CBB Matchups
Every D1 game with tempo-free ratings, four factors and market lines, one place.
How the projection is built
each step, from an average D-I game to this oneSteps are rounded to one decimal, so they can differ from the total by 0.1. The margin is the same build seen from the home side; positive numbers help Florida.
Pace & total
possessions per 40 minutesProjected possessions: 67.7, from each team's opponent-adjusted tempo. On raw 2025-26 season pace, Florida is the faster team (72.0, #23 of 365) and Jacksonville the slower (65.2, #328). When tempos clash, the slower team usually pulls the pace harder (study weights 0.80 vs 0.66).
How this game plays
what the study found each side's numbers actually do when these two teams meetShot diet
Where each offense shoots from and where each defense lets teams shoot · 2025-26 numbers| Zone | D-I avg | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Rim | 57.1%#235 | 50.6%#5 | 58.6% |
| Short 2 (≤9 ft) | 30.4%#346 | 34.8%#53 | 39.5% |
| Mid 2 (10 ft+) | 40.6%#89 | 34.9%#73 | 38.0% |
| Three | 31.7%#289 | 32.1%#66 | 33.7% |
| Zone | D-I avg | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Rim | 64.9%#24 | 62.6%#312 | 58.6% |
| Short 2 (≤9 ft) | 45.9%#52 | 35.6%#79 | 39.5% |
| Mid 2 (10 ft+) | 40.4%#97 | 34.9%#74 | 38.0% |
| Three | 31.2%#315 | 36.3%#318 | 33.7% |
Zones from play-by-play shot descriptions; garbage time removed. Bars show the share of field-goal attempts in each zone; where a slice is too thin for its number, the shares are listed under the bar. FG% ranks: #1 = best for that side (most accurate shooting, stingiest defense).
Shot volume
Extra scoring chances from rebounds, turnovers and the foul line · 2025-26 numbersFlorida has more extra scoring chances per game: +6.7 (#8 of 365) to Jacksonville’s −3.1 (#307).
Grade = extra shots and foul-line trips per game compared with a D-I average team, built from six season rates. Cell shading is the national rank for each rate (greener = better for that team).
Rotation
| # | Player | Pos | Cl | Ht | GP-GS | MPG | PPG | RPG | APG | TOV | eFG% | 3P% | 3PA/g | FT% | Usage | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8 | Hayden Wood | G | Fr | 6'6" | 32-31 | 27.0 | 11.8 | 3.2 | 1.3 | 0.8 | 55.9% | 37.7% | 4.7 | 71.6% | 24.8% | |
| 2 | Jaylen Jones | G | Jr | 6'0" | 31-29 | 26.9 | 9.7 | 3.5 | 2.6 | 2.1 | 49.4% | 33.3% | 2.7 | 66.7% | 26.1% | |
| 34 | Evan Sterck | G | Fr | 6'1" | 32-23 | 24.7 | 6.4 | 2.0 | 3.1 | 1.5 | 47.6% | 30.6% | 3.1 | 78.8% | 19.6% | |
| 11 | Chris Lockett Jr. | G | So | 6'4" | 32-11 | 24.5 | 9.3 | 3.1 | 1.7 | 0.8 | 45.1% | 30.6% | 3.4 | 84.6% | 24.9% | |
| 31 | Jason Thirdkill Jr. | F | Sr | 6'7" | 32-24 | 22.6 | 8.0 | 5.4 | 0.5 | 0.8 | 56.3% | 30.4% | 1.8 | 76.1% | 19.9% | |
| 33 | Donovan Rivers | F | Jr | 6'9" | 32-28 | 20.0 | 8.6 | 4.6 | 0.6 | 1.6 | 54.9% | 0.0% | 0.1 | 64.4% | 27.7% | |
| 1 | Chris Arias | G | So | 6'6" | 30-4 | 17.9 | 7.3 | 2.3 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 52.7% | 36.1% | 4.0 | 84.4% | 24.5% | |
| 22 | Charles Caporaso | C | So | 7'0" | 26-4 | 10.7 | 4.1 | 2.3 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 57.1% | 0.0% | 0.0 | 75.0% | 21.1% | |
