CBB Matchups

Every D1 game with tempo-free ratings, four factors and market lines, one place.

College basketball is being built for the 2026-27 season (tip-off Nov 3). What's here fills in as games are played.
Non-conferenceKohl Center, Madison, WI
Coastal
Efficiency #241
2025-26: 19-13 · 11-8 conf
@
Wisconsin
Efficiency #28
2025-26: 24-11 · 16-7 conf
Sun, Nov 15 · TBD
67.2
win 9%
Projected
82.6
win 91%
No line posted yet.
Model: WIS −15.3 · total 149.8 · ratings as of Sat, Oct 3
Preseason ratings start from 2025-26's final adjusted ratings, regressed toward the D1 average. The stats below are 2025-26's too; both update once 2026-27 games are played.

How the projection is built

each step, from an average D-I game to this one
Projected total
Average D-I game
148.2
PaceAdjusted tempo: Wisconsin 69.2, Coastal 68.1 → 69.0 possessions
+1.5
Wisconsin offense vs Coastal defense
+5.7
Coastal offense vs Wisconsin defense
−5.6
Projected total
149.8
Axis starts at 145 pointsPoints added or removed at each step
Projected margin
Even game
0.0
Wisconsin offense vs Coastal defense
+5.7
Coastal offense vs Wisconsin defense
+5.6
Home court+2.9 points per 100 possessions to the home offense, −2.9 to the visitors
+4.0
Wisconsin by 15.3
15.3
Coastal side ◂▸ Wisconsin side

Steps are rounded to one decimal, so they can differ from the total by 0.1. The margin is the same build seen from the home side; positive numbers help Wisconsin.

Pace & total

possessions per 40 minutes
Tempo, possessions per 40 minutes

Projected possessions: 69.0, from each team's opponent-adjusted tempo. On raw 2025-26 season pace, Wisconsin is the faster team (69.0, #151 of 365) and Coastal the slower (68.3, #189). When tempos clash, the slower team usually pulls the pace harder (study weights 0.80 vs 0.66).

Projected possessions
69.0
per team, 40 min
Projected total
149.8
model
Projected team totals
67.2 / 82.6
Coastal / Wisconsin
Adjusted tempo, vs an average opponent
68.1#200
Coastal
69.2#107
Wisconsin

How this game plays

what the study found each side's numbers actually do when these two teams meet
AdvantageWisconsin
Where Wisconsin scores: ball control
Wisconsin turns it over on 12.8% of possessions (#4); Coastal forces turnovers on 12.3% of opponent possessions (#364). Expect about 11.7%, 5.1 points below an average D1 matchup — worth roughly +6.3 points per 100 possessions.
AdvantageCoastal
Where Coastal scores: ball control
Coastal turns it over on 15.2% of possessions (#82); Wisconsin forces turnovers on 14.3% of opponent possessions (#328). Expect about 14.3%, 2.5 points below an average D1 matchup — worth roughly +3.1 points per 100 possessions.
ClashWisconsin
Style clash: 3-point volume
Wisconsin takes 52.1% of its shots from three; Coastal runs teams off the line (35.7% of shots allowed from three) (D1 average 39.5%). Expect about 47.2% — the offense's habit usually carries a bit more weight (0.80 vs 0.64).
GlassCoastal
Coastal gets out-rebounded
Projected offensive rebound rate of 26.9% is worth roughly -2.1 points per 100 possessions against Coastal's offense.
Watch for noise
3-point caution
A notable season 3-point number here (Wisconsin) is close to a coin flip going forward — the study's model of next-game 3P% barely beats guessing the D1 average. Shot volume is what actually carries: expect Coastal at about 43.1% of its shots from three, Wisconsin about 47.2%.
ClashWisconsin
Style clash: ball movement
Wisconsin assists on 57.3% of its made baskets; Coastal breaks up passing offenses (assists on 37.7% allowed) (D1 average 52.4%). Expect about 46.0% — the offense's habit usually carries a bit more weight (0.65 vs 0.65).
Coastal has the ball
OffenseWisconsin allowsvs D1 avg
47.9% #314
51.4% #178
-2.7 pt/100
15.2% #82
14.3% #328
+3.1 pt/100
26.9% #296
28.2% #74
-2.1 pt/100
32.3% #254
29.8% #56
-0.5 pt/100
73.1% #165
—
+0.1 pt/100
Coastal net across the four factors + FT%, vs. a D1-average matchup: -2.3 pts/100
Wisconsin has the ball
OffenseCoastal allowsvs D1 avg
54.5% #52
46.8% #18
-0.6 pt/100
12.8% #4
12.3% #364
+6.3 pt/100
29.1% #232
27.6% #52
-1.4 pt/100
31.5% #267
34.9% #174
-0.2 pt/100
78.8% #6
—
+0.6 pt/100
Wisconsin net across the four factors + FT%, vs. a D1-average matchup: +4.6 pts/100

