UNC Greensboro Spartans vs UIC Flames basketball final score
Mon, Nov 9 · 7:00 PM ET · Credit Union 1 Arena, Chicago, IL
Non-conferenceESPN+Credit Union 1 Arena, Chicago, IL
UNC Greensboro
1-1 · 0-0 conf
Efficiency #281
@
UIC
2-0 · 0-0 conf
Efficiency #100
Final
7282
Final score
Projected 67.6 – 81.9
UNCG win 11%UIC win 89%
MarketClose
Spread
UIC −20.5
open UIC −18.25
Total
148.0
open 149.5
Our line
UIC −14.3
as of Mon, Nov 9 · 6:51 PM ET
Our play
How our line is built
each step, from an even game to our lineSpread
Even game
0.0
UICrated 3.6 above average
+3.6
UNC Greensbororated 6.7 below average
+6.7
Home court
+4.0
Our line
UIC −14.3
◂ UNC Greensboro sideUIC side ▸
The spread is seen from the home side: a plus moves it toward UIC. Our total joins once both teams have played 3 games.
Pace & total
possessions per 40 minutesTempo, possessions per 40 minutes
Projected possessions: 70.3, from each team's opponent-adjusted tempo. On raw season pace, UIC is the faster team (70.1, #205 of 365) and UNC Greensboro the slower (67.1, #290). When tempos clash, the slower team usually pulls the pace harder (weights 0.80 vs 0.66).
Projected possessions
70.3
per team, 40 min
Market total
148.0
Market close · open 149.5
Adjusted tempo, vs an average opponent
70.2#223
UNC Greensboro
70.7#177
UIC
How this game plays
points this game from the four factors, vs an average D-I matchupOur line
UIC −14.3
Four factors +20.6 · not in these stats −6.3
From the four factors
UIC has the ball+5.6
UNC Greensboro has the ball−15.1
UIC has the ball
✓Shoots it welleFG% 55.8% #98 · UNCG allows 50.0% #164+3.0
✓Wins second chancesOR% 31.0% #187 · UNCG allows 42.4% #324+2.1
✓Takes care of the ballTO% 17.1% #156 · UNCG forces 16.4% #231 · ~12 turnovers+1.5
✗Few trips to the lineFTR 35.0% #198 · UNCG allows 36.2% #172 · FT 57.1% #330−1.0
UNC Greensboro has the ball
✗Few second chancesOR% 8.8% #358 · UIC allows 24.1% #53−8.4
✗Coughs it upTO% 14.9% #89 · UIC forces 28.5% #8 · ~16 turnovers−4.1
✗Tough shooting lookeFG% 49.1% #197 · UIC allows 47.9% #129−2.0
✗Few trips to the lineFTR 19.3% #342 · UIC allows 27.1% #70 · FT 81.8% #34−0.6
Shot diet
Where each offense shoots from and where each defense lets teams shootUNC Greensborooffense vsUICdefense
Share of shots by zone
UNC Greensboro shoots
29.8
3.5
17.5
49.1
UIC allows
33.3
5.1
12.8
48.7
D-I average
38.1
8.0
12.3
41.5
FG% by zone
| Zone | D-I avg | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Rim | 58.8%#172 | 61.5%#214 | 58.1% |
| Short 2 (≤9 ft) | 50.0%#76 | 50.0%#238 | 38.5% |
| Mid 2 (10 ft+) | 50.0%#46 | 0.0%#1 | 34.4% |
| Three | 28.6%#230 | 33.3%#187 | 32.5% |
UICoffense vsUNC Greensborodefense
Share of shots by zone
UIC shoots
50.0
10.0
8.0
32.0
UNC Greensboro allows
37.9
3.4
27.6
31.0
D-I average
38.1
8.0
12.3
41.5
FG% by zone
| Zone | D-I avg | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Rim | 60.0%#147 | 68.2%#284 | 58.1% |
| Short 2 (≤9 ft) | 20.0%#268 | 50.0%#238 | 38.5% |
| Mid 2 (10 ft+) | 25.0%#240 | 43.8%#253 | 34.4% |
| Three | 42.9%#36 | 22.2%#25 | 32.5% |
RimShort 2 (≤9 ft)Mid 2 (10 ft+)Three
Zones from play-by-play shot descriptions; garbage time removed. Bars show the share of field-goal attempts in each zone; where a slice is too thin for its number, the shares are listed under the bar. FG% ranks: #1 = best for that side (most accurate shooting, stingiest defense).
