CBB Matchups
Every D1 game with tempo-free ratings, four factors and market lines, one place.
College basketball is being built for the 2026-27 season (tip-off Nov 3). What's here fills in as games are played.
Non-conferenceCarver Arena, Peoria, IL
Chicago St
Efficiency #342
2025-26: 7-25 · 5-14 conf
@
Bradley
Efficiency #117
2025-26: 21-13 · 14-8 conf
Sat, Nov 28 · TBD
66.2
win 12%
Projected
79.9
win 88%
No line posted yet.
Model: BRAD −13.7 · total 146.0 · ratings as of Sat, Oct 3
Preseason ratings start from 2025-26's final adjusted ratings, regressed toward the D1 average. The stats below are 2025-26's too; both update once 2026-27 games are played.
How the projection is built
each step, from an average D-I game to this oneProjected total
Average D-I game
148.2
PaceAdjusted tempo: Bradley 68.2, Chicago St 67.2 → 67.1 possessions
−2.6
Bradley offense vs Chicago St defense
+5.1
Chicago St offense vs Bradley defense
−4.7
Projected total
146.0
Axis starts at 142 pointsPoints added or removed at each step
Projected margin
Even game
0.0
Bradley offense vs Chicago St defense
+5.1
Chicago St offense vs Bradley defense
+4.7
Home court+2.9 points per 100 possessions to the home offense, −2.9 to the visitors
+3.9
Bradley by 13.7
13.7
Chicago St side ◂▸ Bradley side
Steps are rounded to one decimal, so they can differ from the total by 0.1. The margin is the same build seen from the home side; positive numbers help Bradley.
Pace & total
possessions per 40 minutesTempo, possessions per 40 minutes
Projected possessions: 67.1, from each team's opponent-adjusted tempo. On raw 2025-26 season pace, Bradley is the faster team (67.6, #220 of 365) and Chicago St the slower (65.8, #304). When tempos clash, the slower team usually pulls the pace harder (study weights 0.80 vs 0.66).
Projected possessions
67.1
per team, 40 min
Projected total
146.0
model
Projected team totals
66.2 / 79.9
Chicago St / Bradley
Adjusted tempo, vs an average opponent
67.2#272
Chicago St
68.2#192
Bradley
How this game plays
what the study found each side's numbers actually do when these two teams meetAdvantageBradley
Where Bradley scores: shooting
Bradley shoots an effective 51.1% (#189); Chicago St allows 56.7% (#354). Expect about 53.9%, 2.7 points above an average D1 matchup — worth roughly +3.8 points per 100 possessions.
AdvantageChicago St
Where Chicago St struggles: shooting
Chicago St shoots an effective 45.3% (#358); Bradley allows 52.8% (#259). Expect about 48.6%, 2.7 points below an average D1 matchup — worth roughly -3.8 points per 100 possessions.
Pace
Half-court grind
Bradley averages 67.6 possessions per 40, Chicago St 65.8. Slower teams pull the pace toward themselves more than fast teams push it (0.80 vs 0.66 in five seasons of games), so expect about 66 — more possessions mean more points in the total and more chances for the better team to separate.
Watch for noise
3-point caution
A notable season 3-point number here (Bradley's defense) is close to a coin flip going forward — the study's model of next-game 3P% barely beats guessing the D1 average. Shot volume is what actually carries: expect Chicago St at about 32.9% of its shots from three, Bradley about 47.6%.
GlassChicago St
Chicago St gets out-rebounded
Projected offensive rebound rate of 27.7% is worth roughly -1.7 points per 100 possessions against Chicago St's offense.
ClashBradley
Strength vs strength: live-ball turnovers
Bradley (#6 in live-ball turnovers) against Chicago St (#19 in the same stat allowed) — both rank inside the national top 60. Expect about 10.4%. Historically Chicago St's own number has carried a bit more weight in that exchange (0.40 vs 0.65).
