Alabama State Hornets vs Fresno State Bulldogs basketball preview & prediction

Fri, Nov 20 · 10:00 PM ET · Save Mart Center, Fresno, CA

Non-conferenceSave Mart Center, Fresno, CA
Alabama St
0-2 · 0-0 conf
Efficiency #305
@
Fresno St
1-1 · 0-0 conf
Efficiency #185
Fri, Nov 20 · 10:00 PM ET
Our projected score shows once the market opens.
No line posted yet.

Our play

Pace & total

possessions per 40 minutes
Tempo, possessions per 40 minutes

Projected possessions: 73.3, from each team's opponent-adjusted tempo. On raw season pace, Alabama St is the faster team (83.4, #4 of 365) and Fresno St the slower (67.1, #290). When tempos clash, the slower team usually pulls the pace harder (weights 0.80 vs 0.66).

Projected possessions
73.3
per team, 40 min
Adjusted tempo, vs an average opponent
73.6#43
Alabama St
70.2#213
Fresno St

How this game plays

points this game from the four factors, vs an average D-I matchup
From the four factors
Fresno St has the ball+5.1
Alabama St has the ball−5.5
Fresno St has the ball
✓Takes care of the ballTO% 19.4% #227 · ALST forces 13.2% #312 · ~11 turnovers+2.3
✓Wins second chancesOR% 37.2% #85 · ALST allows 33.3% #217+2.2
✓Gets to the lineFTR 7.4% #358 · ALST allows 77.4% #358 · FT 80.0% #45+1.5
✗Tough shooting lookeFG% 44.9% #269 · ALST allows 54.8% #258−0.9
Alabama St has the ball
✗Tough shooting lookeFG% 38.8% #335 · FRES allows 57.7% #306−3.0
✗Coughs it upTO% 30.0% #354 · FRES forces 11.9% #333 · ~15 turnovers−2.4
✗Few trips to the lineFTR 28.4% #270 · FRES allows 15.4% #6 · FT 73.7% #122−1.3
✓Wins second chancesOR% 35.6% #102 · FRES allows 31.4% #186+1.2

Shot diet

Where each offense shoots from and where each defense lets teams shoot
Alabama Stoffense vsFresno Stdefense
Share of shots by zone
Alabama St shoots
Fresno St allows
D-I average
FG% by zone
ZoneD-I avg
Rim41.7%#32970.0%#30358.0%
Short 2 (≤9 ft)20.0%#27516.7%#4538.2%
Mid 2 (10 ft+)12.5%#31533.3%#15534.7%
Three33.3%#15836.0%#25732.5%
Fresno Stoffense vsAlabama Stdefense
Share of shots by zone
Fresno St shoots
Alabama St allows
D-I average
FG% by zone
ZoneD-I avg
Rim56.5%#20057.9%#17058.0%
Short 2 (≤9 ft)66.7%#2933.3%#12538.2%
Mid 2 (10 ft+)—50.0%#28534.7%
Three24.3%#31134.8%#22232.5%
RimShort 2 (≤9 ft)Mid 2 (10 ft+)Three

Zones from play-by-play shot descriptions; garbage time removed. Bars show the share of field-goal attempts in each zone; where a slice is too thin for its number, the shares are listed under the bar. FG% ranks: #1 = best for that side (most accurate shooting, stingiest defense).

Shot volume

Extra scoring chances from rebounds, turnovers and the foul line
Alabama St
−23.6extra scoring chances per game vs a D-I average team#357 of 365
Off reb %
35.6%
#102
Def reb %
66.7%
#217
Turnover %
30.0%
#354
Forced TO %
13.2%
#312
FT rate
28.4%
#270
FT allowed
77.4%
#358
Where the chances come from (per game)
Offensive rebounding+1.3
Defensive rebounding−0.6
Ball security−8.3
Forcing turnovers−3.5
Foul shots drawn−2.3
Foul shots allowed−10.3
Fresno St
−5.2extra scoring chances per game vs a D-I average team#249 of 365
Off reb %
37.2%
#85
Def reb %
68.6%
#186
Turnover %
19.4%
#227
Forced TO %
11.9%
#333
FT rate
7.4%
#358
FT allowed
15.4%
#6
Where the chances come from (per game)
Offensive rebounding+1.9
Defensive rebounding+0.1
Ball security−0.8
Forcing turnovers−4.3
Foul shots drawn−7.8
Foul shots allowed+5.9

Fresno St has more extra scoring chances per game: −5.2 (#249 of 365) to Alabama St’s −23.6 (#357).

Grade = extra shots and foul-line trips per game compared with a D-I average team, built from six season rates. Cell shading is the national rank for each rate (greener = better for that team).