Shot diet

Where each offense shoots from and where each defense lets teams shoot · 2025-26 numbers
Coastaloffense vsWisconsindefense
Share of shots by zone
Coastal shoots
Wisconsin allows
D-I average
FG% by zone
ZoneD-I avg
Rim53.7%#32458.9%#18758.6%
Short 2 (≤9 ft)38.3%#21547.1%#33339.5%
Mid 2 (10 ft+)36.6%#24541.4%#28638.0%
Three33.5%#19633.4%#15133.7%
Wisconsinoffense vsCoastaldefense
Share of shots by zone
Wisconsin shoots
Coastal allows
D-I average
FG% by zone
ZoneD-I avg
Rim60.8%#9948.8%#358.6%
Short 2 (≤9 ft)47.7%#2745.2%#30239.5%
Mid 2 (10 ft+)39.6%#12638.9%#19838.0%
Three36.2%#5032.8%#10533.7%
RimShort 2 (≤9 ft)Mid 2 (10 ft+)Three

Zones from play-by-play shot descriptions; garbage time removed. Bars show the share of field-goal attempts in each zone; where a slice is too thin for its number, the shares are listed under the bar. FG% ranks: #1 = best for that side (most accurate shooting, stingiest defense).

Shot volume

Extra scoring chances from rebounds, turnovers and the foul line · 2025-26 numbers
Coastal
−2.7extra scoring chances per game vs a D-I average team#291 of 365
Off reb %
26.9%
#296
Def reb %
72.4%
#52
Turnover %
15.2%
#82
Forced TO %
12.3%
#364
FT rate
32.3%
#254
FT allowed
34.9%
#174
Where the chances come from (per game)
Offensive rebounding−1.1
Defensive rebounding+1.0
Ball security+1.1
Forcing turnovers−3.0
Foul shots drawn−0.7
Foul shots allowed+0.1
Wisconsin
+1.9extra scoring chances per game vs a D-I average team#108 of 365
Off reb %
29.1%
#232
Def reb %
71.8%
#74
Turnover %
12.8%
#4
Forced TO %
14.3%
#328
FT rate
31.5%
#267
FT allowed
29.8%
#56
Where the chances come from (per game)
Offensive rebounding−0.4
Defensive rebounding+0.8
Ball security+2.7
Forcing turnovers−1.7
Foul shots drawn−0.9
Foul shots allowed+1.4

Wisconsin has more extra scoring chances per game: +1.9 (#108 of 365) to Coastal’s −2.7 (#291).

Grade = extra shots and foul-line trips per game compared with a D-I average team, built from six season rates. Cell shading is the national rank for each rate (greener = better for that team).

