CBB Matchups
Every D1 game with tempo-free ratings, four factors and market lines, one place.
College basketball is being built for the 2026-27 season (tip-off Nov 3). What's here fills in as games are played.
Non-conferenceJadwin Gymnasium, Princeton, NJ
Monmouth
Efficiency #173
2025-26: 19-15 · 13-8 conf
@
Princeton
Efficiency #251
2025-26: 9-20 · 5-9 conf
Fri, Nov 20 · 7:00 PM ET
69.2
win 47%
Projected
70.1
win 53%
No line posted yet.
Model: PRIN −0.9 · total 139.3 · ratings as of Sat, Oct 3
Preseason ratings start from 2025-26's final adjusted ratings, regressed toward the D1 average. The stats below are 2025-26's too; both update once 2026-27 games are played.
How the projection is built
each step, from an average D-I game to this oneProjected total
Average D-I game
148.2
PaceAdjusted tempo: Princeton 66.1, Monmouth 68.0 → 65.7 possessions
−5.7
Princeton offense vs Monmouth defense
−3.1
Monmouth offense vs Princeton defense
−0.2
Projected total
139.3
Axis starts at 135 pointsPoints added or removed at each step
Projected margin
Even game
0.0
Princeton offense vs Monmouth defense
−3.1
Monmouth offense vs Princeton defense
+0.2
Home court+2.9 points per 100 possessions to the home offense, −2.9 to the visitors
+3.8
Princeton by 0.9
0.9
Monmouth side ◂▸ Princeton side
Steps are rounded to one decimal, so they can differ from the total by 0.1: the total steps add to 139.2 against a projected 139.3. The margin is the same build seen from the home side; positive numbers help Princeton.
Pace & total
possessions per 40 minutesTempo, possessions per 40 minutes
Projected possessions: 65.7, from each team's opponent-adjusted tempo. On raw 2025-26 season pace, Monmouth is the faster team (67.2, #235 of 365) and Princeton the slower (64.5, #342). When tempos clash, the slower team usually pulls the pace harder (study weights 0.80 vs 0.66).
Projected possessions
65.7
per team, 40 min
Projected total
139.3
model
Projected team totals
69.2 / 70.1
Monmouth / Princeton
Adjusted tempo, vs an average opponent
68.0#210
Monmouth
66.1#341
Princeton
How this game plays
what the study found each side's numbers actually do when these two teams meetPace
Half-court grind
Princeton averages 64.5 possessions per 40, Monmouth 67.2. Slower teams pull the pace toward themselves more than fast teams push it (0.80 vs 0.66 in five seasons of games), so expect about 64 — more possessions mean more points in the total and more chances for the better team to separate.
AdvantagePrinceton
Where Princeton struggles: ball control
Princeton turns it over on 17.1% of possessions (#211); Monmouth forces turnovers on 19.9% of opponent possessions (#27). Expect about 18.9%, 2.2 points above an average D1 matchup — worth roughly -2.7 points per 100 possessions.
AdvantageMonmouth
Where Monmouth scores: ball control
Monmouth turns it over on 16.6% of possessions (#173); Princeton forces turnovers on 14.3% of opponent possessions (#327). Expect about 15.1%, 1.7 points below an average D1 matchup — worth roughly +2.1 points per 100 possessions.
Watch for noise
3-point caution
A notable season 3-point number here (Princeton's defense) is close to a coin flip going forward — the study's model of next-game 3P% barely beats guessing the D1 average. Shot volume is what actually carries: expect Monmouth at about 36.6% of its shots from three, Princeton about 42.7%.
