CBB Matchups
Every D1 game with tempo-free ratings, four factors and market lines, one place.
College basketball is being built for the 2026-27 season (tip-off Nov 3). What's here fills in as games are played.
Non-conferenceNeutral siteAcrisure Arena, Palm Springs, CAAcrisure Series
UC Irvine
Efficiency #105
2025-26: 23-12 · 16-6 conf
vs
LMU
Efficiency #183
2025-26: 15-17 · 6-13 conf
Sun, Nov 22 · 4:30 PM ET
71.1
win 60%
Projected
68.2
win 40%
No line posted yet.
Model: UCI −2.8 · total 139.3 · ratings as of Sat, Oct 3
Preseason ratings start from 2025-26's final adjusted ratings, regressed toward the D1 average. The stats below are 2025-26's too; both update once 2026-27 games are played.
How the projection is built
each step, from an average D-I game to this oneProjected total
Average D-I game
148.2
PaceAdjusted tempo: LMU 68.2, UC Irvine 68.9 → 68.8 possessions
+1.1
LMU offense vs UC Irvine defense
−6.5
UC Irvine offense vs LMU defense
−3.6
Projected total
139.3
Axis starts at 135 pointsPoints added or removed at each step
Projected margin
Even game
0.0
LMU offense vs UC Irvine defense
−6.5
UC Irvine offense vs LMU defense
+3.6
UC Irvine by 2.8
2.8
UC Irvine side ◂▸ LMU side
Steps are rounded to one decimal, so they can differ from the total by 0.1: the total steps add to 139.2 against a projected 139.3, and the margin steps add to −2.9 against −2.8. The margin is the same build seen from the home side; positive numbers help LMU.
Pace & total
possessions per 40 minutesTempo, possessions per 40 minutes
Projected possessions: 68.8, from each team's opponent-adjusted tempo. On raw 2025-26 season pace, UC Irvine is the faster team (70.7, #63 of 365) and LMU the slower (68.1, #197). When tempos clash, the slower team usually pulls the pace harder (study weights 0.80 vs 0.66).
Projected possessions
68.8
per team, 40 min
Projected total
139.3
model
Projected team totals
71.1 / 68.2
UC Irvine / LMU
Adjusted tempo, vs an average opponent
68.9#129
UC Irvine
68.2#189
LMU
How this game plays
what the study found each side's numbers actually do when these two teams meetAdvantageLMU
Where LMU struggles: shooting
LMU shoots an effective 51.8% (#152); UC Irvine allows 45.9% (#9). Expect about 48.9%, 2.4 points below an average D1 matchup — worth roughly -3.4 points per 100 possessions.
ClashUC Irvine
Style match: 3-point volume
UC Irvine rarely shoots threes (28.0% of its shots); LMU runs teams off the line (36.2% of shots allowed from three) (D1 average 39.5%). Expect about 28.2% — both habits push the same way.
AdvantageUC Irvine
Where UC Irvine struggles: shooting
UC Irvine shoots an effective 49.5% (#268); LMU allows 48.9% (#60). Expect about 49.0%, 2.3 points below an average D1 matchup — worth roughly -3.2 points per 100 possessions.
ClashLMU
Strength vs strength: shot-blocking exposure
LMU (#23 in shot-blocking exposure) against UC Irvine (#11 in the same stat allowed) — both rank inside the national top 60. Expect about 12.3%. Historically UC Irvine's own number has carried a bit more weight in that exchange (0.41 vs 0.68).
TurnoversLMU
LMU turns it over
Projected turnover rate of 18.5% is worth roughly -2.1 points per 100 possessions against LMU's offense.