| 14 | Allen Udemadu | F | Sr | 6'10" | 24-0 | 11.4 | 3.6 | 2.5 | 0.2 | 1.0 | 60.0% | — | 0.0 | 75.0% | 20.8% | |
| 23 | Enrico Borio | F | So | 6'8" | 21-5 | 12.1 | 3.0 | 1.8 | 0.5 | 0.7 | 46.6% | 27.7% | 2.2 | 53.8% | 18.1% | |
| 0 | Jaylen Jordon | F | Sr | 6'8" | 22-1 | 11.5 | 3.5 | 2.7 | 0.3 | 1.0 | 61.1% | — | 0.0 | 71.4% | 19.2% | |
| 9 | Michael Harper Jr. | G | Fr | 6'3" | 15-0 | 6.9 | 2.7 | 0.9 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 41.5% | 23.1% | 0.9 | 20.0% | 29.6% | |
| 10 | Simon Wheeler | G | Sr | 5'10" | 8-0 | 7.4 | 1.4 | 0.6 | 1.6 | 1.1 | 50.0% | 20.0% | 0.6 | 0.0% | 19.3% | |
| 4 | Anakin Brown | G | Fr | 6'3" | 3-0 | 9.7 | 1.7 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 0.3 | 16.7% | 16.7% | 2.0 | 66.7% | 18.9% | |
| 6 | Lamont Jackson | G | So | 6'0" | 4-0 | 4.0 | 2.3 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 41.7% | 25.0% | 1.0 | 100.0% | 27.8% | |
| 12 | Roman Loux | G | Fr | 6'0" | 4-0 | 3.3 | 1.5 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 75.0% | 0.0% | 0.3 | 0.0% | 21.2% | |
| 5 | Tito Deng | F | Jr | 6'11" | 1-0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | — | 0.0 | — | 0.0% |
| # | Player | Pos | Cl | Ht | GP-GS | MPG | PPG | RPG | APG | TOV | eFG% | 3P% | 3PA/g | FT% | Usage | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | Thomas Haugh | F | Sr | 6'9" | 34-34 | 33.3 | 17.1 | 6.1 | 2.1 | 1.5 | 53.3% | 32.6% | 5.2 | 77.4% | 26.9% | |
| 1 | Denzel Aberdeenat Kentucky | G | Sr | 6'5" | 36-35 | 30.6 | 13.5 | 2.5 | 3.4 | 1.3 | 51.6% | 36.3% | 4.8 | 79.8% | 25.1% | |
| 0 | Boogie Fland | G | Jr | 6'3" | 35-35 | 30.0 | 11.6 | 2.5 | 3.5 | 1.6 | 49.2% | 24.0% | 3.6 | 72.6% | 23.3% | |
| 21 | Alex Condon | F | Sr | 6'11" | 34-34 | 30.5 | 15.1 | 7.5 | 3.6 | 2.4 | 56.9% | 17.0% | 1.6 | 64.9% | 27.8% | |
| 9 | Rueben Chinyelu | C | Sr | 6'10" | 35-35 | 24.5 | 10.9 | 11.2 | 0.7 | 1.5 | 58.4% | 0.0% | 0.1 | 69.5% | 23.8% | |
| 7 | Urban Klavzar | G | Sr | 6'1" | 35-0 | 20.7 | 9.6 | 1.5 | 1.3 | 0.8 | 59.6% | 40.6% | 5.0 | 90.3% | 22.4% | |
| 20 | Isaiah Brown | G | Jr | 6'4" | 32-0 | 13.3 | 5.7 | 2.6 | 0.6 | 0.5 | 54.0% | 34.6% | 1.6 | 73.3% | 22.9% | |
| 11 | CJ Ingram | G | So | 6'6" | 20-0 | 5.7 | 2.3 | 0.9 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 57.1% | 50.0% | 0.8 | 50.0% | 23.7% | |
| 4 | Alex Lloyd | G | So | 6'3" | 17-0 | 4.8 | 1.2 | 0.8 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 38.5% | 21.1% | 1.1 | 20.0% | 23.2% | |
| 8 | Alex Kovatchev | G | Sr | 6'5" | 15-0 | 3.4 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 33.3% | 22.2% | 0.6 | — | 14.5% | |
| 12 | Viktor Mikic | C | Jr | 6'11" | 15-0 | 3.3 | 1.5 | 0.9 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 32.6% | 25.0% | 0.3 | 53.8% | 39.7% | |
| 3 | AJ Brown | G | Sr | 6'4" | 0-0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | — | 0.0 | — | — | |
| 25 | Arturas Butajevas | F | Fr | 6'10" | 0-0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | — | 0.0 | — | — | |
| 19 | Domen Petrovic | F | Jr | 6'9" | 0-0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | — | 0.0 | — | — | |
| 13 | Jones Lay | C | Fr | 6'11" | 0-0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | — | 0.0 | — | — |