Shot volume
Extra scoring chances from rebounds, turnovers and the foul lineUNC Greensboro
−14.4extra scoring chances per game vs a D-I average team#337 of 365
Off reb %
8.8%
#358
Def reb %
57.6%
#324
Turnover %
14.9%
#89
Forced TO %
16.4%
#231
FT rate
19.3%
#342
FT allowed
36.2%
#172
Where the chances come from (per game)
Offensive rebounding−7.6
Defensive rebounding−3.6
Ball security+2.3
Forcing turnovers−1.2
Foul shots drawn−4.8
Foul shots allowed+0.4
UIC
+12.7extra scoring chances per game vs a D-I average team#34 of 365
Off reb %
31.0%
#187
Def reb %
75.9%
#53
Turnover %
17.1%
#156
Forced TO %
28.5%
#8
FT rate
35.0%
#198
FT allowed
27.1%
#70
Where the chances come from (per game)
Offensive rebounding−0.2
Defensive rebounding+2.5
Ball security+0.7
Forcing turnovers+7.5
Foul shots drawn−0.7
Foul shots allowed+2.8
UIC has more extra scoring chances per game: +12.7 (#34 of 365) to UNC Greensboro’s −14.4 (#337).
Grade = extra shots and foul-line trips per game compared with a D-I average team, built from six season rates. Cell shading is the national rank for each rate (greener = better for that team).
Rotation
UNC Greensboro2026-27 numbers through Mon, Nov 9
| # | Player | Pos | Cl | Ht | GP-GS | MPG | PPG | RPG | APG | TOV | eFG% | 3P% | 3PA/g | FT% | Usage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4 | G | Sr | 6'7" | 3-3 | 32.7 | 14.0 | 6.0 | 1.3 | 1.7 | 47.4% | 30.8% | 8.7 | 100.0% | 26.6% | |
| 0 | G | Fr | 5'9" | 3-3 | 32.3 | 13.3 | 2.3 | 6.3 | 2.3 | 62.5% | 20.0% | 1.7 | 71.4% | 22.4% | |
| 14 | G | So | 6'4" | 3-3 | 31.0 | 15.0 | 3.3 | 0.3 | 1.7 | 76.9% | 50.0% | 6.7 | 100.0% | 20.4% | |
| 6 | G | Jr | 6'7" | 3-3 | 25.0 | 12.0 | 5.0 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 53.1% | 33.3% | 4.0 | 66.7% | 28.2% | |
| 11 | F | Jr | 6'5" | 3-0 | 22.3 | 8.3 | 6.3 | 1.3 | 1.7 | 45.5% | 0.0% | 0.7 | 62.5% | 26.2% | |
| 3 | G | Sr | 6'3" | 3-0 | 17.0 | 5.3 | 3.0 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 45.5% | 25.0% | 2.7 | 100.0% | 17.3% | |
| 24 | G | Fr | 6'5" | 3-0 | 17.0 | 4.3 | 1.3 | 0.3 | 0.7 | 37.5% | 14.3% | 2.3 | 100.0% | 17.5% | |
| 33 | F | Sr | 6'10" | 3-3 | 16.7 | 4.0 | 4.7 | 0.0 | 1.3 | 50.0% | 0.0% | 0.7 | 57.1% | 17.3% | |
| 2 | G | Fr | 6'3" | 1-0 | 9.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 33.3% | 0.0% | 2.0 | — | 17.4% | |
| 7 | G | Sr | 6'1" | 1-0 | 4.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0% | 0.0% | 1.0 | — | 26.2% | |
| 32 | F | Fr | 6'11" | 1-0 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 100.0% | — | 0.0 | — | 17.4% |
Trends
