CBB Matchups
Every D1 game with tempo-free ratings, four factors and market lines, one place.
College basketball is being built for the 2026-27 season (tip-off Nov 3). What's here fills in as games are played.
Non-conferenceRedhawk Center, Seattle, WA
UC Irvine
Efficiency #105
2025-26: 23-12 · 16-6 conf
@
Seattle U
Efficiency #125
2025-26: 21-14 · 9-11 conf
Sat, Nov 28 · TBD
65.9
win 39%
Projected
69.1
win 61%
No line posted yet.
Model: SEA −3.2 · total 135.0 · ratings as of Sat, Oct 3
Preseason ratings start from 2025-26's final adjusted ratings, regressed toward the D1 average. The stats below are 2025-26's too; both update once 2026-27 games are played.
How the projection is built
each step, from an average D-I game to this oneProjected total
Average D-I game
148.2
PaceAdjusted tempo: Seattle U 68.7, UC Irvine 68.9 → 69.3 possessions
+2.1
Seattle U offense vs UC Irvine defense
−8.1
UC Irvine offense vs Seattle U defense
−7.3
Projected total
135.0
Axis starts at 120 pointsPoints added or removed at each step
Projected margin
Even game
0.0
Seattle U offense vs UC Irvine defense
−8.1
UC Irvine offense vs Seattle U defense
+7.3
Home court+2.9 points per 100 possessions to the home offense, −2.9 to the visitors
+4.0
Seattle U by 3.2
3.2
UC Irvine side ◂▸ Seattle U side
Steps are rounded to one decimal, so they can differ from the total by 0.1: the total steps add to 134.9 against a projected 135.0. The margin is the same build seen from the home side; positive numbers help Seattle U.
Pace & total
possessions per 40 minutesTempo, possessions per 40 minutes
Projected possessions: 69.3, from each team's opponent-adjusted tempo. On raw 2025-26 season pace, UC Irvine is the faster team (70.7, #63 of 365) and Seattle U the slower (68.8, #160). When tempos clash, the slower team usually pulls the pace harder (study weights 0.80 vs 0.66).
Projected possessions
69.3
per team, 40 min
Projected total
135.0
model
Projected team totals
65.9 / 69.1
UC Irvine / Seattle U
Adjusted tempo, vs an average opponent
68.9#129
UC Irvine
68.7#150
Seattle U
How this game plays
what the study found each side's numbers actually do when these two teams meetAdvantageSeattle U
Where Seattle U struggles: shooting
Seattle U shoots an effective 49.8% (#249); UC Irvine allows 45.9% (#9). Expect about 47.7%, 3.6 points below an average D1 matchup — worth roughly -5.1 points per 100 possessions.
AdvantageUC Irvine
Where UC Irvine struggles: ball control
UC Irvine turns it over on 17.8% of possessions (#258); Seattle U forces turnovers on 21.1% of opponent possessions (#9). Expect about 20.1%, 3.4 points above an average D1 matchup — worth roughly -4.1 points per 100 possessions.
DefenseUC Irvine
UC Irvine's shot-blocking
UC Irvine ranks #11 nationally in block rate — one of the few defensive numbers that travels. Expect about 13.1% of Seattle U's two-point attempts to get blocked against this defense.
DefenseSeattle U
Seattle U's shot-blocking
Seattle U ranks #14 nationally in block rate — one of the few defensive numbers that travels. Expect about 12.4% of UC Irvine's two-point attempts to get blocked against this defense.
GlassSeattle U
Seattle U gets out-rebounded
Projected offensive rebound rate of 26.1% is worth roughly -2.6 points per 100 possessions against Seattle U's offense.
TurnoversSeattle U
Seattle U turns it over
Projected turnover rate of 18.0% is worth roughly -1.6 points per 100 possessions against Seattle U's offense.