Chicago St has the ball
OffenseBradley allowsvs D1 avg
45.3% #358
52.8% #259
-3.8 pt/100
15.6% #113
19.0% #53
-0.9 pt/100
28.3% #255
27.8% #62
-1.7 pt/100
30.0% #311
38.2% #265
-0.1 pt/100
75.0% #84
—
+0.2 pt/100
Chicago St net across the four factors + FT%, vs. a D1-average matchup: -6.2 pts/100
Bradley has the ball
OffenseChicago St allowsvs D1 avg
51.1% #189
56.7% #354
+3.8 pt/100
13.9% #20
20.1% #20
-0.6 pt/100
27.4% #285
35.0% #339
+0.1 pt/100
35.9% #156
38.0% #261
+0.3 pt/100
74.0% #134
—
+0.1 pt/100
Bradley net across the four factors + FT%, vs. a D1-average matchup: +3.7 pts/100
Shot diet
Where each offense shoots from and where each defense lets teams shoot · 2025-26 numbersChicago Stoffense vsBradleydefense
Share of shots by zone
Chicago St shoots
33.6
8.8
26.8
30.7
Bradley allows
32.8
8.8
19.3
39.2
D-I average
38.5
6.4
15.8
39.3
FG% by zone
| Zone | D-I avg | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Rim | 49.8%#361 | 59.2%#199 | 58.6% |
| Short 2 (≤9 ft) | 39.0%#195 | 36.2%#94 | 39.5% |
| Mid 2 (10 ft+) | 36.8%#232 | 44.3%#343 | 38.0% |
| Three | 32.1%#275 | 36.6%#334 | 33.7% |
Bradleyoffense vsChicago Stdefense
Share of shots by zone
Bradley shoots
34.4
9.5
15.9
40.2
Chicago St allows
37.0
4.0
8.8
50.2
D-I average
38.5
6.4
15.8
39.3
FG% by zone
| Zone | D-I avg | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Rim | 58.7%#173 | 64.9%#350 | 58.6% |
| Short 2 (≤9 ft) | 35.1%#287 | 31.0%#19 | 39.5% |
| Mid 2 (10 ft+) | 34.7%#296 | 44.1%#341 | 38.0% |
| Three | 36.1%#53 | 35.6%#290 | 33.7% |
RimShort 2 (≤9 ft)Mid 2 (10 ft+)Three
Zones from play-by-play shot descriptions; garbage time removed. Bars show the share of field-goal attempts in each zone; where a slice is too thin for its number, the shares are listed under the bar. FG% ranks: #1 = best for that side (most accurate shooting, stingiest defense).
Shot volume
Extra scoring chances from rebounds, turnovers and the foul line · 2025-26 numbersChicago St
−1.0extra scoring chances per game vs a D-I average team#232 of 365
Off reb %
28.3%
#255
Def reb %
65.0%
#339
Turnover %
15.6%
#113
Forced TO %
20.1%
#20
FT rate
30.0%
#311
FT allowed
38.0%
#261
Where the chances come from (per game)
Offensive rebounding−0.7
Defensive rebounding−1.4
Ball security+0.8
Forcing turnovers+2.3
Foul shots drawn−1.3
Foul shots allowed−0.7
Bradley
+2.9extra scoring chances per game vs a D-I average team#58 of 365
Off reb %
27.4%
#285
Def reb %
72.2%
#62
Turnover %
13.9%
#20
Forced TO %
19.0%
#53
FT rate
35.9%
#156
FT allowed
38.2%
#265
Where the chances come from (per game)
Offensive rebounding−1.0
Defensive rebounding+0.9
Ball security+1.9
Forcing turnovers+1.5
Foul shots drawn+0.2
Foul shots allowed−0.8
Bradley has more extra scoring chances per game: +2.9 (#58 of 365) to Chicago St’s −1.0 (#232).
Grade = extra shots and foul-line trips per game compared with a D-I average team, built from six season rates. Cell shading is the national rank for each rate (greener = better for that team).
Rotation
Chicago St2025-26 numbers
ESPN hasn't posted Chicago St's 2026-27 roster yet — these are last season's players.