| # | Player | Pos | Cl | Ht | GP-GS | MPG | PPG | RPG | APG | TOV | eFG% | 3P% | 3PA/g | FT% | Usage | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8 | Hayden Wood | G | Fr | 6'6" | 32-31 | 27.0 | 11.8 | 3.2 | 1.3 | 0.8 | 55.9% | 37.7% | 4.7 | 71.6% | 24.8% | |
| 2 | Jaylen Jones | G | Jr | 6'0" | 31-29 | 26.9 | 9.7 | 3.5 | 2.6 | 2.1 | 49.4% | 33.3% | 2.7 | 66.7% | 26.1% | |
| 34 | Evan Sterck | G | Fr | 6'1" | 32-23 | 24.7 | 6.4 | 2.0 | 3.1 | 1.5 | 47.6% | 30.6% | 3.1 | 78.8% | 19.6% | |
| 11 | Chris Lockett Jr. | G | So | 6'4" | 32-11 | 24.5 | 9.3 | 3.1 | 1.7 | 0.8 | 45.1% | 30.6% | 3.4 | 84.6% | 24.9% | |
| 31 | Jason Thirdkill Jr. | F | Sr | 6'7" | 32-24 | 22.6 | 8.0 | 5.4 | 0.5 | 0.8 | 56.3% | 30.4% | 1.8 | 76.1% | 19.9% | |
| 33 | Donovan Rivers | F | Jr | 6'9" | 32-28 | 20.0 | 8.6 | 4.6 | 0.6 | 1.6 | 54.9% | 0.0% | 0.1 | 64.4% | 27.7% | |
| 1 | Chris Arias | G | So | 6'6" | 30-4 | 17.9 | 7.3 | 2.3 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 52.7% | 36.1% | 4.0 | 84.4% | 24.5% | |
| 22 | Charles Caporaso | C | So | 7'0" | 26-4 | 10.7 | 4.1 | 2.3 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 57.1% | 0.0% | 0.0 | 75.0% | 21.1% | |
| 14 | Allen Udemadu | F | Sr | 6'10" | 24-0 | 11.4 | 3.6 | 2.5 | 0.2 | 1.0 | 60.0% | — | 0.0 | 75.0% | 20.8% | |
| 23 | Enrico Borio | F | So | 6'8" | 21-5 | 12.1 | 3.0 | 1.8 | 0.5 | 0.7 | 46.6% | 27.7% | 2.2 | 53.8% | 18.1% | |
| 0 | Jaylen Jordon | F | Sr | 6'8" | 22-1 | 11.5 | 3.5 | 2.7 | 0.3 | 1.0 | 61.1% | — | 0.0 | 71.4% | 19.2% | |
| 9 | Michael Harper Jr. | G | Fr | 6'3" | 15-0 | 6.9 | 2.7 | 0.9 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 41.5% | 23.1% | 0.9 | 20.0% | 29.6% | |
| 10 | Simon Wheeler | G | Sr | 5'10" | 8-0 | 7.4 | 1.4 | 0.6 | 1.6 | 1.1 | 50.0% | 20.0% | 0.6 | 0.0% | 19.3% | |
| 4 | Anakin Brown | G | Fr | 6'3" | 3-0 | 9.7 | 1.7 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 0.3 | 16.7% | 16.7% | 2.0 | 66.7% | 18.9% | |
| 6 | Lamont Jackson | G | So | 6'0" | 4-0 | 4.0 | 2.3 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 41.7% | 25.0% | 1.0 | 100.0% | 27.8% | |
| 12 | Roman Loux | G | Fr | 6'0" | 4-0 | 3.3 | 1.5 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 75.0% | 0.0% | 0.3 | 0.0% | 21.2% | |
| 5 | Tito Deng | F | Jr | 6'11" | 1-0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | — | 0.0 | — | 0.0% |
Trends
Last 10 games of 2025-26| Date | Opponent | Site | Result | Total | PPP for | PPP vs | Pace | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 4 | Bellarmine | N | L 79–82 | +2.0 | L−1.0 | 146.5 | O161 | 123.8 | 128.6 | 63.8 |
| Feb 28 | North Florida | A | W 85–61 | −1.5 | W+22.5 | 150.0 | U146 | 123.1 | 88.3 | 69.1 |
| Feb 26 | Stetson | H | W 89–85 | −7.0 | L−3.0 | 140.0 | O174 | 132.3 | 126.3 | 67.3 |
| Feb 21 | Austin Peay | H | L 61–65 | +5.5 | W+1.5 | 142.5 | U126 | 101.0 | 107.6 | 60.4 |
| Feb 18 | FGCU | A | L 84–86 | +6.5 | W+4.5 | 136.0 | O170 | 127.6 | 130.6 | 65.8 |
| Feb 14 | North Florida | H | W 63–56 | −7.5 | L−0.5 | 153.0 | U119 | 108.2 | 96.1 | 58.3 |
| Feb 11 | Stetson | A | L 62–67 | −1.5 | L−6.5 | 138.5 | U129 | 99.0 | 107.0 | 62.6 |
| Feb 7 | West Georgia | A | L 73–87 | −1.0 | L−15.0 | 138.0 | O160 | 108.1 | 128.8 | 67.5 |
