CBB Matchups

Every D1 game with tempo-free ratings, four factors and market lines, one place.

College basketball is being built for the 2026-27 season (tip-off Nov 3). What's here fills in as games are played.
Non-conferencePremier America Credit Union Arena, Northridge, CA
Delaware
Efficiency #302
2025-26: 10-21 · 6-14 conf
@
CSU Northridge
Efficiency #196
2025-26: 20-14 · 13-9 conf
Fri, Nov 20 · 6:00 PM ET
71.5
win 23%
Projected
79.9
win 77%
No line posted yet.
Model: CSUN −8.5 · total 151.4 · ratings as of Sat, Oct 3
Preseason ratings start from 2025-26's final adjusted ratings, regressed toward the D1 average. The stats below are 2025-26's too; both update once 2026-27 games are played.

How the projection is built

each step, from an average D-I game to this one
Projected total
Average D-I game
148.2
PaceAdjusted tempo: CSU Northridge 72.4, Delaware 65.5 → 69.6 possessions
+2.8
CSU Northridge offense vs Delaware defense
+2.4
Delaware offense vs CSU Northridge defense
−2.0
Projected total
151.4
Axis starts at 146 pointsPoints added or removed at each step
Projected margin
Even game
0.0
CSU Northridge offense vs Delaware defense
+2.4
Delaware offense vs CSU Northridge defense
+2.0
Home court+2.9 points per 100 possessions to the home offense, −2.9 to the visitors
+4.0
CSU Northridge by 8.5
8.5
Delaware side ◂▸ CSU Northridge side

Steps are rounded to one decimal, so they can differ from the total by 0.1: the margin steps add to +8.4 against +8.5. The margin is the same build seen from the home side; positive numbers help CSU Northridge.

Pace & total

possessions per 40 minutes
Tempo, possessions per 40 minutes

Projected possessions: 69.6, from each team's opponent-adjusted tempo. On raw 2025-26 season pace, CSU Northridge is the faster team (75.3, #3 of 365) and Delaware the slower (63.9, #356). When tempos clash, the slower team usually pulls the pace harder (study weights 0.80 vs 0.66).

Projected possessions
69.6
per team, 40 min
Projected total
151.4
model
Projected team totals
71.5 / 79.9
Delaware / CSU Northridge
Adjusted tempo, vs an average opponent
65.5#356
Delaware
72.4#3
CSU Northridge

How this game plays

what the study found each side's numbers actually do when these two teams meet
Pace
Tempo tug-of-war
CSU Northridge averages 75.3 possessions per 40, Delaware 63.9. Slower teams pull the pace toward themselves more than fast teams push it (0.80 vs 0.66 in five seasons of games), so expect about 69 — more possessions mean more points in the total and more chances for the better team to separate.
AdvantageDelaware
Where Delaware struggles: the offensive glass
Delaware rebounds 20.8% of its own misses (#362); CSU Northridge lets opponents grab 26.6% of their own misses (#26). Expect about 21.9%, 8.5 points below an average D1 matchup — worth roughly -5.2 points per 100 possessions.
ClashDelaware
Style match: 3-point volume
Delaware takes 46.2% of its shots from three; CSU Northridge lets opponents take 48.6% of their shots from three (D1 average 39.5%). Expect about 50.8% — both habits push the same way.
ClashCSU Northridge
Style match: ball movement
CSU Northridge assists on 56.6% of its made baskets; Delaware allows assists on 60.7% of opponents' baskets (D1 average 52.4%). Expect about 60.5% — both habits push the same way.
Watch for noise
3-point caution
A notable season 3-point number here (Delaware) is close to a coin flip going forward — the study's model of next-game 3P% barely beats guessing the D1 average. Shot volume is what actually carries: expect Delaware at about 50.8% of its shots from three, CSU Northridge about 37.3%.
AdvantageCSU Northridge
Where CSU Northridge scores: ball control
CSU Northridge turns it over on 17.5% of possessions (#239); Delaware forces turnovers on 14.0% of opponent possessions (#334). Expect about 15.5%, 1.3 points below an average D1 matchup — worth roughly +1.6 points per 100 possessions.
Delaware has the ball
OffenseCSU Northridge allowsvs D1 avg
53.3% #89
51.6% #191
+1.9 pt/100
18.2% #285
16.4% #191
-0.8 pt/100
20.8% #362
26.6% #26
-5.2 pt/100
30.6% #291
34.3% #162
-0.3 pt/100
78.6% #10
—
+0.5 pt/100
Delaware net across the four factors + FT%, vs. a D1-average matchup: -3.8 pts/100
CSU Northridge has the ball
OffenseDelaware allowsvs D1 avg
51.3% #183
51.5% #185
+0.2 pt/100
17.5% #239
14.0% #334
+1.6 pt/100
31.9% #130
31.1% #206
+0.8 pt/100
34.2% #200
30.2% #62
-0.4 pt/100
66.8% #345
—
-0.5 pt/100
CSU Northridge net across the four factors + FT%, vs. a D1-average matchup: +1.7 pts/100