Monmouth has the ball
OffensePrinceton allowsvs D1 avg
49.6% #259
52.0% #209
-0.8 pt/100
16.6% #173
14.3% #327
+2.1 pt/100
31.2% #157
28.5% #82
-0.2 pt/100
32.7% #244
34.0% #152
-0.2 pt/100
75.0% #82
—
+0.2 pt/100
Monmouth net across the four factors + FT%, vs. a D1-average matchup: +1.0 pts/100
Princeton has the ball
OffenseMonmouth allowsvs D1 avg
49.6% #260
50.1% #103
-2.3 pt/100
17.1% #211
19.9% #27
-2.7 pt/100
27.2% #287
32.8% #287
-0.7 pt/100
34.6% #192
32.2% #111
-0.2 pt/100
74.8% #90
—
+0.2 pt/100
Princeton net across the four factors + FT%, vs. a D1-average matchup: -5.6 pts/100
Shot diet
Where each offense shoots from and where each defense lets teams shoot · 2025-26 numbersMonmouthoffense vsPrincetondefense
Share of shots by zone
Monmouth shoots
36.9
7.6
21.0
34.5
Princeton allows
41.0
5.0
14.1
39.9
D-I average
38.5
6.4
15.8
39.3
FG% by zone
| Zone | D-I avg | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Rim | 56.5%#254 | 61.4%#283 | 58.6% |
| Short 2 (≤9 ft) | 37.0%#245 | 45.1%#301 | 39.5% |
| Mid 2 (10 ft+) | 38.8%#153 | 42.3%#313 | 38.0% |
| Three | 34.2%#156 | 31.1%#36 | 33.7% |
Princetonoffense vsMonmouthdefense
Share of shots by zone
Princeton shoots
35.0
4.3
16.2
44.5
Monmouth allows
40.9
6.5
14.5
38.2
D-I average
38.5
6.4
15.8
39.3
FG% by zone
| Zone | D-I avg | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Rim | 53.0%#341 | 55.3%#67 | 58.6% |
| Short 2 (≤9 ft) | 45.0%#65 | 33.6%#37 | 39.5% |
| Mid 2 (10 ft+) | 38.5%#170 | 37.3%#140 | 38.0% |
| Three | 33.9%#177 | 33.9%#174 | 33.7% |
RimShort 2 (≤9 ft)Mid 2 (10 ft+)Three
Zones from play-by-play shot descriptions; garbage time removed. Bars show the share of field-goal attempts in each zone; where a slice is too thin for its number, the shares are listed under the bar. FG% ranks: #1 = best for that side (most accurate shooting, stingiest defense).
Shot volume
Extra scoring chances from rebounds, turnovers and the foul line · 2025-26 numbersMonmouth
+2.1extra scoring chances per game vs a D-I average team#95 of 365
Off reb %
31.2%
#157
Def reb %
67.2%
#287
Turnover %
16.6%
#173
Forced TO %
19.9%
#27
FT rate
32.7%
#244
FT allowed
32.2%
#111
Where the chances come from (per game)
Offensive rebounding+0.3
Defensive rebounding−0.7
Ball security+0.1
Forcing turnovers+2.2
Foul shots drawn−0.6
Foul shots allowed+0.8
Princeton
−2.0extra scoring chances per game vs a D-I average team#268 of 365
Off reb %
27.2%
#287
Def reb %
71.5%
#82
Turnover %
17.1%
#211
Forced TO %
14.3%
#327
FT rate
34.6%
#192
FT allowed
34.0%
#152
Where the chances come from (per game)
Offensive rebounding−1.0
Defensive rebounding+0.7
Ball security−0.2
Forcing turnovers−1.7
Foul shots drawn−0.1
Foul shots allowed+0.3
Monmouth has more extra scoring chances per game: +2.1 (#95 of 365) to Princeton’s −2.0 (#268).
Grade = extra shots and foul-line trips per game compared with a D-I average team, built from six season rates. Cell shading is the national rank for each rate (greener = better for that team).
Rotation
Monmouth2025-26 numbers
ESPN hasn't posted Monmouth's 2026-27 roster yet — these are last season's players.