| # | Player | Pos | Cl | Ht | GP-GS | MPG | PPG | RPG | APG | TOV | eFG% | 3P% | 3PA/g | FT% | Usage | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 23 | CJ Ray | F | Sr | 6'6" | 32-27 | 31.1 | 13.5 | 4.7 | 1.5 | 1.3 | 47.8% | 37.2% | 3.5 | 85.2% | 28.3% | |
| 4 | Marcus Tankersley | G | Sr | 6'5" | 30-29 | 30.6 | 13.0 | 3.1 | 2.5 | 2.0 | 46.5% | 23.3% | 1.0 | 65.6% | 29.9% | |
| 3 | Doyel Cockrill III | G | Jr | 6'2" | 28-9 | 24.4 | 11.8 | 2.6 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 49.4% | 36.4% | 5.8 | 83.3% | 29.7% | |
| 21 | Braelon Bush | G | Sr | 5'9" | 26-9 | 25.9 | 8.5 | 1.9 | 3.1 | 1.4 | 45.6% | 27.7% | 3.9 | 91.9% | 23.3% | |
| 10 | Corey Sands | G | Sr | 6'4" | 30-20 | 17.4 | 2.8 | 1.9 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 39.4% | 25.8% | 2.1 | 73.3% | 13.1% | |
| 8 | Stephen Byard | F | Sr | 6'8" | 22-9 | 22.6 | 9.8 | 4.8 | 0.8 | 1.4 | 48.3% | 41.7% | 0.5 | 73.4% | 28.7% | |
| 9 | Malek Robinson | G | Fr | 5'11" | 32-22 | 15.4 | 3.0 | 1.6 | 0.9 | 0.8 | 36.5% | 31.8% | 0.7 | 70.4% | 15.8% | |
| 22 | Dailliss Cox | F | Sr | 6'6" | 32-21 | 15.2 | 3.1 | 3.2 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 48.4% | 33.3% | 0.3 | 69.2% | 14.0% | |
| 15 | Joseph Owens | F | Sr | 6'7" | 26-2 | 11.2 | 2.1 | 2.2 | 0.2 | 0.6 | 53.7% | — | 0.0 | 62.5% | 13.5% | |
| 11 | Lionel Larvadain III | G | So | 6'0" | 21-1 | 11.2 | 2.8 | 1.1 | 0.7 | 1.0 | 31.6% | 20.0% | 0.7 | 71.4% | 24.4% | |
| 5 | Chauncey Gibson | G | Jr | 6'7" | 15-4 | 15.5 | 4.9 | 2.3 | 1.2 | 1.1 | 37.8% | 26.4% | 3.5 | 42.9% | 30.0% | |
| 6 | Daniel Zatsepin | F | Jr | 6'4" | 25-2 | 8.7 | 0.9 | 1.4 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 35.2% | 50.0% | 0.1 | 50.0% | 10.1% | |
| 25 | Dakari Thomas | G | So | 6'1" | 19-0 | 5.0 | 0.7 | 0.6 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 42.9% | — | 0.0 | 63.6% | 8.3% | |
| 20 | CJ Delancy | F | Sr | 6'9" | 6-2 | 9.2 | 1.7 | 1.8 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 44.4% | — | 0.0 | 100.0% | 12.4% | |
| 1 | Deshawn Jean-Charles | G | Sr | 6'7" | 4-3 | 8.5 | 0.8 | 1.3 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.0% | — | 0.0 | 75.0% | 7.7% | |
| 12 | DaJuan Bates | G | Jr | 6'2" | 0-0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | — | 0.0 | — | — | |
| 0 | Greg Spate | G | Jr | 6'7" | 0-0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | — | 0.0 | — | — |
Rosters come from ESPN and are still filling in; incoming transfers and freshmen may be missing.
Bradley2025-26 numbers
ESPN hasn't posted Bradley's 2026-27 roster yet — these are last season's players.
