CBB Matchups

Every D1 game with tempo-free ratings, four factors and market lines, one place.

College basketball is being built for the 2026-27 season (tip-off Nov 3). What's here fills in as games are played.
Non-conferenceNeutral siteKoessler Athletic Center, Buffalo, NYQueen City Classic
W Illinois
Efficiency #362
2025-26: 5-26 · 1-19 conf
vs
UAlbany
Efficiency #306
2025-26: 11-21 · 7-10 conf
Fri, Nov 20 · TBD
68.6
win 29%
Projected
75.1
win 71%
No line posted yet.
Model: UALB −6.5 · total 143.6 · ratings as of Sat, Oct 3
Preseason ratings start from 2025-26's final adjusted ratings, regressed toward the D1 average. The stats below are 2025-26's too; both update once 2026-27 games are played.

How the projection is built

each step, from an average D-I game to this one
Projected total
Average D-I game
148.2
PaceAdjusted tempo: UAlbany 67.0, W Illinois 67.7 → 66.4 possessions
−4.2
UAlbany offense vs W Illinois defense
+3.1
W Illinois offense vs UAlbany defense
−3.5
Projected total
143.6
Axis starts at 140 pointsPoints added or removed at each step
Projected margin
Even game
0.0
UAlbany offense vs W Illinois defense
+3.1
W Illinois offense vs UAlbany defense
+3.5
UAlbany by 6.5
6.5
W Illinois side ◂▸ UAlbany side

Steps are rounded to one decimal, so they can differ from the total by 0.1: the margin steps add to +6.6 against +6.5. The margin is the same build seen from the home side; positive numbers help UAlbany.

Pace & total

possessions per 40 minutes
Tempo, possessions per 40 minutes

Projected possessions: 66.4, from each team's opponent-adjusted tempo. On raw 2025-26 season pace, W Illinois is the faster team (67.3, #230 of 365) and UAlbany the slower (65.6, #311). When tempos clash, the slower team usually pulls the pace harder (study weights 0.80 vs 0.66).

Projected possessions
66.4
per team, 40 min
Projected total
143.6
model
Projected team totals
68.6 / 75.1
W Illinois / UAlbany
Adjusted tempo, vs an average opponent
67.7#231
W Illinois
67.0#291
UAlbany

How this game plays

what the study found each side's numbers actually do when these two teams meet
AdvantageW Illinois
Where W Illinois struggles: shooting
W Illinois shoots an effective 44.5% (#361); UAlbany allows 53.2% (#275). Expect about 48.3%, 2.9 points below an average D1 matchup — worth roughly -4.2 points per 100 possessions.
Pace
Half-court grind
UAlbany averages 65.6 possessions per 40, W Illinois 67.3. Slower teams pull the pace toward themselves more than fast teams push it (0.80 vs 0.66 in five seasons of games), so expect about 66 — more possessions mean more points in the total and more chances for the better team to separate.
AdvantageUAlbany
Where UAlbany scores: the offensive glass
UAlbany rebounds 32.7% of its own misses (#99); W Illinois lets opponents grab 34.8% of their own misses (#334). Expect about 34.1%, 3.7 points above an average D1 matchup — worth roughly +2.3 points per 100 possessions.
Watch for noise
3-point caution
A notable season 3-point number here (W Illinois) is close to a coin flip going forward — the study's model of next-game 3P% barely beats guessing the D1 average. Shot volume is what actually carries: expect W Illinois at about 35.2% of its shots from three, UAlbany about 34.9%.
ClashUAlbany
Style match: paint scoring
UAlbany scores 49.5% of its points in the paint; W Illinois gives up 48.8% of opponents' points in the paint (D1 average 42.8%). Expect about 46.5% — both habits push the same way.
W Illinois has the ball
OffenseUAlbany allowsvs D1 avg
44.5% #361
53.2% #275
-4.2 pt/100
17.5% #236
15.8% #230
+0.3 pt/100
27.0% #293
32.4% #277
-0.9 pt/100
37.7% #108
35.7% #202
+0.2 pt/100
66.2% #351
—
-0.5 pt/100
W Illinois net across the four factors + FT%, vs. a D1-average matchup: -5.1 pts/100
UAlbany has the ball
OffenseW Illinois allowsvs D1 avg
51.3% #182
54.2% #303
+2.2 pt/100
18.5% #300
14.9% #297
+0.2 pt/100
32.7% #99
34.8% #334
+2.3 pt/100
24.9% #364
34.8% #173
-0.6 pt/100
65.9% #354
—
-0.6 pt/100
UAlbany net across the four factors + FT%, vs. a D1-average matchup: +3.5 pts/100

Shot diet

Where each offense shoots from and where each defense lets teams shoot · 2025-26 numbers
W Illinoisoffense vsUAlbanydefense
Share of shots by zone
W Illinois shoots
UAlbany allows
D-I average
FG% by zone
ZoneD-I avg
Rim51.3%#35356.9%#11058.6%
Short 2 (≤9 ft)29.0%#35241.3%#21939.5%
Mid 2 (10 ft+)35.0%#29339.6%#22538.0%
Three30.9%#32236.0%#30233.7%
UAlbanyoffense vsW Illinoisdefense
Share of shots by zone
UAlbany shoots
W Illinois allows
D-I average
FG% by zone
ZoneD-I avg
Rim57.1%#22862.3%#30658.6%
Short 2 (≤9 ft)49.0%#1440.5%#20039.5%
Mid 2 (10 ft+)38.9%#14633.7%#4438.0%
Three32.6%#24835.6%#28833.7%
RimShort 2 (≤9 ft)Mid 2 (10 ft+)Three

Zones from play-by-play shot descriptions; garbage time removed. Bars show the share of field-goal attempts in each zone; where a slice is too thin for its number, the shares are listed under the bar. FG% ranks: #1 = best for that side (most accurate shooting, stingiest defense).