UC Irvine has the ball
OffenseSeattle U allowsvs D1 avg
49.5% #268
48.4% #46
-3.6 pt/100
17.8% #258
21.1% #9
-4.1 pt/100
31.0% #166
31.8% #249
+0.6 pt/100
35.9% #152
33.0% #131
-0.1 pt/100
69.7% #276
—
-0.2 pt/100
UC Irvine net across the four factors + FT%, vs. a D1-average matchup: -7.4 pts/100
Seattle U has the ball
OffenseUC Irvine allowsvs D1 avg
49.8% #249
45.9% #9
-5.1 pt/100
16.8% #183
18.8% #59
-1.6 pt/100
23.7% #347
31.2% #213
-2.6 pt/100
34.2% #201
26.7% #18
-0.7 pt/100
70.6% #252
—
-0.2 pt/100
Seattle U net across the four factors + FT%, vs. a D1-average matchup: -10.1 pts/100
Shot diet
Where each offense shoots from and where each defense lets teams shoot · 2025-26 numbersUC Irvineoffense vsSeattle Udefense
Share of shots by zone
UC Irvine shoots
44.1
8.7
20.1
27.1
Seattle U allows
38.4
8.8
15.3
37.5
D-I average
38.5
6.4
15.8
39.3
FG% by zone
| Zone | D-I avg | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Rim | 54.5%#312 | 53.2%#26 | 58.6% |
| Short 2 (≤9 ft) | 47.2%#38 | 39.6%#180 | 39.5% |
| Mid 2 (10 ft+) | 37.3%#213 | 40.7%#267 | 38.0% |
| Three | 33.6%#191 | 32.1%#69 | 33.7% |
Seattle Uoffense vsUC Irvinedefense
Share of shots by zone
Seattle U shoots
39.2
7.3
14.0
39.5
UC Irvine allows
38.6
7.5
16.0
38.0
D-I average
38.5
6.4
15.8
39.3
FG% by zone
| Zone | D-I avg | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Rim | 56.3%#262 | 46.5%#1 | 58.6% |
| Short 2 (≤9 ft) | 40.8%#151 | 38.0%#135 | 39.5% |
| Mid 2 (10 ft+) | 36.0%#263 | 35.6%#95 | 38.0% |
| Three | 33.7%#186 | 33.7%#167 | 33.7% |
RimShort 2 (≤9 ft)Mid 2 (10 ft+)Three
Zones from play-by-play shot descriptions; garbage time removed. Bars show the share of field-goal attempts in each zone; where a slice is too thin for its number, the shares are listed under the bar. FG% ranks: #1 = best for that side (most accurate shooting, stingiest defense).
Shot volume
Extra scoring chances from rebounds, turnovers and the foul line · 2025-26 numbersUC Irvine
+3.1extra scoring chances per game vs a D-I average team#52 of 365
Off reb %
31.0%
#166
Def reb %
68.8%
#213
Turnover %
17.8%
#258
Forced TO %
18.8%
#59
FT rate
35.9%
#152
FT allowed
26.7%
#18
Where the chances come from (per game)
Offensive rebounding+0.2
Defensive rebounding−0.2
Ball security−0.7
Forcing turnovers+1.4
Foul shots drawn+0.2
Foul shots allowed+2.2
Seattle U
+0.9extra scoring chances per game vs a D-I average team#145 of 365
Off reb %
23.7%
#347
Def reb %
68.2%
#249
Turnover %
16.8%
#183
Forced TO %
21.1%
#9
FT rate
34.2%
#201
FT allowed
33.0%
#131
Where the chances come from (per game)
Offensive rebounding−2.2
Defensive rebounding−0.4
Ball security0.0
Forcing turnovers+3.0
Foul shots drawn−0.2
Foul shots allowed+0.6
UC Irvine has more extra scoring chances per game: +3.1 (#52 of 365) to Seattle U’s +0.9 (#145).
Grade = extra shots and foul-line trips per game compared with a D-I average team, built from six season rates. Cell shading is the national rank for each rate (greener = better for that team).
Rotation
UC Irvine2025-26 numbers
ESPN hasn't posted UC Irvine's 2026-27 roster yet — these are last season's players.