UC Irvine has the ball
OffenseLMU allowsvs D1 avg
49.5% #268
48.9% #60
-3.2 pt/100
17.8% #258
16.6% #181
-0.6 pt/100
31.0% #166
32.0% #258
+0.7 pt/100
35.9% #152
32.5% #114
-0.1 pt/100
69.7% #276
—
-0.2 pt/100
UC Irvine net across the four factors + FT%, vs. a D1-average matchup: -3.5 pts/100
LMU has the ball
OffenseUC Irvine allowsvs D1 avg
51.8% #152
45.9% #9
-3.4 pt/100
17.5% #238
18.8% #59
-2.1 pt/100
26.7% #307
31.2% #213
-1.3 pt/100
31.1% #280
26.7% #18
-0.9 pt/100
69.5% #280
—
-0.2 pt/100
LMU net across the four factors + FT%, vs. a D1-average matchup: -8.0 pts/100
Shot diet
Where each offense shoots from and where each defense lets teams shoot · 2025-26 numbersUC Irvineoffense vsLMUdefense
Share of shots by zone
UC Irvine shoots
44.1
8.7
20.1
27.1
LMU allows
37.1
7.4
18.9
36.6
D-I average
38.5
6.4
15.8
39.3
FG% by zone
| Zone | D-I avg | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Rim | 54.5%#312 | 53.3%#27 | 58.6% |
| Short 2 (≤9 ft) | 47.2%#38 | 35.8%#88 | 39.5% |
| Mid 2 (10 ft+) | 37.3%#213 | 39.0%#200 | 38.0% |
| Three | 33.6%#191 | 34.6%#225 | 33.7% |
LMUoffense vsUC Irvinedefense
Share of shots by zone
LMU shoots
32.8
8.4
19.0
39.8
UC Irvine allows
38.6
7.5
16.0
38.0
D-I average
38.5
6.4
15.8
39.3
FG% by zone
| Zone | D-I avg | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Rim | 59.2%#156 | 46.5%#1 | 58.6% |
| Short 2 (≤9 ft) | 39.0%#195 | 38.0%#135 | 39.5% |
| Mid 2 (10 ft+) | 41.6%#68 | 35.6%#95 | 38.0% |
| Three | 34.8%#130 | 33.7%#167 | 33.7% |
RimShort 2 (≤9 ft)Mid 2 (10 ft+)Three
Zones from play-by-play shot descriptions; garbage time removed. Bars show the share of field-goal attempts in each zone; where a slice is too thin for its number, the shares are listed under the bar. FG% ranks: #1 = best for that side (most accurate shooting, stingiest defense).
Shot volume
Extra scoring chances from rebounds, turnovers and the foul line · 2025-26 numbersUC Irvine
+3.1extra scoring chances per game vs a D-I average team#52 of 365
Off reb %
31.0%
#166
Def reb %
68.8%
#213
Turnover %
17.8%
#258
Forced TO %
18.8%
#59
FT rate
35.9%
#152
FT allowed
26.7%
#18
Where the chances come from (per game)
Offensive rebounding+0.2
Defensive rebounding−0.2
Ball security−0.7
Forcing turnovers+1.4
Foul shots drawn+0.2
Foul shots allowed+2.2
LMU
−2.5extra scoring chances per game vs a D-I average team#287 of 365
Off reb %
26.7%
#307
Def reb %
68.0%
#258
Turnover %
17.5%
#238
Forced TO %
16.6%
#181
FT rate
31.1%
#280
FT allowed
32.5%
#114
Where the chances come from (per game)
Offensive rebounding−1.2
Defensive rebounding−0.5
Ball security−0.5
Forcing turnovers−0.1
Foul shots drawn−1.0
Foul shots allowed+0.7
UC Irvine has more extra scoring chances per game: +3.1 (#52 of 365) to LMU’s −2.5 (#287).
Grade = extra shots and foul-line trips per game compared with a D-I average team, built from six season rates. Cell shading is the national rank for each rate (greener = better for that team).
Rotation
UC Irvine2025-26 numbers
ESPN hasn't posted UC Irvine's 2026-27 roster yet — these are last season's players.
