Portland Pilots vs Hawai'i Rainbow Warriors basketball final score

Mon, Nov 9 · 11:59 PM ET · Stan Sheriff Center, Honolulu, HI

Rainbow ClassicNon-conferenceMW+Stan Sheriff Center, Honolulu, HI
Portland
2-1 · 0-0 conf
Efficiency #247
@
Hawai'i
3-0 · 0-0 conf
Efficiency #118
Final
7366
Final score
Projected 74.4 – 83.1
PORT win 23%HAW win 77%
MarketClose
Spread
HAW −8.0
open HAW −6.5
Total
158.0
open 157.5
Our line
HAW −8.7
as of Mon, Nov 9 · 11:51 PM ET

Our play

How our line is built

each step, from an even game to our line
Spread
Even game
0.0
Hawai'irated 2.7 above average
+2.7
Portlandrated 1.9 below average
+1.9
Home court
+4.0
Our line
HAW −8.7
◂ Portland sideHawai'i side ▸

Steps are rounded to one decimal, so they can differ from the line by 0.1. The spread is seen from the home side: a plus moves it toward Hawai'i. Our total joins once both teams have played 3 games.

Pace & total

possessions per 40 minutes
Tempo, possessions per 40 minutes

Projected possessions: 76.1, from each team's opponent-adjusted tempo. On raw season pace, Portland is the faster team (80.3, #17 of 365) and Hawai'i the slower (73.4, #98). When tempos clash, the slower team usually pulls the pace harder (weights 0.80 vs 0.66).

Projected possessions
76.1
per team, 40 min
Market total
158.0
Market close · open 157.5
Adjusted tempo, vs an average opponent
74.1#30
Portland
72.6#69
Hawai'i

How this game plays

points this game from the four factors, vs an average D-I matchup
Our line
HAW −8.7
Four factors 8.5Not in these stats 0.2
From the four factors
Hawai'i has the ball+2.8
Portland has the ball−5.7
Hawai'i has the ball
✓Shoots it welleFG% 47.9% #227 · PORT allows 58.9% #309+3.1
✗Few second chancesOR% 28.2% #241 · PORT allows 26.5% #101−2.2
✓Takes care of the ballTO% 17.7% #173 · PORT forces 16.2% #235 · ~13 turnovers+1.4
✓Gets to the lineFTR 37.6% #167 · PORT allows 40.3% #216 · FT 75.0% #95+0.5
Portland has the ball
✗Coughs it upTO% 26.1% #343 · HAW forces 25.2% #28 · ~21 turnovers−8.5
✓Shoots it welleFG% 62.7% #19 · HAW allows 50.0% #164+7.5
✗Few second chancesOR% 22.2% #317 · HAW allows 26.9% #108−4.1
✗Few trips to the lineFTR 49.1% #66 · HAW allows 28.7% #90 · FT 59.3% #314−0.7

Shot diet

Where each offense shoots from and where each defense lets teams shoot
Portlandoffense vsHawai'idefense
Share of shots by zone
Portland shoots
Hawai'i allows
D-I average
FG% by zone
ZoneD-I avg
Rim55.6%#21656.9%#15558.1%
Short 2 (≤9 ft)50.0%#7610.0%#3438.5%
Mid 2 (10 ft+)58.3%#3437.5%#19934.4%
Three47.8%#834.1%#21532.5%
Hawai'ioffense vsPortlanddefense
Share of shots by zone
Hawai'i shoots
Portland allows
D-I average
FG% by zone
ZoneD-I avg
Rim49.0%#28162.5%#22758.1%
Short 2 (≤9 ft)62.5%#4550.0%#23838.5%
Mid 2 (10 ft+)50.0%#4620.0%#6334.4%
Three27.9%#24744.0%#32532.5%
RimShort 2 (≤9 ft)Mid 2 (10 ft+)Three

Zones from play-by-play shot descriptions; garbage time removed. Bars show the share of field-goal attempts in each zone; where a slice is too thin for its number, the shares are listed under the bar. FG% ranks: #1 = best for that side (most accurate shooting, stingiest defense).