| # | Player | Pos | Cl | Ht | GP-GS | MPG | PPG | RPG | APG | TOV | eFG% | 3P% | 3PA/g | FT% | Usage | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 24 | Jurian Dixon | G | So | 6'4" | 35-35 | 30.4 | 15.9 | 3.6 | 2.5 | 1.5 | 50.5% | 38.5% | 5.2 | 79.5% | 29.9% | |
| 13 | Derin Saran | G | So | 6'5" | 35-35 | 29.7 | 11.5 | 5.3 | 3.4 | 2.2 | 43.6% | 26.5% | 2.8 | 68.5% | 27.4% | |
| 14 | Kyle Evans | F | Sr | 6'10" | 35-35 | 28.6 | 12.1 | 8.7 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 62.3% | 20.0% | 0.3 | 78.8% | 19.9% | |
| 6 | Tama Isaac | G | Fr | 6'2" | 35-35 | 26.8 | 6.3 | 3.2 | 3.8 | 2.1 | 43.9% | 31.9% | 2.1 | 68.4% | 17.8% | |
| 4 | Andre Henry | G | Sr | 6'4" | 31-0 | 22.5 | 9.9 | 2.5 | 1.1 | 0.9 | 52.5% | 36.4% | 3.5 | 82.1% | 24.3% | |
| 2 | Harrison Carrington | F | Jr | 6'7" | 35-1 | 17.0 | 8.5 | 3.8 | 0.9 | 0.7 | 59.4% | 36.4% | 0.3 | 67.3% | 24.6% | |
| 9 | Jovan Jester Jr. | G | Fr | 6'4" | 35-0 | 16.1 | 6.5 | 2.8 | 2.3 | 2.1 | 51.2% | 37.5% | 1.8 | 67.5% | 27.6% | |
| 3 | Elijah Chol | F | Jr | 7'0" | 26-17 | 16.6 | 4.6 | 3.3 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 51.5% | 33.3% | 1.0 | 46.3% | 16.8% | |
| 43 | Akiva McBirney-Griffin | F | Jr | 6'9" | 34-16 | 9.9 | 2.4 | 2.1 | 0.4 | 0.8 | 40.9% | 0.0% | 0.3 | 63.4% | 18.5% | |
| 23 | Nes Emeneke | F | Fr | 6'10" | 35-0 | 8.1 | 1.3 | 2.4 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 43.6% | — | 0.0 | 35.7% | 12.2% | |
| 5 | Ben Egbo | G | So | 6'4" | 17-1 | 6.0 | 1.0 | 0.9 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 57.1% | 0.0% | 0.1 | 25.0% | 11.1% | |
| 27 | Tishan Ahir | G | So | 6'0" | 9-0 | 2.3 | 1.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 41.7% | 28.6% | 0.8 | 50.0% | 33.0% | |
| 0 | Bryce Goldman | G | Fr | 6'6" | 0-0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | — | 0.0 | — | — | |
| 7 | Joshua Palmer | G | Fr | 6'4" | 0-0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | — | 0.0 | — | — | |
| 21 | Langston Redfield | G | Sr | 6'4" | 0-0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | — | 0.0 | — | — | |
| 8 | Luke Isaak | G | Fr | 6'3" | 0-0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | — | 0.0 | — | — | |
| 55 | Mason Hodges | F | Fr | 6'7" | 0-0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | — | 0.0 | — | — | |
| 1 | Torian Lee | G | So | 6'0" | 0-0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | — | 0.0 | — | — |
Rosters come from ESPN and are still filling in; incoming transfers and freshmen may be missing.
Seattle U2025-26 numbers
ESPN hasn't posted Seattle U's 2026-27 roster yet — these are last season's players.