| # | Player | Pos | Cl | Ht | GP-GS | MPG | PPG | RPG | APG | TOV | eFG% | 3P% | 3PA/g | FT% | Usage | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 24 | Jurian Dixon | G | So | 6'4" | 35-35 | 30.4 | 15.9 | 3.6 | 2.5 | 1.5 | 50.5% | 38.5% | 5.2 | 79.5% | 29.9% | |
| 13 | Derin Saran | G | So | 6'5" | 35-35 | 29.7 | 11.5 | 5.3 | 3.4 | 2.2 | 43.6% | 26.5% | 2.8 | 68.5% | 27.4% | |
| 14 | Kyle Evans | F | Sr | 6'10" | 35-35 | 28.6 | 12.1 | 8.7 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 62.3% | 20.0% | 0.3 | 78.8% | 19.9% | |
| 6 | Tama Isaac | G | Fr | 6'2" | 35-35 | 26.8 | 6.3 | 3.2 | 3.8 | 2.1 | 43.9% | 31.9% | 2.1 | 68.4% | 17.8% | |
| 4 | Andre Henry | G | Sr | 6'4" | 31-0 | 22.5 | 9.9 | 2.5 | 1.1 | 0.9 | 52.5% | 36.4% | 3.5 | 82.1% | 24.3% | |
| 2 | Harrison Carrington | F | Jr | 6'7" | 35-1 | 17.0 | 8.5 | 3.8 | 0.9 | 0.7 | 59.4% | 36.4% | 0.3 | 67.3% | 24.6% | |
| 9 | Jovan Jester Jr. | G | Fr | 6'4" | 35-0 | 16.1 | 6.5 | 2.8 | 2.3 | 2.1 | 51.2% | 37.5% | 1.8 | 67.5% | 27.6% | |
| 3 | Elijah Chol | F | Jr | 7'0" | 26-17 | 16.6 | 4.6 | 3.3 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 51.5% | 33.3% | 1.0 | 46.3% | 16.8% | |
| 43 | Akiva McBirney-Griffin | F | Jr | 6'9" | 34-16 | 9.9 | 2.4 | 2.1 | 0.4 | 0.8 | 40.9% | 0.0% | 0.3 | 63.4% | 18.5% | |
| 23 | Nes Emeneke | F | Fr | 6'10" | 35-0 | 8.1 | 1.3 | 2.4 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 43.6% | — | 0.0 | 35.7% | 12.2% | |
| 5 | Ben Egbo | G | So | 6'4" | 17-1 | 6.0 | 1.0 | 0.9 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 57.1% | 0.0% | 0.1 | 25.0% | 11.1% | |
| 27 | Tishan Ahir | G | So | 6'0" | 9-0 | 2.3 | 1.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 41.7% | 28.6% | 0.8 | 50.0% | 33.0% | |
| 0 | Bryce Goldman | G | Fr | 6'6" | 0-0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | — | 0.0 | — | — | |
| 7 | Joshua Palmer | G | Fr | 6'4" | 0-0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | — | 0.0 | — | — | |
| 21 | Langston Redfield | G | Sr | 6'4" | 0-0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | — | 0.0 | — | — | |
| 8 | Luke Isaak | G | Fr | 6'3" | 0-0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | — | 0.0 | — | — | |
| 55 | Mason Hodges | F | Fr | 6'7" | 0-0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | — | 0.0 | — | — | |
| 1 | Torian Lee | G | So | 6'0" | 0-0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | — | 0.0 | — | — |
Rosters come from ESPN and are still filling in; incoming transfers and freshmen may be missing.
LMU2025-26 numbers
ESPN hasn't posted LMU's 2026-27 roster yet — these are last season's players.