| # | Player | Pos | Cl | Ht | GP-GS | MPG | PPG | RPG | APG | TOV | eFG% | 3P% | 3PA/g | FT% | Usage | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jason Rivera-Torres | F | Jr | 6'7" | 34-34 | 35.2 | 15.8 | 8.1 | 2.9 | 1.9 | 46.2% | 31.5% | 4.9 | 81.0% | 28.9% | |
| 13 | Jack Collins | G | Sr | 6'5" | 31-31 | 34.9 | 7.0 | 4.7 | 4.5 | 2.7 | 43.0% | 28.9% | 4.6 | 65.3% | 17.2% | |
| 7 | Justin Ray | G | So | 6'3" | 34-21 | 28.4 | 11.3 | 2.1 | 1.2 | 0.6 | 55.4% | 42.0% | 4.6 | 88.9% | 21.4% | |
| 23 | Cornelius Robinson III | F | Jr | 6'7" | 33-25 | 24.9 | 8.0 | 3.9 | 1.2 | 1.3 | 46.9% | 31.3% | 0.5 | 64.2% | 22.2% | |
| 15 | Stefanos Spartalis | F | Fr | 6'9" | 32-30 | 23.6 | 10.7 | 5.1 | 0.9 | 1.5 | 46.5% | 25.0% | 0.5 | 85.1% | 29.4% | |
| 4 | Andrew Ball | G | Jr | 6'9" | 34-9 | 20.5 | 7.9 | 3.9 | 0.6 | 0.8 | 56.4% | 30.5% | 2.4 | 60.0% | 22.5% | |
| 0 | Dok Muordar | C | Sr | 7'1" | 33-3 | 12.4 | 4.1 | 2.3 | 0.1 | 0.4 | 51.0% | — | 0.0 | 64.2% | 20.4% | |
| 2 | Kavion McClain | F | Sr | 5'10" | 11-11 | 35.6 | 17.1 | 2.8 | 5.5 | 3.5 | 58.0% | 38.1% | 5.7 | 84.6% | 29.5% | |
| 3 | Anthony Martinez | G | Fr | 6'2" | 25-5 | 6.9 | 0.6 | 0.3 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 27.5% | 100.0% | 0.0 | 42.9% | 11.5% | |
| 5 | Corey Miller | G | Jr | 6'2" | 9-1 | 13.4 | 3.7 | 0.9 | 1.0 | 0.3 | 60.9% | 44.4% | 1.0 | 83.3% | 14.2% | |
| 24 | Jinup Dobuol | F | So | 6'8" | 19-0 | 6.1 | 3.1 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 58.2% | 44.0% | 1.3 | 50.0% | 28.0% | |
| 8 | O'Marion Harvey | F | Fr | 6'7" | 14-0 | 3.8 | 0.6 | 0.7 | 0.1 | 0.4 | 80.0% | 0.0% | 0.1 | 33.3% | 13.5% | |
| 20 | Zubayr Griffin | G | Fr | 6'4" | 10-0 | 3.6 | 1.1 | 0.7 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 55.0% | 20.0% | 0.5 | — | 18.6% | |
| 9 | Lucas Orchard | G | So | 6'3" | 9-0 | 2.4 | 0.8 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 50.0% | 100.0% | 0.1 | 0.0% | 18.6% | |
| 42 | Quinn Peters | F | Jr | 6'6" | 9-0 | 2.1 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0% | — | 0.0 | 50.0% | 14.3% | |
| 10 | Jack Leahy | G | Jr | 6'5" | 9-0 | 1.7 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.0% | — | 0.0 | — | 15.3% |
Rosters come from ESPN and are still filling in; incoming transfers and freshmen may be missing.
Princeton2025-26 numbers
ESPN hasn't posted Princeton's 2026-27 roster yet — these are last season's players.
| # | Player | Pos | Cl | Ht | GP-GS | MPG | PPG | RPG | APG | TOV | eFG% | 3P% | 3PA/g | FT% | Usage | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 33 | Jackson Hicke | G | Jr | 6'5" | 29-29 | 34.0 | 15.4 | 5.2 | 2.4 | 1.9 | 54.3% | 39.8% | 4.2 | 83.2% | 27.7% | |
| 8 | Landon Clark | G | Fr | 6'8" | 29-22 | 28.8 | 6.0 | 4.0 | 1.8 | 1.1 | 52.0% | 35.6% | 3.6 | 73.1% | 14.6% | |
| 7 | Malik Abdullahi | F | So | 6'7" | 27-25 | 28.5 | 9.7 | 5.7 | 1.3 | 1.5 | 56.7% | 9.1% | 0.8 | 72.1% | 20.7% | |
| 21 | Jack Stanton | G | So | 6'2" | 23-22 | 31.0 | 10.9 | 3.5 | 1.7 | 0.9 | 54.8% | 37.7% | 6.6 | 93.8% | 20.0% | |