| # | Player | Pos | Cl | Ht | GP-GS | MPG | PPG | RPG | APG | TOV | eFG% | 3P% | 3PA/g | FT% | Usage | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 21 | Junseok Yeo | F | Sr | 6'8" | 34-34 | 30.8 | 12.0 | 4.0 | 1.6 | 2.0 | 51.2% | 29.5% | 5.2 | 69.6% | 24.5% | |
| 15 | Will Heimbrodt | F | So | 6'7" | 34-33 | 30.8 | 12.3 | 5.2 | 2.2 | 2.4 | 44.9% | 29.7% | 1.9 | 59.3% | 28.7% | |
| 1 | Maleek Arington | G | Sr | 6'3" | 35-35 | 29.6 | 4.7 | 3.1 | 3.9 | 1.4 | 36.3% | 32.1% | 1.5 | 75.6% | 12.5% | |
| 0 | Brayden Maldonado | G | Sr | 6'0" | 32-32 | 30.6 | 14.7 | 3.4 | 2.8 | 1.6 | 51.8% | 37.8% | 6.5 | 88.7% | 27.5% | |
| 34 | Austin Maurer | C | So | 7'0" | 35-25 | 17.9 | 7.2 | 4.7 | 0.5 | 0.8 | 55.0% | 25.6% | 1.1 | 72.4% | 22.6% | |
| 11 | John Christofilis | G | Sr | 6'3" | 35-2 | 16.5 | 6.5 | 1.1 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 53.4% | 38.7% | 3.5 | 83.3% | 21.3% | |
| 5 | Jojo Murphy | G | Sr | 6'2" | 35-4 | 15.5 | 5.9 | 2.3 | 1.4 | 0.7 | 48.9% | 34.5% | 2.5 | 79.5% | 23.7% | |
| 6 | Houran Dan | C | So | 6'10" | 35-10 | 15.0 | 5.7 | 2.5 | 0.3 | 1.0 | 58.8% | — | 0.0 | 64.5% | 22.3% | |
| 2 | Miles Amos | G | Jr | 6'2" | 30-0 | 11.0 | 1.9 | 1.6 | 0.6 | 0.8 | 55.0% | 46.2% | 0.4 | 50.0% | 13.2% | |
| 33 | Brock Felder | F | Jr | 6'8" | 28-0 | 7.3 | 3.1 | 2.3 | 0.1 | 0.4 | 79.6% | 0.0% | 0.0 | 50.0% | 19.0% | |
| 10 | Ray Adams | F | Fr | 6'8" | 5-0 | 10.2 | 3.2 | 2.2 | 1.6 | 0.4 | 38.2% | 25.0% | 0.8 | 60.0% | 22.3% | |
| 25 | Yuto Kawashima | F | Fr | 6'9" | 4-0 | 8.3 | 5.0 | 2.8 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 52.8% | 20.0% | 1.3 | 50.0% | 32.0% | |
| 9 | Stratos Papastavrou | F | Fr | 6'7" | 4-0 | 7.8 | 0.5 | 1.8 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 11.1% | 0.0% | 0.8 | 0.0% | 20.2% | |
| 19 | Eric Zheng | G | So | 5'11" | 0-0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | — | 0.0 | — | — | |
| 7 | Jeremiah Harshman | G | Fr | 6'1" | 0-0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | — | 0.0 | — | — | |
| 14 | JT White | G | Sr | 6'4" | 0-0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | — | 0.0 | — | — |
Rosters come from ESPN and are still filling in; incoming transfers and freshmen may be missing.
UC Irvine2025-26 numbers
ESPN hasn't posted UC Irvine's 2026-27 roster yet — these are last season's players.
| # | Player | Pos | Cl | Ht | GP-GS | MPG | PPG | RPG | APG | TOV | eFG% | 3P% | 3PA/g | FT% | Usage | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 24 | Jurian Dixon | G | So | 6'4" | 35-35 | 30.4 | 15.9 | 3.6 | 2.5 | 1.5 | 50.5% | 38.5% | 5.2 | 79.5% | 29.9% | |
| 13 | Derin Saran | G | So | 6'5" | 35-35 | 29.7 | 11.5 | 5.3 | 3.4 | 2.2 | 43.6% | 26.5% | 2.8 | 68.5% | 27.4% | |
| 14 | Kyle Evans | F | Sr | 6'10" | 35-35 | 28.6 | 12.1 | 8.7 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 62.3% | 20.0% | 0.3 | 78.8% | 19.9% | |
| 6 | Tama Isaac | G | Fr | 6'2" | 35-35 | 26.8 | 6.3 | 3.2 | 3.8 | 2.1 | 43.9% | 31.9% | 2.1 | 68.4% | 17.8% | |
| 4 | Andre Henry | G | Sr | 6'4" | 31-0 | 22.5 | 9.9 | 2.5 | 1.1 | 0.9 | 52.5% | 36.4% | 3.5 | 82.1% | 24.3% | |
| 2 | Harrison Carrington | F | Jr | 6'7" | 35-1 | 17.0 | 8.5 | 3.8 | 0.9 | 0.7 | 59.4% | 36.4% | 0.3 | 67.3% | 24.6% | |
