Purdue Fort Wayne Mastodons vs Eastern Illinois Panthers basketball preview & prediction

Sun, Nov 15 · 3:00 PM ET · Groniger Arena, Charleston, IL

Non-conferenceESPN+Groniger Arena, Charleston, IL
Purdue FW
1-1 · 0-0 conf
Efficiency #237
@
E Illinois
0-3 · 0-0 conf
Efficiency #348
Sun, Nov 15 · 3:00 PM ET
Our projected score shows once the market opens.
No line posted yet.

Our play

Pace & total

possessions per 40 minutes
Tempo, possessions per 40 minutes

Projected possessions: 70.7, from each team's opponent-adjusted tempo. On raw season pace, Purdue FW is the faster team (71.1, #167 of 365) and E Illinois the slower (69.6, #217). When tempos clash, the slower team usually pulls the pace harder (weights 0.80 vs 0.66).

Projected possessions
70.7
per team, 40 min
Adjusted tempo, vs an average opponent
70.6#176
Purdue FW
70.6#179
E Illinois

How this game plays

points this game from the four factors, vs an average D-I matchup
From the four factors
E Illinois has the ball−7.7
Purdue FW has the ball+7.3
E Illinois has the ball
✗Coughs it upTO% 27.8% #348 · PFW forces 21.1% #83 · ~18 turnovers−6.3
✗Few second chancesOR% 21.3% #328 · PFW allows 30.8% #171−3.2
✓Shoots it welleFG% 47.2% #237 · PFW allows 57.3% #300+1.8
✓Gets to the lineFTR 38.5% #157 · PFW allows 36.4% #179 · FT 70.9% #161+0.1
Purdue FW has the ball
✓Shoots it welleFG% 50.0% #176 · EIU allows 67.5% #352+8.7
✗Few second chancesOR% 25.6% #279 · EIU allows 34.9% #252−1.1
✗Coughs it upTO% 19.7% #237 · EIU forces 18.2% #169 · ~13 turnovers−0.7
✓Gets to the lineFTR 19.7% #343 · EIU allows 44.0% #261 · FT 83.3% #21+0.4

Shot diet

Where each offense shoots from and where each defense lets teams shoot
Purdue FWoffense vsE Illinoisdefense
Share of shots by zone
Purdue FW shoots
E Illinois allows
D-I average
FG% by zone
ZoneD-I avg
Rim38.5%#34676.5%#34658.0%
Short 2 (≤9 ft)0.0%#3230.0%#138.2%
Mid 2 (10 ft+)20.0%#27960.0%#32934.7%
Three50.0%#343.6%#33032.5%
E Illinoisoffense vsPurdue FWdefense
Share of shots by zone
E Illinois shoots
Purdue FW allows
D-I average
FG% by zone
ZoneD-I avg
Rim52.3%#24667.7%#28258.0%
Short 2 (≤9 ft)28.6%#23550.0%#24338.2%
Mid 2 (10 ft+)27.8%#23325.0%#8534.7%
Three26.5%#27131.3%#15332.5%
RimShort 2 (≤9 ft)Mid 2 (10 ft+)Three

Zones from play-by-play shot descriptions; garbage time removed. Bars show the share of field-goal attempts in each zone; where a slice is too thin for its number, the shares are listed under the bar. FG% ranks: #1 = best for that side (most accurate shooting, stingiest defense).

Shot volume

Extra scoring chances from rebounds, turnovers and the foul line
Purdue FW
−4.8extra scoring chances per game vs a D-I average team#245 of 365
Off reb %
25.6%
#279
Def reb %
69.2%
#171
Turnover %
19.7%
#237
Forced TO %
21.1%
#83
FT rate
19.7%
#343
FT allowed
36.4%
#179
Where the chances come from (per game)
Offensive rebounding−2.0
Defensive rebounding+0.3
Ball security−1.0
Forcing turnovers+2.2
Foul shots drawn−4.6
Foul shots allowed+0.4
E Illinois
−12.5extra scoring chances per game vs a D-I average team#325 of 365
Off reb %
21.3%
#328
Def reb %
65.1%
#252
Turnover %
27.8%
#348
Forced TO %
18.2%
#169
FT rate
38.5%
#157
FT allowed
44.0%
#261
Where the chances come from (per game)
Offensive rebounding−3.4
Defensive rebounding−1.1
Ball security−6.8
Forcing turnovers+0.1
Foul shots drawn+0.3
Foul shots allowed−1.6

Purdue FW has more extra scoring chances per game: −4.8 (#245 of 365) to E Illinois’s −12.5 (#325).

Grade = extra shots and foul-line trips per game compared with a D-I average team, built from six season rates. Cell shading is the national rank for each rate (greener = better for that team).