Shot diet

Where each offense shoots from and where each defense lets teams shoot · 2025-26 numbers
Delawareoffense vsCSU Northridgedefense
Share of shots by zone
Delaware shoots
CSU Northridge allows
D-I average
FG% by zone
ZoneD-I avg
Rim58.4%#17958.4%#16258.6%
Short 2 (≤9 ft)39.6%#18537.4%#12239.5%
Mid 2 (10 ft+)39.0%#14440.2%#24838.0%
Three36.8%#3134.4%#21033.7%
CSU Northridgeoffense vsDelawaredefense
Share of shots by zone
CSU Northridge shoots
Delaware allows
D-I average
FG% by zone
ZoneD-I avg
Rim58.0%#19459.3%#20658.6%
Short 2 (≤9 ft)32.7%#31938.0%#13639.5%
Mid 2 (10 ft+)41.9%#6236.1%#11238.0%
Three32.4%#26035.1%#25533.7%
RimShort 2 (≤9 ft)Mid 2 (10 ft+)Three

Zones from play-by-play shot descriptions; garbage time removed. Bars show the share of field-goal attempts in each zone; where a slice is too thin for its number, the shares are listed under the bar. FG% ranks: #1 = best for that side (most accurate shooting, stingiest defense).

Shot volume

Extra scoring chances from rebounds, turnovers and the foul line · 2025-26 numbers
Delaware
−5.9extra scoring chances per game vs a D-I average team#355 of 365
Off reb %
20.8%
#362
Def reb %
68.9%
#206
Turnover %
18.2%
#285
Forced TO %
14.0%
#334
FT rate
30.6%
#291
FT allowed
30.2%
#62
Where the chances come from (per game)
Offensive rebounding−3.1
Defensive rebounding−0.1
Ball security−1.0
Forcing turnovers−1.8
Foul shots drawn−1.1
Foul shots allowed+1.3
CSU Northridge
+1.1extra scoring chances per game vs a D-I average team#133 of 365
Off reb %
31.9%
#130
Def reb %
73.4%
#26
Turnover %
17.5%
#239
Forced TO %
16.4%
#191
FT rate
34.2%
#200
FT allowed
34.3%
#162
Where the chances come from (per game)
Offensive rebounding+0.5
Defensive rebounding+1.3
Ball security−0.5
Forcing turnovers−0.2
Foul shots drawn−0.2
Foul shots allowed+0.2

CSU Northridge has more extra scoring chances per game: +1.1 (#133 of 365) to Delaware’s −5.9 (#355).

Grade = extra shots and foul-line trips per game compared with a D-I average team, built from six season rates. Cell shading is the national rank for each rate (greener = better for that team).

