CBB Matchups

Every D1 game with tempo-free ratings, four factors and market lines, one place.

College basketball is being built for the 2026-27 season (tip-off Nov 3). What's here fills in as games are played.

Non-conferenceNeutral siteOcean Center, Daytona Beach, FLSunshine Slam

Wyoming

Efficiency #98

2025-26: 18-15 · 9-12 conf

Duquesne

Efficiency #131

2025-26: 18-15 · 10-10 conf

Sun, Nov 22 · 2:00 PM ET

76.0

win 55%

Projected

74.7

win 45%

No line posted yet.

Model: WYO −1.4 · total 150.7 · ratings as of Sat, Oct 3

Preseason ratings start from 2025-26's final adjusted ratings, regressed toward the D1 average. The stats below are 2025-26's too; both update once 2026-27 games are played.

How the projection is built

each step, from an average D-I game to this one

Projected total

Average D-I game

148.2

PaceAdjusted tempo: Duquesne 69.3, Wyoming 67.7 → 68.6 possessions

+0.7

Duquesne offense vs Wyoming defense

+0.2

Wyoming offense vs Duquesne defense

+1.6

Projected total

150.7

Axis starts at 147 pointsPoints added or removed at each step

Projected margin

Even game

0.0

Duquesne offense vs Wyoming defense

+0.2

Wyoming offense vs Duquesne defense

−1.6

Wyoming by 1.4

1.4

Wyoming side ◂▸ Duquesne side

Steps are rounded to one decimal, so they can differ from the total by 0.1. The margin is the same build seen from the home side; positive numbers help Duquesne.

Pace & total

possessions per 40 minutes

Tempo, possessions per 40 minutes

Projected possessions: 68.6, from each team's opponent-adjusted tempo. On raw 2025-26 season pace, Duquesne is the faster team (69.3, #127 of 365) and Wyoming the slower (67.6, #221). When tempos clash, the slower team usually pulls the pace harder (study weights 0.80 vs 0.66).

Projected possessions

68.6

per team, 40 min

Projected total

150.7

model

Projected team totals

76.0 / 74.7

Wyoming / Duquesne

Adjusted tempo, vs an average opponent

67.7#237

Wyoming

69.3#101

Duquesne

How this game plays

what the study found each side's numbers actually do when these two teams meet

ClashDuquesne

Style clash: 3-point volume

Duquesne takes 44.4% of its shots from three; Wyoming runs teams off the line (35.9% of shots allowed from three) (D1 average 39.5%). Expect about 41.1% — the offense's habit usually carries a bit more weight (0.80 vs 0.64).

Wyoming has the ball

OffenseDuquesne allowsvs D1 avg

51.8% #154

52.5% #241

+1.3 pt/100

16.3% #155

18.3% #84

-0.9 pt/100

34.1% #66

29.6% #142

+1.3 pt/100

35.4% #166

39.9% #300

+0.4 pt/100

74.3% #115

—

+0.2 pt/100

Wyoming net across the four factors + FT%, vs. a D1-average matchup: +2.3 pts/100

Duquesne has the ball

OffenseWyoming allowsvs D1 avg

52.3% #131

52.0% #211

+1.4 pt/100

17.6% #245

16.8% #171

-0.6 pt/100

30.4% #184

28.0% #66

-0.7 pt/100

38.3% #94

47.9% #360

+1.2 pt/100

71.5% #220

—

-0.1 pt/100

Duquesne net across the four factors + FT%, vs. a D1-average matchup: +1.1 pts/100

Shot diet

Where each offense shoots from and where each defense lets teams shoot · 2025-26 numbers

Wyomingoffense vsDuquesnedefense

Share of shots by zone

Wyoming shoots

41.6

3.7

11.6

43.1

Duquesne allows

38.6

5.7

15.0

40.8

D-I average

38.5

6.4

15.8

39.3

FG% by zone

Zone			D-I avg
Rim	56.9%#242	56.2%#90	58.6%
Short 2 (≤9 ft)	44.4%#72	45.7%#319	39.5%
Mid 2 (10 ft+)	40.3%#102	39.4%#216	38.0%
Three	33.0%#234	36.2%#314	33.7%