Rotation

Who has been playing, and who has not
Purdue FW2026-27 numbers
#PlayerPosClHtGP-GSMPGPPGRPGAPGTOVeFG%3P%3PA/gFT%UsageStatus
0GJr6'3"2-225.58.04.53.51.039.5%27.3%5.550.0%23.0%Active
9GSr6'0"2-223.511.03.54.51.558.8%28.6%3.5100.0%24.0%Active
1FSr6'6"2-221.014.54.51.01.576.5%—0.075.0%28.2%Active
20FJr6'9"2-220.03.53.50.51.575.0%100.0%1.050.0%10.8%Active
4GSr6'2"2-019.55.51.04.04.056.3%42.9%3.5100.0%23.1%Active
5GSo6'0"2-218.06.01.01.01.035.7%33.3%3.0100.0%25.0%Active
2GJr6'5"2-015.05.51.50.00.091.7%75.0%2.0—10.4%Active
7GJr6'6"2-015.012.02.50.01.568.8%50.0%4.066.7%35.7%Active
24GSo6'5"2-010.510.52.50.00.590.9%75.0%4.050.0%31.1%Active
3GFr6'5"1-017.05.01.01.00.030.0%50.0%2.0100.0%19.8%Missed last
11GFr6'1"1-017.010.02.03.01.050.0%0.0%3.0—32.1%Active
31FFr6'9"2-06.00.01.00.00.00.0%—0.0—12.5%Active
34FFr6'11"1-011.06.08.00.00.075.0%—0.00.0%22.3%Active
13GFr6'1"1-03.00.00.00.01.00.0%0.0%1.0—33.1%Active
23GFr6'2"1-03.00.00.00.00.0——0.0—0.0%Active

Competitive minutes leave out garbage time (provisional rule: a second-half lead of 25+ inside 15:00, 20+ inside 10:00, 15+ inside 5:00 or 10+ inside 2:00, held to the end) and are shown per 40 minutes. Status says only whether a player appeared; the reason is not published.

Team comparison

national rank toned left for away, right for home
Purdue FWE Illinois
Efficiency
103.8
95.7
108.4
111.8
70.6
70.6
1.8
13.7
Shooting
50.0%
47.2%
31.4%
49.5%
50.0%
26.5%
83.3%
70.9%
19.7%
38.5%
Ball control & glass
19.7%
27.8%
21.1%
18.2%
25.6%
21.3%
30.8%
34.9%
11.3%
19.6%
11.4%
10.1%
Style
42.6%
23.8%
28.2%
51.7%
15.5%
5.2%
66.7%
58.7%
45.9%
51.3%
Roster
2.86
3.30
6'4.1"
6'4.7"
28.2%
10.1%

Offseason

roster movement into this season — descriptive, not a model input
Purdue FW
Returning minutes: 28.2%Returning production: 25.4%
Lost
  • Corey Hadnot II 33.2 mpg, 20.4 ppg · transferred to Houston
  • Mikale Stevenson 29.8 mpg, 13.9 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
  • Maximus Nelson 27.5 mpg, 7.9 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
  • Darius Duffy 21.6 mpg, 5.0 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
  • Deangelo Elisee 13.8 mpg, 3.8 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
  • Yuval Levin 9.6 mpg, 3.2 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
Added
  • Anthony Isaac Jr. from Manhattan · 23.8 mpg, 9.5 ppg last season
  • Ashton Williamson from FIU · 18.4 mpg, 6.3 ppg last season
  • Jaiden Arnold no D1 minutes last season
  • Tamaje Izuagbe no D1 minutes last season
  • Adam Walker no D1 minutes last season
  • Luke Balanis no D1 minutes last season

Returns 28% of last season's minutes; lost 4 of its top 5 (1 transferred). Teams returning under 40% of last season's minutes have historically fallen about 0.8 points of AdjEM (n=716 team-seasons, 2022-2026).

E Illinois
Returning minutes: 10.1%Returning production: 6.2%
Lost
  • Kooper Jacobi 33.3 mpg, 11.1 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
  • Meechie White 30.4 mpg, 10.5 ppg · transferred to Indiana St
  • Zion Fruster 28.8 mpg, 13.2 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
  • Terry McMorris 26.1 mpg, 7.6 ppg · transferred to San Diego
  • Preston Turner 19.6 mpg, 7.2 ppg · transferred to UTSA
  • Nazareth Fisher 13.4 mpg, 3.6 ppg · not on a D1 roster yet
Added
  • Devin Davenport no D1 minutes last season
  • Gavin Welch no D1 minutes last season
  • Daniel Ntambwe no D1 minutes last season
  • Jayden Wright no D1 minutes last season
  • Jalen Calloway no D1 minutes last season
  • Ethan Hillsman no D1 minutes last season

No incoming D1 transfers are listed on ESPN's roster yet — until they are, returning shares read high.

Returns 10% of last season's minutes; lost 5 of its top 5 (3 transferred). Teams returning under 40% of last season's minutes have historically fallen about 0.8 points of AdjEM (n=716 team-seasons, 2022-2026).

Head-to-head

this season and last
No meetings the last two seasons.

The CBB Matchups tab lays out the day's Division I slate: matchup, tip time, records and rank, and — once posted — the market spread and total (the median across books when no market line is up). Three views switch the table between projected scores, pace and totals, and each team's offensive and defensive tendencies. Each game opens into opponent-adjusted possessions, efficiency and four-factor tendencies for both teams, plus recent form, rotation and head-to-head history. Every game also carries our projected score, spread and total, from our line: the same view our bets are made from.

What these numbers mean: line shopping.