| 12 | Jacob Huggins | F | Jr | 6'8" | 29-5 | 21.2 | 4.8 | 4.3 | 1.7 | 0.7 | 38.9% | 30.0% | 0.7 | 61.9% | 17.5% | |
| 22 | Dalen Davis | G | Jr | 6'0" | 20-15 | 27.7 | 14.7 | 2.5 | 2.3 | 2.1 | 45.8% | 39.0% | 4.1 | 89.4% | 35.6% | |
| 4 | CJ Happy | F | So | 6'9" | 25-24 | 18.4 | 6.8 | 2.6 | 1.6 | 1.3 | 48.2% | 30.5% | 3.3 | 36.0% | 28.4% | |
| 23 | Sebastian Whitfield | F | Fr | 6'6" | 29-3 | 12.5 | 3.4 | 1.9 | 0.5 | 0.8 | 43.0% | 27.3% | 1.5 | 60.0% | 22.2% | |
| 24 | Jacob Hammond | F | Fr | 6'6" | 23-0 | 7.1 | 2.3 | 1.2 | 0.2 | 0.5 | 40.2% | 5.6% | 0.8 | 72.2% | 26.3% | |
| 2 | Peyton Seals | G | So | 6'4" | 18-0 | 8.7 | 2.0 | 1.3 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 48.4% | 29.2% | 1.3 | 100.0% | 16.9% | |
| 11 | Jake Sussberg | G | Fr | 6'5" | 19-0 | 6.7 | 2.3 | 1.1 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 53.0% | 34.6% | 1.4 | 72.7% | 19.8% | |
| 15 | Cash McSweeney | F | Fr | 6'8" | 14-0 | 5.6 | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.9 | 0.8 | 38.5% | 28.6% | 0.5 | 25.0% | 19.5% | |
| 5 | Zio Kim | G | So | 6'4" | 8-0 | 1.4 | 0.9 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 83.3% | 50.0% | 0.3 | 100.0% | 26.3% | |
| 6 | Ryan Mandes | G | Fr | 6'3" | 8-0 | 1.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 100.0% | — | 0.0 | 0.0% | 8.6% | |
| 0 | Will Kutzler | F | Jr | 6'7" | 4-0 | 1.5 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.0 | — | — | 0.0 | — | 0.0% | |
| 66 | Cooper Mueller | G | Jr | 6'3" | 2-0 | 2.0 | 1.5 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 75.0% | 100.0% | 0.5 | — | 57.8% | |
| 10 | Lucas Denault | G | Jr | 6'3" | 1-0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | — | 0.0 | — | 0.0% |
Rosters come from ESPN and are still filling in; incoming transfers and freshmen may be missing.
Monmouth2025-26 numbers
ESPN hasn't posted Monmouth's 2026-27 roster yet — these are last season's players.
| # | Player | Pos | Cl | Ht | GP-GS | MPG | PPG | RPG | APG | TOV | eFG% | 3P% | 3PA/g | FT% | Usage | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jason Rivera-Torres | F | Jr | 6'7" | 34-34 | 35.2 | 15.8 | 8.1 | 2.9 | 1.9 | 46.2% | 31.5% | 4.9 | 81.0% | 28.9% | |
| 13 | Jack Collins | G | Sr | 6'5" | 31-31 | 34.9 | 7.0 | 4.7 | 4.5 | 2.7 | 43.0% | 28.9% | 4.6 | 65.3% | 17.2% | |
| 7 | Justin Ray | G | So | 6'3" | 34-21 | 28.4 | 11.3 | 2.1 | 1.2 | 0.6 | 55.4% | 42.0% | 4.6 | 88.9% | 21.4% | |
| 23 | Cornelius Robinson III | F | Jr | 6'7" | 33-25 | 24.9 | 8.0 | 3.9 | 1.2 | 1.3 | 46.9% | 31.3% | 0.5 | 64.2% | 22.2% | |
| 15 | Stefanos Spartalis | F | Fr | 6'9" | 32-30 | 23.6 | 10.7 | 5.1 | 0.9 | 1.5 | 46.5% | 25.0% | 0.5 | 85.1% | 29.4% | |
| 4 | Andrew Ball | G | Jr | 6'9" | 34-9 | 20.5 | 7.9 | 3.9 | 0.6 | 0.8 | 56.4% | 30.5% | 2.4 | 60.0% | 22.5% | |
| 0 | Dok Muordar | C | Sr | 7'1" | 33-3 | 12.4 | 4.1 | 2.3 | 0.1 | 0.4 | 51.0% | — | 0.0 | 64.2% | 20.4% | |
| 2 | Kavion McClain | F | Sr | 5'10" | 11-11 | 35.6 | 17.1 | 2.8 | 5.5 | 3.5 | 58.0% | 38.1% | 5.7 | 84.6% | 29.5% | |