Rotation

Delaware2025-26 numbers
ESPN hasn't posted Delaware's 2026-27 roster yet — these are last season's players.
#PlayerPosClHtGP-GSMPGPPGRPGAPGTOVeFG%3P%3PA/gFT%UsageStatus
00Christian BlissGJr6'4"31-3139.816.75.25.93.151.5%39.2%5.584.8%27.4%
5Macon EmoryFSo6'8"31-3137.111.36.61.21.749.8%28.5%4.975.4%21.0%
4Justyn FernandezGSr6'5"28-2837.416.64.62.13.052.9%40.3%5.787.8%29.6%
20Alex KazaneckiGFr6'6"31-1328.75.12.10.60.657.5%37.1%3.172.2%10.9%
44Tyler HouserFSr6'9"26-2633.314.25.41.71.357.4%38.3%4.181.7%24.6%
11Jayden TaylorFFr6'8"31-1015.33.12.40.20.561.7%33.3%0.461.8%12.4%
15Houston EmoryFSr6'9"24-511.11.71.60.30.672.7%100.0%0.150.0%10.3%
1Mason EllisonGFr6'4"7-121.34.71.30.91.340.6%16.7%1.758.3%18.1%
55Jameel BrownGSr6'4"4-423.59.82.80.81.846.9%42.1%4.875.0%27.8%
35Bouna KebeFSr6'9"14-55.71.21.00.30.142.5%12.5%0.60.0%17.4%
21Nnanna NjokuFSr6'9"2-014.02.01.50.01.014.3%0.0%0.550.0%25.0%
3Cavan ReillyGSr6'4"1-123.03.01.01.02.012.5%0.0%5.050.0%26.2%
10Brandon BaffoneGJr6'1"5-02.80.40.00.20.00.0%—0.0100.0%8.4%
12Alex McFaddenGSo6'1"4-02.31.00.30.30.050.0%—0.050.0%27.4%
14Lance PiperGSo6'6"0-00.00.00.00.00.0——0.0——
Rosters come from ESPN and are still filling in; incoming transfers and freshmen may be missing.

Tale of the tape

national rank toned left for away, right for home
DelawareCSU Northridge
Efficiency
105.2
107.8
112.6
108.9
65.5
72.4
—
—
Shooting
53.3%
51.3%
51.7%
52.6%
36.8%
32.4%
78.6%
66.8%
30.6%
34.2%
Ball control & glass
18.2%
17.5%
14.0%
16.4%
20.8%
31.9%
31.1%
26.6%
11.4%
10.7%
10.4%
10.1%
Style
46.2%
33.6%
36.8%
50.4%
6.9%
14.8%
52.3%
56.6%
15.7%
26.5%
Roster
2.72
3.43
6'6.4"
6'4.8"
—
83.8%

Offseason

roster movement into this season — descriptive, not a model input
Delaware
Returning minutes: 100.0%Returning production: 100.0%
ESPN hasn't posted Delaware's roster for this season yet — no movement to show.

Returns 100% of last season's minutes. Teams returning at least 65% of last season's minutes have historically gained about 2.2 points of AdjEM (n=156 team-seasons, 2022-2026). (ESPN hasn't posted this season's roster yet -- this may still be last season's list.)

CSU Northridge
Returning minutes: 83.8%Returning production: 81.4%
Lost
  • Joshua O'Garro 32.5 mpg, 14.2 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
Added
  • Max Rehl no D1 minutes last season
  • Jalen Barbee no D1 minutes last season
  • Omer Dahan no D1 minutes last season
  • Quinton Webb no D1 minutes last season

No incoming D1 transfers are listed on ESPN's roster yet — until they are, returning shares read high.

Returns 84% of last season's minutes; lost 1 of its top 5. Teams returning at least 65% of last season's minutes have historically gained about 2.2 points of AdjEM (n=156 team-seasons, 2022-2026).

Head-to-head

this season and last
DateSeasonResult
Sat, Dec 132025-26CSU Northridge 88 – 66 Delaware

The CBB Matchups tab lays out the day's Division I slate: matchup, tip time, records and rank, and — once posted — Pinnacle's spread and total (the median across books when Pinnacle has no line). Three views switch the table between projected scores, pace and totals, and each team's offensive and defensive tendencies. Each game opens into opponent-adjusted possessions, efficiency and four-factor tendencies for both teams, plus recent form, rotation and head-to-head history. Every game also carries our projected score, spread and total, built bottom-up from those same numbers: expected possessions times each side's opponent-adjusted points per possession, plus home court.

What these numbers mean: line shopping.