafferty | G | So | 6'5" | 11-0 | 13.5 | 1.0 | 1.9 | 1.3 | 1.1 | 45.8% | 20.0% | 0.5 | 0.0% | 9.5% | |
| 5 | Tim Franks | G | Fr | 6'5" | 16-0 | 4.0 | 2.1 | 0.8 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 66.7% | 60.0% | 0.6 | 71.4% | 22.6% | |
| 10 | Tommy Humphries Jr. | G | So | 6'5" | 9-0 | 4.2 | 1.1 | 0.7 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 34.6% | 25.0% | 0.4 | 33.3% | 20.4% | |
| 15 | Adam Tauer | G | So | 6'3" | 12-0 | 2.8 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 40.0% | 0.0% | 0.1 | 50.0% | 11.3% | |
| 20 | Jack Tauer | G | Sr | 6'2" | 11-0 | 1.7 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 75.0% | 100.0% | 0.1 | 0.0% | 9.9% | |
| 24 | Kyle Counts | F | Fr | 6'7" | 5-0 | 3.8 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 83.3% | 50.0% | 0.4 | — | 12.3% | |
| 13 | Luka Momcilovic | F | Fr | 6'8" | 0-0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | — | 0.0 | — | — |
Rosters come from ESPN and are still filling in; incoming transfers and freshmen may be missing.
Trends
Last 10 games of 2025-26St Thomas
Against the spread
Season
15-16
Home
6-6
Road
8-7
Last 10
6-4
avg cover +3.5
Missed the spread 2 straightCovered 5 of 8 as a favoriteCovered 3 of 4 with a line of 10+
Over / under
Season
15-15-1
Home
7-5
Road
7-7-1
Last 10
3-7
avg vs total −5.8
Under 6 straightOver in 3 of 8 as a favoriteOver in 2 of 4 with a line of 10+
Last 10 games, newest first
| Date | Opponent | Site | Result | Total | PPP for | PPP vs | Pace | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 17 | Seattle U | A | L 52–67 | +2.0 | L−13.0 | 145.5 | U119 | 74.2 | 95.5 | 70.1 |
| Mar 7 | North Dakota | N | L 66–67 | −11.5 | L−12.5 | 153.5 | U133 | 102.4 | 104.0 | 64.4 |
| Mar 5 | S Dakota St | N | W 80–67 | −5.0 | W+8.0 | 150.0 | U147 | 124.5 | 104.3 | 64.3 |
| Feb 28 | Omaha | H | W 68–53 | −11.5 | W+3.5 | 159.5 | U121 | 104.3 | 81.3 | 65.2 |
| Feb 26 | N Dakota St | H | W 84–62 | −3.0 | W+19.0 | 155.5 | U146 | 128.8 | 95.1 | 65.2 |
| Feb 21 | Denver | A | L 80–82 | −4.0 | L−6.0 | 168.5 | U162 | 116.8 | 119.7 | 68.5 |
| Feb 14 | Kansas City | A | W 104–64 | −13.0 | W+27.0 | 153.5 | O168 | 142.9 | 87.9 | 72.8 |
| Feb 12 | Omaha | A | L 94–98 | −4.5 | L−8.5 | 156.5 | O192 | 127.1 | 132.5 | 74.0 |
| Feb 7 | Oral Roberts | H | W 92–75 | −15.5 | W+1.5 | 152.0 | O167 | 122.6 | 99.9 | 75.1 |
| Feb 4 | S Dakota St | A | W 77–62 | +1.0 | W+16.0 | 157.0 | U139 | 123.4 | 99.3 | 62.4 |
Long Island
Against the spread
Season
18-17
Home
9-6
Road
9-10
Last 10
5-5
avg cover −1.6
Missed the spread in the last gameCovered 5 of 9 as a favoriteCovered 2 of 4 with a line of 10+
Over / under
Season
15-20
Home
6-9
Road
8-11
Last 10
6-4
avg vs total +5.3
Over 2 straightOver in 5 of 9 as a favoriteOver in 3 of 4 with a line of 10+
Last 10 games, newest first
| Date | Opponent | Site | Result | Total | PPP for | PPP vs | Pace | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20 | #1Arizona | N | L 58–92 | +30.5 | L−3.5 | 148.0 | O150 | 82.0 | 130.1 | 70.7 |