| 3 | Anthony Martinez | G | Fr | 6'2" | 25-5 | 6.9 | 0.6 | 0.3 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 27.5% | 100.0% | 0.0 | 42.9% | 11.5% | |
| 5 | Corey Miller | G | Jr | 6'2" | 9-1 | 13.4 | 3.7 | 0.9 | 1.0 | 0.3 | 60.9% | 44.4% | 1.0 | 83.3% | 14.2% | |
| 24 | Jinup Dobuol | F | So | 6'8" | 19-0 | 6.1 | 3.1 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 58.2% | 44.0% | 1.3 | 50.0% | 28.0% | |
| 8 | O'Marion Harvey | F | Fr | 6'7" | 14-0 | 3.8 | 0.6 | 0.7 | 0.1 | 0.4 | 80.0% | 0.0% | 0.1 | 33.3% | 13.5% | |
| 20 | Zubayr Griffin | G | Fr | 6'4" | 10-0 | 3.6 | 1.1 | 0.7 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 55.0% | 20.0% | 0.5 | — | 18.6% | |
| 9 | Lucas Orchard | G | So | 6'3" | 9-0 | 2.4 | 0.8 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 50.0% | 100.0% | 0.1 | 0.0% | 18.6% | |
| 42 | Quinn Peters | F | Jr | 6'6" | 9-0 | 2.1 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0% | — | 0.0 | 50.0% | 14.3% | |
| 10 | Jack Leahy | G | Jr | 6'5" | 9-0 | 1.7 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.0% | — | 0.0 | — | 15.3% |
Rosters come from ESPN and are still filling in; incoming transfers and freshmen may be missing.
Trends
Last 10 games of 2025-26Monmouth
Against the spread
Season
17-14-2
Home
5-6-2
Road
9-6
Last 10
6-3-1
avg cover +4.6
Missed the spread in the last gameCovered 5 of 6 as a favorite, 1 pushCovered 1 of 4 as an underdog
Over / under
Season
16-17
Home
5-8
Road
8-7
Last 10
6-4
avg vs total +1.1
Over in the last gameOver in 3 of 6 as a favoriteOver in 3 of 4 as an underdog
Last 10 games, newest first
| Date | Opponent | Site | Result | Total | PPP for | PPP vs | Pace | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 10 | Hofstra | N | L 69–75 | +4.0 | L−2.0 | 135.0 | O144 | 103.9 | 113.0 | 66.4 |
| Mar 9 | Campbell | N | W 74–64 | −1.5 | W+8.5 | 152.0 | U138 | 110.1 | 95.2 | 67.2 |
| Mar 8 | Drexel | N | W 65–57 | −4.0 | W+4.0 | 137.5 | U122 | 100.6 | 88.2 | 64.6 |
| Mar 3 | Northeastern | A | W 89–83 | −4.0 | W+2.0 | 149.5 | O172 | 132.9 | 123.9 | 67.0 |
| Feb 28 | Elon | H | W 73–57 | −3.5 | W+12.5 | 153.0 | U130 | 115.7 | 90.3 | 63.1 |
| Feb 26 | Stony Brook | H | W 82–69 | −4.5 | W+8.5 | 146.5 | O151 | 121.4 | 102.2 | 67.5 |
| Feb 21 | Charleston | A | L 63–74 | +5.0 | L−6.0 | 150.0 | U137 | 93.5 | 109.9 | 67.4 |
| Feb 19 | UNC Wilmington | A | L 69–79 | +7.5 | L−2.5 | 145.0 | O148 | 95.8 | 109.7 | 72.0 |
| Feb 15 | Towson | H | W 72–71 | −1.0 | P0.0 | 137.5 | O143 | 110.7 | 109.1 | 65.0 |
| Feb 12 | Drexel | A | W 93–73 | +1.0 | W+21.0 | 134.0 | O166 | 129.7 | 101.8 | 71.7 |
Princeton
Against the spread
Season
15-12-1
Home
7-4
Road
5-7-1
Last 10
5-5
avg cover −1.6
Missed the spread in the last gameCovered 3 of 8 as an underdog
Over / under
Season
13-15
Home
4-7
Road
6-7
Last 10
4-6
avg vs total −3.7
Under in the last gameOver in 3 of 8 as an underdog
Last 10 games, newest first
| Date | Opponent | Site | Result | Total | PPP for | PPP vs | Pace | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 7 | Yale | A | L 53–78 | +14.0 | L−11.0 | 137.0 | U131 | 79.6 | 117.2 | 66.6 |