| Feb 5 | Queens | A | L 84–93 | +8.5 | L−0.5 | 147.5 | O177 | 119.0 | 131.8 | 70.6 |
| Jan 31 | FGCU | H | L 49–68 | −2.0 | L−21.0 | 137.5 | U117 | 74.2 | 103.0 | 66.0 |
| Date | Opponent | Site | Result | Total | PPP for | PPP vs | Pace | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 22 | #9Iowa | N | L 72–73 | −10.0 | L−11.0 | 145.0 | P145 | 117.8 | 119.4 | 61.1 |
| Mar 20 | #16Prairie View | N | W 114–55 | −35.0 | W+24.0 | 154.0 | O169 | 164.5 | 79.4 | 69.3 |
| Mar 14 | #22Vanderbilt | N | L 74–91 | −7.0 | L−24.0 | 160.0 | O165 | 115.8 | 142.4 | 63.9 |
| Mar 13 | Kentucky | N | W 71–63 | −10.0 | L−2.0 | 160.5 | U134 | 97.1 | 86.2 | 73.1 |
| Mar 7 | Kentucky | A | W 84–77 | −5.5 | W+1.5 | 162.0 | U161 | 117.3 | 107.6 | 71.6 |
| Mar 3 | Mississippi St | H | W 108–74 | −21.0 | W+13.0 | 160.5 | O182 | 143.9 | 98.6 | 75.1 |
| Feb 28 | #20Arkansas | H | W 111–77 | −10.5 | W+23.5 | 170.0 | O188 | 137.4 | 95.3 | 80.8 |
| Feb 25 | Texas | A | W 84–71 | −7.0 | W+6.0 | 158.5 | U155 | 130.1 | 110.0 | 64.5 |
| Feb 21 | Ole Miss | A | W 94–75 | −13.5 | W+5.5 | 150.5 | O169 | 122.2 | 97.5 | 76.9 |
| Feb 17 | South Carolina | H | W 76–62 | −23.0 | L−9.0 | 155.0 | U138 | 113.4 | 92.5 | 67.0 |
Records vs the closing line describe the past; ten games is a small sample.
Tale of the tape
national rank toned left for away, right for homeOffseason
roster movement into this season — descriptive, not a model inputReturns 100% of last season's minutes. Teams returning at least 65% of last season's minutes have historically gained about 2.2 points of AdjEM (n=156 team-seasons, 2022-2026). (ESPN hasn't posted this season's roster yet -- this may still be last season's list.)
- Xaivian Lee 27.4 mpg, 11.6 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
- Micah Handlogten 14.4 mpg, 4.0 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
- Olivier Rioux 0.5 mpg, 0.2 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
- Cooper Josefsberg 0.1 mpg, 0.1 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
- Denzel Aberdeen from Kentucky · 30.6 mpg, 13.5 ppg last season
- Jones Lay no D1 minutes last season
- Arturas Butajevas no D1 minutes last season
- AJ Brown no D1 minutes last season
- Domen Petrovic no D1 minutes last season
Returns 79% of last season's minutes; lost 1 of its top 5. Teams returning at least 65% of last season's minutes have historically gained about 2.2 points of AdjEM (n=156 team-seasons, 2022-2026).
Head-to-head
this season and lastThe CBB Matchups tab lays out the day's Division I slate: matchup, tip time, records and rank, and — once posted — Pinnacle's spread and total (the median across books when Pinnacle has no line). Three views switch the table between projected scores, pace and totals, and each team's offensive and defensive tendencies. Each game opens into opponent-adjusted possessions, efficiency and four-factor tendencies for both teams, plus recent form, rotation and head-to-head history. Every game also carries our projected score, spread and total, built bottom-up from those same numbers: expected possessions times each side's opponent-adjusted points per possession, plus home court.
What these numbers mean: line shopping.