Results against the closing spread and total, last ten games, entering this gameUNC Greensboro
Against the spread
Season
0-1
Home
0-0
Road
0-1
Last 10
0-1
avg cover −0.5
Missed the spread in the last game
Over / under
Season
0-1
Home
0-0
Road
0-1
Last 10
0-1
avg vs total −11.0
Under in the last game
Last 10 games, newest first
| Date | Opponent | Site | Result | Total | PPP for | PPP vs | Pace | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 6 | Elon | A | L 65–74 | +8.5 | L−0.5 | 150.0 | U139 | 96.9 | 110.3 | 67.1 |
| Nov 3 | Milligan Buffaloes | H | W 96–43 | — | — | — | — | 125.8 | 56.3 | 76.3 |
| Mar 8 | Furman | N | L 75–81 | +6.0 | P0.0 | 148.5 | O156 | 114.3 | 123.4 | 65.6 |
| Mar 7 | Wofford | N | W 75–72 | +5.5 | W+8.5 | 156.5 | U147 | 114.3 | 109.7 | 65.6 |
| Mar 6 | VMI | N | W 84–70 | −6.5 | W+7.5 | 156.0 | U154 | 124.6 | 103.8 | 67.4 |
| Feb 28 | Samford | A | L 78–87 | +9.5 | W+0.5 | 157.0 | O165 | 107.4 | 119.8 | 72.6 |
| Feb 26 | Chattanooga | A | W 85–80 | +3.5 | W+8.5 | 157.5 | O165 | 110.8 | 104.3 | 76.7 |
| Feb 21 | ETSU | H | L 75–87 | +6.0 | L−6.0 | 149.0 | O162 | 112.1 | 130.1 | 66.9 |
| Feb 18 | W Carolina | A | L 77–91 | +6.0 | L−8.0 | 155.0 | O168 | 109.3 | 129.1 | 70.5 |
| Feb 14 | Wofford | H | W 99–89 | +2.0 | W+12.0 | 155.5 | O188 | 141.1 | 126.8 | 70.2 |
UIC
Against the spread
Season
1-0
Home
1-0
Road
0-0
Last 10
1-0
avg cover +12.5
Covered the last game
Over / under
Season
0-1
Home
0-1
Road
0-0
Last 10
0-1
avg vs total −7.0
Under in the last game
Last 10 games, newest first
| Date | Opponent | Site | Result | Total | PPP for | PPP vs | Pace | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 6 | Robert Morris | H | W 79–56 | −10.5 | W+12.5 | 142.0 | U135 | 112.7 | 79.9 | 70.1 |
| Nov 2 | St. Francis (IL) Fighting Saints | H | W 96–47 | — | — | — | — | 142.3 | 69.7 | 67.5 |
| Mar 18 | California | A | L 73–91 | +6.5 | L−11.5 | 151.0 | O164 | 102.6 | 127.9 | 71.2 |
| Mar 8 | Northern Iowa | N | L 69–84 | +3.0 | L−12.0 | 124.5 | O153 | 116.5 | 141.8 | 59.2 |
| Mar 7 | Drake | N | W 72–51 | −4.5 | W+16.5 | 143.5 | U123 | 115.9 | 82.1 | 62.1 |
| Mar 6 | Murray St | N | W 92–79 | −1.0 | W+12.0 | 149.5 | O171 | 116.6 | 100.1 | 78.9 |
| Mar 1 | Indiana St | A | L 63–79 | −4.0 | L−20.0 | 144.0 | U142 | 93.3 | 117.0 | 67.5 |
| Feb 24 | Bradley | H | W 93–86 2OT | −2.0 | W+5.0 | 142.0 | O179 | 118.8 | 109.8 | 78.3 |
| Feb 21 | Valparaiso | H | L 67–71 | −7.0 | L−11.0 | 138.5 | U138 | 104.3 | 110.6 | 64.2 |
| Feb 18 | Evansville | A | W 84–46 | −8.0 | W+30.0 | 140.0 | U130 | 130.1 | 71.2 | 64.6 |
Records vs the closing line describe the past; ten games is a small sample.