Duquesneoffense vsWyomingdefense

Share of shots by zone

Duquesne shoots

42.0

5.0

8.9

44.1

Wyoming allows

41.4

6.9

16.1

35.6

D-I average

38.5

6.4

15.8

39.3

FG% by zone

Zone			D-I avg
Rim	59.1%#158	61.7%#292	58.6%
Short 2 (≤9 ft)	36.5%#258	44.2%#273	39.5%
Mid 2 (10 ft+)	38.7%#161	36.1%#111	38.0%
Three	33.1%#223	32.8%#108	33.7%

RimShort 2 (≤9 ft)Mid 2 (10 ft+)Three

Zones from play-by-play shot descriptions; garbage time removed. Bars show the share of field-goal attempts in each zone; where a slice is too thin for its number, the shares are listed under the bar. FG% ranks: #1 = best for that side (most accurate shooting, stingiest defense).

Shot volume

Extra scoring chances from rebounds, turnovers and the foul line · 2025-26 numbers

Wyoming

−0.7extra scoring chances per game vs a D-I average team#213 of 365

Off reb %

34.1%

#66

Def reb %

72.0%

#66

Turnover %

16.3%

#155

Forced TO %

16.8%

#171

FT rate

35.4%

#166

FT allowed

47.9%

#360

Where the chances come from (per game)

Offensive rebounding+1.2

Defensive rebounding+0.8

Ball security+0.3

Forcing turnovers+0.1

Foul shots drawn+0.1

Foul shots allowed−3.3

Duquesne

+0.5extra scoring chances per game vs a D-I average team#161 of 365

Off reb %

30.4%

#184

Def reb %

70.4%

#142

Turnover %

17.6%

#245

Forced TO %

18.3%

#84

FT rate

38.3%

#94

FT allowed

39.9%

#300

Where the chances come from (per game)

Offensive rebounding0.0

Defensive rebounding+0.3

Ball security−0.6

Forcing turnovers+1.1

Foul shots drawn+0.9

Foul shots allowed−1.2

Duquesne has more extra scoring chances per game: +0.5 (#161 of 365) to Wyoming’s −0.7 (#213).

Grade = extra shots and foul-line trips per game compared with a D-I average team, built from six season rates. Cell shading is the national rank for each rate (greener = better for that team).

Rotation

Wyoming2025-26 numbers

ESPN hasn't posted Wyoming's 2026-27 roster yet — these are last season's players.

#	Player	Pos	Cl	Ht	GP-GS	MPG	PPG	RPG	APG	TOV	eFG%	3P%	3PA/g	FT%	Usage
5	Leland Walker	G	Sr	6'1"	33-32	28.7	13.5	3.0	3.8	2.3	45.4%	28.6%	3.6	82.7%	31.7%
3	Khaden Bennett	G	Jr	6'4"	33-32	28.3	10.2	4.9	2.8	1.3	50.0%	35.7%	3.8	80.2%	22.0%
2	Nasir Meyer	G	Fr	6'7"	31-23	27.6	12.9	4.9	2.4	1.8	54.7%	35.2%	4.6	75.5%	27.7%
1	Damarion Dennis	G	So	6'1"	32-19	23.9	11.2	3.2	1.3	0.6	58.7%	34.0%	3.1	86.1%	23.7%
13	Adam Harakow	G	Jr	6'7"	33-7	18.9	6.1	2.8	0.7	0.6	57.1%	38.1%	2.5	68.0%	18.1%
0	Uriyah Rojas	G	Jr	6'3"	33-2	16.6	6.2	1.9	1.7	0.6	47.3%	31.3%	2.9	76.3%	23.9%
11	Gavin Gores	F	Fr	6'10"	28-8	18.0	7.3	3.4	0.4	1.0	62.3%	22.2%	0.6	68.8%	21.9%
8	Kiani Saxon	F	Sr	6'8"	33-16	14.9	2.0	2.8	0.4	0.6	51.8%	37.5%	0.5	32.1%	10.9%
10	Abou Magassa	F	So	6'7"	29-11	10.3	3.1	3.0	0.2	0.5	57.6%	—	0.0	51.2%	18.2%
35	Simm-Marten Saadi	F	Fr	6'9"	32-3	8.6	3.2	1.1	0.3	0.5	46.6%	30.8%	2.4	100.0%	26.2%
7	Matija Belic	F	Sr	6'7"	13-12	17.0	5.5	4.5	0.8	1.9	50.0%	21.1%	1.5	55.6%	23.4%
9	Jared Harris	G	So	6'2"	12-0	9.7	4.0	2.4	0.3	0.3	43.2%	30.0%	1.7	80.0%	23.7%
14	Garrett Spielman	G	Fr	6'7"	8-0	2.0	1.0	0.5	0.1	0.1	66.7%	66.7%	0.4	—	24.8%
32	Talan Taylor	G	Fr	6'4"	3-0	2.3	1.0	0.7	0.3	0.0	75.0%	50.0%	0.7	—	15.7%
45	Neil Summers	F	Fr	6'9"	0-0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	—	—	0.0	—	—