| # | Player | Pos | Cl | Ht | GP-GS | MPG | PPG | RPG | APG | TOV | eFG% | 3P% | 3PA/g | FT% | Usage | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | Alex Huibregtse | G | Sr | 6'4" | 34-34 | 31.2 | 12.8 | 3.1 | 1.7 | 1.0 | 59.3% | 43.3% | 7.0 | 84.4% | 21.7% | |
| 22 | Jaquan Johnson | G | So | 5'11" | 34-34 | 30.4 | 16.9 | 3.9 | 3.6 | 1.4 | 48.9% | 38.3% | 4.1 | 78.4% | 32.2% | |
| 21 | AJ Smith | F | Sr | 6'7" | 34-32 | 25.7 | 8.4 | 5.4 | 1.3 | 1.0 | 51.2% | 37.2% | 2.8 | 72.2% | 19.8% | |
| 14 | Ahmet Jonovic | C | Sr | 7'1" | 34-33 | 24.7 | 8.1 | 5.3 | 1.4 | 1.5 | 53.3% | 20.0% | 0.1 | 75.0% | 20.2% | |
| 10 | Timoty van der Knaap | G | So | 6'8" | 34-11 | 22.9 | 6.5 | 4.8 | 0.4 | 0.8 | 46.8% | 23.1% | 1.9 | 65.2% | 18.8% | |
| 7 | Montana Wheeler | G | Fr | 5'10" | 34-0 | 22.3 | 8.5 | 1.1 | 2.8 | 1.0 | 50.0% | 33.7% | 3.1 | 71.2% | 23.8% | |
| 4 | Corey Thomas | F | Sr | 6'10" | 34-10 | 18.4 | 5.4 | 3.6 | 0.8 | 0.7 | 57.1% | 32.8% | 1.8 | 75.0% | 16.7% | |
| 0 | Demarion Burch | G | Jr | 6'4" | 26-16 | 23.0 | 8.8 | 2.2 | 1.0 | 0.9 | 46.2% | 31.3% | 3.1 | 58.5% | 25.7% | |
| 12 | Kai Yu | C | So | 7'0" | 29-0 | 8.3 | 2.7 | 1.9 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 50.8% | 27.8% | 0.6 | 69.6% | 20.3% | |
| 1 | Dietrich Richardson | G | Fr | 6'7" | 18-0 | 7.2 | 2.3 | 0.8 | 0.5 | 1.1 | 37.8% | 9.1% | 0.6 | 62.5% | 31.0% | |
| 5 | Matthew Zobrist | G | Fr | 6'5" | 13-0 | 5.0 | 1.5 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 41.7% | 25.0% | 0.6 | 81.8% | 17.4% | |
| 13 | Handy Toussaint III | F | Jr | 6'8" | 5-0 | 2.2 | 0.0 | 0.8 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0% | — | 0.0 | 0.0% | 9.9% | |
| 23 | Gus Rugaard | G | So | 6'1" | 7-0 | 1.4 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.3 | — | 11.5% | |
| 17 | Gustavo Guimares | C | Fr | 6'11" | 0-0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | — | 0.0 | — | — | |
| 9 | Jackson Seastrunk | G | Fr | 6'5" | 0-0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | — | 0.0 | — | — |
Rosters come from ESPN and are still filling in; incoming transfers and freshmen may be missing.
Chicago St2025-26 numbers
ESPN hasn't posted Chicago St's 2026-27 roster yet — these are last season's players.
| # | Player | Pos | Cl | Ht | GP-GS | MPG | PPG | RPG | APG | TOV | eFG% | 3P% | 3PA/g | FT% | Usage | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 23 | CJ Ray | F | Sr | 6'6" | 32-27 | 31.1 | 13.5 | 4.7 | 1.5 | 1.3 | 47.8% | 37.2% | 3.5 | 85.2% | 28.3% | |
| 4 | Marcus Tankersley | G | Sr | 6'5" | 30-29 | 30.6 | 13.0 | 3.1 | 2.5 | 2.0 | 46.5% | 23.3% | 1.0 | 65.6% | 29.9% | |
| 3 | Doyel Cockrill III | G | Jr | 6'2" | 28-9 | 24.4 | 11.8 | 2.6 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 49.4% | 36.4% | 5.8 | 83.3% | 29.7% | |
| 21 | Braelon Bush | G | Sr | 5'9" | 26-9 | 25.9 | 8.5 | 1.9 | 3.1 | 1.4 | 45.6% | 27.7% | 3.9 | 91.9% | 23.3% | |
| 10 | Corey Sands | G | Sr | 6'4" | 30-20 | 17.4 | 2.8 | 1.9 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 39.4% | 25.8% | 2.1 | 73.3% | 13.1% | |
| 8 | Stephen Byard | F | Sr | 6'8" | 22-9 | 22.6 | 9.8 | 4.8 | 0.8 | 1.4 | 48.3% | 41.7% | 0.5 | 73.4% | 28.7% | |