| 9 | Jovan Jester Jr. | G | Fr | 6'4" | 35-0 | 16.1 | 6.5 | 2.8 | 2.3 | 2.1 | 51.2% | 37.5% | 1.8 | 67.5% | 27.6% | |
| 3 | Elijah Chol | F | Jr | 7'0" | 26-17 | 16.6 | 4.6 | 3.3 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 51.5% | 33.3% | 1.0 | 46.3% | 16.8% | |
| 43 | Akiva McBirney-Griffin | F | Jr | 6'9" | 34-16 | 9.9 | 2.4 | 2.1 | 0.4 | 0.8 | 40.9% | 0.0% | 0.3 | 63.4% | 18.5% | |
| 23 | Nes Emeneke | F | Fr | 6'10" | 35-0 | 8.1 | 1.3 | 2.4 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 43.6% | — | 0.0 | 35.7% | 12.2% | |
| 5 | Ben Egbo | G | So | 6'4" | 17-1 | 6.0 | 1.0 | 0.9 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 57.1% | 0.0% | 0.1 | 25.0% | 11.1% | |
| 27 | Tishan Ahir | G | So | 6'0" | 9-0 | 2.3 | 1.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 41.7% | 28.6% | 0.8 | 50.0% | 33.0% | |
| 0 | Bryce Goldman | G | Fr | 6'6" | 0-0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | — | 0.0 | — | — | |
| 7 | Joshua Palmer | G | Fr | 6'4" | 0-0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | — | 0.0 | — | — | |
| 21 | Langston Redfield | G | Sr | 6'4" | 0-0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | — | 0.0 | — | — | |
| 8 | Luke Isaak | G | Fr | 6'3" | 0-0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | — | 0.0 | — | — | |
| 55 | Mason Hodges | F | Fr | 6'7" | 0-0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | — | 0.0 | — | — | |
| 1 | Torian Lee | G | So | 6'0" | 0-0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | — | 0.0 | — | — |
Rosters come from ESPN and are still filling in; incoming transfers and freshmen may be missing.
Trends
Last 10 games of 2025-26UC Irvine
Against the spread
Season
16-15-2
Home
6-8-1
Road
7-5
Last 10
7-3
avg cover +2.8
Missed the spread 2 straightCovered 6 of 9 as a favorite
Over / under
Season
11-21-1
Home
5-10
Road
4-8
Last 10
3-7
avg vs total −1.6
Under 2 straightOver in 3 of 9 as a favorite
Last 10 games, newest first
| Date | Opponent | Site | Result | Total | PPP for | PPP vs | Pace | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 17 | UNLV | H | L 72–75 | −1.0 | L−4.0 | 152.5 | U147 | 97.3 | 101.3 | 74.0 |
| Mar 14 | Hawai'i | N | L 64–71 | −1.5 | L−8.5 | 142.0 | U135 | 90.7 | 100.6 | 70.6 |
| Mar 13 | CSU Northridge | N | W 93–78 | −4.0 | W+11.0 | 153.0 | O171 | 131.7 | 110.4 | 70.6 |
| Mar 7 | UC Davis | H | W 79–69 OT | −8.5 | W+1.5 | 145.0 | O148 | 106.0 | 92.6 | 74.6 |
| Mar 5 | Cal Poly | H | W 107–85 | −9.5 | W+12.5 | 160.5 | O192 | 136.1 | 108.1 | 78.6 |
| Feb 28 | Santa Barbara | H | W 64–60 | −3.5 | W+0.5 | 138.5 | U124 | 96.9 | 90.8 | 66.1 |
| Feb 26 | CSU Northridge | A | W 68–67 | +1.0 | W+2.0 | 154.0 | U135 | 93.0 | 91.7 | 73.1 |
| Feb 21 | UC San Diego | H | L 69–71 | −4.5 | L−6.5 | 143.5 | U140 | 109.0 | 112.2 | 63.3 |
| Feb 19 | Long Beach St | A | W 69–58 | −5.0 | W+6.0 | 143.0 | U127 | 93.6 | 78.7 | 73.7 |
| Feb 14 | Fullerton | H | W 86–65 | −8.0 | W+13.0 | 154.0 | U151 | 117.0 | 88.4 | 73.5 |
Seattle U
Against the spread
Season
15-17-1
Home
9-7
Road
5-7-1
Last 10
7-3
avg cover +3.5
Covered 2 straightCovered 3 of 5 as a favoriteCovered 4 of 5 as an underdog
Over / under
Season
13-20
Home
6-10
Road
6-7
Last 10
5-5
avg vs total −2.8