Rosters come from ESPN and are still filling in; incoming transfers and freshmen may be missing.

Duquesne2025-26 numbers

ESPN hasn't posted Duquesne's 2026-27 roster yet — these are last season's players.

#	Player	Pos	Cl	Ht	GP-GS	MPG	PPG	RPG	APG	TOV	eFG%	3P%	3PA/g	FT%	Usage
1	Tarence Guinyard	G	Sr	6'2"	32-32	33.3	16.6	3.3	4.7	2.2	54.6%	36.0%	6.2	71.4%	28.2%
3	Jimmie Williams	G	Jr	6'5"	33-33	29.7	15.1	4.5	2.6	1.7	54.5%	33.9%	5.5	75.7%	28.8%
9	Jakub Necas	F	Jr	6'10"	32-32	24.5	6.9	5.1	1.1	1.3	55.3%	36.4%	1.4	69.7%	16.8%
2	David Dixon	F	Sr	6'9"	33-23	22.4	8.2	5.5	1.3	1.7	61.1%	20.0%	0.5	71.8%	20.8%
5	Cam Crawford	G	Sr	6'5"	32-20	18.6	4.6	1.8	1.0	0.7	47.2%	33.7%	2.8	57.9%	16.4%
6	Alex Williams	F	Sr	6'5"	31-1	17.9	9.2	3.5	0.9	1.1	54.5%	39.6%	3.4	81.0%	28.9%
0	Brandon Hall	G	Jr	6'4"	26-14	18.9	3.4	1.3	0.8	0.9	44.3%	33.3%	1.6	50.0%	14.7%
4	John Hugley IV	F	Sr	6'11"	27-10	16.0	7.7	3.5	1.3	1.4	52.5%	27.3%	1.2	74.7%	27.6%
22	Maximus Edwards	G	Sr	6'5"	23-0	16.0	6.3	2.8	1.3	0.9	46.9%	28.4%	2.9	64.7%	25.3%
44	Jake DiMichele	G	So	6'4"	25-0	14.4	3.8	1.1	0.7	0.4	49.4%	29.5%	1.8	81.3%	15.7%
7	Dom Aekins	G	Fr	5'10"	14-0	7.8	3.0	0.8	0.7	0.6	47.5%	28.6%	1.0	57.1%	25.9%
18	Stef van Bussel	C	So	6'10"	17-0	5.9	1.4	1.8	0.4	0.8	83.3%	—	0.0	30.0%	17.1%
27	Lazar Milosevic	F	Fr	6'10"	12-0	7.6	2.0	1.5	0.4	0.3	59.4%	20.0%	0.4	62.5%	14.8%
33	Lucas Prolla	G	Jr	6'2"	4-0	2.8	1.0	0.5	0.0	0.5	75.0%	50.0%	0.5	50.0%	24.4%
32	Ethan Anish	G	So	6'1"	4-0	2.3	1.3	0.0	0.0	0.0	50.0%	0.0%	0.3	75.0%	23.4%
31	Seamus McDermott	G	Jr	6'2"	3-0	2.7	0.0	0.3	0.3	0.0	0.0%	0.0%	1.7	—	34.0%
8	Arness Lawson	G	Fr	6'2"	0-0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	—	—	0.0	—	—
17	Frederik Jellum	F	Fr	6'10"	0-0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	—	—	0.0	—	—

Rosters come from ESPN and are still filling in; incoming transfers and freshmen may be missing.

Wyoming2025-26 numbers

ESPN hasn't posted Wyoming's 2026-27 roster yet — these are last season's players.