Shot volume

Extra scoring chances from rebounds, turnovers and the foul line
Portland
−6.0extra scoring chances per game vs a D-I average team#265 of 365
Off reb %
22.2%
#317
Def reb %
73.5%
#101
Turnover %
26.1%
#343
Forced TO %
16.2%
#235
FT rate
49.1%
#66
FT allowed
40.3%
#216
Where the chances come from (per game)
Offensive rebounding−3.1
Defensive rebounding+1.7
Ball security−5.7
Forcing turnovers−1.3
Foul shots drawn+3.0
Foul shots allowed−0.6
Hawai'i
+8.3extra scoring chances per game vs a D-I average team#70 of 365
Off reb %
28.2%
#241
Def reb %
73.1%
#108
Turnover %
17.7%
#173
Forced TO %
25.2%
#28
FT rate
37.6%
#167
FT allowed
28.7%
#90
Where the chances come from (per game)
Offensive rebounding−1.1
Defensive rebounding+1.6
Ball security+0.3
Forcing turnovers+5.1
Foul shots drawn0.0
Foul shots allowed+2.4

Hawai'i has more extra scoring chances per game: +8.3 (#70 of 365) to Portland’s −6.0 (#265).

Grade = extra shots and foul-line trips per game compared with a D-I average team, built from six season rates. Cell shading is the national rank for each rate (greener = better for that team).

Rotation

Who has been playing, and who has not
Portland2026-27 numbers through Mon, Nov 9
#PlayerPosClHtGP-GSMPGPPGRPGAPGTOVeFG%3P%3PA/gFT%Usage
12GSr6'7"4-428.510.83.81.51.366.7%46.2%6.577.8%15.6%
14FJr6'10"4-427.019.311.31.52.076.3%—0.076.0%26.7%
10GJr6'5"4-422.810.03.83.31.548.4%25.0%2.071.4%23.6%
11GSr6'2"4-421.811.83.03.53.369.6%52.4%5.3100.0%25.6%
3FSo6'8"4-118.011.35.31.31.072.0%—0.064.3%24.4%
1GJr6'2"4-017.813.53.32.82.065.2%35.7%3.564.7%32.4%
5GSo6'7"4-317.53.83.30.31.050.0%0.0%0.387.5%10.7%
6GSr6'4"4-015.54.32.53.82.044.4%25.0%2.081.8%16.8%
2FSo6'10"3-012.36.34.70.31.065.4%33.3%1.0100.0%20.1%
9GFr6'7"2-012.58.53.01.50.566.7%0.0%0.5100.0%23.2%
32FFr6'10"2-010.513.53.00.50.090.9%—0.063.6%32.6%
15GFr6'3"2-09.52.51.53.00.550.0%33.3%1.50.0%15.8%
23GFr6'3"2-08.06.02.01.01.5112.5%100.0%0.560.0%25.1%
13GSo6'3"2-02.51.50.50.00.575.0%100.0%0.5—26.6%

Competitive minutes leave out garbage time (provisional rule: a second-half lead of 25+ inside 15:00, 20+ inside 10:00, 15+ inside 5:00 or 10+ inside 2:00, held to the end) and are shown per 40 minutes. Status says only whether a player appeared; the reason is not published.

Team comparison

national rank toned left for away, right for home
PortlandHawai'i
Efficiency
103.6
104.2
108.6
100.0
74.1
72.6
-0.1
2.7
Shooting
62.7%
47.9%
56.3%
51.4%
47.8%
27.9%
59.3%
75.0%
49.1%
37.6%
Ball control & glass
26.1%
17.7%
16.2%
25.2%
22.2%
28.2%
26.5%
26.9%
11.2%
9.5%
3.1%
5.4%
Style
41.8%
36.8%
25.9%
48.3%
11.8%
15.2%
44.8%
44.0%
47.0%
36.0%
Roster
2.80
2.90
6'6"
6'6.7"
25.7%
0.0%