Over in the last gameOver in 1 of 5 as a favoriteOver in 4 of 5 as an underdog
Last 10 games, newest first
| Date | Opponent | Site | Result | Total | PPP for | PPP vs | Pace | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 22 | Auburn | A | L 85–91 | +14.0 | W+8.0 | 146.0 | O176 | 116.9 | 125.2 | 72.7 |
| Mar 17 | St Thomas | H | W 67–52 | −2.0 | W+13.0 | 145.5 | U119 | 95.5 | 74.2 | 70.1 |
| Mar 7 | Pacific | N | L 58–61 | +1.0 | L−2.0 | 129.5 | U119 | 89.9 | 94.5 | 64.6 |
| Mar 6 | San Diego | N | W 58–56 | −8.0 | L−6.0 | 139.0 | U114 | 94.9 | 91.6 | 61.1 |
| Feb 28 | LMU | A | W 71–66 | +1.0 | W+6.0 | 136.0 | O137 | 112.8 | 104.8 | 63.0 |
| Feb 25 | Pepperdine | A | W 87–80 | −7.5 | L−0.5 | 145.5 | O167 | 124.1 | 114.1 | 70.1 |
| Feb 21 | Portland | H | W 71–59 | −6.5 | W+5.5 | 140.0 | U130 | 103.5 | 86.0 | 68.6 |
| Feb 18 | Saint Mary's | H | L 70–72 | +9.5 | W+7.5 | 133.0 | O142 | 95.7 | 98.4 | 73.1 |
| Feb 15 | Oregon St | H | W 60–50 | −7.0 | W+3.0 | 136.0 | U110 | 93.6 | 78.0 | 64.1 |
| Feb 11 | Santa Clara | A | L 72–84 | +12.5 | W+0.5 | 147.0 | O156 | 105.2 | 122.8 | 68.4 |
Records vs the closing line describe the past; ten games is a small sample.
Tale of the tape
national rank toned left for away, right for homeUC IrvineSeattle U
Efficiency
105.1
103.7
101.6
101.3
68.9
68.7
—
—
Shooting
49.5%
49.8%
49.1%
49.3%
33.6%
33.7%
69.7%
70.6%
35.9%
34.2%
Ball control & glass
17.8%
16.8%
18.8%
21.1%
31.0%
23.7%
31.2%
31.8%
9.1%
9.6%
9.1%
9.4%
Style
28.0%
39.4%
48.9%
43.9%
15.0%
9.9%
55.1%
53.8%
34.8%
30.5%
Roster
2.42
3.25
6'5.9"
6'5.4"
—
—
Offseason
roster movement into this season — descriptive, not a model inputUC Irvine
Returning minutes: 100.0%Returning production: 100.0%
ESPN hasn't posted UC Irvine's roster for this season yet — no movement to show.
Returns 100% of last season's minutes. Teams returning at least 65% of last season's minutes have historically gained about 2.2 points of AdjEM (n=156 team-seasons, 2022-2026). (ESPN hasn't posted this season's roster yet -- this may still be last season's list.)
Seattle U
Returning minutes: 100.0%Returning production: 100.0%
ESPN hasn't posted Seattle U's roster for this season yet — no movement to show.
Returns 100% of last season's minutes. Teams returning at least 65% of last season's minutes have historically gained about 2.2 points of AdjEM (n=156 team-seasons, 2022-2026). (ESPN hasn't posted this season's roster yet -- this may still be last season's list.)
Head-to-head
this season and lastNo meetings the last two seasons.
The CBB Matchups tab lays out the day's Division I slate: matchup, tip time, records and rank, and — once posted — Pinnacle's spread and total (the median across books when Pinnacle has no line). Three views switch the table between projected scores, pace and totals, and each team's offensive and defensive tendencies. Each game opens into opponent-adjusted possessions, efficiency and four-factor tendencies for both teams, plus recent form, rotation and head-to-head history. Every game also carries our projected score, spread and total, built bottom-up from those same numbers: expected possessions times each side's opponent-adjusted points per possession, plus home court.
What these numbers mean: line shopping.