| Mar 10 | Mercyhurst | H | W 79–70 | −5.0 | W+4.0 | 134.0 | O149 | 119.3 | 105.7 | 66.2 |
| Mar 7 | Wagner | H | W 64–56 | −6.5 | W+1.5 | 139.0 | U120 | 100.1 | 87.6 | 63.9 |
| Mar 4 | Chicago St | H | W 79–75 | −11.0 | L−7.0 | 138.0 | O154 | 128.7 | 122.2 | 61.4 |
| Feb 28 | FDU | H | W 74–60 | −9.0 | W+5.0 | 137.5 | U134 | 117.6 | 95.3 | 62.9 |
| Feb 26 | Chicago St | H | W 73–56 | −11.5 | W+5.5 | 140.0 | U129 | 111.9 | 85.8 | 65.3 |
| Feb 21 | Mercyhurst | A | L 83–91 | −3.5 | L−11.5 | 141.0 | O174 | 119.0 | 130.5 | 69.7 |
| Feb 19 | Saint Francis Red Wolves | A | W 91–89 | −9.0 | L−7.0 | 148.0 | O180 | 118.2 | 115.6 | 77.0 |
| Feb 16 | Wagner | H | W 83–65 | −10.5 | W+7.5 | 137.0 | O148 | 130.1 | 101.9 | 63.8 |
| Feb 14 | New Haven | A | L 52–55 | −7.0 | L−10.0 | 129.5 | U107 | 84.1 | 88.9 | 61.8 |
Records vs the closing line describe the past; ten games is a small sample.
Tale of the tape
national rank toned left for away, right for homeSt ThomasLong Island
Efficiency
111.9
106.8
107.0
107.8
69.0
68.6
—
—
Shooting
58.9%
52.8%
63.0%
52.4%
36.0%
35.8%
68.7%
66.7%
33.8%
34.0%
Ball control & glass
14.3%
18.9%
17.0%
18.8%
22.6%
33.9%
26.6%
33.0%
7.7%
10.4%
8.3%
8.6%
Style
46.3%
29.3%
46.5%
51.9%
12.6%
19.4%
56.7%
50.2%
32.7%
24.1%
Roster
2.13
3.38
6'4.9"
6'5.5"
—
—
Offseason
roster movement into this season — descriptive, not a model inputSt Thomas
Returning minutes: 100.0%Returning production: 100.0%
ESPN hasn't posted St Thomas's roster for this season yet — no movement to show.
Returns 100% of last season's minutes. Teams returning at least 65% of last season's minutes have historically gained about 2.2 points of AdjEM (n=156 team-seasons, 2022-2026). (ESPN hasn't posted this season's roster yet -- this may still be last season's list.)
Long Island
Returning minutes: 100.0%Returning production: 100.0%
ESPN hasn't posted Long Island's roster for this season yet — no movement to show.
Returns 100% of last season's minutes. Teams returning at least 65% of last season's minutes have historically gained about 2.2 points of AdjEM (n=156 team-seasons, 2022-2026). (ESPN hasn't posted this season's roster yet -- this may still be last season's list.)
Head-to-head
this season and lastNo meetings the last two seasons.
The CBB Matchups tab lays out the day's Division I slate: matchup, tip time, records and rank, and — once posted — Pinnacle's spread and total (the median across books when Pinnacle has no line). Three views switch the table between projected scores, pace and totals, and each team's offensive and defensive tendencies. Each game opens into opponent-adjusted possessions, efficiency and four-factor tendencies for both teams, plus recent form, rotation and head-to-head history. Every game also carries our projected score, spread and total, built bottom-up from those same numbers: expected possessions times each side's opponent-adjusted points per possession, plus home court.
What these numbers mean: line shopping.