Offseason

roster movement into this season — descriptive, not a model input
Portland
Returning minutes: 25.7%Returning production: 30.0%
Lost
  • Joel Foxwell 35.7 mpg, 15.6 ppg · transferred to Arizona St
  • Garrett Nuckolls 25.9 mpg, 6.7 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
  • Cameron Williams 21.8 mpg, 9.7 ppg · transferred to Kent State
  • Mikah Ballew 21.5 mpg, 8.0 ppg · transferred to CSU Northridge
  • Jermaine Ballisager Webb 19.8 mpg, 8.9 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
  • Matus Hronsky 16.7 mpg, 5.1 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
Added
  • Jaxon Olvera from Louisiana · 29.2 mpg, 13.7 ppg last season
  • Kaia Isaac from Tarleton St · 25.3 mpg, 5.6 ppg last season
  • Hunter Adam from Davidson · 15.2 mpg, 5.5 ppg last season
  • Vito Perkovic from East Carolina · 4.1 mpg, 1.4 ppg last season
  • Omer Sukur no D1 minutes last season
  • Marchelo Moreira no D1 minutes last season

Returns 26% of last season's minutes; lost 4 of its top 5 (3 transferred). Teams returning under 40% of last season's minutes have historically fallen about 0.8 points of AdjEM (n=716 team-seasons, 2022-2026).

Hawai'i
Returning minutes: 9.7%Returning production: 7.1%
Lost
  • Hunter Erickson 31.4 mpg, 8.4 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
  • Dre Bullock 28.4 mpg, 13.8 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
  • Harry Rouhliadeff 24.0 mpg, 10.1 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
  • Gytis Nemeiksa 23.8 mpg, 9.2 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
  • Isaac Finlinson 22.7 mpg, 9.2 ppg · transferred to W Michigan
  • Isaac Johnson 21.2 mpg, 14.1 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
Added
  • Chance Trujillo from Utah Tech · 31.9 mpg, 11.9 ppg last season
  • Bol Dengdit from UC San Diego · 23.4 mpg, 10.7 ppg last season
  • Houran Dan from Seattle U · 15.0 mpg, 5.7 ppg last season
  • Zack Davidson from N Arizona · 10.3 mpg, 6.1 ppg last season
  • Manie Joses from Davidson · 8.6 mpg, 1.7 ppg last season
  • Marcus Adams Jr. from Arizona St · 5.0 mpg, 1.5 ppg last season

Returns 10% of last season's minutes; lost 5 of its top 5 (1 transferred). Teams returning under 40% of last season's minutes have historically fallen about 0.8 points of AdjEM (n=716 team-seasons, 2022-2026).

Line history

Market line, home spread or game total

Lines by book

BookSpread (home) open → nowTotal open → nowML homeML away
DraftKings-6.5→-7.5-112157.5o-110 u-110-310+250
FanDuel-7.5-106158.5→157.5o-110 u-110-315+250
BetMGM-6.5→-7.5-110157.5o-110 u-110-300+240
BetRivers-6.5→-9.5-106157.5o-114 u-109-420+310
Caesars-6.5→-7.5-110157.5o-110 u-110-305+240
Fanatics-6.5→-7.5-115156.5→158o-110 u-110-320+250
BetOnline-6.5→-8-103156→157o-120 u+100-310+252
Bovada-6.5→-7.5-115157.5→158o-115 u-105-290+240
theScore Bet-6.5→-7.5-110157.5o-110 u-110-300+250
Hard Rock-6.5→-9.5-105157.5o-110 u-110-425+300
Kalshi-6.5-133159.5o+108 u-113-285+270
Polymarket-6.5→-7.5-108158.5o+100 u-104-285+270
Novig-6.5→—157.5→—-285+277
open = first-sighted line for this event · now = latest capture

Head-to-head

this season and last
No meetings the last two seasons.

The CBB Matchups tab lays out the day's Division I slate: matchup, tip time, records and rank, and — once posted — the market spread and total (the median across books when no market line is up). Three views switch the table between projected scores, pace and totals, and each team's offensive and defensive tendencies. Each game opens into opponent-adjusted possessions, efficiency and four-factor tendencies for both teams, plus recent form, rotation and head-to-head history. Every game also carries our projected score, spread and total, from our line: the same view our bets are made from.

What these numbers mean: line shopping.