Team comparison
national rank toned left for away, right for homeUNC GreensboroUIC
Efficiency
104.2
107.0
111.5
100.6
70.2
70.7
0.7
-5.9
Shooting
49.1%
55.8%
55.2%
51.3%
28.6%
42.9%
81.8%
57.1%
19.3%
35.0%
Ball control & glass
14.9%
17.1%
16.4%
28.5%
8.8%
31.0%
42.4%
24.1%
4.5%
7.1%
6.9%
2.6%
Style
49.1%
35.0%
36.9%
48.1%
12.3%
13.9%
33.3%
58.6%
31.3%
39.9%
Roster
2.67
2.77
6'4.3"
6'4.3"
1.3%
44.5%
Offseason
roster movement into this season — descriptive, not a model inputUNC Greensboro
Returning minutes: 2.1%Returning production: 1.7%
Lost
- Justin Neely 32.3 mpg, 17.9 ppg · transferred to Colorado
- KJ Younger 28.5 mpg, 15.1 ppg · transferred to Texas St
- Donald Whitehead Jr. 26.2 mpg, 10.1 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
- Noah Norgaard 25.1 mpg, 7.7 ppg · transferred to Western KY
- Valentino Pinedo 24.9 mpg, 6.8 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
- Lilian Marville 23.9 mpg, 8.7 ppg · transferred to George Mason
Added
- Braxton Stacker from SE Missouri · 28.2 mpg, 11.8 ppg last season
- Zavier Fitch from Wagner · 13.5 mpg, 3.9 ppg last season
- Cameron Grant from Stanford · 6.3 mpg, 1.3 ppg last season
- Ante Beljan from UIC · 5.5 mpg, 2.6 ppg last season
- RJ Greer from Davidson · 3.4 mpg, 1.7 ppg last season
- Vernon Collins Jr. from W Carolina · 1.0 mpg, 0.2 ppg last season
Returns 2% of last season's minutes; lost 5 of its top 5 (3 transferred). Teams returning under 40% of last season's minutes have historically fallen about 0.8 points of AdjEM (n=716 team-seasons, 2022-2026).
UIC
Returning minutes: 58.6%Returning production: 58.3%
Lost
- Abdul Momoh 23.3 mpg, 7.9 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
- Sam Silverstein 21.3 mpg, 2.8 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
- Elijah Crawford 17.0 mpg, 9.3 ppg · transferred to Villanova
- Josiah Hammons 14.2 mpg, 6.2 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
- Ante Beljan 5.5 mpg, 2.6 ppg · transferred to UNC Greensboro
- Tai Walters-Whitaker 2.2 mpg, 0.3 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
Added
- Benny Gealer from Stanford · 29.5 mpg, 10.9 ppg last season
- Nicolas Ortiz new to D1 · 25.5 mpg, 11.5 ppg last season
- Asa Thomas from Furman · 21.9 mpg, 9.5 ppg last season
- Lucas Scroggins from Saint Peter's · 16.2 mpg, 5.4 ppg last season
- Gabe Cupps from Ohio State · 11.9 mpg, 1.6 ppg last season
- Rocco Pagliocca no D1 minutes last season
Returns 59% of last season's minutes; lost 1 of its top 5.