Shot volume

Extra scoring chances from rebounds, turnovers and the foul line · 2025-26 numbers
W Illinois
−3.4extra scoring chances per game vs a D-I average team#311 of 365
Off reb %
27.0%
#293
Def reb %
65.2%
#334
Turnover %
17.5%
#236
Forced TO %
14.9%
#297
FT rate
37.7%
#108
FT allowed
34.8%
#173
Where the chances come from (per game)
Offensive rebounding−1.1
Defensive rebounding−1.4
Ball security−0.5
Forcing turnovers−1.2
Foul shots drawn+0.7
Foul shots allowed+0.1
UAlbany
−4.3extra scoring chances per game vs a D-I average team#336 of 365
Off reb %
32.7%
#99
Def reb %
67.6%
#277
Turnover %
18.5%
#300
Forced TO %
15.8%
#230
FT rate
24.9%
#364
FT allowed
35.7%
#202
Where the chances come from (per game)
Offensive rebounding+0.7
Defensive rebounding−0.6
Ball security−1.2
Forcing turnovers−0.6
Foul shots drawn−2.6
Foul shots allowed−0.1

W Illinois has more extra scoring chances per game: −3.4 (#311 of 365) to UAlbany’s −4.3 (#336).

Grade = extra shots and foul-line trips per game compared with a D-I average team, built from six season rates. Cell shading is the national rank for each rate (greener = better for that team).

Rotation

W Illinois2025-26 numbers
ESPN hasn't posted W Illinois's 2026-27 roster yet — these are last season's players.
#PlayerPosClHtGP-GSMPGPPGRPGAPGTOVeFG%3P%3PA/gFT%UsageStatus
3Lucas LorenzenGJr6'4"31-3032.914.74.30.91.848.0%31.5%6.980.2%28.5%
12Isaiah GriffinFSr6'6"31-2028.410.63.41.11.642.0%33.0%2.872.0%26.6%
13Makai KvammeGFr6'2"31-2425.35.02.82.71.337.0%17.2%0.948.0%18.1%
15Francis OkwuosahFSr6'6"31-1922.07.44.00.50.953.0%37.8%3.870.8%20.8%
45Antwaun MasseyFSr6'8"26-2322.68.03.50.91.849.7%66.7%0.148.2%26.0%
22Goanar BiliewFSr6'8"31-1817.34.12.20.20.944.6%38.9%0.656.5%17.7%
5Karyiek DixonFSr6'5"20-1425.38.37.20.70.853.3%9.1%0.672.0%19.3%
0Tyran CookGSo6'2"27-515.84.21.61.30.840.6%16.7%0.784.6%20.2%
23Danny StephensGFr6'5"15-117.25.52.20.51.142.8%26.8%2.773.9%23.9%
2Marcus PigramGJr6'4"17-012.23.31.10.60.640.2%27.3%1.970.0%21.9%
11Ifiok PeterFSo6'6"23-06.72.01.20.00.440.0%—0.052.8%24.3%
50Nick HittleFSr6'10"18-15.71.41.10.10.339.5%100.0%0.168.8%18.7%
14Steven TiptonGSr6'2"14-04.31.30.80.10.446.7%40.0%0.4100.0%22.5%
10Jake EdwardsGFr6'5"11-02.20.00.20.10.00.0%0.0%0.1—5.0%
1Jack RileyFJr6'7"0-00.00.00.00.00.0——0.0——
Rosters come from ESPN and are still filling in; incoming transfers and freshmen may be missing.

Tale of the tape

national rank toned left for away, right for home
W IllinoisUAlbany
Efficiency
98.4
105.5
116.1
113.4
67.7
67.0
—
—
Shooting
44.5%
51.3%
43.5%
52.8%
30.9%
32.6%
66.2%
65.9%
37.7%
24.9%
Ball control & glass
17.5%
18.5%
14.9%
15.8%
27.0%
32.7%
34.8%
32.4%
10.0%
10.4%
11.1%
9.4%
Style
33.3%
37.6%
43.2%
49.5%
11.9%
13.7%
37.0%
48.9%
30.1%
26.3%
Roster
3.10
2.86
6'5.1"
6'5.2"
—
—

Offseason

roster movement into this season — descriptive, not a model input
W Illinois
Returning minutes: 100.0%Returning production: 100.0%
ESPN hasn't posted W Illinois's roster for this season yet — no movement to show.

Returns 100% of last season's minutes. Teams returning at least 65% of last season's minutes have historically gained about 2.2 points of AdjEM (n=156 team-seasons, 2022-2026). (ESPN hasn't posted this season's roster yet -- this may still be last season's list.)

UAlbany
Returning minutes: 100.0%Returning production: 100.0%
ESPN hasn't posted UAlbany's roster for this season yet — no movement to show.

Returns 100% of last season's minutes. Teams returning at least 65% of last season's minutes have historically gained about 2.2 points of AdjEM (n=156 team-seasons, 2022-2026). (ESPN hasn't posted this season's roster yet -- this may still be last season's list.)

Head-to-head

this season and last
No meetings the last two seasons.

The CBB Matchups tab lays out the day's Division I slate: matchup, tip time, records and rank, and — once posted — Pinnacle's spread and total (the median across books when Pinnacle has no line). Three views switch the table between projected scores, pace and totals, and each team's offensive and defensive tendencies. Each game opens into opponent-adjusted possessions, efficiency and four-factor tendencies for both teams, plus recent form, rotation and head-to-head history. Every game also carries our projected score, spread and total, built bottom-up from those same numbers: expected possessions times each side's opponent-adjusted points per possession, plus home court.

What these numbers mean: line shopping.