| # | Player | Pos | Cl | Ht | GP-GS | MPG | PPG | RPG | APG | TOV | eFG% | 3P% | 3PA/g | FT% | Usage | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | Rodney Brown Jr. | G | Jr | 6'6" | 31-30 | 32.4 | 14.0 | 2.4 | 1.7 | 1.5 | 54.8% | 38.2% | 7.4 | 83.0% | 24.9% | |
| 5 | Myron Amey Jr. | G | Sr | 6'2" | 32-17 | 30.5 | 14.8 | 3.9 | 1.7 | 1.3 | 52.7% | 35.3% | 7.3 | 77.1% | 28.0% | |
| 16 | Aaron McBride | F | Jr | 6'6" | 31-24 | 27.2 | 7.6 | 5.6 | 1.0 | 1.2 | 58.1% | 35.0% | 1.3 | 75.5% | 16.1% | |
| 1 | Jalen Shelley | F | So | 6'8" | 25-25 | 31.2 | 13.7 | 6.6 | 2.7 | 2.3 | 50.6% | 28.7% | 3.5 | 70.4% | 27.5% | |
| 7 | Jan Vide | G | Jr | 6'6" | 27-27 | 28.8 | 12.1 | 3.0 | 4.0 | 2.3 | 47.0% | 32.3% | 1.1 | 75.3% | 29.0% | |
| 22 | Rick Issanza | C | Sr | 7'1" | 30-17 | 16.3 | 2.6 | 3.4 | 0.3 | 0.6 | 66.7% | 0.0% | 0.0 | 34.4% | 10.3% | |
| 4 | AJ Thomas | G | Fr | 6'4" | 32-4 | 13.5 | 5.2 | 1.4 | 1.8 | 1.3 | 44.7% | 29.2% | 0.8 | 66.0% | 26.6% | |
| 35 | Rokas Jocius | F | Sr | 6'10" | 32-15 | 12.5 | 3.2 | 3.0 | 0.4 | 0.7 | 59.1% | 43.8% | 0.5 | 52.2% | 15.9% | |
| 6 | Josh Dalton | F | Fr | 6'10" | 29-0 | 12.9 | 3.6 | 2.6 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 55.5% | 33.3% | 1.8 | 72.2% | 15.9% | |
| 0 | Nakyel Shelton | G | Sr | 6'3" | 27-0 | 9.1 | 2.9 | 1.0 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 55.6% | 38.5% | 1.0 | 85.0% | 17.4% | |
| 24 | Jael Martin | F | Fr | 6'8" | 17-1 | 7.4 | 1.9 | 1.4 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 61.4% | 20.0% | 0.3 | 62.5% | 12.0% | |
| 42 | George Tupy | F | Jr | 6'6" | 4-0 | 2.8 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 100.0% | — | 0.0 | — | 4.8% | |
| 41 | Kevin Carney | G | Sr | 5'11" | 2-0 | 4.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.0% | 0.0% | 1.5 | 0.0% | 32.3% | |
| 40 | Cooper Smith | G | Fr | 6'2" | 3-0 | 2.3 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | — | 0.0 | 100.0% | 7.0% | |
| 3 | Marley Zeller | G | Fr | 6'5" | 0-0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | — | 0.0 | — | — | |
| 13 | Tanner Thomas | G | Sr | 6'6" | 0-0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | — | 0.0 | — | — |
Rosters come from ESPN and are still filling in; incoming transfers and freshmen may be missing.
UC Irvine2025-26 numbers
ESPN hasn't posted UC Irvine's 2026-27 roster yet — these are last season's players.
| # | Player | Pos | Cl | Ht | GP-GS | MPG | PPG | RPG | APG | TOV | eFG% | 3P% | 3PA/g | FT% | Usage | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 24 | Jurian Dixon | G | So | 6'4" | 35-35 | 30.4 | 15.9 | 3.6 | 2.5 | 1.5 | 50.5% | 38.5% | 5.2 | 79.5% | 29.9% | |
| 13 | Derin Saran | G | So | 6'5" | 35-35 | 29.7 | 11.5 | 5.3 | 3.4 | 2.2 | 43.6% | 26.5% | 2.8 | 68.5% | 27.4% | |
| 14 | Kyle Evans | F | Sr | 6'10" | 35-35 | 28.6 | 12.1 | 8.7 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 62.3% | 20.0% | 0.3 | 78.8% | 19.9% | |
| 6 | Tama Isaac | G | Fr | 6'2" | 35-35 | 26.8 | 6.3 | 3.2 | 3.8 | 2.1 | 43.9% | 31.9% | 2.1 | 68.4% | 17.8% | |
| 4 | Andre Henry | G | Sr | 6'4" | 31-0 | 22.5 | 9.9 | 2.5 | 1.1 | 0.9 | 52.5% | 36.4% | 3.5 | 82.1% | 24.3% | |
| 2 | Harrison Carrington | F | Jr | 6'7" | 35-1 | 17.0 | 8.5 | 3.8 | 0.9 | 0.7 | 59.4% | 36.4% | 0.3 | 67.3% | 24.6% | |