| 9 | Malek Robinson | G | Fr | 5'11" | 32-22 | 15.4 | 3.0 | 1.6 | 0.9 | 0.8 | 36.5% | 31.8% | 0.7 | 70.4% | 15.8% | |
| 22 | Dailliss Cox | F | Sr | 6'6" | 32-21 | 15.2 | 3.1 | 3.2 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 48.4% | 33.3% | 0.3 | 69.2% | 14.0% | |
| 15 | Joseph Owens | F | Sr | 6'7" | 26-2 | 11.2 | 2.1 | 2.2 | 0.2 | 0.6 | 53.7% | — | 0.0 | 62.5% | 13.5% | |
| 11 | Lionel Larvadain III | G | So | 6'0" | 21-1 | 11.2 | 2.8 | 1.1 | 0.7 | 1.0 | 31.6% | 20.0% | 0.7 | 71.4% | 24.4% | |
| 5 | Chauncey Gibson | G | Jr | 6'7" | 15-4 | 15.5 | 4.9 | 2.3 | 1.2 | 1.1 | 37.8% | 26.4% | 3.5 | 42.9% | 30.0% | |
| 6 | Daniel Zatsepin | F | Jr | 6'4" | 25-2 | 8.7 | 0.9 | 1.4 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 35.2% | 50.0% | 0.1 | 50.0% | 10.1% | |
| 25 | Dakari Thomas | G | So | 6'1" | 19-0 | 5.0 | 0.7 | 0.6 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 42.9% | — | 0.0 | 63.6% | 8.3% | |
| 20 | CJ Delancy | F | Sr | 6'9" | 6-2 | 9.2 | 1.7 | 1.8 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 44.4% | — | 0.0 | 100.0% | 12.4% | |
| 1 | Deshawn Jean-Charles | G | Sr | 6'7" | 4-3 | 8.5 | 0.8 | 1.3 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.0% | — | 0.0 | 75.0% | 7.7% | |
| 12 | DaJuan Bates | G | Jr | 6'2" | 0-0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | — | 0.0 | — | — | |
| 0 | Greg Spate | G | Jr | 6'7" | 0-0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | — | 0.0 | — | — |
Rosters come from ESPN and are still filling in; incoming transfers and freshmen may be missing.
Trends
Last 10 games of 2025-26Chicago St
Against the spread
Season
14-16-1
Home
6-4
Road
8-12-1
Last 10
6-4
avg cover +2.5
Covered the last gameCovered 5 of 9 as an underdog
Over / under
Season
15-16
Home
3-7
Road
12-9
Last 10
4-6
avg vs total −2.1
Over 2 straightOver in 3 of 9 as an underdog
Last 10 games, newest first
| Date | Opponent | Site | Result | Total | PPP for | PPP vs | Pace | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 4 | Long Island | A | L 75–79 | +11.0 | W+7.0 | 138.0 | O154 | 122.2 | 128.7 | 61.4 |
| Feb 28 | Wagner | A | L 61–80 | +5.0 | L−14.0 | 135.5 | O141 | 88.6 | 116.2 | 68.9 |
| Feb 26 | Long Island | A | L 56–73 | +11.5 | L−5.5 | 140.0 | U129 | 85.8 | 111.9 | 65.3 |
| Feb 21 | C Connecticut | H | W 70–51 | +3.0 | W+22.0 | 138.5 | U121 | 113.1 | 82.4 | 61.9 |
| Feb 19 | FDU | H | L 59–60 | +2.0 | W+1.0 | 132.0 | U119 | 111.6 | 113.5 | 52.9 |
| Feb 14 | Le Moyne | A | L 63–81 | +7.0 | L−11.0 | 146.0 | U144 | 91.5 | 117.6 | 68.9 |
| Feb 12 | Stonehill | H | W 68–55 | +1.5 | W+14.5 | 132.5 | U123 | 121.5 | 98.3 | 56.0 |
| Feb 9 | Saint Francis Red Wolves | H | W 80–75 | −3.0 | W+2.0 | 145.5 | O155 | 112.7 | 105.7 | 71.0 |
| Feb 7 | New Haven | A | W 63–57 | +5.5 | W+11.5 | 127.5 | U120 | 106.9 | 96.8 | 58.9 |
| Feb 5 | C Connecticut | A | L 67–78 | +9.0 | L−2.0 | 137.0 | O145 | 107.5 | 125.1 | 62.3 |
Bradley
Against the spread
Season
14-19
Home
7-9
Road
3-8
Last 10
6-4
avg cover +0.6
Missed the spread in the last gameCovered 3 of 4 as a favoriteCovered 3 of 6 as an underdog
Over / under
Season
20-13
Home
9-7
Road
7-4
Last 10
7-3
avg vs total +8.2
Over 5 straightOver in 3 of 4 as a favoriteOver in 4 of 6 as an underdog