Rotation

Coastal2025-26 numbers
ESPN hasn't posted Coastal's 2026-27 roster yet — these are last season's players.
#PlayerPosClHtGP-GSMPGPPGRPGAPGTOVeFG%3P%3PA/gFT%UsageStatus
2Rasheed JonesGJr6'6"32-3236.214.84.62.91.549.1%36.7%6.180.7%24.8%
0AJ DanclerGJr6'2"32-3233.215.65.52.11.549.6%39.3%6.375.7%28.5%
5Joshua BeadleGSr6'3"32-3232.217.83.92.92.646.2%26.3%3.779.7%35.8%
21Reggie HillFSr6'7"31-3025.26.65.80.81.445.3%35.1%3.672.1%19.2%
4Nadjrick PeatFSr6'10"32-3223.14.35.70.11.168.6%—0.063.5%10.6%
1Tristan ThompsonGFr6'5"32-019.54.04.20.80.843.2%16.1%1.065.1%14.9%
3DaJohn CraigGSo6'1"32-012.64.51.50.40.553.5%37.2%2.988.9%20.9%
15Derrick GreenFSo6'9"31-010.62.12.90.20.465.7%—0.043.2%12.4%
14Jerry NgopotFSr6'10"24-28.52.22.30.10.241.4%28.1%1.30.0%19.2%
13Braeden MacVicarFSo6'11"23-07.52.72.10.10.343.3%29.6%2.368.8%25.1%
11Jackson KeilGSr6'2"6-03.70.70.30.50.525.0%0.0%0.5100.0%17.8%
30Charles DunlapGSr6'2"3-04.01.31.00.00.0100.0%—0.0—8.1%
20Connor MartinFJr6'4"3-03.70.00.70.00.00.0%0.0%1.3—17.7%
7Andre MulibeaGSr6'6"0-00.00.00.00.00.0——0.0——
12Devin BrownFFr6'7"0-00.00.00.00.00.0——0.0——
Rosters come from ESPN and are still filling in; incoming transfers and freshmen may be missing.

Tale of the tape

national rank toned left for away, right for home
CoastalWisconsin
Efficiency
103.8
118.0
107.3
105.0
68.1
69.2
—
—
Shooting
47.9%
54.5%
46.1%
54.7%
33.5%
36.2%
73.1%
78.8%
32.3%
31.5%
Ball control & glass
15.2%
12.8%
12.3%
14.3%
26.9%
29.1%
27.6%
28.2%
7.9%
6.6%
7.6%
12.5%
Style
43.1%
52.1%
34.5%
36.2%
10.3%
12.9%
40.4%
57.3%
26.8%
28.3%
Roster
3.10
2.59
6'5.4"
6'8.3"
—
68.1%

Offseason

roster movement into this season — descriptive, not a model input
Coastal
Returning minutes: 100.0%Returning production: 100.0%
ESPN hasn't posted Coastal's roster for this season yet — no movement to show.

Returns 100% of last season's minutes. Teams returning at least 65% of last season's minutes have historically gained about 2.2 points of AdjEM (n=156 team-seasons, 2022-2026). (ESPN hasn't posted this season's roster yet -- this may still be last season's list.)

Wisconsin
Returning minutes: 68.1%Returning production: 58.3%
Lost
  • John Blackwell 32.8 mpg, 18.6 ppg · transferred to Duke
  • Nick Boyd 32.0 mpg, 20.7 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
Added
  • Elijah Gray no D1 minutes last season

No incoming D1 transfers are listed on ESPN's roster yet — until they are, returning shares read high.

Returns 68% of last season's minutes; lost 2 of its top 5 (1 transferred). Teams returning at least 65% of last season's minutes have historically gained about 2.2 points of AdjEM (n=156 team-seasons, 2022-2026).

Head-to-head

this season and last
No meetings the last two seasons.

The CBB Matchups tab lays out the day's Division I slate: matchup, tip time, records and rank, and — once posted — Pinnacle's spread and total (the median across books when Pinnacle has no line). Three views switch the table between projected scores, pace and totals, and each team's offensive and defensive tendencies. Each game opens into opponent-adjusted possessions, efficiency and four-factor tendencies for both teams, plus recent form, rotation and head-to-head history. Every game also carries our projected score, spread and total, built bottom-up from those same numbers: expected possessions times each side's opponent-adjusted points per possession, plus home court.

What these numbers mean: line shopping.