| 9 | Jovan Jester Jr. | G | Fr | 6'4" | 35-0 | 16.1 | 6.5 | 2.8 | 2.3 | 2.1 | 51.2% | 37.5% | 1.8 | 67.5% | 27.6% | |
| 3 | Elijah Chol | F | Jr | 7'0" | 26-17 | 16.6 | 4.6 | 3.3 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 51.5% | 33.3% | 1.0 | 46.3% | 16.8% | |
| 43 | Akiva McBirney-Griffin | F | Jr | 6'9" | 34-16 | 9.9 | 2.4 | 2.1 | 0.4 | 0.8 | 40.9% | 0.0% | 0.3 | 63.4% | 18.5% | |
| 23 | Nes Emeneke | F | Fr | 6'10" | 35-0 | 8.1 | 1.3 | 2.4 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 43.6% | — | 0.0 | 35.7% | 12.2% | |
| 5 | Ben Egbo | G | So | 6'4" | 17-1 | 6.0 | 1.0 | 0.9 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 57.1% | 0.0% | 0.1 | 25.0% | 11.1% | |
| 27 | Tishan Ahir | G | So | 6'0" | 9-0 | 2.3 | 1.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 41.7% | 28.6% | 0.8 | 50.0% | 33.0% | |
| 0 | Bryce Goldman | G | Fr | 6'6" | 0-0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | — | 0.0 | — | — | |
| 7 | Joshua Palmer | G | Fr | 6'4" | 0-0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | — | 0.0 | — | — | |
| 21 | Langston Redfield | G | Sr | 6'4" | 0-0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | — | 0.0 | — | — | |
| 8 | Luke Isaak | G | Fr | 6'3" | 0-0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | — | 0.0 | — | — | |
| 55 | Mason Hodges | F | Fr | 6'7" | 0-0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | — | 0.0 | — | — | |
| 1 | Torian Lee | G | So | 6'0" | 0-0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | — | — | 0.0 | — | — |
Rosters come from ESPN and are still filling in; incoming transfers and freshmen may be missing.
Trends
Last 10 games of 2025-26UC Irvine
Against the spread
Season
16-15-2
Home
6-8-1
Road
7-5
Last 10
7-3
avg cover +2.8
Missed the spread 2 straightCovered 6 of 9 as a favorite
Over / under
Season
11-21-1
Home
5-10
Road
4-8
Last 10
3-7
avg vs total −1.6
Under 2 straightOver in 3 of 9 as a favorite
Last 10 games, newest first
| Date | Opponent | Site | Result | Total | PPP for | PPP vs | Pace | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 17 | UNLV | H | L 72–75 | −1.0 | L−4.0 | 152.5 | U147 | 97.3 | 101.3 | 74.0 |
| Mar 14 | Hawai'i | N | L 64–71 | −1.5 | L−8.5 | 142.0 | U135 | 90.7 | 100.6 | 70.6 |
| Mar 13 | CSU Northridge | N | W 93–78 | −4.0 | W+11.0 | 153.0 | O171 | 131.7 | 110.4 | 70.6 |
| Mar 7 | UC Davis | H | W 79–69 OT | −8.5 | W+1.5 | 145.0 | O148 | 106.0 | 92.6 | 74.6 |
| Mar 5 | Cal Poly | H | W 107–85 | −9.5 | W+12.5 | 160.5 | O192 | 136.1 | 108.1 | 78.6 |
| Feb 28 | Santa Barbara | H | W 64–60 | −3.5 | W+0.5 | 138.5 | U124 | 96.9 | 90.8 | 66.1 |
| Feb 26 | CSU Northridge | A | W 68–67 | +1.0 | W+2.0 | 154.0 | U135 | 93.0 | 91.7 | 73.1 |
| Feb 21 | UC San Diego | H | L 69–71 | −4.5 | L−6.5 | 143.5 | U140 | 109.0 | 112.2 | 63.3 |
| Feb 19 | Long Beach St | A | W 69–58 | −5.0 | W+6.0 | 143.0 | U127 | 93.6 | 78.7 | 73.7 |
| Feb 14 | Fullerton | H | W 86–65 | −8.0 | W+13.0 | 154.0 | U151 | 117.0 | 88.4 | 73.5 |
LMU
Against the spread
Season
14-16-1
Home
8-9
Road
5-5-1
Last 10
3-6-1
avg cover −1.4
Missed the spread 3 straightCovered 2 of 7 as a favorite
Over / under
Season
15-16
Home
9-8
Road
6-5
Last 10
4-6