| Feb 28 | Dartmouth | H | W 82–61 | −2.0 | W+19.0 | 141.5 | O143 | 126.9 | 94.4 | 64.6 |
| Feb 27 | Harvard | H | L 56–58 | +4.0 | W+2.0 | 129.5 | U114 | 93.3 | 96.6 | 60.0 |
| Feb 20 | Brown | A | L 71–80 | +3.0 | L−6.0 | 130.0 | O151 | 110.7 | 124.7 | 64.1 |
| Feb 14 | Columbia | H | L 65–75 | +1.5 | L−8.5 | 136.5 | O140 | 115.5 | 133.2 | 56.3 |
| Feb 13 | Cornell | H | L 65–89 | +3.5 | L−20.5 | 154.5 | U154 | 102.7 | 140.6 | 63.3 |
| Feb 7 | Penn | A | L 60–61 | +3.5 | W+2.5 | 145.0 | U121 | 102.8 | 104.5 | 58.4 |
| Jan 31 | Columbia | A | W 80–68 | +5.5 | W+17.5 | 139.0 | O148 | 129.0 | 109.6 | 62.0 |
| Jan 30 | Cornell | A | L 64–87 | +7.0 | L−16.0 | 159.5 | U151 | 104.1 | 141.5 | 61.5 |
| Jan 24 | Brown | H | W 63–53 | −4.5 | W+5.5 | 133.5 | U116 | 98.7 | 83.1 | 63.8 |
Records vs the closing line describe the past; ten games is a small sample.
Tale of the tape
national rank toned left for away, right for homeMonmouthPrinceton
Efficiency
106.8
105.7
106.6
109.9
68.0
66.1
—
—
Shooting
49.6%
49.6%
48.7%
48.6%
34.2%
33.9%
75.0%
74.8%
32.7%
34.6%
Ball control & glass
16.6%
17.1%
19.9%
14.3%
31.2%
27.2%
32.8%
28.5%
9.1%
10.2%
8.7%
10.3%
Style
34.4%
44.5%
42.9%
36.7%
16.0%
4.4%
53.9%
55.0%
25.7%
27.9%
Roster
2.82
2.10
6'6.2"
6'5.6"
—
—
Offseason
roster movement into this season — descriptive, not a model inputMonmouth
Returning minutes: 100.0%Returning production: 100.0%
ESPN hasn't posted Monmouth's roster for this season yet — no movement to show.
Returns 100% of last season's minutes. Teams returning at least 65% of last season's minutes have historically gained about 2.2 points of AdjEM (n=156 team-seasons, 2022-2026). (ESPN hasn't posted this season's roster yet -- this may still be last season's list.)
Princeton
Returning minutes: 100.0%Returning production: 100.0%
ESPN hasn't posted Princeton's roster for this season yet — no movement to show.
Returns 100% of last season's minutes. Teams returning at least 65% of last season's minutes have historically gained about 2.2 points of AdjEM (n=156 team-seasons, 2022-2026). (ESPN hasn't posted this season's roster yet -- this may still be last season's list.)
Head-to-head
this season and last| Date | Season | Result |
|---|---|---|
| Wed, Dec 3 | 2025-26 | Princeton 58 – 63 Monmouth |
The CBB Matchups tab lays out the day's Division I slate: matchup, tip time, records and rank, and — once posted — Pinnacle's spread and total (the median across books when Pinnacle has no line). Three views switch the table between projected scores, pace and totals, and each team's offensive and defensive tendencies. Each game opens into opponent-adjusted possessions, efficiency and four-factor tendencies for both teams, plus recent form, rotation and head-to-head history. Every game also carries our projected score, spread and total, built bottom-up from those same numbers: expected possessions times each side's opponent-adjusted points per possession, plus home court.
What these numbers mean: line shopping.