#	Player	Pos	Cl	Ht	GP-GS	MPG	PPG	RPG	APG	TOV	eFG%	3P%	3PA/g	FT%	Usage
5	Leland Walker	G	Sr	6'1"	33-32	28.7	13.5	3.0	3.8	2.3	45.4%	28.6%	3.6	82.7%	31.7%
3	Khaden Bennett	G	Jr	6'4"	33-32	28.3	10.2	4.9	2.8	1.3	50.0%	35.7%	3.8	80.2%	22.0%
2	Nasir Meyer	G	Fr	6'7"	31-23	27.6	12.9	4.9	2.4	1.8	54.7%	35.2%	4.6	75.5%	27.7%
1	Damarion Dennis	G	So	6'1"	32-19	23.9	11.2	3.2	1.3	0.6	58.7%	34.0%	3.1	86.1%	23.7%
13	Adam Harakow	G	Jr	6'7"	33-7	18.9	6.1	2.8	0.7	0.6	57.1%	38.1%	2.5	68.0%	18.1%
0	Uriyah Rojas	G	Jr	6'3"	33-2	16.6	6.2	1.9	1.7	0.6	47.3%	31.3%	2.9	76.3%	23.9%
11	Gavin Gores	F	Fr	6'10"	28-8	18.0	7.3	3.4	0.4	1.0	62.3%	22.2%	0.6	68.8%	21.9%
8	Kiani Saxon	F	Sr	6'8"	33-16	14.9	2.0	2.8	0.4	0.6	51.8%	37.5%	0.5	32.1%	10.9%
10	Abou Magassa	F	So	6'7"	29-11	10.3	3.1	3.0	0.2	0.5	57.6%	—	0.0	51.2%	18.2%
35	Simm-Marten Saadi	F	Fr	6'9"	32-3	8.6	3.2	1.1	0.3	0.5	46.6%	30.8%	2.4	100.0%	26.2%
7	Matija Belic	F	Sr	6'7"	13-12	17.0	5.5	4.5	0.8	1.9	50.0%	21.1%	1.5	55.6%	23.4%
9	Jared Harris	G	So	6'2"	12-0	9.7	4.0	2.4	0.3	0.3	43.2%	30.0%	1.7	80.0%	23.7%
14	Garrett Spielman	G	Fr	6'7"	8-0	2.0	1.0	0.5	0.1	0.1	66.7%	66.7%	0.4	—	24.8%
32	Talan Taylor	G	Fr	6'4"	3-0	2.3	1.0	0.7	0.3	0.0	75.0%	50.0%	0.7	—	15.7%
45	Neil Summers	F	Fr	6'9"	0-0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	—	—	0.0	—	—

Rosters come from ESPN and are still filling in; incoming transfers and freshmen may be missing.

Trends

Last 10 games of 2025-26

Wyoming

Against the spread

Season

16-16

Home

9-8

Road

5-8

Last 10

7-3

avg cover +1.2

Covered 4 straightCovered 5 of 7 as an underdog

Over / under

Season

16-16

Home

11-6

Road

4-9

Last 10

5-5

avg vs total +3.3

Under 2 straightOver in 3 of 7 as an underdog

Last 10 games, newest first

Date	Opponent	Site	Result			Total		PPP for	PPP vs	Pace
Mar 17	Wichita StAdjEM #60	A	L 70–74	+5.5	W+1.5	148.0	U144	93.7	99.0	74.7
Mar 11	UNLVAdjEM #124	N	L 70–73	+3.5	W+0.5	153.0	U143	106.7	111.3	65.6
Mar 7	San José StAdjEM #282	A	W 88–78	−5.5	W+4.5	148.0	O166	146.0	129.4	60.3
Mar 3	NevadaAdjEM #71	H	W 83–73	+1.5	W+11.5	144.0	O156	125.2	110.1	66.3
Feb 28	Air ForceAdjEM #360	H	W 66–62	−21.5	L−17.5	146.5	U128	101.1	95.0	65.3
Feb 24	Boise StAdjEM #63	A	L 62–72	+8.5	L−1.5	146.0	U134	97.4	113.1	63.7
Feb 21	Grand CanyonAdjEM #65	A	W 70–65	+8.5	W+13.5	144.5	U135	103.7	96.3	67.5
Feb 17	Fresno StAdjEM #169	H	W 92–82	−9.5	W+0.5	147.5	O174	140.9	125.6	65.3
Feb 14	Colorado StAdjEM #88	A	L 68–79	+3.5	L−7.5	138.5	O147	110.5	128.4	61.5
Feb 7	Utah StateAdjEM #24	H	L 83–85	+8.5	W+6.5	146.0	O168	122.6	125.6	67.7