Line history
Market line, home spread or game totalLines by book
| Book | Spread (home) open → now | Total open → now | ML home | ML away |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DraftKings | -18.5→-19.5-118 | 149.5→148.5o-108 u-112 | -3600 | +1500 |
| FanDuel | -19.5-120 | 149.5→148.5o-105 u-115 | -4500 | +1600 |
| BetMGM | -20.5-110 | 150.5→148.5o-105 u-115 | -2500 | +1150 |
| BetRivers | -19.5-120 | 150.5→148.5o-109 u-114 | — | — |
| Fanatics | -18→-20-110 | 149.5→148.5o-105 u-115 | -4000 | +1800 |
| BetOnline | -15→-20-110 | 149.5→148o-110 u-110 | -4000 | +1450 |
| Bovada | -20-115 | 150→148.5o-110 u-110 | — | +1325 |
| theScore Bet | -18.5→-20.5-115 | 149.5→148.5o-110 u-110 | — | +1800 |
| Hard Rock | -19.5-120 | 150.5→148.5o-110 u-110 | — | — |
| Kalshi | -19.5-117 | 147.5o-104 u+100 | -2400 | +1900 |
| Polymarket | -20.5+100 | 148.5o+100 u-104 | -2400 | +1567 |
| Novig | -20.5+100 | 147.5o-104 u+102 | -2122 | +1900 |
DraftKings
FanDuel
BetMGM
BetRivers
Fanatics
BetOnline
Bovada
theScore Bet
Hard Rock
Kalshi
Polymarket
Novigopen = first-sighted line for this event · now = latest capture
Head-to-head
this season and lastNo meetings the last two seasons.
More games on Mon, Nov 9
- Marshall at Ohio State · 6:00 PM ET
- Syracuse vs Indiana · 6:30 PM ET
- Howard at Penn · 6:30 PM ET
- FGCU at Georgia · 7:00 PM ET
- Radford at Tennessee · 7:00 PM ET
- Grambling at Texas · 7:00 PM ET
- Cleveland St at Bowling Green · 7:00 PM ET
- Minnesota at Cincinnati · 7:00 PM ET
- North Dakota at Clemson · 7:00 PM ET
- Norfolk St at William & Mary · 7:00 PM ET
- SC State at Chicago St · 7:00 PM ET
- Long Island at Towson · 7:00 PM ET
- Stonehill at Columbia · 7:00 PM ET
- Wagner at UConn · 7:00 PM ET
- Kansas City at Jacksonville · 7:00 PM ET
- North Florida at Miami · 7:00 PM ET
- SC Upstate at Coastal · 7:00 PM ET
- E Illinois at Notre Dame · 7:00 PM ET
- Oakland at Alabama · 7:30 PM ET
- Jackson St at Mississippi St · 7:30 PM ET
- Florida A&M at UAB · 7:30 PM ET
- North Alabama at Oklahoma · 8:00 PM ET
- UL Monroe at Texas A&M · 8:00 PM ET
- Boston U at Northwestern · 8:00 PM ET
- Louisiana Tech at LSU · 8:00 PM ET
- SIUE at Missouri · 8:00 PM ET
- Illinois St at Purdue · 8:30 PM ET
- Alabama A&M at DePaul · 9:00 PM ET
- App State at Auburn · 9:00 PM ET
- Seton Hall vs Charlotte · 9:00 PM ET
- E Washington at Oregon St · 9:30 PM ET
- Rice at Stanford · 10:00 PM ET
- Miss Valley St at Washington · 10:00 PM ET
- Portland at Hawai'i · 11:59 PM ET
The CBB Matchups tab lays out the day's Division I slate: matchup, tip time, records and rank, and — once posted — the market spread and total (the median across books when no market line is up). Three views switch the table between projected scores, pace and totals, and each team's offensive and defensive tendencies. Each game opens into opponent-adjusted possessions, efficiency and four-factor tendencies for both teams, plus recent form, rotation and head-to-head history. Every game also carries our projected score, spread and total, from our line: the same view our bets are made from.
What these numbers mean: line shopping.