Rotation

Alabama St2026-27 numbers
#PlayerPosClHtGP-GSMPGPPGRPGAPGTOVeFG%3P%3PA/gFT%UsageStatus
34GJr6'3"2-235.520.52.53.54.048.5%54.5%5.564.3%33.8%Active
10GSr6'1"2-230.59.52.02.53.532.6%27.3%5.580.0%26.5%Active
7GSr6'6"2-226.04.010.01.52.018.8%0.0%4.550.0%21.6%Active
33FSo6'8"2-122.58.56.01.01.046.7%0.0%0.575.0%21.6%Active
2FJr6'7"2-117.03.04.50.50.575.0%—0.0—7.4%Active
4GJr6'3"2-017.011.51.51.01.095.5%70.0%5.0100.0%21.4%Active
23FSr6'7"2-116.06.04.00.51.058.3%50.0%1.083.3%16.9%Active
11FSo6'9"1-118.04.09.00.00.020.0%—0.00.0%28.6%Missed last
25FSr6'10"2-08.01.52.00.50.025.0%0.0%1.050.0%15.5%Active
3GFr6'0"2-08.04.00.00.01.060.0%40.0%2.5100.0%23.8%Active
5GSr6'2"1-016.02.00.00.02.033.3%0.0%1.0—17.0%Active
22GJr6'2"1-03.00.01.00.00.00.0%—0.0—15.7%Missed last
0GFr6'2"1-02.00.00.00.00.0——0.0—0.0%Missed last

Team comparison

national rank toned left for away, right for home
Alabama StFresno St
Efficiency
98.4
103.7
108.6
105.3
73.6
70.2
16.6
4.5
Shooting
38.8%
44.9%
32.6%
54.8%
33.3%
24.3%
73.7%
80.0%
28.4%
7.4%
Ball control & glass
30.0%
19.4%
13.2%
11.9%
35.6%
37.2%
33.3%
31.4%
15.6%
11.9%
14.0%
3.2%
Style
35.8%
54.4%
39.4%
52.3%
4.5%
7.7%
50.0%
53.8%
33.5%
18.3%
Roster
3.19
2.66
6'4.7"
6'5.9"
5.0%
0.0%

Offseason

roster movement into this season — descriptive, not a model input
Alabama St
Returning minutes: 5.0%Returning production: 4.4%
Lost
  • Micah Simpson 32.7 mpg, 13.9 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
  • Cameron Palesse 27.7 mpg, 5.5 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
  • Jerquarius Stanback 24.6 mpg, 8.8 ppg · transferred to Boise St
  • Tyler Byrd 23.3 mpg, 10.0 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
  • Asjon Anderson 23.3 mpg, 12.4 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
  • Damarien Yates 17.1 mpg, 6.8 ppg · transferred to North Alabama
Added
  • Mike James from Miss Valley St · 35.6 mpg, 20.8 ppg last season
  • Amaree Brown from S Indiana · 14.1 mpg, 7.4 ppg last season
  • Joseph Scott from Abilene Chrstn · 10.4 mpg, 3.6 ppg last season
  • Isaiah Barganier from Texas St · 0.5 mpg, 0.2 ppg last season
  • Terrance Hampton no D1 minutes last season
  • Noah Benny no D1 minutes last season

Returns 5% of last season's minutes; lost 5 of its top 5 (1 transferred). Teams returning under 40% of last season's minutes have historically fallen about 0.8 points of AdjEM (n=716 team-seasons, 2022-2026).

Fresno St
Returning minutes: 0.0%Returning production: 0.0%
Lost
  • Jake Heidbreder 34.7 mpg, 15.9 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
  • DeShawn Gory 29.3 mpg, 13.7 ppg · transferred to Oregon St
  • Wilson Jacques 27.4 mpg, 8.8 ppg · transferred to DePaul
  • Zaon Collins 24.9 mpg, 9.4 ppg · transferred to Ball State
  • Cameron Faas 19.1 mpg, 5.3 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
  • Bastien Rieber 16.4 mpg, 4.0 ppg · transferred to Niagara
Added
  • Ross Candelino from Lipscomb · 21.8 mpg, 9.8 ppg last season
  • Bradey Henige from CA Baptist · 19.6 mpg, 4.8 ppg last season
  • Brian Amuneke from Wichita St · 7.9 mpg, 2.4 ppg last season
  • Dragos Lungu from UT Martin · 4.7 mpg, 2.5 ppg last season
  • Baye Fall from Rutgers · 1.4 mpg, 0.1 ppg last season
  • Nathan Zulemie no D1 minutes last season

Returns 0% of last season's minutes; lost 5 of its top 5 (3 transferred). Teams returning under 40% of last season's minutes have historically fallen about 0.8 points of AdjEM (n=716 team-seasons, 2022-2026).

Head-to-head

this season and last
No meetings the last two seasons.

More games on Fri, Nov 20

← Thu, Nov 19 · Sat, Nov 21 → · Full season schedule

The CBB Matchups tab lays out the day's Division I slate: matchup, tip time, records and rank, and — once posted — the market spread and total (the median across books when no market line is up). Three views switch the table between projected scores, pace and totals, and each team's offensive and defensive tendencies. Each game opens into opponent-adjusted possessions, efficiency and four-factor tendencies for both teams, plus recent form, rotation and head-to-head history. Every game also carries our projected score, spread and total, from our line: the same view our bets are made from.

What these numbers mean: line shopping.