Duquesne

Against the spread

Season

14-17

Home

5-11

Road

7-5

Last 10

4-6

avg cover −2.7

Covered 2 straightCovered 1 of 4 as a favoriteCovered 3 of 6 as an underdog

Over / under

Season

16-14-1

Home

10-6

Road

5-6-1

Last 10

3-7

avg vs total −7.1

Under 2 straightOver in 1 of 4 as a favoriteOver in 2 of 6 as an underdog

Last 10 games, newest first

Date	Opponent	Site	Result			Total		PPP for	PPP vs	Pace
Mar 13	VCUAdjEM #39	N	L 66–71	+7.0	W+2.0	153.0	U137	101.9	109.6	64.8
Mar 12	Rhode IslandAdjEM #137	N	W 67–61	−1.5	W+4.5	138.5	U128	112.4	102.3	59.6
Mar 7	RichmondAdjEM #150	H	W 79–77	−4.5	L−2.5	148.0	O156	119.9	116.8	65.9
Mar 4	Rhode IslandAdjEM #137	A	L 52–64	+2.5	L−9.5	143.0	U116	79.7	98.1	65.3
Feb 28	#23Saint LouisAdjEM #20	A	L 76–91	+13.5	L−1.5	160.0	O167	115.7	138.6	65.7
Feb 25	DavidsonAdjEM #112	H	L 56–67	−3.5	L−14.5	143.0	U123	85.4	102.2	65.6
Feb 21	DaytonAdjEM #62	A	L 66–78	+6.5	L−5.5	148.5	U144	102.6	121.3	64.3
Feb 18	La SalleAdjEM #256	H	W 62–61	−11.0	L−10.0	146.0	U123	89.5	88.1	69.2
Feb 14	St BonaventureAdjEM #138	A	W 78–73	+2.0	W+7.0	152.5	U151	113.0	105.8	69.0
Feb 7	G WashingtonAdjEM #68	H	W 88–86	+1.0	W+3.0	157.5	O174	129.2	126.2	68.1

Records vs the closing line describe the past; ten games is a small sample.

Tale of the tape

national rank toned left for away, right for home

WyomingDuquesne

Efficiency

111.8

109.6

107.6

107.5

67.7

69.3

—

Shooting

51.8%

52.3%

53.6%

54.5%

33.0%

33.1%

74.3%

71.5%

35.4%

38.3%

Ball control & glass

16.3%

17.6%

16.8%

18.3%

34.1%

30.4%

28.0%

29.6%

8.3%

9.8%

10.9%

12.5%

Style

43.0%

44.4%

43.0%

42.9%

9.6%

15.7%

53.8%

55.9%

37.3%

31.8%

Roster

2.57

3.43

6'5"

6'5.8"

—

Offseason

roster movement into this season — descriptive, not a model input

Wyoming

Returning minutes: 100.0%Returning production: 100.0%

ESPN hasn't posted Wyoming's roster for this season yet — no movement to show.

Returns 100% of last season's minutes. Teams returning at least 65% of last season's minutes have historically gained about 2.2 points of AdjEM (n=156 team-seasons, 2022-2026). (ESPN hasn't posted this season's roster yet -- this may still be last season's list.)

Duquesne

Returning minutes: 100.0%Returning production: 100.0%

ESPN hasn't posted Duquesne's roster for this season yet — no movement to show.

Head-to-head

this season and last

No meetings the last two seasons.

The CBB Matchups tab lays out the day's Division I slate: matchup, tip time, records and rank, and — once posted — Pinnacle's spread and total (the median across books when Pinnacle has no line). Three views switch the table between projected scores, pace and totals, and each team's offensive and defensive tendencies. Each game opens into opponent-adjusted possessions, efficiency and four-factor tendencies for both teams, plus recent form, rotation and head-to-head history. Every game also carries our projected score, spread and total, built bottom-up from those same numbers: expected possessions times each side's opponent-adjusted points per possession, plus home court.

What these numbers mean: line shopping.