avg vs total +0.3
Under in the last gameOver in 2 of 7 as a favorite
Last 10 games, newest first
| Date | Opponent | Site | Result | Total | PPP for | PPP vs | Pace | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 5 | San Diego | N | L 62–66 | −5.5 | L−9.5 | 145.5 | U128 | 101.1 | 107.6 | 61.3 |
| Feb 28 | Seattle U | H | L 66–71 | −1.0 | L−6.0 | 136.0 | O137 | 104.8 | 112.8 | 63.0 |
| Feb 25 | Washington St | H | W 67–66 | −2.0 | L−1.0 | 148.0 | U133 | 98.6 | 97.1 | 68.0 |
| Feb 21 | San Diego | A | W 77–65 | −2.5 | W+9.5 | 149.5 | U142 | 124.0 | 104.7 | 62.1 |
| Feb 14 | Pepperdine | A | L 89–90 | −6.0 | L−7.0 | 148.5 | O179 | 125.0 | 126.4 | 71.2 |
| Feb 11 | Pacific | A | L 59–65 | +6.0 | P0.0 | 141.5 | U124 | 93.7 | 103.2 | 63.0 |
| Feb 7 | San Diego | H | W 83–63 | −6.0 | W+14.0 | 151.5 | U146 | 131.5 | 99.8 | 63.1 |
| Feb 4 | San Francisco | A | W 84–75 | +8.0 | W+17.0 | 146.0 | O159 | 121.8 | 108.8 | 69.0 |
| Jan 31 | Santa Clara | H | L 73–104 | +9.0 | L−22.0 | 154.5 | O177 | 94.1 | 134.1 | 77.5 |
| Jan 28 | Oregon St | H | L 69–72 | −6.0 | L−9.0 | 142.0 | U141 | 104.6 | 109.2 | 65.9 |
Records vs the closing line describe the past; ten games is a small sample.
Tale of the tape
national rank toned left for away, right for homeUC IrvineLMU
Efficiency
105.1
106.0
101.6
106.6
68.9
68.2
—
—
Shooting
49.5%
51.8%
49.1%
51.6%
33.6%
34.8%
69.7%
69.5%
35.9%
31.1%
Ball control & glass
17.8%
17.5%
18.8%
16.6%
31.0%
26.7%
31.2%
32.0%
9.1%
9.0%
9.1%
7.3%
Style
28.0%
40.4%
48.9%
43.4%
15.0%
14.5%
55.1%
49.3%
34.8%
32.4%
Roster
2.42
2.92
6'5.9"
6'6.4"
—
—
Offseason
roster movement into this season — descriptive, not a model inputUC Irvine
Returning minutes: 100.0%Returning production: 100.0%
ESPN hasn't posted UC Irvine's roster for this season yet — no movement to show.
Returns 100% of last season's minutes. Teams returning at least 65% of last season's minutes have historically gained about 2.2 points of AdjEM (n=156 team-seasons, 2022-2026). (ESPN hasn't posted this season's roster yet -- this may still be last season's list.)
LMU
Returning minutes: 100.0%Returning production: 100.0%
ESPN hasn't posted LMU's roster for this season yet — no movement to show.
Returns 100% of last season's minutes. Teams returning at least 65% of last season's minutes have historically gained about 2.2 points of AdjEM (n=156 team-seasons, 2022-2026). (ESPN hasn't posted this season's roster yet -- this may still be last season's list.)
Head-to-head
this season and lastNo meetings the last two seasons.
The CBB Matchups tab lays out the day's Division I slate: matchup, tip time, records and rank, and — once posted — Pinnacle's spread and total (the median across books when Pinnacle has no line). Three views switch the table between projected scores, pace and totals, and each team's offensive and defensive tendencies. Each game opens into opponent-adjusted possessions, efficiency and four-factor tendencies for both teams, plus recent form, rotation and head-to-head history. Every game also carries our projected score, spread and total, built bottom-up from those same numbers: expected possessions times each side's opponent-adjusted points per possession, plus home court.
What these numbers mean: line shopping.