Last 10 games, newest first
| Date | Opponent | Site | Result | Total | PPP for | PPP vs | Pace | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 18 | Dayton | H | L 66–80 | +2.5 | L−11.5 | 141.0 | O146 | 110.4 | 133.9 | 59.8 |
| Mar 7 | Northern Iowa | N | L 69–73 | +4.5 | W+0.5 | 126.5 | O142 | 108.9 | 115.3 | 63.3 |
| Mar 6 | Valparaiso | N | W 90–84 2OT | −5.0 | W+1.0 | 138.5 | O174 | 102.6 | 95.8 | 87.7 |
| Mar 1 | Murray St | H | W 87–78 | −4.0 | W+5.0 | 158.0 | O165 | 129.4 | 116.0 | 67.2 |
| Feb 24 | UIC | A | L 86–93 2OT | +2.0 | L−5.0 | 142.0 | O179 | 109.8 | 118.8 | 78.3 |
| Feb 21 | Illinois St | H | W 74–60 | −4.5 | W+9.5 | 144.5 | U134 | 115.3 | 93.5 | 64.2 |
| Feb 18 | Valparaiso | A | L 72–79 | −2.5 | L−9.5 | 142.5 | O151 | 108.5 | 119.0 | 66.4 |
| Feb 15 | S Illinois | A | W 70–60 | +2.5 | W+12.5 | 147.0 | U130 | 101.2 | 86.8 | 69.2 |
| Feb 9 | Belmont | H | W 95–84 OT | +1.0 | W+12.0 | 153.0 | O179 | 122.8 | 108.6 | 77.4 |
| Feb 6 | Northern Iowa | A | L 49–61 | +3.5 | L−8.5 | 134.5 | U110 | 82.1 | 102.3 | 59.6 |
Records vs the closing line describe the past; ten games is a small sample.
Tale of the tape
national rank toned left for away, right for homeChicago StBradley
Efficiency
102.4
110.2
114.4
107.5
67.2
68.2
—
—
Shooting
45.3%
51.1%
44.0%
49.1%
32.1%
36.1%
75.0%
74.0%
30.0%
35.9%
Ball control & glass
15.6%
13.9%
20.1%
19.0%
28.3%
27.4%
35.0%
27.8%
8.4%
7.1%
8.7%
8.8%
Style
30.9%
40.5%
41.8%
39.4%
11.7%
12.0%
50.3%
50.8%
39.8%
33.2%
Roster
3.49
2.92
6'3.7"
6'5.4"
—
—
Offseason
roster movement into this season — descriptive, not a model inputChicago St
Returning minutes: 100.0%Returning production: 100.0%
ESPN hasn't posted Chicago St's roster for this season yet — no movement to show.
Returns 100% of last season's minutes. Teams returning at least 65% of last season's minutes have historically gained about 2.2 points of AdjEM (n=156 team-seasons, 2022-2026). (ESPN hasn't posted this season's roster yet -- this may still be last season's list.)
Bradley
Returning minutes: 100.0%Returning production: 100.0%
ESPN hasn't posted Bradley's roster for this season yet — no movement to show.
Returns 100% of last season's minutes. Teams returning at least 65% of last season's minutes have historically gained about 2.2 points of AdjEM (n=156 team-seasons, 2022-2026). (ESPN hasn't posted this season's roster yet -- this may still be last season's list.)
Head-to-head
this season and lastNo meetings the last two seasons.
The CBB Matchups tab lays out the day's Division I slate: matchup, tip time, records and rank, and — once posted — Pinnacle's spread and total (the median across books when Pinnacle has no line). Three views switch the table between projected scores, pace and totals, and each team's offensive and defensive tendencies. Each game opens into opponent-adjusted possessions, efficiency and four-factor tendencies for both teams, plus recent form, rotation and head-to-head history. Every game also carries our projected score, spread and total, built bottom-up from those same numbers: expected possessions times each side's opponent-adjusted points per possession, plus home court.
What these numbers mean: line shopping.